Structural Bone Grafting with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis with Severe Glenoid Bone Loss: outcomes using a long post.

INTRODUCTION: Severe posterior glenoid bone loss with glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff can be managed with reverse shoulder arthroplasty but requires lateralization and version correction to avoid potential complications, such as instability, notching and implant failure. Angled bone grafting with humeral head autograft can provide durable glenoid bone stock, but results have been mixed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported and objective outcomes as well as complication and failure rates for patients who underwent angled humeral head autografting for severe retroversion. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary RSA with angled humeral head autograft and Stryker Tornier long central post baseplate for severe glenoid bone loss in the setting of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff at our institution between November 2018 and February of 2022 were identified. Individuals with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis and preoperative glenoid retroversion of ≥30° were included. Patients undergoing revision procedures, planned two-stage arthroplasty were excluded. Differences in pre- and postoperative range of motion, as well as patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and re-operation rates were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 24 shoulders in 23 patients (61% male), with a mean age of 65.6 years were included. Average preoperative retroversion was 37.4° (range: 30° - 51°). Mean follow-up was 2.9 years (range: 2 - 4.3 years). Significant improvements were found in flexion, abduction, and external rotation. Patient-reported subjective outcomes were excellent, with average ASES score of 93.6 and average SSV 93.8%. Sixteen (67%) shoulders received postoperative CT scans and all were found to have incorporated. Complications included one shoulder hematoma requiring incision and drainage without revision, and a post-traumatic fracture of the inferior glenoid screw at 11 months, requiring revision RSA with bone grafting. No atraumatic catastrophic failures occurred due to component loosening. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that using angled humeral head bone grafting is a good solution for version correction in extreme posterior glenoid bone loss. Significant improvements are reported in ROM, pain, and subjective functional scores, with excellent graft incorporation rates and a low complication profile at early follow-up. Further work should focus on gathering higher levels of evidence, detailed radiographic analyses and exploring humeral head bone grafting for other indications.

Should All Patients Receive Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis? Defining Its Role in Patients Undergoing Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated reduced periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates following extended oral antibiotics (EOAs) for high-risk patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study compared 3-month PJI rates in all patients undergoing primary or aseptic revision TJA with or without EOA prophylaxis. METHODS: In total, 2,982 consecutive primary (n = 2,677) and aseptic revision (n = 305) TJAs were performed by a single, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon from 2016 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Beginning January 2020, all patients received 7 days of 300 mg oral cefdinir twice daily immediately postoperatively. Rates of PJI at 3 months were compared between patients who received or did not receive EOA. RESULTS: Rates of PJI at 3 months in patients undergoing primary and aseptic revision TJA were significantly lower in those receiving EOA prophylaxis compared to those who did not (0.41 versus 1.13%, respectively; P = .02). After primary TJA, lower PJI rates were observed with EOA prophylaxis utilization (0.23 versus 0.74%, P = .04; odds ratio [OR] 3.85). Following aseptic revision TJA, PJI rates trended toward a significant decrease with the EOA compared to without (1.88 versus 4.83%, respectively; P = .16; OR 2.71). CONCLUSIONS: All patients undergoing primary or aseptic revision TJA who received EOA prophylaxis were 3.85 and 2.71 times less likely, respectively, to develop PJI at 3 months compared to those without EOA. Future studies are needed to determine if these results are maintained at postoperative time periods beyond 3 months following primary TJA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective review.

Variation in scapulohumeral rhythm on dynamic radiography in pathologic shoulders: a novel diagnostic tool.

HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to analyze the SHR of patients diagnosed with small (SRCTs) and massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs), adhesive capsulitis (AC), and glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GH-OA) and compare their measurements to those of patient controls with healthy shoulders using DDR. We hypothesize that various diagnoses will vary with regards to SHR. METHODS: The sequences of pulsed radiographs collated in DDR to create a moving image were prospectively analyzed during humeral abduction in normal controls and in 4 distinct shoulder pathology groups: SRCT, MRCT, AC, and GH-OA. GH and ST joint angles were measured at 0°-30°, 30°-60°, 60°-90°, and maximal coronal plane humeral abduction. SHR was defined as the ratio of the change in humeral abduction over the change in scapula upward rotation during humeral abduction and was calculated within the above angle intervals. RESULTS: A total of 121 shoulders were analyzed. Forty normal controls were compared to 13 SRCTs, 29 MRCTs, 16 AC, and 23 GH-OA. SHR during humeral abduction differed significantly in patients with MRCT (1.91 ± 0.72), AC (1.55 ± 0.37), and GH-OA (2.31 ± 1.01) compared to controls (3.39 ± 0.79). When analyzed across 30° intervals of abduction, there was a significantly lower SHR found at 0°-30°, 30°-60°, and 60°-90° in MRCT, AC, and GH-OA across each motion range compared to controls. Control patients had an arc of abduction of 103° ± 32°, which was significantly larger than all other pathologies (MRCT: 76° ± 23°, SRCT: 81° ± 21°, AC: 65° ± 27°, GH-OA: 71° ± 35°) and an average scapular abduction of 33° ± 14°, which was significantly less than patients with an MRCT (46° ± 10°) and AC (65° ± 27°). CONCLUSION: SHR remained significantly lower throughout shoulder abduction in MRCT (43.65%), AC (-54.29%), and GH-OA (32.01%) compared to controls. When isolating for humeral and scapular motion, all 4 pathologies had decreased GH abduction, whereas AC and MRCT had an increased scapular compensatory motion compared to controls. Quantifying kinematic patterns like SHR using DDR can be implemented as a novel, safe, and cost-effective method to diagnose shoulder pathology and to monitor response to treatment.

Arthroscopic Pectoralis Minor Release After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Novel Consideration for Postarthroplasty Pain.

CASE: A 74-year-old male patient presenting with chronic radiating shoulder pain, paresthesias, and weakness had previously undergone reverse shoulder arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for an irreparable cuff tear and cervical radiculopathy, respectively. After being diagnosed with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome and undergoing physiotherapy, the patient's recalcitrant condition was surgically managed with arthroscopic pectoralis minor tenotomy, suprascapular nerve release, and brachial plexus neurolysis. CONCLUSION: This ultimately led to complete pain relief and improved function. By sharing this case, we aim to shed light on this overlooked pathology and help prevent unnecessary procedures for others suffering from similar conditions.