Safety and durability of one-stage repair of abdominal wall defects with enteric fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and long-term durability of 1-stage repair of enteric fistulas in the presence of an abdominal wall defect. BACKGROUND: Patients with enteric fistulas and an abdominal wall defect present an extreme challenge to surgeons and have been associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Durability of repair is unknown as studies fail to report this or use limited follow-up periods. METHODS: Chart review was done of consecutive patients who underwent 1-stage repair. Short-term outcomes included morbidity (wound and medical) and mortality. Long-term durability of repair was determined by prospective outpatient follow-up at least 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 61.2 years, a mean BMI of 24.4 kg/m2, and a mean abdominal wall defect size of 247.9 cm2. Component separation technique was used in 34 (87.2%) and synthetic mesh in 13 (33.3%) patients. There was 1 (2.6%) postoperative death. Twenty-four wound complications developed in 18 (46.2%) patients, including surgical-site infection in 8 (20.5%) patients. Two (5.1%) enteric fistulas recurred and were treated conservatively resulting in closure. Medical complications were seen 36 times in 23 (59%) patients. Twelve of 33 (36.4%) living patients developed a recurrent hernia after a mean follow-up of 62.7 months (range: 36-130). CONCLUSIONS: One-stage abdominal wall reconstruction with enteric fistula takedown is feasible at the cost of considerable morbidity. Our treatment strategy including component separation technique with synthetic mesh on-demand results in a durable repair in 6 to 7 of 10 patients.

Postoperative pain and early quality of life after radiofrequency ablation and mechanochemical endovenous ablation of incompetent great saphenous veins.

OBJECTIVE: Thermal ablative techniques of varicose veins carry a risk of heat-related complications, including postoperative pain. Mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) might avoid these complications and reduce postoperative pain because of the absence of thermal energy. This study evaluated postoperative pain and quality of life after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and MOCA for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with unilateral GSV incompetence were treated with either RFA or MOCA in this prospective observational study. Patients monitored their pain for the first 14 postoperative days on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). They also completed the general (RAND 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) and disease-specific (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire) quality of life questionnaires before and 6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Patients treated with MOCA reported significantly less postoperative pain than patients treated with RFA during the first 14 days after treatment (4.8 ± 9.7 mm vs 18.6 ± 17.0 mm; P < .001) (mean VAS over 14 days). The lower postoperative pain score was associated with a significantly earlier return to normal activities (1.2 ± 1.8 vs 2.4 ± 2.8 days; P = .02) and work resumption (3.3 ± 4.7 vs 5.6 ± 5.8 days, respectively; P = .02). At 6 weeks, patients in both groups perceived an improved change in health status and an improved disease-specific quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: MOCA is associated with significantly less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and earlier work resumption compared with RFA in the treatment of GSV incompetence. MOCA and RFA are both related to a rapid improvement in quality of life.