Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of BAY 2433334, a novel activated factor XI inhibitor, in healthy volunteers: A randomized phase 1 multiple-dose study.

AIM: To evaluate BAY 2433334, an oral activated factor XI (FXIa) inhibitor, in volunteers. METHODS: Phase 1 study of healthy men at a German centre. Part A: randomized, single-blind, multiple dose-escalation study of BAY 2433334 (25/50/100 mg once daily [OD]) vs. placebo. Part B: similar design to Part A; evaluated BAY 2433334 25 mg twice daily. Part C: nonrandomized, open-label study; evaluated potential interactions between BAY 2433334 (25/75 mg OD) and midazolam (7.5 mg), a CYP3A4 index substrate. Primary variables: treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; Parts A and B); area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration of midazolam and α-hydroxymidazolam (Part C). STUDY PERIOD: 18 days plus follow-up visit. RESULTS: Parts A and B: 36 participants randomized to BAY 2433334; 12 to placebo. Part C: 48 participants assigned to BAY 2433334 plus midazolam. BAY 2433334 was well tolerated in all study parts. AUC and maximum plasma concentration of BAY 2433334 in plasma appeared dose proportional over 25-100 mg OD, with low-to-moderate variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. Multiple dosing caused minor-to-moderate accumulation and a mean terminal half-life (15.8-17.8 h) supporting once-daily dosing. Dose-dependent FXIa activity inhibition and activated partial thromboplastin time prolongation were observed. BAY 2433334 appeared to have a minor effect on AUC for midazolam (ratio [90% confidence interval]: 1.1736 [1.0963-1.2564]) and α-hydroxymidazolam (0.9864 [0.9169-1.0612]) only for BAY 2433334 75 mg OD on day 10. CONCLUSION: Multiple dosing of BAY 2433334 in healthy volunteers was well tolerated, with a predictable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile and no clinically relevant CYP3A4 induction or inhibition.

Is there a role for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-guided dosing for novel oral anticoagulants?

The novel direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs) represent a major advance in oral anticoagulant therapy and are replacing vitamin K antagonists as the preferred options for many indications. Given in fixed doses without routine laboratory monitoring, they have been shown to be at least as effective in reducing thromboembolic stroke as dose-adjusted warfarin in phase 3 randomized trials and less likely to cause hemorrhagic stroke. Pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic subanalyses of the major NOAC trials in patients with atrial fibrillation have established relationships between clinical characteristics, and drug levels and/or pharmacodynamic responses with both efficacy and safety. Based on these analyses, pharmaceutical manufacturers and regulatory authorities have provided contraindications and dosing recommendations based on clinical characteristics that are associated with drug levels and/or pharmacodynamic responses, stroke reduction, and bleeding risk to optimize the risk-benefit profile of the NOACs in the real world. The current fixed-dosing strategy of NOACs has triggered discussions about the potential value of laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment in customizing drug exposure to further improve the safety and efficacy of the NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation. As there is neither high-quality evidence nor consensus about the potential role of laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment for the NOACs, a Cardiac Research Safety Consortium "Think Tank" meeting was held at the American College of Cardiology Heart House in December 2015 to discussions these issues. This manuscript reports on the deliberations and the conclusions reached at that meeting.

Pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in children using physiologically based and population pharmacokinetic modelling: an EINSTEIN-Jr phase I study.

BACKGROUND: The EINSTEIN-Jr program will evaluate rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children, targeting exposures similar to the 20 mg once-daily dose for adults. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for pediatric rivaroxaban dosing has been constructed. METHODS: We quantitatively assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single rivaroxaban dose in children using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modelling and assessed the applicability of the PBPK model. Plasma concentration-time data from the EINSTEIN-Jr phase I study were analysed by non-compartmental and PopPK analyses and compared with the predictions of the PBPK model. Two rivaroxaban dose levels, equivalent to adult doses of rivaroxaban 10 mg and 20 mg, and two different formulations (tablet and oral suspension) were tested in children aged 0.5-18 years who had completed treatment for VTE. RESULTS: PK data from 59 children were obtained. The observed plasma concentration-time profiles in all subjects were mostly within the 90% prediction interval, irrespective of dose or formulation. The PopPK estimates and non-compartmental analysis-derived PK parameters (in children aged ≥6 years) were in good agreement with the PBPK model predictions. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirmed the applicability of the rivaroxaban pediatric PBPK model in the pediatric population aged 0.5-18 years, which in combination with the PopPK model, will be further used to guide dose selection for the treatment of VTE with rivaroxaban in EINSTEIN-Jr phase II and III studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01145859; registration date: 17 June 2010.

Exploratory evaluation of pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of rivaroxaban in children and adolescents: an EINSTEIN-Jr phase I study.

BACKGROUND: The EINSTEIN-Jr program will evaluate rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children, targeting exposures similar to the 20 mg once-daily dose for adults. METHODS: This was a multinational, single-dose, open-label, phase I study to describe the pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of a single bodyweight-adjusted rivaroxaban dose in children aged 0.5-18 years. Children who had completed treatment for a venous thromboembolic event were enrolled into four age groups (0.5-2 years, 2-6 years, 6-12 years and 12-18 years) receiving rivaroxaban doses equivalent to 10 mg or 20 mg (either as a tablet or oral suspension). Blood samples for PK and PD analyses were collected within specified time windows. RESULTS: Fifty-nine children were evaluated. In all age groups, PD parameters (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and anti-Factor Xa activity) showed a linear relationship versus rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and were in line with previously acquired adult data, as well as in vitro spiking experiments. The rivaroxaban pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic model, used to predict the doses for the individual body weight groups, was confirmed. No episodes of bleeding were reported, and treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in four children and all resolved during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Bodyweight-adjusted, single-dose rivaroxaban had predictable PK/PD profiles in children across all age groups from 0.5 to 18 years. The PD assessments based on prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time demonstrated that the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban was not affected by developmental hemostasis in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01145859.

Rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for acute venous thromboembolism in childhood. Design of the EINSTEIN-Jr phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a relatively rare condition in childhood with treatment mainly based on extrapolation from studies in adults. Therefore, clinical trials of anticoagulation in children require novel approaches to deal with numerous challenges. The EINSTEIN-Jr program identified pediatric rivaroxaban regimens commencing with in vitro dose finding studies followed by evaluation of children of different ages through phase I and II studies using extensive modeling to determine bodyweight-related doses. Use of this approach resulted in drug exposure similar to that observed in young adults treated with rivaroxaban 20 mg once-daily. METHODS: EINSTEIN-Jr phase III is a randomized, open-label, study comparing the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban 20 mg-equivalent dose regimens with those of standard anticoagulation for the treatment of any types of acute VTE in children aged 0-18 years.A total of approximately 500 children are expected to be included during the 4-year study window. Flexibility of treatment duration is allowed with study treatment to be given for 3 months with the option to continue treatment in 3-month increments, up to a total of 12 months. However, based on most common current practice, children younger than 2 years with catheter-related thrombosis will have a main treatment period of 1 month with the option to prolong treatment in 1-month increments, up to a total of 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: EINSTEIN-Jr will compare previously established 20 mg-equivalent rivaroxaban dosing regimens with standard anticoagulation for the treatment of VTE in children. Demonstration of similarity of disease, as well as equivalent rivaroxaban exposure and exposure-response will enable extrapolation of efficacy from adult trials, which is critical given the challenges of enrollment in pediatric anticoagulation trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02234843, registered on 9 September 2014.

Clinical presentation and therapeutic management of venous thrombosis in young children: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in young children is not well documented. METHODS: Clinicians from 12 institutions retrospectively evaluated the presentation, therapeutic management, and outcome of VTE in children younger than 2 years seen in 2011-2016. Feasibility of recruiting these children in EINSTEIN-Jr. phase III, a randomized trial evaluating rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for VTE, was assessed. RESULTS: We identified 346 children with VTE, of whom 227 (65.6%) had central venous catheter-related thrombosis (CVC-VTE), 119 (34.4%) had non-CVC-VTE, and 156 (45.1%) were younger than 1 month. Of the 309 children who received anticoagulant therapy, 86 (27.8%) had a short duration of therapy (i.e. < 6 weeks for CVC-VTE and < 3 months for non-CVC-VTE) and 17 (5.5%) had recurrent VTE during anticoagulation (n = 8, 2.6%) or shortly after its discontinuation (n = 9, 2.9%). A total of 37 (10.7%) children did not receive anticoagulant therapy and 4 (10.5%) had recurrent VTE.The average number of children aged < 0.5 years and 0.5-2 years who would have been considered for enrolment in EINSTEIN-Jr is approximately 1.0 and 0.9 per year per site, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Young children with VTE most commonly have CVC-VTE and approximately one-tenth and one-fourth received no or only short durations of anticoagulant therapy, respectively. Recurrent VTE rates without anticoagulation, during anticoagulation or shortly after its discontinuation seem comparable to those observed in adults. Short and flexible treatment durations could potentially increase recruitment in EINSTEIN-Jr. phase III.

Contribution of rivaroxaban to the international normalized ratio when switching to warfarin for anticoagulation as determined by simulation studies.

AIM: This study evaluated the influence of rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily on international normalized ratio (INR) during the co-administration period when switching from rivaroxaban to warfarin. METHODS: We developed a calibrated coagulation model that was qualified with phase I clinical data. Prothrombin time and INR values were simulated by use of phospholipid concentrations that matched Neoplastin Plus® and Innovin® reagents. To simulate the combined effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin on INR during switching, warfarin initiation was simulated by adjusting the magnitude of the warfarin effect to reach the desired target INRs over the course of 21 days. The warfarin effect values (obtained every 6 h) and the desired rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were used. Nomograms were generated from rivaroxaban induced increases in INR. RESULTS: The simulation had good prediction quality. Rivaroxaban induced increases in the total INR from the warfarin attributed INR were seen, which increased with rivaroxaban plasma concentration. When the warfarin only INR was 2.0-3.0, the INR contribution of rivaroxaban with Neoplastin Plus® was 0.5-1.2, decreasing to 0.3-0.6 with Innovin® at median trough rivaroxaban plasma concentrations (38 µg l(-1) ). CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that measuring warfarin induced changes in INR are best performed at trough rivaroxaban concentrations (24 h after rivaroxaban dosing) during the co-administration period when switching from rivaroxaban to warfarin. Furthermore, Innovin® is preferable to Neoplastin Plus® because of its substantially lower sensitivity to rivaroxaban, thereby reducing the influence of rivaroxaban on the measured INR.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics during the transition from warfarin to rivaroxaban: a randomized study in healthy subjects.

AIMS: This study investigated relevant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters during the transition from warfarin to rivaroxaban in healthy male subjects. METHODS: Ninety-six healthy men were randomized into the following three groups: warfarin [international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0-3.0] transitioned to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (od; group A); warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) followed by placebo od (group B); and rivaroxaban alone 20 mg od (group C) for 4 days. Anti-factor Xa activity, inhibition of factor Xa activity, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time, HepTest, prothrombinase-induced clotting time, factor VIIa activity, factor IIa activity, endogenous thrombin potential and pharmacokinetics were measured. RESULTS: An additive effect was observed on the PT and PT/INR during the initial transition period. The mean maximal prolongation of PT was 4.39-fold [coefficient of variation (CV) 18.03%; range 3.39-6.50] of the baseline value in group A, compared with 1.88-fold (CV 10.35%; range 1.53-2.21) in group B and 1.57-fold (CV 9.98%; range 1.37-2.09) in group C. Rivaroxaban had minimal influence on the PT/INR at trough levels. Inhibition of factor Xa activity, activated partial thromboplastin time and endogenous thrombin potential were also enhanced, but to a lesser extent. In contrast, the effects of rivaroxaban on anti-factor Xa activity, HepTest and prothrombinase-induced clotting time were not affected by pretreatment with warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in pharmacodynamics during the transition from warfarin to rivaroxaban vary depending on the test used. A supra-additive effect on PT/INR is expected during the initial period of transition, but pretreatment with warfarin does not influence the effect of rivaroxaban on anti-factor Xa activity.

Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist therapy in patients with venous thromboembolism and renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with renal impairment receiving classical anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk of bleeding and possibly pulmonary embolism. We examined the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban in patients with VTE with and without renal impairment. METHODS: Prespecified subgroup analysis of the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies comparing fixed-dose rivaroxaban with enoxaparin/a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), performed in 8246 patients enrolled from 2007 to 2011 in 314 hospitals. RESULTS: Outcomes were recurrent VTE and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in patients with normal renal function (n = 5569; 67.3%) or mild (n = 2037; 24.6%), moderate (n = 636; 7.7%), or severe (n = 21; 0.3%) renal impairment. Rates of recurrent VTE were 1.8%, 2.8%, 3.3%, and 4.8% in patients with normal renal function and mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively (ptrend = 0.001). Hazard ratios for recurrent VTE were similar between treatment groups across renal function categories (pinteraction = 0.72). Major bleeding in rivaroxaban recipients occurred in 0.8%, 1.4%, 0.9%, and 0%, respectively (ptrend = 0.50). Respective rates in enoxaparin/VKA recipients were 1.0%, 3.0%, 3.9%, and 9.1% (ptrend < 0.001). Rivaroxaban-enoxaparin/VKA hazard ratios were 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-1.36) for normal renal function, 0.44 (95% CI 0.24-0.84) for mild renal impairment, and 0.23 (95% CI 0.06-0.81) for moderate renal impairment (pinteraction = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptomatic VTE and renal impairment are at increased risk of recurrent VTE. Renal impairment increased the risk of major bleeding in enoxaparin/VKA-treated patients but not in rivaroxaban-treated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00440193 and NCT00439777.

Anticoagulation with osocimab in patients with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis: a randomized phase 2 trial.

Individuals with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis are at elevated risk for thromboembolic events. Factor (F) XI, which is in the intrinsic pathway of coagulation, is emerging as an attractive target for new anticoagulants that may be safer than existing agents. Osocimab-an inhibitory FXIa antibody-is a potential treatment option for such patients. We conducted a phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, in which 704 participants (448 male, 256 female) with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis were randomized to receive lower- or higher-dose osocimab or placebo. In total, 686 participants (436 male, 250 female) received treatment for ≤18 months (planned minimal treatment period of 6 months). The co-primary outcomes were clinically relevant bleeding (a composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) and a composite of the incidence of moderate, severe or serious adverse events. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 16/232 (6.9%) and 11/224 (4.9%) participants who received lower- and higher-dose osocimab, respectively, and in 18/230 participants (7.8%) who received a placebo. For the composite adverse event endpoint, incidences were 51%, 47% and 43% in the lower-dose osocimab, higher-dose osocimab and placebo groups, respectively. These results suggest that osocimab is associated with a low risk of bleeding and is generally well tolerated in this population; findings that require confirmation in larger trials. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04523220 .

Co-administration of rivaroxaban with drugs that share its elimination pathways: pharmacokinetic effects in healthy subjects.

AIMS: The anticoagulant rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor for the management of thromboembolic disorders. Metabolism and excretion involve cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and 2J2 (CYP2J2), CYP-independent mechanisms, and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp) (ABCG2). METHODS: The pharmacokinetic effects of substrates or inhibitors of CYP3A4, P-gp and Bcrp (ABCG2) on rivaroxaban were studied in healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban did not interact with midazolam (CYP3A4 probe substrate). Exposure to rivaroxaban when co-administered with midazolam was slightly decreased by 11% (95% confidence interval [CI] -28%, 7%) compared with rivaroxaban alone. The following drugs moderately affected rivaroxaban exposure, but not to a clinically relevant extent: erythromycin (moderate CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitor; 34% increase [95% CI 23%, 46%]), clarithromycin (strong CYP3A4/moderate P-gp inhibitor; 54% increase [95% CI 44%, 64%]) and fluconazole (moderate CYP3A4, possible Bcrp [ABCG2] inhibitor; 42% increase [95% CI 29%, 56%]). A significant increase in rivaroxaban exposure was demonstrated with the strong CYP3A4, P-gp/Bcrp (ABCG2) inhibitors (and potential CYP2J2 inhibitors) ketoconazole (158% increase [95% CI 136%, 182%] for a 400 mg once daily dose) and ritonavir (153% increase [95% CI 134%, 174%]). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that rivaroxaban may be co-administered with CYP3A4 and/or P-gp substrates/moderate inhibitors, but not with strong combined CYP3A4, P-gp and Bcrp (ABCG2) inhibitors (mainly comprising azole-antimycotics, apart from fluconazole, and HIV protease inhibitors), which are multi-pathway inhibitors of rivaroxaban clearance and elimination.

Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor.

AIM: This study investigated the effects of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban (10 mg), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. METHOD: This single centre, non-randomized, non-blinded study included subjects with mild (n = 8) or moderate hepatic impairment (n = 8), according to the Child-Pugh classification, and gender-matched healthy subjects (n = 16). RESULTS: Rivaroxaban was well tolerated irrespective of hepatic function. Mild hepatic impairment did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban, compared with healthy subjects. However, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, total body clearance was decreased, leading to a significant increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). The least-squares (LS)-mean values for AUC were 1.15-fold [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.85, 1.57] and 2.27-fold (90% CI 1.68, 3.07) higher in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively, than in healthy subjects. Consequently, the pharmacodynamic responses were significantly enhanced in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. For inhibition of Factor Xa, increases in the area under the effect-time curve and the maximum effect were observed, with LS-mean ratios of 2.59 and 1.24, respectively, vs. healthy subjects. Prolongation of prothrombin time was similar in healthy subjects and those with mild hepatic impairment, but was significantly enhanced in those with moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION: Moderate (but not mild) hepatic impairment reduced total body clearance of rivaroxaban after a single 10 mg dose, leading to increased rivaroxaban exposure and pharmacodynamic effects.

The effect of food on the absorption and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban.

OBJECTIVE: Doses of 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg of rivaroxaban are approved for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disorders in adult patients. In six Phase I studies, the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg rivaroxaban were investigated in healthy male subjects, and the influence of food on these parameters was investigated for the 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg tablet doses. In addition, an oral suspension containing 1 mg/ml rivaroxaban, which is under investigation for future use in the pediatric population, was investigated at doses of 10 mg and 20 mg. MATERIALS: Rivaroxaban was obtained from Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany. METHODS: Six independent, single-dose, cross-over studies were performed in healthy male subjects (between 13 and 24 subjects were enrolled in each study) to determine the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of rivaroxaban under fasting and fed conditions. Study 1 was an absolute bioavailability study that compared 5 mg and 20 mg tablet doses with a 1 mg intravenous solution. Studies 2 and 3 were confirmatory food-effect studies that assessed 10 mg and 20 mg tablet doses, respectively, under fed and fasting conditions. Study 4 was a formulation study that evaluated oral suspensions of 10 mg (fasting) and 20 mg (fasting and fed) rivaroxaban vs. a 10 mg tablet (fasted). Study 5 was a dose-proportionality study that assessed 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg tablets under fasting conditions. Study 6 was a dose-proportionality study that assessed tablet doses of 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg under fed conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve after a single dose, the maximum drug concentration in plasma after a single dose, dose-adjusted values of area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum drug concentration in plasma after a single dose, half-life associated with the terminal slope, and time to maximum concentration in plasma after a single dose were evaluated. Adverse events were classified according to their degree of severity and were summarized using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms. RESULTS: At all doses, rivaroxaban showed an acceptable safety profile and was well tolerated in healthy individuals. Independent of food and formulation, pharmacokinetic parameters of doses up to 10 mg rivaroxaban were dose proportional and had high oral bioavailability (≥ 80%). Under fasting conditions, pharmacokinetic parameters of 15 mg and 20 mg rivaroxaban increased with dose but were less than dose proportional. However, when taken with food, high bioavailability (≥ 80%) of these doses was achieved independent of formulation. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic parameters of doses up to 10 mg rivaroxaban were dose proportional and had high oral bioavailability independent of food or whether administered as tablet or solution. High bioavailability (≥ 80%) of 15 mg and 20 mg rivaroxaban was achieved when taken with food; therefore, these doses need to be taken with food.

Effects of Tablet Formulation, Food, or Gastric pH on the Bioavailability of Asundexian.

Absolute bioavailability (F) and the impact of gastric pH, tablet formulation, and food on the pharmacokinetics and safety of asundexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, was assessed in healthy White men aged 18-45 years in 4 studies. For F, fasted participants received 50 µg of [13 C7 ,15 N]-labeled asundexian intravenously 2 hours after 25 mg of asundexian orally. Tablet formulation (50-mg immediate release [IR], and different amorphous solid dispersion [ASD] IR 25-mg and 50-mg ASD IR tablets) and food effects were explored in 2 studies. Formulation was compared using 50-mg IR versus 25-mg ASD IR and 25-mg ASD IR versus 50-mg ASD IR (fasted); food effect using 25-mg ASD IR and 50-mg ASD IR. Gastric pH modulation was assessed using omeprazole or antacid coadministration with asundexian in the fasted state. Pharmacokinetic parameters included area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; and AUC/dose [D]) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax and Cmax /D) data were evaluable for 59 participants. F was 103.9%. Relative bioavailability with 25-mg ASD IR and 50-mg ASD IR tablets, respectively, was marginally affected by formulation (AUC/D ratios, 94.3% and 95.1%; Cmax /D ratios, 95.5% and 88.7%), food (AUC[/D] ratios, 91.1% and 96.9%; Cmax [/D] ratios: 78.3% and 95.1%), and gastric pH (omeprazole, no effect; antacid, AUC ratio, 89.9% and Cmax ratio, 83.7%). No serious adverse events or deaths occurred; most adverse events were mild or moderate. In summary, oral asundexian was well tolerated and demonstrated complete bioavailability irrespective of tablet formulation, food, or gastric pH.

Model-informed bridging of rivaroxaban doses for thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients aged 9 years and older with congenital heart disease.

Rivaroxaban is approved in various regions for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children aged between 0 and 18 years and was recently investigated for thromboprophylaxis in children aged between 2 and 8 years (with body weights <30 kg) with congenital heart disease who had undergone the Fontan procedure. In the absence of clinical data, rivaroxaban doses for thromboprophylaxis in post-Fontan children aged 9 years and older or ≥30 kg were derived by a bridging approach that used physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models based on pharmacokinetic (PK) data from 588 pediatric patients and from adult patients who received 10 mg once daily for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgeries as a reference. Both models showed a tendency toward underestimating rivaroxaban exposure in post-Fontan patients aged between 2 and 5 years but accurately described rivaroxaban PK in post-Fontan patients aged between 5 and 8 years. Under the assumption that hepatic function is not impaired in post-Fontan patients, PBPK and popPK simulations indicated that half of the rivaroxaban doses for the same body weight given to pediatric patients treated for acute VTE would yield in pediatric post-Fontan patients exposures similar to the exposure observed in adult patients receiving 10 mg rivaroxaban once daily for thromboprophylaxis. Simulation-derived doses (7.5 mg rivaroxaban once daily for body weights 30-<50 kg and 10 mg once daily for body weights ≥50 kg) were therefore included in the recent US label of rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in children aged 2 years and older with congenital heart disease who have undergone the Fontan procedure.

Dosing Regimen Prediction and Confirmation With Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in Children After the Fontan Procedure: Insights From the Phase III UNIVERSE Study.

Thrombosis remains an important complication for children with single-ventricle physiology following the Fontan procedure, and effective thromboprophylaxis is an important unmet medical need. To obviate conventional dose-finding studies and expedite clinical development, a rivaroxaban dose regimen for this indication was determined using a model-informed drug development approach. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic rivaroxaban model was used to predict a pediatric dosing regimen that would produce drug exposures similar to that of 10 mg once daily in adults. This regimen was used in an open-label, multicenter phase III study, which investigated the use of rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in post-Fontan patients 2 to 8 years of age. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of rivaroxaban was assessed in part A (n = 12) and in part B (n = 64) of the UNIVERSE study. The safety and efficacy in the rivaroxaban group were compared to those in the acetylsalicylic acid group for 12 months. Pharmacodynamic end points were assessed in both parts of the study. Rivaroxaban exposures achieved in parts A and B were similar to the adult reference exposures. Prothrombin time also showed similarity to the adult reference. Exposure-response analysis did not identify a quantitative relationship between rivaroxaban exposures and efficacy/safety outcomes within the observed exposure ranges. A body weight-based dose regimen selected by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was shown in the UNIVERSE study to be appropriate for thromboprophylaxis in the post-Fontan pediatric population. Model-based dose selection can support pediatric drug development and bridge adult dose data to pediatrics, thereby obviating the need for dose-finding studies in pediatric programs.

Anticoagulation in pediatric cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a subgroup analysis of EINSTEIN-Jr.

Anticoagulant treatment of pediatric cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been prospectively evaluated. Management of anticoagulation for cancer-associated VTE is often challenged by drug interactions and treatment interruptions. A total of 56 of the 500 children (11.2%) with VTE who participated in the recent EINSTEIN-Jr randomized study had cancer (hematologic malignancy, 64.3%, solid malignant tumor, 35.7%). Children were allocated to either therapeutic-dose bodyweight-adjusted oral rivaroxaban (n=40) or standard anticoagulation with heparins, with or without vitamin K antagonists (n=16) and received a median of 30 concomitant medications. Based on sparse blood sampling at steady-state, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of rivaroxaban were derived using population PK modeling. During the 3 months of treatment, no recurrent VTE or major bleeding occurred (95% confidence interval, 0.0%-6.4%), and 3-month repeat imaging showed complete or partial vein recanalization in 20 and 24 of 52 evaluable children (38.5% and 46.2%, respectively). Anticoagulant treatment was interrupted 70 times in 26 (46.4%) children because of thrombocytopenia, invasive procedures, or adverse events, for a mean individual period of 5.8 days. Anticoagulant therapy was resumed in therapeutic doses and was not associated with thrombotic or bleeding complications. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range and similar to those observed in children with VTE who did not have cancer-associated VTE. Rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulants appeared safe and efficacious and were associated with reduced clot burden in most children with cancer-associated VTE, including those who had anticoagulant treatment interruptions. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range despite significant polypharmacy use. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02234843.

Rivaroxaban: a new oral factor Xa inhibitor.

Rivaroxaban is a direct inhibitor of factor Xa, a coagulation factor at a critical juncture in the blood coagulation pathway leading to thrombin generation and clot formation. It is selective for human factor Xa, for which it has >10 000-fold greater selectivity than for other biologically relevant serine proteases (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC(50)], >20 micromol/L). Rivaroxaban inhibits factor Xa in a concentration-dependent manner (inhibitory constant [K(i)], 0.4 nmol/L) and binds rapidly (kinetic association rate constant [k(on)], 1.7x10(7) mol/L(-1) s(-1)) and reversibly (kinetic dissociation rate constant [k(off)], 5x10(-3) s(-1)). By inhibiting prothrombinase complex-bound (IC(50), 2.1 nmol/L) and clot-associated factor Xa (IC(50), 75 nmol/L), rivaroxaban reduces the thrombin burst during the propagation phase. In animal models of venous and arterial thrombosis, rivaroxaban showed dose-dependent antithrombotic activity. In healthy individuals, rivaroxaban was found to have predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics across a 5- to 80-mg total daily dose range, inhibiting factor Xa activity and prolonging plasma clotting time. In phase III clinical trials, rivaroxaban regimens reduced rates of venous thromboembolism in patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty compared with enoxaparin regimens, without significant differences in rates of major bleeding, showing that rivaroxaban has a favorable benefit-to-risk profile.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of rivaroxaban in children and comparison to prospective physiologically-based pharmacokinetic predictions.

Rivaroxaban has been investigated in the EINSTEIN-Jr program for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children aged 0 to 18 years and in the UNIVERSE program for thromboprophylaxis in children aged 2 to 8 years with congenital heart disease after Fontan-procedure. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling were used throughout the pediatric development of rivaroxaban according to the learn-and-confirm paradigm. The development strategy was to match pediatric drug exposures to adult exposure proven to be safe and efficacious. In this analysis, a refined pediatric PopPK model for rivaroxaban based on integrated EINSTEIN-Jr data and interim PK data from part A of the UNIVERSE phase III study was developed and the influence of potential covariates and intrinsic factors on rivaroxaban exposure was assessed. The model adequately described the observed pediatric PK data. PK parameters and exposure metrics estimated by the PopPK model were compared to the predictions from a previously published pediatric PBPK model for rivaroxaban. Ninety-one percent of the individual post hoc clearance estimates were found within the 5th to 95th percentile of the PBPK model predictions. In patients below 2 years of age, however, clearance was underpredicted by the PBPK model. The iterative and integrative use of PBPK and PopPK modeling and simulation played a major role in the establishment of the bodyweight-adjusted rivaroxaban dosing regimen that was ultimately confirmed to be a safe and efficacious dosing regimen for children aged 0 to 18 years with acute VTE in the EINSTEIN-Jr phase III study.

Effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor.

AIM: This study evaluated the effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban (10mg single dose), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. METHODS: Subjects (n= 32) were stratified based on measured creatinine clearance: healthy controls (≥80ml min(-1) ), mild (50-79mlmin(-1) ), moderate (30-49mlmin(-1) ) and severe impairment (<30mlmin(-1) ). RESULTS: Renal clearance of rivaroxaban decreased with increasing renal impairment. Thus, plasma concentrations increased and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) LS-mean values were 1.44-fold (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 1.9; mild), 1.52-fold (90% CI 1.2, 2.0; moderate) and 1.64-fold (90% CI 1.2, 2.2; severe impairment) higher than in healthy controls. Corresponding values for the LS-mean of the AUC for prolongation of prothrombin time were 1.33-fold (90% CI 0.92, 1.92; mild), 2.16-fold (90% CI 1.51, 3.10 moderate) and 2.44-fold (90% CI 1.70, 3.49 severe) higher than in healthy subjects, respectively. Likewise, the LS-mean of the AUC for Factor Xa inhibition in subjects with mild renal impairment was 1.50-fold (90% CI 1.07, 2.10) higher than in healthy subjects. In subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment, the increase was 1.86-fold (90% CI 1.34, 2.59) and 2.0-fold (90% CI 1.44, 2.78) higher than in healthy subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban clearance is decreased with increasing renal impairment, leading to increased plasma exposure and pharmacodynamic effects, as expected for a partially renally excreted drug. However, the influence of renal function on rivaroxaban clearance was moderate, even in subjects with severe renal impairment.