Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(5): 1130-1136, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032968

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear which patients with metastatic germ cell tumours (mGCTs) need prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk and onset of VTEs stratified by risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multi-institutional retrospective dataset included mGCT patients treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. INTERVENTION: Patients with prophylactic anticoagulation were excluded. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A regression analysis was performed to select risk factors for VTEs. The simulated number needed to treat (NNT) and the number needed to harm (NNH) with prophylactic anticoagulation were calculated based on the cumulative incidences retrieved from this study and hazard rates of recently published trials describing the efficacy of prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTEs and the risk of bleeding events. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From 1120 patients, 121 (11%) had a VTE, which occurred prior to chemotherapy in 49 (4%) and on or after chemotherapy in 72 (6%). Six patients (<1%) had a bleeding event without anticoagulation. After backward regression, the one risk factor for a VTE during or after chemotherapy was the use of a venous access device. The simulated cumulative VTE incidence from prophylactic anticoagulation for patients on or after chemotherapy would translate into an NNT of 45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-56) and an NNH of 186 (95% CI 87-506). Limitations are mainly related to the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The mGCTs associated VTEs are most common before and during, but not after, chemotherapy. Avoiding venous access device and/or prophylactic anticoagulation with an acceptable risk-benefit profile may decrease VTE occurring on chemotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) occur rarely after chemotherapy. Based on experience of prophylactic anticoagulation in other cancers, we conclude that the risk of VTE in men undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumours can be decreased by thromboprophylaxis with a reasonable risk-benefit profile and by avoidance of venous access devices.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas , Neoplasias Testiculares , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombose Venosa , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle
2.
Cancer Med ; 9(1): 116-124, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31715650

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Metastatic germ cell tumor (mGCT) patients receiving chemotherapy have increased risk of life-threatening venous thromboembolism (VTE). Identifying VTE risk factors may guide thromboprophylaxis in this highly curable population. METHODS: Data were collected from mGCT patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy at 22 centers. Predefined variables included International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) risk classification, long-axis diameter of largest retroperitoneal lymph node (RPLN), Khorana score, and use of indwelling vascular access device (VAD). VTE occurring at baseline, during chemotherapy and within 90 days, was analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 1135 patients were collected. Median age was 31 years (range 10-74). IGCCCG risk was 64% good, 20% intermediate, and 16% poor. VTE occurred in 150 (13%) patients. RPLN >3.5 cm demonstrated highest discriminatory accuracy for VTE (AUC 0.632, P < .001) and was associated with significantly higher risk of VTE in univariable analysis (22% vs 8%, OR 3.0, P < .001) and multivariable analysis (OR 1.8, P = .02). Other significant risk factors included, Khorana score ≥3 (OR 2.6, P = .008) and VAD use (OR 2.7, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Large RPLN and VAD use are independent risk factors for VTE in mGCT patients receiving chemotherapy. VAD use should be minimized in this population and thromboprophylaxis might be considered for large RPLN.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Metástase Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Criança , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/patologia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/secundário , Espaço Retroperitoneal/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA