RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the risk factors for failure of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) needling revision, a useful procedure for restoring a failed filtration bleb. DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: Retrospectively conducted study. SETTING: Institutional. STUDY POPULATION: Sixty-four eyes of 64 consecutive glaucoma patients that underwent 5-FU needling revisions for failed filtering bleb following either trabeculectomy or phaco-trabeculectomy with or without adjunctive mitomycin C (MMC). OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: Goldmann applanation tonometry, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful outcome of the initial 5-FU needling revision, arbitrarily defined as target intraocular pressure (IOP) control with not more than two topical glaucoma medications and no additional 5-FU needling or other surgical procedures, was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and risk factors for failure of the initial 5-FU needling revision were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: The cumulative success rate of the initial 5-FU needling revision was 45% at 1 year, 33% at 2 years, and 28% at 4 years. Failure of the initial 5-FU revision correlated significantly with preneedling IOP > 30 mm Hg (P =.0003), lack of MMC use during the previous filtration surgery (P =.013), and IOP >10 mm Hg immediately following needling revision (P =.0012) according to Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-needling IOP > 30 mm Hg, lack of MMC use during the previous filtration surgery, and IOP > 10 mm Hg immediately after needling were found to be significant risk factors for failure of the initial 5-FU needling procedure. Therefore, it is important to monitor IOP closely following needling revision in those patients with such risk factors. They are more likely to require additional therapeutic interventions, including repeat needling revisions.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Túnica Conjuntiva/cirurgia , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Trabeculectomia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Extração de Catarata , Túnica Conjuntiva/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Glaucoma/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agulhas , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Because of the reported antifibroblastic effect of verapamil, a calcium-channel blocker, we investigated the potential benefit of adjunctive topical verapamil in patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery. METHODS: This prospective, double-masked, randomized study included 56 eyes of 56 consecutive patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma undergoing trabeculectomy (primary or surgical revision of failed trabeculectomy), trabeculectomy combined with cataract surgery, or Molteno drainage device implantation. Postoperatively, the treated eyes received verapamil (0.25%) or one drop of placebo four times a day for 1 month in addition to 1% prednisolone four times a day and corticosteroid-antibiotic ophthalmic ointment at bedtime. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preoperative mean intraocular pressure, mean number of medications, and glaucoma severity between the verapamil and placebo groups. There were also no significant differences between the two groups in filtration success rate, mean intraocular pressure, and mean number of medications on postoperative days 1, 4, or 7 and at postoperative months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant benefit of adjunctive topical verapamil when it was used after trabeculectomy, trabeculectomy combined with cataract surgery, or Molteno drainage device implantation.