When Did the Empathy Die?: Examining the Correlation Between Length of Medical Training and Level of Empathy.

Purpose: Empathy is an important skill for physicians as it can lead to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. This study assessed self-reported empathy by medical students across all four years of medical school and potential differences in empathy across students interested in different subspecialties. Method: All medical students enrolled at New York Medical College in August 2020 were invited to participate in this study. Participants completed the student version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy. Results: A total of 179 medical students participated. Mean empathy score in fourth-year students was significantly lower than that in first-year students. Mean empathy score was greatest among students interested in Pediatrics and was greater in participants who identified as women. Conclusions: Self-reported empathy may be lower in upper-year medical students when compared to lower-year students. The potential reasons for lower empathy in the later years of training are discussed. A systematic curriculum for teaching and maintaining empathy should be developed and uniformly implemented across medical schools to combat a potential decline in empathy.

A peer-led kinesthetic forearm and wrist anatomy workshop: A multiple cohort study.

An understanding of forearm and wrist anatomy is necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of various injuries. Evidence supports the use of peer-assisted learning (PAL) as an effective resource for teaching basic science courses. First-year medical students across three class years participated in an optional PAL kinesthetic workshop wherein participants created anatomically accurate paper models of forearm and wrist muscles. Participants completed pre- and post-workshop surveys. Participant and nonparticipant exam performances were compared. Participation ranged from 17.3% to 33.2% of each class; participants were more likely to identify as women than men (p < 0.001). Participants in cohorts 2 and 3 reported increased comfort with relevant content after the workshop (p < 0.001). Survey responses for cohort 1 were omitted due to low response rates; however, exam performances were assessed for all three cohorts. Cohort 2 participants scored higher than nonparticipants on forearm and wrist questions on the cumulative course exam (p = 0.010), while the opposite was found for cohort 3 (p = 0.051). No other statistically significant differences were observed. This is the first study to examine quantitative and qualitative results for a PAL intervention repeated for three separate cohorts. Although academic performance varied, two cohorts reported increased comfort with relevant course material after the workshop. Results of this study support the need for further exploration of PAL workshops as an instructional method in teaching anatomy and highlight the challenges associated with repeating interventions over multiple years. As more studies attempt replication across multiple years, these challenges may be addressed, thereby informing PAL best practices.

Increasing medical student confidence in gender and sexual health through a student-initiated lecture series.

INTRODUCTION: Medical students self-report insufficient training in topics of gender and sexuality in medicine, which may ultimately lead to negative health outcomes in patients for whom they will provide care. This study aims to identify whether a student-initiated lecture series on topics related to gender and sexual health leads to greater student comfort with discussing topics related to diverse sexual content. METHODS: Medical students matriculated during two consecutive academic years were invited to participate in the lecture series. Investigators administered anonymous pre- and post-series surveys (n=152 and 105 respondents, respectively) using google forms. Respondents rated their comfort levels discussing relevant topics and provided narrative feedback concerning strengths and areas for improvement of the lecture series. Overlaps between the 95% confidence intervals around pre- and post-series percentage of students comfortable/very comfortable discussing each topic were examined to compare pre- vs post-series comfort ratings. Narrative comments were reviewed for thematic feedback. RESULTS: 105 medical students completed the lecture series, with 80% identifying as female. Self-assessed comfort levels across all seminar topics were greater in post- versus pre-lecture series surveys with the following topics showing the biggest differences (percentage of students "somewhat" or "very" comfortable [95% confidence intervals]: discussing sexuality with gender (68%[59-77] vs. 29%[22-36]) and sexual minority patients (84%[77-91] vs. 49%[41-57]), HIV prevention counseling (70%[61-78] vs. 20% [20-34]), identifying female genital cutting (44% [34-53] vs. 11%[6-16]), and discussing intimate partner violence (65%[55-74] vs. 33%[25-40]). Qualitative analysis indicated respondents found the lectures to be effective and believed they should be integrated into the required medical school curriculum. CONCLUSION: Our student-initiated lecture series was associated with greater student comfort discussing topics related to gender and sexuality with patients. This framework represents a useful method to address gaps in medical education and has the potential to improve health outcomes in multiple populations.

Easing the transition: medical students' perceptions of critical skills required for the clerkships.

OBJECTIVES: The preclinical years of undergraduate medical education provide educational content in a structured learning environment whereas clerkships provide clinical training in a more experiential manner. Although early clinical skills training is emphasized in many medical schools, students still feel unprepared and anxious about starting their clerkships. This study identifies the skills medical students perceive as essential and those skill areas students are most anxious about prior to starting clerkship rotations. METHODS: Open-ended questionnaires were administered to two cohorts of students, preclinical students (PCS) completing their second year and clinical students (CS) in the ninth month of the clinical training of their third year at a single urban US medical school. The following questions were addressed in the survey: which three clinical skills do they perceive are most essential for the clerkships; which skills are students most anxious about as they enter clerkships; and what additional skills training should be provided to students to ease the transition into clerkships. RESULTS: Response rate to the questionnaire was 84%. PCS (n=93) reported the three most essential skills to be prepared for clerkships are: history taking/physical examination (73%), proficiency in oral case presentations (56%), and generation of differential diagnosis (46%). CS (n=105) reported interpersonal skills (80%), history taking/physical examination (37%), and time management (26%) as most essential. PCS were most anxious about their oral case presentation skills (30%), but CS were most concerned about time management and self care (40%). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the skills that students at one school regard as most important to have mastered before beginning clerkship training and the areas students find most anxiety provoking before and after they make the transition into clerkships. These results can inform medical educators about needed curriculum to facilitate this transition and decrease the anxiety of students entering the clinical realm.

Resident as teacher: educating the educators.

BACKGROUND: Medical students receive their clinical training from various sources: from residents during informal teaching sessions and from attending physicians during more formalized rounds. As a result of the increasing pressures of clinical medicine, efforts need to be focused on the identification and training of the next generation of clinical educators. DESCRIPTION: We have created a pilot medical education elective for residents which pairs training in teaching skills with formal teaching opportunities during protected blocks of elective time, an opportunity which is rare in most residency programs and may provide for more effective teaching skill acquisition. RESULTS: Feedback from the participants demonstrates widespread acceptance of the pilot program. CONCLUSIONS: We believe this new model would provide motivated residents with the skills and the protected time to teach, and help create a future generation of attendings better able to teach.

360 degrees: planning a new pediatric clerkship.

OBJECTIVE: Mount Sinai School of Medicine is midway through a major curriculum revision. The immediate goal for the core third-year clerkships was to create a modular schedule with varied and integrated clinical experiences. Some clerkships were lengthened; others, blended. Clerkship directors were asked to find ways to ally with those also in their 12-week module. Content material, only presented at Mount Sinai, was to be delivered at all affiliate sites. Each clerkship had one year to prepare. DESCRIPTION: Core pediatrics faced multiple challenges. Once an eight-week clerkship, pediatrics was condensed into a six-week block and paired with ob-gyn at the same affiliate sites. Material presented during weekly, lecture-based didactic sessions at Mount Sinai was to be delivered at all sites, some of which were considerable distances away. To enable students to have both content and clinical experiences at the same site, new teaching formats and techniques had to be utilized and faculty retrained to implement their new roles. Three approaches met both conditions: (1) interactive case-based learning of clerkship content objectives, (2) use of Web-based instruction to provide resources to all sites, and (3) the identification and training core educators to deliver this new content material. Generalist and specialist pediatricians prepared clinical cases. Each author was given a case-writing template, so that all cases included objectives, references, a case presentation, and guiding questions. Cases were written with extended answers to each of eight standard questions, including key teaching points, to create a teacher's manual. Three faculty members reviewed each case to assure that the content matched the objectives for the module and that cases were written at an appropriate level for third-year medical students. Weekly seminars are now interactive, small-group, and Web-based. Cases use multimedia resources and integrate multiple clinical disciplines. The structure of the seminars, modeled on adult learning theory, include review of the basic approach to patients, organization of data, and generation of a prioritized differential diagnosis. The seminars also review basic management principles for a variety of common pediatric conditions. Core educators were designated to facilitate the cases at each clinical site. They were given instructions for case facilitation, a detailed teacher's manual, and a multimedia CD-ROM. The teacher's manual contains the course syllabus as well as extended case discussions. The accompanying CD-ROM contains photographic images, growth charts, x-rays, microscopy, and sound files. Computers are available at each site and are linked to WEB-CT, the program supporting the Mount Sinai undergraduate online curriculum. DISCUSSION: We have not yet reached 360 degrees in revising our clerkship. Feedback from both students and clinician educators has been extremely positive. Future plans include further enhancement of the cases to incorporate clinical pathology, genetics, laboratory medicine, radiology, and evidence-based medicine. We will also develop and implement a faculty development program to equip our faculty with tools for effective, time-efficient, case facilitation. Starting anew with a few core organizing principles and a multidisciplinary approach has enhanced the learning for both faculty and students.

Pediatric Resident-as-Teacher Curricula: A National Survey of Existing Programs and Future Needs.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a national survey of US pediatric program directors to explore the current status, content, and teaching methods of Resident-as-Teacher (RAT) curricula. The purposes of the survey were to (1) determine the level and method of evaluation of such curricula, and (2) assess the need for a national curricular resource in this area. METHODS: A survey was sent to US pediatric program directors that asked questions regarding demographics, support, design, development, content, and evaluation of RAT curricula, as well as existing needs and desires for RAT curricular resources. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of pediatric program directors completed our survey. Eighty-seven percent have a formal RAT curriculum, but more than 50% allocate 10 hours or less to it during residency. The primary teaching modalities are lectures and workshops. Content areas include feedback, in-patient teaching, communication skills, case-based teaching, role modeling, evaluation, leadership skills, 1-minute preceptors, teaching/learning styles, professionalism, and small-group teaching. Sixty-three percent of programs report evaluating their curricula, but only 27% perceive their program to be very/extremely effective. Nearly all respondents expressed interest in a national RAT curriculum, preferring web-based modules for dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirement for a RAT curriculum, some pediatrics programs still lack one, and some consider their program only moderately effective. A wealth of curricular material exists across programs, which could be shared nationally. Establishing a national RAT curriculum would offer programs resources to meet educational mandates and the ability to tailor programs to best fit their own program needs.