Tegaserod treatment for dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia: results of two randomized, controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: Therapies for dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia (FD) are limited. We studied tegaserod, a selective serotonin type 4 receptor agonist, in patients with FD. METHODS: Two identical multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials enrolled women >/=18 yr with recurring mid-upper abdominal discomfort characterized by postprandial fullness, early satiety, and/or bloating. Patients were randomized to tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. or placebo. Two patient-reported primary variables were assessed: percentage of days with satisfactory symptom relief, and symptom severity using the composite average daily severity score (CADSS). RESULTS: In total, 2,667 women were randomized with no differences between trials in terms of recruitment method, Helicobacter pylori status, heartburn, or medication use. Mean percentage of days with satisfactory symptom relief for tegaserod versus placebo in Trial 1: 32.2%versus 26.6% (95% CI of treatment difference 2.82, 9.27; P < 0.01), Trial 2: 31.9%versus 29.4% (95% CI of treatment difference -0.21, 6.53; P= 0.066). Mean CADSS in Trial 1: 3.14 versus 3.35 (95% CI of treatment difference -0.29, -0.10; P < 0.0001), Trial 2: 3.15 versus 3.23 (95% CI of treatment difference -0.18, 0.01; P= 0.094). Meta-analysis showed significant benefit for both end points: increase in days with satisfactory relief 4.6% (95% CI 2.29, 6.96); decrease in CADSS 0.14 (95% CI 0.21, 0.07). Treatment effect was greater in patients with severe baseline symptoms. Diarrhea requiring study discontinuation was more common with tegaserod than placebo (4.1%vs 0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Some improvement in dysmotility-like FD was observed with tegaserod treatment. The clinical implication of this improvement is uncertain.

Significant enhancement of esophageal pre-epithelial defense by tegaserod: implications for an esophagoprotective effect.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tegaserod, a serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)4 receptor agonist, is thought to stimulate intestinal secretions. The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of tegaserod vs placebo on salivary and esophageal protective factors in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in 38 GERD patients treated with tegaserod 6 mg twice a day vs placebo. Salivary samples were collected basally and during mastication. In addition, in 32 GERD patients, salivary and esophageal secretions also were collected during infusion of NaCl, HCl/pepsin, and NaCl in a consecutive fashion using a specially designed esophageal catheter. Saliva and esophageal perfusates were assessed for the pH, volume, content of buffers, protein, mucin, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor alpha (TGFalpha), and prostaglandin E (PGE)2 and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Salivary flow rates during administration of tegaserod increased over corresponding values during both basal conditions (P < .01) and mastication (P < .001). The rate of secretion of salivary bicarbonate and nonbicarbonate buffers also increased in basal conditions (P < .001 and P < .01, respectively) and during mastication (P < .05 and P = .05). Salivary EGF increased during mastication (P < .05), whereas PGE2 and TGF alpha increased in basal conditions (P < .05 and P < .01). Esophageal perfusate volumes increased during administration of tegaserod in basal conditions (P < .05), whereas esophageal EGF secretion increased after mucosal exposure to HCl/pepsin and subsequent final perfusion with NaCl (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant stimulatory impact of 5-HT4 agonist on several salivary protective factors as well as esophageal EGF secretion may have esophagoprotective implications in patients with GERD and may help to address new therapies in the future.

Tegaserod and the risk of cardiovascular ischemic events: an observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Tegaserod, a partial 5-HT(4) agonist previously approved for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation and chronic idiopathic constipation, was suspended from US marketing in 2007, based on pooled clinical trial results which contained a signal suggesting increased risk of cardiovascular ischemic events (CVIEs). We sought to evaluate whether there was an association between tegaserod and CVIE in a setting of routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a matched cohort study conducted within a large US health insurance database, involving 52 229 patients who initiated tegaserod and 52 229 patients with similar characteristics who did not initiate tegaserod. Participants were followed for up to 6 months for the occurrence of CVIE (myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, and stroke). Outcomes were identified using insurance claims and were confirmed by review of medical records. We conducted as-matched analyses providing hazard ratios (HRs) along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and as-treated analyses accounting for changes in dispensed therapy. RESULTS: There was no increased risk of CVIE associated with tegaserod treatment. The as-matched association between tegaserod and ischemic cardiovascular outcomes (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.73-1.23) and stroke (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.46-1.77) did not change substantially in the as-treated analyses (cardiovascular relative risk [RR] = 1.14, 95% CI 0.83-1.56; stroke: RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.49-2.02). The results were largely unaffected by adjustment for characteristics or subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: In this observational study of tegaserod use, we found no evidence for an increased risk of CVIE in tegaserod users.

Effect of tegaserod on esophageal pain threshold, regurgitation, and symptom relief in patients with functional heartburn and mechanical sensitivity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tegaserod, a 5-HT4-receptor partial agonist, effectively treats irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. The role of tegaserod in functional disorders of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is unclear. The aims of this study were to determine if tegaserod improves esophageal pain with mechanical and chemical stimuli, GI symptom profile, and global preference in patients with functional heartburn. METHODS: Patients with functional heartburn, as defined by Rome II criteria, underwent esophageal barostat and acid-infusion sensory tests. Mechanical hypersensitivity was required for entry. The baseline GI symptom profile was rated before treatment. Patients were blinded to treatment and randomly assigned to tegaserod 6 mg twice daily or placebo for 14 days, and crossed-over to the alternate treatment after 7 to 10 days of washout. Patients underwent sensory tests and rated GI symptoms after each treatment. Global treatment preference was completed at the end of the study. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (15 men, 27 women; age, 20-68 y) completed the study. The predominant baseline symptoms in addition to heartburn included upper-abdominal pain, upper-abdominal discomfort, regurgitation, chest pain, early satiety, and postmeal bloating. Tegaserod significantly increased balloon pressure to pain (P = .04) and the mean (P = .002) and maximum wall tension at pain (P = .0004). Tegaserod did not alter pain with acid infusion. Tegaserod significantly decreased the frequency of occurrence of heartburn/acid reflux (P = .004), regurgitation (P = .048), and distress from regurgitation (P = .039). The global preference for tegaserod was 63.4% vs 12.2% for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Tegaserod improved the esophageal pain threshold to mechanical distention, and distressing upper-GI symptoms in patients with functional heartburn.