Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 387(2): 109-119, 2022 07 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35731908

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infants younger than 6 months of age are at high risk for complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and are not eligible for vaccination. Transplacental transfer of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after maternal Covid-19 vaccination may confer protection against Covid-19 in infants. METHODS: We used a case-control test-negative design to assess the effectiveness of maternal vaccination during pregnancy against hospitalization for Covid-19 among infants younger than 6 months of age. Between July 1, 2021, and March 8, 2022, we enrolled infants hospitalized for Covid-19 (case infants) and infants hospitalized without Covid-19 (control infants) at 30 hospitals in 22 states. We estimated vaccine effectiveness by comparing the odds of full maternal vaccination (two doses of mRNA vaccine) among case infants and control infants during circulation of the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant (July 1, 2021, to December 18, 2021) and the B.1.1.259 (omicron) variant (December 19, 2021, to March 8, 2022). RESULTS: A total of 537 case infants (181 of whom had been admitted to a hospital during the delta period and 356 during the omicron period; median age, 2 months) and 512 control infants were enrolled and included in the analyses; 16% of the case infants and 29% of the control infants had been born to mothers who had been fully vaccinated against Covid-19 during pregnancy. Among the case infants, 113 (21%) received intensive care (64 [12%] received mechanical ventilation or vasoactive infusions). Two case infants died from Covid-19; neither infant's mother had been vaccinated during pregnancy. The effectiveness of maternal vaccination against hospitalization for Covid-19 among infants was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33 to 65) overall, 80% (95% CI, 60 to 90) during the delta period, and 38% (95% CI, 8 to 58) during the omicron period. Effectiveness was 69% (95% CI, 50 to 80) when maternal vaccination occurred after 20 weeks of pregnancy and 38% (95% CI, 3 to 60) during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal vaccination with two doses of mRNA vaccine was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization for Covid-19, including for critical illness, among infants younger than 6 months of age. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Vacinas de mRNA , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Mães , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNA/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de mRNA/uso terapêutico
2.
N Engl J Med ; 386(8): 713-723, 2022 02 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35021004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence of pediatric hospitalizations associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) caused by the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the United States has offered an opportunity to assess the real-world effectiveness of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine in adolescents between 12 and 18 years of age. METHODS: We used a case-control, test-negative design to assess vaccine effectiveness against Covid-19 resulting in hospitalization, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of life-supporting interventions (mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), or death. Between July 1 and October 25, 2021, we screened admission logs for eligible case patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 at 31 hospitals in 23 states. We estimated vaccine effectiveness by comparing the odds of antecedent full vaccination (two doses of BNT162b2) in case patients as compared with two hospital-based control groups: patients who had Covid-19-like symptoms but negative results on testing for SARS-CoV-2 (test-negative) and patients who did not have Covid-19-like symptoms (syndrome-negative). RESULTS: A total of 445 case patients and 777 controls were enrolled. Overall, 17 case patients (4%) and 282 controls (36%) had been fully vaccinated. Of the case patients, 180 (40%) were admitted to the ICU, and 127 (29%) required life support; only 2 patients in the ICU had been fully vaccinated. The overall effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against hospitalization for Covid-19 was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90 to 96); the effectiveness was 95% (95% CI, 91 to 97) among test-negative controls and 94% (95% CI, 89 to 96) among syndrome-negative controls. The effectiveness was 98% against ICU admission and 98% against Covid-19 resulting in the receipt of life support. All 7 deaths occurred in patients who were unvaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized adolescent patients, two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine were highly effective against Covid-19-related hospitalization and ICU admission or the receipt of life support. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).


Assuntos
Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Eficácia de Vacinas , Adolescente , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/terapia , Teste para COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida , Masculino , Gravidade do Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
3.
N Engl J Med ; 386(20): 1899-1909, 2022 05 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35353976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant, which led to increased U.S. hospitalizations for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), generated concern about immune evasion and the duration of protection from vaccines in children and adolescents. METHODS: Using a case-control, test-negative design, we assessed vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 leading to hospitalization and against critical Covid-19 (i.e., leading to receipt of life support or to death). From July 1, 2021, to February 17, 2022, we enrolled case patients with Covid-19 and controls without Covid-19 at 31 hospitals in 23 states. We estimated vaccine effectiveness by comparing the odds of antecedent full vaccination (two doses of BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine) at least 14 days before illness among case patients and controls, according to time since vaccination for patients 12 to 18 years of age and in periods coinciding with circulation of B.1.617.2 (delta) (July 1, 2021, to December 18, 2021) and omicron (December 19, 2021, to February 17, 2022) among patients 5 to 11 and 12 to 18 years of age. RESULTS: We enrolled 1185 case patients (1043 [88%] of whom were unvaccinated, 291 [25%] of whom received life support, and 14 of whom died) and 1627 controls. During the delta-predominant period, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization for Covid-19 among adolescents 12 to 18 years of age was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89 to 95) 2 to 22 weeks after vaccination and was 92% (95% CI, 80 to 97) at 23 to 44 weeks. Among adolescents 12 to 18 years of age (median interval since vaccination, 162 days) during the omicron-predominant period, vaccine effectiveness was 40% (95% CI, 9 to 60) against hospitalization for Covid-19, 79% (95% CI, 51 to 91) against critical Covid-19, and 20% (95% CI, -25 to 49) against noncritical Covid-19. During the omicron period, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization among children 5 to 11 years of age was 68% (95% CI, 42 to 82; median interval since vaccination, 34 days). CONCLUSIONS: BNT162b2 vaccination reduced the risk of omicron-associated hospitalization by two thirds among children 5 to 11 years of age. Although two doses provided lower protection against omicron-associated hospitalization than against delta-associated hospitalization among adolescents 12 to 18 years of age, vaccination prevented critical illness caused by either variant. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).


Assuntos
Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Vacina BNT162/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estado Terminal/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Eficácia de Vacinas , Vacinas Sintéticas/uso terapêutico , Vacinas de mRNA/uso terapêutico
4.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536442

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Establishing the safety and immunogenicity of a hepatitis E virus vaccine in multiple populations could facilitate broader access and prevent maternal and infant mortality. METHODS: We conducted a phase 1, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled (4:1 vaccine: placebo) trial of 30 µg HEV-239 (Hecolin®, Xiamen Innovax Biotech Company Limited, China) administered intramuscularly in healthy US adults aged 18-45 years. Participants were vaccinated on days 1, 29, and 180. Participants reported solicited local and systemic reactions for 7 days following vaccination and were followed through 12 months after enrollment for safety and immunogenicity (IgG, IgM). RESULTS: Solicited local and systemic reactions between treatment and placebo group were similar and overall mild. No participants experienced serious adverse events related to HEV-239. All participants receiving HEV-239 seroconverted at one month following the first dose and remained seropositive throughout the study. HEV-239 elicited a robust hepatitis E IgG response that peaked one month following the second dose (Geometric Mean Concentration (GMC) 6.16; 95% CI 4.40-8.63), was boosted with the third dose (GMC 11.50; 95% CI 7.90-16.75) and persisted through 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: HEV-239 is safe and elicits a durable immune response through at least 6 months after the third dose in healthy US adults. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03827395. Safety Study of Hepatitis E Vaccine (HEV239) - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov.

5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(4): 1065-1072, 2024 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37946601

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data are limited on influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the prevention of influenza-related hospitalizations in older adults and those with underlying high-risk comorbidities. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, test-negative, case-control study at 2 US hospitals from October 2018-March 2020 among adults aged ≥50 years hospitalized with acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs) and adults ≥18 years admitted with congestive heart failure (CHF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Adults were eligible if they resided in 1 of 8 counties in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were tested using BioFire FilmArray (bioMérieux, Inc.) respiratory panel, and standard-of-care molecular results were included when available. Influenza vaccination history was determined from the Georgia vaccine registry and medical records. We used multivariable logistic regression to control for potential confounders and to determine 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 3090 eligible adults, 1562 (50.6%) were enrolled. Of the 1515 with influenza vaccination history available, 701 (46.2%) had received vaccination during that season. Influenza was identified in 37 (5.3%) vaccinated versus 78 (9.6%) unvaccinated participants. After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, immunosuppression, month, and season, pooled VE for any influenza-related hospitalization in the eligible study population was 63.1% (95% CI, 43.8-75.8%). Adjusted VE against influenza-related hospitalization for ARI in adults ≥50 years was 55.9% (29.9-72.3%) and adjusted VE against influenza-related CHF/COPD exacerbation in adults ≥18 years was 80.3% (36.3-93.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination was effective in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations in adults aged ≥50 years and those with CHF/COPD exacerbations during the 2018-2020 seasons.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Idoso , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Prospectivos , Pandemias , Eficácia de Vacinas , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Hospitalização , Estações do Ano
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(6): 1757-1768, 2024 Jun 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537255

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A surge of human influenza A(H7N9) cases began in 2016 in China from an antigenically distinct lineage. Data are needed about the safety and immunogenicity of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) and the effects of AS03 adjuvant, prime-boost interval, and priming effects of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) IIVs. METHODS: Healthy adults (n = 180), ages 19-50 years, were enrolled into this partially blinded, randomized, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 vaccination groups evaluating homologous versus heterologous prime-boost strategies with 2 different boost intervals (21 vs 120 days) and 2 dosages (3.75 or 15 µg of hemagglutinin) administered with or without AS03 adjuvant. Reactogenicity, safety, and immunogenicity measured by hemagglutination inhibition and neutralizing antibody titers were assessed. RESULTS: Two doses of A(H7N9) IIV were well tolerated, and no safety issues were identified. Although most participants had injection site and systemic reactogenicity, these symptoms were mostly mild to moderate in severity; injection site reactogenicity was greater in vaccination groups receiving adjuvant. Immune responses were greater after an adjuvanted second dose, and with a longer interval between prime and boost. The highest hemagglutination inhibition geometric mean titer (95% confidence interval) observed against the 2017 A(H7N9) strain was 133.4 (83.6-212.6) among participants who received homologous, adjuvanted 3.75 µg + AS03/2017 doses with delayed boost interval. CONCLUSIONS: Administering AS03 adjuvant with the second H7N9 IIV dose and extending the boost interval to 4 months resulted in higher peak antibody responses. These observations can broadly inform strategic approaches for pandemic preparedness. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03589807.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Imunização Secundária , Subtipo H7N9 do Vírus da Influenza A , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Subtipo H7N9 do Vírus da Influenza A/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Esquemas de Imunização , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Estados Unidos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Polissorbatos/administração & dosagem , Polissorbatos/efeitos adversos , alfa-Tocoferol/administração & dosagem , alfa-Tocoferol/efeitos adversos , Esqualeno/administração & dosagem , Esqualeno/efeitos adversos , Esqualeno/imunologia , Voluntários Saudáveis , Combinação de Medicamentos , Adjuvantes de Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/métodos , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(15): 330-338, 2024 Apr 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635481

RESUMO

Pediatric COVID-19 vaccination is effective in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalization, but duration of protection of the original monovalent vaccine during SARS-CoV-2 Omicron predominance merits evaluation, particularly given low coverage with updated COVID-19 vaccines. During December 19, 2021-October 29, 2023, the Overcoming COVID-19 Network evaluated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of ≥2 original monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses against COVID-19-related hospitalization and critical illness among U.S. children and adolescents aged 5-18 years, using a case-control design. Too few children and adolescents received bivalent or updated monovalent vaccines to separately evaluate their effectiveness. Most case-patients (persons with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result) were unvaccinated, despite the high frequency of reported underlying conditions associated with severe COVID-19. VE of the original monovalent vaccine against COVID-19-related hospitalizations was 52% (95% CI = 33%-66%) when the most recent dose was administered <120 days before hospitalization and 19% (95% CI = 2%-32%) if the interval was 120-364 days. VE of the original monovalent vaccine against COVID-19-related hospitalization was 31% (95% CI = 18%-43%) if the last dose was received any time within the previous year. VE against critical COVID-19-related illness, defined as receipt of noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, vasoactive infusions, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and illness resulting in death, was 57% (95% CI = 21%-76%) when the most recent dose was received <120 days before hospitalization, 25% (95% CI = -9% to 49%) if it was received 120-364 days before hospitalization, and 38% (95% CI = 15%-55%) if the last dose was received any time within the previous year. VE was similar after excluding children and adolescents with documented immunocompromising conditions. Because of the low frequency of children who received updated COVID-19 vaccines and waning effectiveness of original monovalent doses, these data support CDC recommendations that all children and adolescents receive updated COVID-19 vaccines to protect against severe COVID-19.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Adolescente , Criança , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas de mRNA , Eficácia de Vacinas , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalização , RNA Mensageiro
8.
J Infect Dis ; 228(2): 143-148, 2023 07 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36821777

RESUMO

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; in the United States, reporting of MIS-C after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is required for vaccine safety monitoring. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was authorized for children aged 5-11 years on 29 October 2021. Covering a period when approximately 7 million children received vaccine, surveillance for MIS-C ≤ 90 days postvaccination using passive systems identified 58 children with MIS-C and laboratory evidence of past/recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 4 without evidence. During a period with extensive SARS-CoV-2 circulation, MIS-C illness in children after COVID-19 vaccination who lacked evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was rare (<1 per million vaccinated children).


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacina BNT162 , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e90-e100, 2023 02 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924406

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), linked to antecedent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, is associated with considerable morbidity. Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by vaccination might also decrease MIS-C likelihood. METHODS: In a multicenter, case-control, public health investigation of children ages 5-18 years hospitalized from 1 July 2021 to 7 April 2022, we compared the odds of being fully vaccinated (2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine ≥28 days before hospital admission) between MIS-C case-patients and hospital-based controls who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. These associations were examined by age group, timing of vaccination, and periods of Delta and Omicron variant predominance using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We compared 304 MIS-C case-patients (280 [92%] unvaccinated) with 502 controls (346 [69%] unvaccinated). MIS-C was associated with decreased likelihood of vaccination (adjusted OR [aOR]: .16; 95% CI: .10-.26), including among children ages 5-11 years (aOR: .22; 95% CI: .10-.52), ages 12-18 years (aOR: .10; 95% CI: .05-.19), and during the Delta (aOR: .06; 95% CI: .02-.15) and Omicron (aOR: .22; 95% CI: .11-.42) variant-predominant periods. This association persisted beyond 120 days after the second dose (aOR: .08; 95% CI: .03-.22) in 12-18-year-olds. Among all MIS-C case-patients, 187 (62%) required intensive care unit admission and 280 (92%) vaccine-eligible case-patients were unvaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination with 2 doses of BNT162b2 is associated with reduced likelihood of MIS-C in children ages 5-18 years. Most vaccine-eligible hospitalized patients with MIS-C were unvaccinated.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo , Criança , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacina BNT162 , Vacinação , RNA Mensageiro
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(39): 1057-1064, 2023 Sep 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37874864

RESUMO

Infants aged <6 months are not eligible for COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccination during pregnancy has been associated with protection against infant COVID-19-related hospitalization. The Overcoming COVID-19 Network conducted a case-control study during March 9, 2022-May 31, 2023, to evaluate the effectiveness of maternal receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine dose (vaccine effectiveness [VE]) during pregnancy against COVID-19-related hospitalization in infants aged <6 months and a subset of infants aged <3 months. VE was calculated as (1 - adjusted odds ratio) x 100% among all infants aged <6 months and <3 months. Case-patients (infants hospitalized for COVID-19 outside of birth hospitalization and who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result) and control patients (infants hospitalized for COVID-19-like illness with a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result) were compared. Odds ratios were determined using multivariable logistic regression, comparing the odds of receipt of a maternal COVID-19 vaccine dose (completion of a 2-dose vaccination series or a third or higher dose) during pregnancy with maternal nonvaccination between case- and control patients. VE of maternal vaccination during pregnancy against COVID-19-related hospitalization was 35% (95% CI = 15%-51%) among infants aged <6 months and 54% (95% CI = 32%-68%) among infants aged <3 months. Intensive care unit admissions occurred in 23% of all case-patients, and invasive mechanical ventilation was more common among infants of unvaccinated (9%) compared with vaccinated mothers (1%) (p = 0.02). Maternal vaccination during pregnancy provides some protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations among infants, particularly those aged <3 months. Expectant mothers should remain current with COVID-19 vaccination to protect themselves and their infants from hospitalization and severe outcomes associated with COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Feminino , Gravidez , Lactente , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , RNA Mensageiro Estocado , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Hospitalização , Mães , Vacinação
12.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 25(10): 1327-1335, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37688764

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a known complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. A clear benefit of COVID-19 vaccination is a reduction mortality; however, COVID-19 vaccination may also prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aim to describe CV pathology associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and describe how COVID-19 vaccination is a strategy for CVD prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: The risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination have been widely studied. Analysis of individuals with and without pre-existing CVD has shown that COVID-19 vaccination can prevent morbidity associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and reduce mortality. COVID-19 vaccination is effective in preventing myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, myopericarditis, and long COVID, all associated with CVD risk factors. Vaccination reduces mortality in patients with pre-existing CVD. Further study investigating ideal vaccination schedules for individuals with CVD should be undertaken to protect this vulnerable group and address new risks from variants of concern.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(11): 1930-1939, 2022 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35438769

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent population-based data are limited regarding influenza-associated hospitalizations in US children. METHODS: We identified children <18 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza during 2010-2019 seasons, through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network. Adjusted hospitalization and in-hospital mortality rates were calculated, and multivariable logistic regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for pneumonia, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and death. RESULTS: Over 9 seasons, adjusted influenza-associated hospitalization incidence rates ranged from 10 to 375 per 100 000 persons each season and were highest among infants <6 months old. Rates decreased with increasing age. The highest in-hospital mortality rates were observed in children <6 months old (0.73 per 100 000 persons). Over time, antiviral treatment significantly increased, from 56% to 85% (P < .001), and influenza vaccination rates increased from 33% to 44% (P = .003). Among the 13 235 hospitalized children, 2676 (20%) were admitted to the ICU, 2262 (17%) had pneumonia, 690 (5%) required mechanical ventilation, and 72 (0.5%) died during hospitalization. Compared with those <6 months of age, hospitalized children ≥13 years old had higher odds of pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio, 2.7 [95% confidence interval, 2.1-3.4], ICU admission (1.6 [1.3-1.9]), mechanical ventilation (1.6 [1.1-2.2]), and death (3.3 [1.2-9.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization and death rates were greatest in younger children at the population level. Among hospitalized children, however, older children had a higher risk of severe outcomes. Continued efforts to prevent and attenuate influenza in children are needed.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana , Pneumonia , Criança , Lactente , Humanos , Adolescente , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/terapia , Estações do Ano , Hospitalização
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(2): 52-58, 2022 Jan 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35025852

RESUMO

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a severe postinfectious hyperinflammatory condition, which generally occurs 2-6 weeks after a typically mild or asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 (1-3). In the United States, the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine is currently authorized for use in children and adolescents aged 5-15 years under an Emergency Use Authorization and is fully licensed by the Food and Drug Administration for persons aged ≥16 years (4). Prelicensure randomized trials in persons aged ≥5 years documented high vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity (5),§ and real-world studies in persons aged 12-18 years demonstrated high vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe COVID-19 (6). Recent evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccination is associated with lower MIS-C incidence among adolescents (7); however, VE of the 2-dose Pfizer-BioNTech regimen against MIS-C has not been evaluated. The effectiveness of 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine received ≥28 days before hospital admission in preventing MIS-C was assessed using a test-negative case-control design¶ among hospitalized patients aged 12-18 years at 24 pediatric hospitals in 20 states** during July 1-December 9, 2021, the period when most MIS-C patients could be temporally linked to SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant predominance. Patients with MIS-C (case-patients) and two groups of hospitalized controls matched to case-patients were evaluated: test-negative controls had at least one COVID-19-like symptom and negative SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or antigen-based assay results, and syndrome-negative controls were hospitalized patients without COVID-19-like illness. Among 102 MIS-C case-patients and 181 hospitalized controls, estimated effectiveness of 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against MIS-C was 91% (95% CI = 78%-97%). All 38 MIS-C patients requiring life support were unvaccinated. Receipt of 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is associated with a high level of protection against MIS-C in persons aged 12-18 years, highlighting the importance of vaccination among all eligible children.


Assuntos
Vacina BNT162/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/complicações , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/tratamento farmacológico , Eficácia de Vacinas , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidade do Paciente , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(7): 264-270, 2022 Feb 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35176002

RESUMO

COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for persons who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or who might become pregnant in the future, to protect them from COVID-19.§ Infants are at risk for life-threatening complications from COVID-19, including acute respiratory failure (1). Evidence from other vaccine-preventable diseases suggests that maternal immunization can provide protection to infants, especially during the high-risk first 6 months of life, through passive transplacental antibody transfer (2). Recent studies of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy suggest the possibility of transplacental transfer of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies that might provide protection to infants (3-5); however, no epidemiologic evidence currently exists for the protective benefits of maternal immunization during pregnancy against COVID-19 in infants. The Overcoming COVID-19 network conducted a test-negative, case-control study at 20 pediatric hospitals in 17 states during July 1, 2021-January 17, 2022, to assess effectiveness of maternal completion of a 2-dose primary mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series during pregnancy against COVID-19 hospitalization in infants. Among 379 hospitalized infants aged <6 months (176 with COVID-19 [case-infants] and 203 without COVID-19 [control-infants]), the median age was 2 months, 21% had at least one underlying medical condition, and 22% of case- and control-infants were born premature (<37 weeks gestation). Effectiveness of maternal vaccination during pregnancy against COVID-19 hospitalization in infants aged <6 months was 61% (95% CI = 31%-78%). Completion of a 2-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series during pregnancy might help prevent COVID-19 hospitalization among infants aged <6 months.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunidade Materno-Adquirida , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas de mRNA/imunologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Imunização Passiva , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(2): 336-340, 2021 07 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32945335

RESUMO

While adult clinical trials of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have moved quickly into phase 3 clinical trials, clinical trials have not started in children in the United States. The direct COVID-19 impact upon children is greater than that observed for a number of other pathogens for which we now have effective pediatric vaccines. Additionally, the role of children in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission has clearly been underappreciated. Carefully conducted phase 2 clinical trials can adequately address potential COVID-19 vaccine safety concerns. Delaying phase 2 vaccine clinical trials in children will delay our recovery from COVID-19 and unnecessarily prolong its impact upon children's education, health, and emotional well-being, and equitable access to opportunities for development and social success. Given the potential direct and indirect benefits of pediatric vaccination, implementation of phase 2 clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines should begin now.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Adulto , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
17.
Curr Opin Pediatr ; 33(1): 144-151, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33278108

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the novel coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has caused substantial morbidity and mortality. Operation Warp Speed aims to accelerate the development of a safe and effective vaccine by early 2021. Multiple vaccine candidates with reassuring safety and efficacy profiles have advanced to phase 3 clinical trials in adults. The purpose of this review is to describe the burden of COVID-19 in children, to update pediatricians about adult COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, to discuss the importance of COVID-19 vaccine trials in children and to instill confidence in the established vaccine development and licensure processes. RECENT FINDINGS: Children of all ages are at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe disease manifestations. Children are also susceptible to downstream effects of COVID-19, including social isolation and interruption in education. Developing a pediatric COVID-19 vaccine could prevent disease, mitigate downstream effects and enable children to re-engage in their world. SUMMARY: Children could benefit both directly and indirectly from vaccination. In light of the safety and immunogenicity results from recent adult COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, children should have the opportunity to be included in clinical trials in parallel to ongoing adult phase 3 clinical trials in a manner that is careful, methodical and transparent.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
18.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 36(4): e199-e203, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28953097

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Fever of 39°C or higher and a white blood cell (WBC) count of 15,000/µL or greater are known predictors of occult bacteremia (OB). However, because of a decreasing prevalence of OB, WBC counts have become poor predictors of OB in populations of routinely immunized children. Thus, we aim to evaluate the clinical characteristics of OB in Japanese children and identify potential risk factors for OB. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of children aged 3 to 36 months old with positive blood cultures for Streptococcus pneumoniae or Haemophilus influenzae at an emergency department in a tertiary care children's hospital between April 2002 and December 2015. Patients with significant underlying diseases, a proven source of infection, or toxic appearance, were excluded. RESULTS: Positive blood cultures were recorded in 231 patients; of these, 110 were included in the study (S. pneumoniae, n = 102; H. influenzae, n = 8). Median age was 16 (3-34) months. Patients had a high median body temperature of 39.2 (interquartile range, 38.6-39.9) °C and median WBC of 21,120 (interquartile range, 16,408-24,242)/µL. A high rate of febrile seizures (58 patients, 53%) was observed, with complex febrile seizures accounting for 43% of the episodes. Frequency of febrile seizures was positively associated with age (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a high rate of children presenting with febrile seizures, especially complex seizures, among children with OB in Japan. A further study is necessary to evaluate the role of febrile seizures as a predictor for OB.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Haemophilus/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Convulsões Febris/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Haemophilus influenzae/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Lactente , Japão/epidemiologia , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Convulsões Febris/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação
19.
Pediatr Int ; 61(6): 578-582, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30980459

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Febrile children 3-36 months old, who had a body temperature >39°C and white blood cell (WBC) count >15 000/mm3 were known to be at risk for occult pneumococcal bacteremia (OPB) in the pre-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) era. The positive predictive value of these criteria, however, decreased dramatically after the introduction of PCV, indicating a need for alternative criteria. A high rate of febrile seizures has been noted in children with OPB, suggesting that screening may still be practical in this population. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate factors that predict OPB in patients visiting the emergency department (ED) with febrile seizures. METHODS: Children 3-36 months old who visited the ED for febrile seizures and had blood cultures taken were included. Patients with underlying diseases were excluded from analysis. We performed statistical analyses comparing patient demographics according to the presence or absence of OPB. RESULTS: One thousand and eighty-two patients visited the ED with febrile seizure, and blood cultures were taken in 397, of whom 87% had received more than three doses of PCV. Of the nine patients with OPB, eight (89%) met the risk criteria. In contrast, only 12% (48/388) of those without OPB met the criteria. In this population, those who fulfilled the risk criteria were more likely to have OPB than those who did not (14.3% vs 0.3%; likelihood ratio, 7.17). CONCLUSIONS: High WBC count and fever may effectively predict OPB in pediatric patients with febrile seizure in the post-PCV era.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Leucocitose/microbiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/diagnóstico , Convulsões Febris/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/complicações , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Pré-Escolar , Regras de Decisão Clínica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Infecções Pneumocócicas/complicações , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA