Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles ruptures in the high demand patient: Using decision analysis to help clinical decisions.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature suggests that functional treatment of acute non-insertional Achilles tendon ruptures yields outcomes (re-rupture and function) similar to those of surgery, but does not address the unique issues in treating high performance athletes or other high demand patients. METHODS: Decision analysis was used to develop an estimate of outcome utility for both types of treatment using published Costs and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) values. The expected value for either treatment was then calculated for high, intermediate, and normal demand patients, using the specific functional needs of the patients. RESULTS: Nonoperative treatment is the preferred management for normal demand patients, while high and intermediate demand patients are more likely to experience better expected functional outcomes from surgery. CONCLUSION: The combination of a decision analysis and expected value analysis provides evidence-based support for the existing intuitive recommendations that favor surgical treatment in elite athletes and other high demand patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Biomechanical comparison of a novel tensioned cable construct versus tension band wiring for transverse patella fracture fixation.

PURPOSE: Tension band wiring (TBW) is the most widely accepted method for patella fracture fixation. The purpose of our study was to compare the biomechanical efficacy of a novel cable construct to TBW for the fixation of transverse patella fractures. The tensioned cable construct was hypothesized to have less fracture gapping after cyclic flexion-extension loading and greater ultimate load to failure as compared to TBW. METHODS: Transverse patellar osteotomies (AO/OTA 34C1.1) were performed on nine pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric whole legs (mean age 82.2 years, range 71-101). Treatment with TBW or tensioned cable construct was randomized within each specimen pair. Fracture site displacement was measured after 5000 flexion-extension cycles from 0° to 90° at 0.5 Hz. In load to failure testing, the knee was fixed at 45° of flexion and the quadriceps tendon was pulled proximally at 0.5 mm/sec until patella fixation failure. Comparisons were made using paired t-tests with alpha values of 0.05. RESULTS: Eight paired specimens completed the cyclic loading. The tensioned cable construct had significantly less fracture gapping than TBW (2.9 vs 10.9 mm; p = 0.020). Seven paired limbs underwent load to failure testing, which revealed no significant difference between the tensioned cable construct and TBW (1551.6 N vs 1664.0 N; p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: In this study of transverse patella fracture fixation, a tensioned cable construct demonstrated significantly less fracture gapping compared to TBW in response to cyclic loading with no significant difference in load at failure.

Intraoperative Comparative Femoral Rotation Imaging: Do not Overlook Parallax.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the degree of error due to parallax during intraoperative rotational imaging involving the distal femur. METHODS: Twelve, fresh-frozen, lower-extremity cadaveric specimens were studied. The limbs were positioned supine and rotated until the posterior femoral condyles were superimposed using a C-arm. The C-arm was then repositioned to place the femoral condyles at the anterior and posterior margins of the image intensifier. The rotation necessary to resuperimpose the femoral condyles due to parallax was recorded. A second C-arm was then used from the contralateral side to simulate the rotational imaging technique to determine the magnitude and directionality of combined parallax. RESULTS: All 12 specimens demonstrated parallax, resulting in rotational discrepancies. Compared with central field of view alignment, the mean rotational discrepancy was 5.6 and 5.5 degrees for anterior and posterior positions, respectively. Contralateral imaging resulted in an additive effect with rotational differences of 9.0 and 12.6 degrees for bilateral anterior and posterior positions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Parallax causes rotational discrepancies with fluoroscopic imaging of the distal femur when the posterior femoral condyles are off-center in the imaging field of view. If femoral condyles are not centered when obtaining intraoperative rotational imaging of the uninjured and injured femurs, parallax can result in potentially clinically significant rotational deformity even if the femurs seem perfectly matched at the conclusion of surgery. We recommend perfectly centering of the posterior femoral condyles in the imaging field of view when obtaining lateral images of the distal femur to prevent this potentially overlooked contribution to malrotation.

The positive prediction of single photon emission computed tomography/ computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in the outcome of intervention for cervical facet pain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous studies have reported that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) do not predict response to facet blocks. However, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) uptake within facet joints has been shown to correlate with pain relief after intervention in the lumbar spine. There is minimal data regarding the predictive value of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for neck pain. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of SPECT/CT in patients with axial neck pain for the identification of specific facet joints that would benefit from diagnostic and therapeutic facet joint steroid injections and/or medial branch block/RFA treatments. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred seventy-nine patients at a single institution pain center with neck pain and a SPECT/CT scan between 2009 and 2015. One hundred twelve patients had no prior intervention at the level of interest and met inclusion criteria. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain reduction at 50% and 80% thresholds within 24 hours of facet intervention. Concordance of facet intervention with the focus of maximal uptake on SPECT/CT scan. METHODS: All patients were referred to our institution's Center for Pain Medicine and were treated with facet interventions. The site of facet intervention was determined by pain center providers based on their clinical examination and interpretation of images. Groups were formed based on whether the facet intervention included the level of maximal uptake on SPECT/CT scan. A positive response to intervention was defined at both 50% and 80% thresholds for reduction in pain within 24 hours of facet injection with steroid and local anesthetic or medial branch block with local anesthetic only. These were the facet interventions used for our data collection. A Chi-square statistic was used to analyze categorical data and a Student's t-test was used to analyze non-categorical data. SPSS (IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Version 24.0) was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Of our 112 patients, Group 1 consisted of 89 with an intervention occurring at the level with increased uptake on SPECT/CT. Group 2 consisted of 23 patients with an intervention at a level without uptake on SPECT/CT. Demographic data did not significantly differ between cohorts. A Chi-square test of independence demonstrated that intervention at a level concordant with SPECT/CT was significantly correlated with self-reported pain relief thresholds of both 50% and 80% (p=.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Facet interventions based on SPECT/CT scan uptake were more successful in pain reduction than those which were not. This suggests a role for SPECT/CT in diagnosing therapeutic targets for neck pain.