Is inadequate human immunodeficiency virus care associated with increased ED and hospital utilization? A prospective study in human immunodeficiency virus-positive ED patients.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on the effect(s) of suboptimal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care on subsequent health care utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with HIV. Findings on their ED and inpatient care utilization patterns will provide information on service provision for those who have suboptimal access to HIV-related care. METHODS: A pilot prospective study was conducted on HIV-positive patients in an ED. At enrollment, participants were interviewed regarding health care utilization. Participants were followed up for 1 year, during which time data on ED visits and hospitalizations were obtained from their patient records. Inadequate HIV care (IHC) was defined according to Infectious Diseases Society of America recommendations as less than 3 scheduled clinic visits for HIV care in the year before enrollment. Cox regression models were used to evaluate whether IHC was associated with increased hazard of health care utilization. RESULTS: Of 107 subjects, 36% were found to have IHC. Inadequate HIV care did not predict more frequent ED visits but was significantly associated with fewer hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.61 [95% CI: 0.43-0.86]). Inadequate HIV care did not significantly increase the hazard for earlier ED visit or hospitalization. However, further stratification analysis found that IHC increased the hazard of hospitalization for subjects without comorbid diseases (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.50 [95% CI: 1.10-5.68]). CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, IHC does not appear to be associated with earlier or more frequent ED visits but may lead to earlier hospitalization, particularly among those without other chronic diseases.

Outcomes and cost analysis of 3 operational models for rapid HIV testing services in an academic inner-city emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: We compare the outcomes and costs of alternative staffing models for an emergency department (ED) rapid HIV testing program. METHODS: A rapid oral-fluid HIV testing program was instituted in an inner-city ED in 2005. Three staffing models were compared during 24.5 months: indigenous medical staff only, exogenous staff only, or exogenous staff plus medical staff (hybrid). Personnel obtained written consent and provided brief pretest counseling, obtained kits, collected specimens, returned specimens to the ED satellite laboratory, and performed posttest counseling and referral to care. Cost analysis was performed to estimate cost per patient tested and cost per patient linked to care. RESULTS: Overall, 44 of 2,958 (1.5%) patients tested received confirmed positive results and 30 (68%) were linked to care. The exogenous staff only model yielded the highest number tested per month (587), and indigenous medical staff only yielded the lowest (57). Significantly higher positivity rates were found in both indigenous medical staff only (2.2%) and hybrid (2.0%) models versus the exogenous staff only model (0.6%) (prevalence rate ratio: 3.7 [95% confidence interval {CI}1.5 to 9.3] versus 3.4 [95% CI 1.5 to 7.8], respectively). All patients with confirmed positive results were linked to care in the indigenous medical staff only model but only approximately 60% were linked to care in the 2 other models (linked to care rate ratio versus exogenous staff only: 1.8 [95% CI 1.1 to 4.4]; versus hybrid: 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.5]). The indigenous medical staff only model had the highest cost ($109) per patient tested, followed by the hybrid ($87) and the exogenous staff only ($39). However, the indigenous medical staff only model had the lowest cost ($4,937) per patient linked to care, followed by the hybrid ($7,213) and exogenous staff only ($11,454). CONCLUSION: The exogenous staff only model tested the most patients at the least cost per patient tested. The indigenous medical staff only model identified the fewest patients with unrecognized HIV infection and had the highest cost per patient tested but the lowest cost per patient linked to care.

Patients who leave without being seen: their characteristics and history of emergency department use.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We identify patient characteristics associated with uncompleted visits to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We used registration and billing data to conduct a pair-matched case-control study. ED patients who left without being seen (cases) between July 1 and December 31, 2004, were matched to patients who stayed and were treated (N=1,476 pairs) according to registration date and time (+/-2 hours) and triage level (controls). The association between sociodemographic characteristics, previous ED utilization, and proximity to the ED and the risk of an uncompleted visit was assessed by the odds ratio (OR) using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: During the 6-month study period, the overall left-without-being-seen rate was 6.4%. Seventeen percent of cases compared with 5% of controls had at least 1 previous uncompleted visit during the previous year. After adjusting for all patient characteristics, younger age, being uninsured (adjusted OR=1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35 to 2.21) or covered by Medicaid (adjusted OR=1.67; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.20), and a previous uncompleted visit (adjusted OR=3.60; 95% CI 2.67 to 4.85) were significantly associated with the risk of an uncompleted visit. CONCLUSION: Previous ED utilization is predictive of future ED utilization. EDs should make every effort to keep their left-without-being-seen rates to a minimum because patients who are the least likely to receive care elsewhere (ie, those uninsured or covered by Medicaid) are more likely to leave without being seen.

Global health and emergency care: a resuscitation research agenda--part 1.

At the 2013 Academic Emergency Medicine global health consensus conference, a breakout session on a resuscitation research agenda was held. Two articles focusing on cardiac arrest and trauma resuscitation are the result of that discussion. This article describes the burden of disease and outcomes, issues in resuscitation research, and global trends in resuscitation research funding priorities. Globally, cardiovascular disease and trauma cause a high burden of disease that receives a disproportionately smaller research investment. International resuscitation research faces unique ethical challenges. It needs reliable baseline statistics regarding quality of care and outcomes; data linkages between providers; reliable and comparable national databases; and an effective, efficient, and sustainable resuscitation research infrastructure to advance the field. Research in resuscitation in low- and middle-income countries is needed to understand the epidemiology, infrastructure and systems context, level of training needed, and potential for cost-effective care to improve outcomes. Research is needed on low-cost models of population-based research, ways to disseminate information to the developing world, and finding the most cost-effective strategies to improve outcomes.

Emergency medicine resident attitudes and perceptions of HIV testing before and after a focused training program and testing implementation.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine attitudes and perceptions (A&P) of emergency medicine (EM) residents toward emergency department (ED) routine provider-driven rapid HIV testing services and the impact of both a focused training program (FTP) and implementation of HIV testing on A&P. METHODS: A three-phase, consecutive, anonymous, identity-unlinked survey was conducted pre-FTP, post-FTP, and 6 months postimplementation. The survey was designed to assess residents' A&P using a five-point Likert scale. A preimplementation FTP provided both the rationale for the HIV testing program and the planned operational details of the intervention. The HIV testing program used only indigenous ED staff to deliver HIV testing as part of standard-of-care in an academic ED. The impact of the FTP and implementation on A&P were analyzed by multivariate regression analysis using generalized estimating equations to control for repeated measurements in the same individuals. A "favorable" A&P was operationally defined as a mean score of >3.5, "neutral" as mean score of 2.5 to 3.5, and "unfavorable" as mean score of <2.5. RESULTS: Thirty of 36 residents (83.3%) participated in all three phases. Areas of favorable A&P found in phase I and sustained through phases II and III included "ED serving as a testing venue" (score range = 3.7-4.1) and "emergency medicine physicians offering the test" (score range = 3.9-4.1). Areas of unfavorable and neutral A&P identified in phase I were all operational barriers and included required paperwork (score = 3.2), inadequate staff support (score = 2.2), counseling and referral requirements (score range = 2.2-3.1), and time requirements (score = 2.9). Following the FTP, significant increases in favorable A&P were observed with regard to impact of the intervention on modification of patient risk behaviors, decrease in rates of HIV transmission, availability of support staff, and self-confidence in counseling and referral (p < 0.05). At 6 months postimplementation, all A&P except for time requirements and lack of support staff scored favorably or neutral. During the study period, 388 patients were consented for and received HIV testing; six (1.5%) were newly confirmed HIV positive. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine residents conceptually supported HIV testing services. Most A&P were favorably influenced by both the FTP and the implementation. All areas of negative A&P involved operational requirements, which may have influenced the low overall uptake of HIV testing during the study period.

Uncompleted emergency department care: patients who leave against medical advice.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the patient characteristics, clinical conditions, and short-term recidivism rates of emergency department (ED) patients who leave against medical advice (AMA) with those who leave without being seen (LWBS) or complete their ED care. METHODS: All eligible patients who visited the ED between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2005 (N = 31,252) were classified into one of four groups: 1) AMA (n = 857), 2) LWBS (n = 2,767), 3) admitted (n = 8,894), or 4) discharged (n = 18,734). The patient characteristics, primary diagnosis, and 30-day rates of emergent hospitalizations, nonemergent hospitalizations, and ED discharge visits were compared between patients who left AMA and each of the other study groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the influence of study group status on the risk of emergent hospitalization, adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Patients who left AMA were significantly more likely to be uninsured or covered by Medicaid compared with those admitted or discharged (p < 0.001). The AMA visit rates were highest for nausea and vomiting (9.7%), abdominal pain (7.9%), and nonspecific chest pain (7.6%). During the 30-day follow-up period, patients who left AMA had significantly higher emergent hospitalization and ED discharge visit rates compared with each of the other study groups (p < 0.001). Insurance status, male gender, and higher acuity level were also associated with a significantly higher emergent hospitalization rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who leave AMA may do so prematurely, as evidenced by higher emergent hospitalization rates compared with those who LWBS or complete their care.