A systematic review on disease-drug-drug interactions with immunomodulating drugs: A critical appraisal of risk assessment and drug labelling.

AIM: Use of immunomodulating therapeutics for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases may cause disease-drug-drug interactions (DDDIs) by reversing inflammation-driven alterations in the metabolic capacity of cytochrome P450 enzymes. European Medicine Agency (EMA) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines from 2007 recommend that the DDDI potential of therapeutic proteins should be assessed. This systematic analysis aimed to characterize the available DDDI trials with immunomodulatory drugs, experimental evidence for a DDDI risk and reported DDDI risk information in FDA/EMA approved drug labelling. METHOD: For this systematic review, the EMA list of European Public Assessment Reports of human medicine was used to select immunomodulating monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) marketed after 2007 at risk for a DDDI. Selected drugs were included in PubMed and Embase searches to extract reported interaction studies. The Summary of Product Characteristics (SPCs) and the United States Prescribing Information (USPIs) were subsequently used for analysis of DDDI risk descriptions. RESULTS: Clinical interaction studies to evaluate DDDI risks were performed for 12 of the 24 mAbs (50%) and for none of the TKIs. Four studies identified a DDDI risk, of which three were studies with interleukin-6 (IL-6) neutralizing mAbs. Based on (non)clinical data, a DDDI risk was reported in 32% of the SPCs and in 60% of the USPIs. The EMA/FDA documentation aligned with the DDDI risk potential in 35% of the 20 cases. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reinforces that the risk for DDDI by immunomodulating drugs is target- and disease-specific. Drug labelling information designates the greatest DDDI risk to mAbs that neutralize the effects of IL-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor alfa (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 bèta (IL-1ß) in diseases with systemic inflammation.

Increased Tacrolimus Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients With COVID-19: Inflammation-Driven Downregulation of Metabolism as a Potential Mechanism.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease compared to the general population. This is partly driven by their use of immunosuppressive therapy, which influences inflammatory responses and viral loads. Current guidelines suggest to withdraw mycophenolate while calcineurin inhibitors are often continued during a COVID-19 infection. However, clinical signs of calcineurin toxicity have been described in multiple COVID-19 positive KTRs. In this report we describe the course of tacrolimus exposure prior to, during, and post COVID-19 in observations from three clinical cases as well as four KTRs from a controlled trial population. We postulate inflammation driven downregulation of the CYP3A metabolism as a potential mechanism for higher tacrolimus exposure. To mitigate the risk of tacrolimus overexposure and toxicity therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in KTRs with COVID-19 both in the in-, out-patient and home monitoring setting.

Inflammation altered correlation between CYP2C19 genotype and CYP2C19 activity in patients receiving voriconazole.

Voriconazole is the cornerstone of the treatment and prevention of fungal infections. While there is a good correlation between CYP2C19 genotype and voriconazole exposure during prophylactic treatment, no correlation was found in patients with invasive aspergillosis. Proinflammatory cytokines result in inhibition of CYP2C19 enzyme activity (and may result in phenoconversion). Here we investigated the relationship between inflammation, CYP2C19 genotype-predicted-phenotype, and CYP2C19 activity in patients receiving voriconazole. Data were obtained from two prospective studies investigating voriconazole treatment (NCT02074462 and NCT00893555). Dose-corrected voriconazole plasma concentration and C-reactive protein (CRP) were used as proxies for CYP2C19 activity and inflammation, respectively. After data extraction and synthesis, data from 39 patients with paired voriconazole and CRP measurements were available. The distribution of CYP2C19 genotype-predicted metabolizer phenotypes was 31% intermediate (IM), 41% normal (NM), and 28% rapid metabolizer (RM). During inflammation, dose-corrected voriconazole levels were increased by 245%, 278%, and 486% for CYP2C19 NMs IMs and RMs, respectively. Patients with moderate or high CRP levels (>50 mg/L) were phenoconverted to a lower metabolizer phenotype irrespective of their CYP2C19 genotype. In a subgroup analysis of eight patients with longitudinal data available with and without inflammation, the pattern of the dose-corrected voriconazole and CRP measurements were similar, with CYP2C19 activity following decreasing or increasing CRP levels. In conclusion, voriconazole plasma concentrations increase during inflammation due to downregulation of CYP2C19 activity. While this effect appears largest for CYP2C19 RMs, no clinically relevant differences were observed between the CYP2C19 genotypes.

Phenoconversion of Cytochrome P450 Metabolism: A Systematic Review.

Phenoconversion is the mismatch between the individual's genotype-based prediction of drug metabolism and the true capacity to metabolize drugs due to nongenetic factors. While the concept of phenoconversion has been described in narrative reviews, no systematic review is available. A systematic review was conducted to investigate factors contributing to phenoconversion and the impact on cytochrome P450 metabolism. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated in this review, of which 14 demonstrate phenoconversion for a specific genotype group. Phenoconversion into a lower metabolizer phenotype was reported for concomitant use of CYP450-inhibiting drugs, increasing age, cancer, and inflammation. Phenoconversion into a higher metabolizer phenotype was reported for concomitant use of CYP450 inducers and smoking. Moreover, alcohol, pregnancy, and vitamin D exposure are factors where study data suggested phenoconversion. The studies reported genotype-phenotype discrepancies, but the impact of phenoconversion on the effectiveness and toxicity in the clinical setting remains unclear. In conclusion, phenoconversion is caused by both extrinsic factors and patient- and disease-related factors. The mechanism(s) behind and the extent to which CYP450 metabolism is affected remain unexplored. If studied more comprehensively, accounting for phenoconversion may help to improve our ability to predict the individual CYP450 metabolism and personalize drug treatment.