Punjabi version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-OES 18 and Quality of Life Questionnaire-OG25 modules for quality of life assessment.

CONTEXT: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment plays an important role in the decision-making process in oncology. AIMS: The aim of the study was to translate European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) OES18 and OG25 in Punjabi language for HRQOL assessment of patients diagnosed with esophagus and esophagogastric malignancies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The EORTC translation guidelines were duly followed to translate QLQ-OES18 and OG25 into Punjabi language. Each set of questionnaire was independently translated by two forward translators, followed by backward translation of the reconciled version by two independent translators. The final version was submitted to the EORTC Translation Team and served to the patients for the pilot testing. RESULTS: The questionnaire was administered to ten patients each of esophagus and esophagogastric malignancies who were evaluated and treated at our hospital. Every patient underwent an interview to check if any of the questions was difficult, uncomfortable, or upsetting to answer. Their concerns were recorded as per the template provided by the EORTC team and due changes done if required. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC QLQ-OES18 and OG25 questionnaire has been translated to Punjabi language and subsequently approved for usage.

Comparison of early quality of life in patients treated with radiotherapy following mastectomy or breast conservation therapy: a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: To compare quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients from a developing country after breast conservation surgery (BCS) or mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 6-month period, all consecutive early and locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with either BCS or mastectomy and treated with RT were analyzed. All patients who underwent mastectomy were treated with 45 Gray/20#/4 weeks. Patients with BCS were treated with a dose of 45-50 Gray/25#/5 weeks to whole breast followed by tumor bed boost (15 Gray/6#/6 days with suitable energy electrons). Prospective evaluation of QOL using EORTC QLQ C30 and breast cancer specific QLQ BR23 was done before starting RT (baseline), at mid-RT and at RT conclusion for all patients. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients had mastectomy and 142 patients underwent BCS. Reliability test (Cronbach alpha) for questionnaire filling was 0.669-0.886. At pre-RT assessment, global QOL scores in mastectomy and BCS groups were 71.1 and 71.3, respectively. There was no significant difference in pre-RT EORTC QLQ C30 functional and symptom domains between mastectomy and BCS patients. However, social function domain score was higher in patients who underwent mastectomy (83 versus 73.9; p=0.018). In QLQ BR23 domains, body image and sexual functioning domains were similar between the two groups. However, sexual enjoyment (10.9 versus 47.6; p=0.006) and future perspective (7.4 versus 37.1; p=0.036) domains were significantly better in BCS arm. There was no difference between systemic side effect (BRSSE), breast symptom (BRBS) and arm symptom (BRAS) domain scores between the groups. There was no significant difference in change of QOL scores between mastectomy and BCS patients at RT completion as compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in quality of life in patients with BCS versus those with mastectomy. However, patients who underwent BCS had better sexual enjoyment and future perspective scores compared with mastectomy patients. There was no significant change of QOL domain scores after RT in mastectomy and BCS patients.