Simvastatin therapy in lymphocyte cross-match-positive kidney transplantation candidates.

OBJECTIVES: Recent identification of several mechanisms by which statins decrease recruitment of monocytes and T cells into the arterial wall and inhibit both T-cell and B-cell activation and proliferation in vitro prompted us to study the immunomodulatory effects of statins. In this study, we examined the effect of simvastatin therapy on lymphocyte cross-match positivity in kidney transplantation candidates. METHODS: Simvastatin therapy (20 mg/d) was administered to 25 patients (18 men, 7 women of mean age 34 +/- 11.7 years who displayed positive lymphocyte cross-matches between July 2002 and October 2004. The etiologies of end-stage renal disease were vesicoureteral reflux (n = 5), urinary stone disease (n = 4), glomerulonephritis (n = 6), amyloidosis secondary to familial Mediterranean fever (n = 1), and unknown (n = 9). RESULTS: The lymphocyte cross-match became negative in 10 patients 4-9 months, and successful kidney transplantation was performed in 6 of them. The serum creatinine levels of these patients ranged between 0.8 and 1.4 mg/dL. Two patients required higher doses, but none suffered from adverse effects. The remaining 4 patients are still undergoing pretransplantation evaluation. CONCLUSION: Simvastatin therapy seems to be a cost-effective and useful method for lymphocyte cross-match-positive kidney transplantation candidates compared with immunoadsorption or intravenous immunoglobulin use.

The solution to organ shortage in Turkey: trained transplant coordinators.

The organ shortage is a social, psychological, ethical, moral, and probably legal and political problem of the 21st century. It must be solved as soon as possible to save lives; transplant coordinators are important cornerstones in this effort. The first transplant coordinator training course was organized in May, 2002, including 27 participants from different hospitals, but unfortunately only 13 were able to work as transplant coordinators in their hospitals after the course. After the course, the number of cadaveric donors in Turkey increased 12%, compared to 2001. Currently, only 14 hospitals have transplant coordinators and 12 of them are transplant centers. There is no transplant coordinator at 10 transplant centers. Only two nontransplant centers have a transplant coordinator. Eightyeight percent of donors are procured from hospitals with a transplant coordinator. According to data from the Transplantation Society meeting held in Rome, August 2000, there should be 1675 donors in Turkey, but we had only 100 for 2002 and 49 in 1999. Transplant coordinators are essential to organize donation, seeking to achieve the maximum for potential generating capacity (60 brain-dead pmp). So we need approximately 200 (3/pmp) trained transplant coordinators in Turkey but we presently have only 15% of this number.

The role of the transplant coordinator on tissue donation in Turkey.

While solid organs represent the dramatic and lifesaving aspect of donation after death, the transplantation of tissues from donors after death is a much larger-scale activity that benefits enormous numbers of patients, usually in a life-enhancing rather than a lifesaving manner. Some types of tissue transplantation, such as heart valve and cornea transplantation, have been established for many decades and are reasonably well understood by health professionals and the public. Many other types of tissue donation, such as bone, skin, tendons, etc, are much less well known but nonetheless result in beneficial treatment for large numbers of patients. Skin is used to prevent fluid loss and infection following a major burn; bone is used to improve the clinical success of a range of orthopedic operations, such as joint replacements, spinal fusions, and reconstructions following trauma or tumor. In the United States more than 20,000 donors provided cadaveric tissue in 1999, compared to 6,000 in 1994. We ask all families of brain-dead donors for consent for tissue donation. Between January 1, 1999, and January 3, 2003, we had 58 actual cadaveric donors, procuring three skins, 15 tendons, six bones, 13 heart valves, and 40 corneas. We performed three skin, 40 tendon, and three bone transplants as well as storing other tissues. One donor can give health to 50 different recipients. In general, the argument runs for a transplant coordinator "if you can do it, then you must." We can save lives and present a better quality of life with solid organ and tissue donation.

Is there any effect of compliance on clinical parameters of renal transplant recipients?

Noncompliance with regard to diet, medications and routine physician visits is frequently observed among some patient groups. This results in late graft dysfunction and behavior loss. In the present study, we defined compliance as attendance at 80% or more outpatient visits. The study included 63 cadaveric and 158 living-related renal transplant recipients namely, 150 men and 76 women of 8 to 70 years of age (median 38 +/- 12) who were operated between 1986 and 2001. Demographic data, number of visits attended per month, cigarette smoking, and alcohol intake were probed with a questionnaire that was delivered to the patients, 8 of whom died; hemophagocytic syndrome (n = 4), cardiovascular disease (n = 2), Kaposi' sarcoma (n = 1), and cerebrovascular bleeding (n = 1). Twenty-three patients had lost their graft. Compliance among men was lower than among women, a result that trended toward statistical significance (P =.087). Compliance was not related to marital status (P =.297), but tended to increase with educational background (P =.059). Graft loss (P =.546) and aging (P =.509) were not related to compliance. There was no relationship between compliance and mortality rate (P =.526). Interestingly, living-related kidney transplant recipients showed lower compliance than cadaveric kidney recipients, a result that was statistically significant (P =.04). Noncompliance was also related to cigarette smoking during the pre- and posttransplant periods (P =.008 and P =.03, respectively), as well as alcohol intake (P =.000). In conclusion, male gender and living-related donation are related to noncompliance, but (in contrast with literature) not young age, graft loss, or mortality. Compliance increases with educational status of the patients. Smoking and alcohol intake are closely related to noncompliance.

Paired exchange kidney transplantation experience of Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: Paired-exchange kidney transplantation (PKD) has gained in importance because of the difficulty to obtain suitable organs. The aim of this study was to compare the biochemical and clinical parameters of PKT with those of living-related kidney transplantation (LD). METHOD: We compared 272 PKD performed in 3 transplant centers with 1885 LD. The 2 groups were compared for graft and patient survivals, rejection episodes, serum creatinine levels, and other biochemical parameters. RESULTS: The median human leukocyte antigen, mismatch was similar: PKD, 4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3-4) and LD; 3 (95% CI, 3-4; P = .1292). The mean creatinine level among the PKT group of 1.07 ± .37 was lower then the LD group 1.17 ± .56 (P = .0043), but after the second year it was lower in the LD group (1.39 ± 0.61 and 1.16 ± 0.43; P < .0001). The rates of patient death (PKT, 3.31% vs LD 3.58; P = .9603), graft loss (2.74% vs 2.71%; P = .8647) and acute rejection episodes (19.48% vs 19.36%; P = 0.9719), were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Paired donation expands the living donor pool and decreases the number of waiting list patients. It is cost effective according to ABO incompetible transplantation.