Restricted energy intake affects nocturnal body temperature and sleep patterns.

Changes in nocturnal body temperature, sleep patterns, and blood variables with energy restriction (3347 kJ/d) were studied in nine overweight (body mass index 26.1 +/- 2.8) premenopausal women aged 20-36 y. Variables were measured both 2 wk before and in the final 2 wk of 4-wk dieting. Data collected 28 d apart were compared to attenuate menstrual cycle differences. Subjects lost 8 +/- 4% of their initial body mass after 4 wk of energy restriction and plasma triiodothyronine (T3) was significantly reduced from 5.9 +/- 0.7 to 5.1 +/- 0.6 pmol/L (P < 0.05). The implied suppression of heat production (metabolic rate) with reduced T3 may account for the observed decrease in minimum nocturnal rectal temperature (from 36.5 +/- 0.3 to 36.3 +/- 0.3 degree C, P < 0.05). Furthermore, dieting significantly altered sleep patterns; sleep onset latency was lengthened and slow-wave sleep decreased (P < 0.05). These changes may be indicative of reduced restorative/biosynthetic requirements. It thus appears that energy restriction results in a hypometabolic state that affects nocturnal body temperature and sleep patterns.

Beneficial physiological and performance responses to a month of restricted energy intake in healthy overweight women.

Changes in mood, performance, cortisol, and physiological variables with a month-long energy restricting diet (3.347 MJ/day) were studied in nine overweight (mean mass 71.2 +/- 8 kg; body mass index 26.1 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2)), healthy premenopausal (age 20-36 years) women. Measurements were taken in the 2 weeks before the diet (baseline) and again in the final 2 weeks of the diet to attenuate menstrual cycle differences. A reduction in energy intake and concomitant weight loss (5.80 +/- 1.65 kg) were accompanied by a significant decline in systolic blood pressure (5.4%), heart rate (7.6%), and cortisol concentration (13.6%). Fatigue and vigour on the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire were adversely affected; however, subjective assessments of mood, concentration, temperature sensitivity, appetite, and sleep quality using visual analogue scales, were not significantly altered during the month-long period of energy restriction. Motor performance, as assessed by hand-eye coordination, improved with both a reduction in mean reaction time and improved accuracy in response to visual stimuli. The very low-energy diet appeared to be neither physiologically nor psychologically stressful. Beneficial effects were evident with a reduction in BMI, reduced risk of cardiovascular stress, improved motor performance, and a decline in physiological stress with dieting success.