Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: Past, present, and future.

Chemoprevention began to be considered as a potential strategy for lowering the incidence of cancer and cancer-related deaths in the 1970s. For clinical chemoprevention trials against cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC), well-established biomarkers are necessary for use as reliable endpoints. Difficulty in establishing validated biomarkers has delayed the start of CRC chemoprevention development. Chemoprevention trials for CRC have only recently been initiated thanks to the identification of reliable biomarkers, such as colorectal adenomas and aberrant crypt foci. Some promising agents have been developed for the prevention of CRC. The chemopreventive effect of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors has been shown, although these inhibitors are associated with cardiovascular toxicity as a crucial adverse effect. Aspirin, which is a unique agent among non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) showing minimal gastrointestinal toxicity and no cardiovascular risk, has prevented adenoma recurrence in some randomized controlled trials. More recently, metformin, which is a first-line oral medicine for type 2 diabetes, has been shown to be safe and to prevent adenoma recurrence. A recommendation of the United States Preventive Services Task Force published in 2016 provides a Grade B recommendation for the use of aspirin for chronic prophylaxis against diseases, including CRC, in certain select populations. However, the roles of other agents have yet to be determined, and investigations to identify novel "post-aspirin" agents are also needed. The combined use of multiple drugs, such as aspirin and metformin, is another option that may lead not only to stronger CRC prevention, but also to improvement of other obesity-related diseases.

Metformin for chemoprevention of metachronous colorectal adenoma or polyps in post-polypectomy patients without diabetes: a multicentre double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of, and mortality from, colorectal cancer is increasing worldwide, and new strategies for prevention are needed to reduce the burden of this disease. The oral diabetes medicine metformin might have chemopreventive effects against cancer, including colorectal cancer. However, no clinical trial data exist for the use of metformin for colorectal cancer chemoprevention. Therefore, we devised a 1-year clinical trial to assess the safety and chemopreventive effects of metformin on sporadic colorectal cancer (assessed by adenoma and polyp recurrence) in patients with a high risk of adenoma recurrence. METHODS: This trial was a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 trial. Non-diabetic adult patients who had previously had single or multiple colorectal adenomas or polyps resected by endoscopy were enrolled into the study from five hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral metformin (250 mg daily) or identical placebo tablets by a stratified computer-based randomisation method, with stratification by institute, age, sex, and body-mass index. All patients, endoscopists, doctors, and investigators were masked to drug allocation until the end of the trial. After 1 year of administration of metformin or placebo, colonoscopies were done to assess the co-primary endpoints: the number and prevalence of adenomas or polyps. Our analysis included all participants who underwent random allocation, according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), number UMIN000006254. FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2011, and Dec 30, 2014, 498 patients who had had single or multiple colorectal adenomas resected by endoscopy were enrolled into the study. After exclusions for ineligibility, 151 patients underwent randomisation: 79 were assigned to the metformin group and 72 to the placebo group. 71 patients in the metformin group and 62 in the placebo group underwent 1-year follow-up colonoscopy. The prevalence of total polyps (hyperplastic polyps plus adenomas) and of adenomas in the metformin group was significantly lower than that in the placebo group (total polyps: metformin group 27 [38·0%; 95% CI 26·7-49·3] of 71 patients, placebo group 35 [56·5%; 95% CI 44·1-68·8] of 62; p=0·034, risk ratio [RR] 0·67 [95% CI 0·47-0·97]; adenomas: metformin group 22 [30·6%; 95% CI 19·9-41·2] of 71 patients, placebo group 32 [51·6%; 95% CI 39·2-64·1] of 62; p=0·016, RR 0·60 [95% CI 0·39-0·92]). The median number of polyps was zero (IQR 0-1) in the metformin group and one (0-1) in the placebo group (p=0·041). The median number of adenomas was zero (0-1) in the metformin group and zero (0-1) in the placebo group (p=0·037). 15 (11%) of patients had adverse events, all of which were grade 1. We recorded no serious adverse events during the 1-year trial. INTERPRETATION: The administration of low-dose metformin for 1 year to patients without diabetes was safe. Low-dose metformin reduced the prevalence and number of metachronous adenomas or polyps after polypectomy. Metformin has a potential role in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. However, further large, long-term trials are needed to provide definitive conclusions. FUNDING: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.

Risk factors for small-bowel mucosal breaks in chronic low-dose aspirin users: data from a prospective multicenter capsule endoscopy registry.

BACKGROUND: To develop appropriate management strategies for patients who take low-dose aspirin, it is important to identify the risk factors for GI injury. However, few studies have described the risk factors for small-bowel injury in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors influencing the risk of small-bowel mucosal breaks in individuals taking continuous low-dose aspirin. DESIGN: Capsule endoscopy data were collected prospectively from 5 institutions. SETTING: Yokohama City University Hospital and 4 other hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 205 patients receiving treatment with low-dose aspirin for over 3 months. INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopic and upper GI endoscopy had been performed in all of the patients before the capsule endoscope evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Risk factors for small-bowel mucosal breaks. RESULTS: Of the 198 patients (141 male; mean age 71.9 years) included in the final analysis, 114 (57.6%) had at least 1 mucosal break. Multivariate analysis identified protein pump inhibitor (PPI) use (OR 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.97) and use of enteric-coated aspirin (OR 4.05; 95% CI, 1.49-11.0) as independent risk factors for the presence of mucosal breaks. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional study. CONCLUSION: PPI use appears to increase the risk of small-bowel injury in patients who take continuous low-dose aspirin. Clinicians should be aware of this effect of PPIs; new strategies are needed to treat aspirin-induced gastroenteropathy.

Strain-level detection of Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal cancer specimens by targeting the CRISPR-Cas region.

IMPORTANCE: Fusobacterium nucleatum is one of the predominant oral bacteria in humans. However, this bacterium is enriched in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and may be involved in CRC development. Our previous research suggested that F. nucleatum is present in CRC tissues originating from the oral cavity using a traditional strain-typing method [arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR)]. First, using whole-genome sequencing, this study confirmed an exemplary similarity between the oral and tumoral strains derived from each patient with CRC. Second, we successfully developed a method to genotype this bacterium at the strain level, targeting the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated system, which is hypervariable (defined as F. nucleatum-strain genotyping PCR). This method can identify F. nucleatum strains in cryopreserved samples and is significantly superior to traditional AP-PCR, which can only be performed on isolates. The new methods have great potential for application in etiological studies of F. nucleatum in CRC.

Effectiveness of therapeutic barium enema for diverticular hemorrhage.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of barium impaction therapy for patients with colonic diverticular bleeding. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical charts of patients in whom therapeutic barium enema was performed for the control of diverticular bleeding between August 2010 and March 2012 at Yokohama Rosai Hospital. Twenty patients were included in the review, consisting of 14 men and 6 women. The median age of the patients was 73.5 years. The duration of the follow-up period ranged from 1 to 19 mo (median: 9.8 mo). Among the 20 patients were 11 patients who required the procedure for re-bleeding during hospitalization, 6 patients who required it for re-bleeding that developed after the patient left the hospital, and 3 patients who required the procedure for the prevention of re-bleeding. Barium (concentration: 150 w%/v%) was administered per the rectum, and the leading edge of the contrast medium was followed up to the cecum by fluoroscopy. After confirmation that the ascending colon and cecum were filled with barium, the enema tube was withdrawn, and the patient's position was changed every 20 min for 3 h. RESULTS: Twelve patients remained free of re-bleeding during the follow-up period (range: 1-19 mo) after the therapeutic barium enema, including 9 men and 3 women with a median age of 72.0 years. Re-bleeding occurred in 8 patients including 5 men and 3 women with a median age of 68.5 years: 4 developed early re-bleeding, defined as re-bleeding that occurs within one week after the procedure, and the remaining 4 developed late re-bleeding. The DFI (disease-free interval) decreased 0.4 for 12 mo. Only one patient developed a complication from therapeutic barium enema (colonic perforation). CONCLUSION: Therapeutic barium enema is effective for the control of diverticular hemorrhage in cases where the active bleeding site cannot be identified by colonoscopy.