Expert survey on real-world data utilization and real-world evidence generation for regulatory decision-making in drug lifecycle in Korea.

As the importance of utilizing real-world data (RWD)/real-world evidence (RWE) for supporting regulatory scientific decision-making continues to grow, experiences and inputs from experts become crucial for developing a systematic and practice-oriented plan for the use of fit-for-purpose RWD/RWE. This study aimed to survey relevant experts from government agencies, industries, and academia to identify prerequisites for the drug life cycle in Korea. The questionnaire comprised the following: (A) the definition and categories of RWD/RWE, (B) the suitability and feasibility of using RWD/RWE at each authorization stage by the types of RWD, and (C) the challenges and solutions for the use of RWD/RWE. A total of 46 respondents completed the online survey, with 89.1% of them having prior experience with RWD/RWE usage. A majority of respondents agreed that RWD can be obtained from various sources. Among these sources, the registry was the most suitable source. It is suitable to compensate for the limitations of randomized control trials and ensure quality in data collection. Though there was consensus among the respondents for the use of RWD/RWE in post-marketing surveillance, the use of such data in new drug application (NDA) was disagreeable. Respondents considered it necessary to write a protocol in advance for RWD collection and RWE generation, for all RWD types. In conclusion, this study examined the perceptions of experts for RWD/RWE use at each approval stage of drugs. The results suggest that guidelines for the fit-for-purpose use of RWD/RWE should be developed via careful deliberation among experts in the future.

The Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation on Healthcare Costs and Clinical Outcomes Based on Frailty Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is preferred for treating severe aortic stenosis in older, frail populations, yet the impact of frailty on TAVI's economic and clinical outcomes is not well-studied. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 2,175 TAVI patients from 2015 to 2019 using Korea's National Health Insurance Service database, stratifying patients into low, intermediate, and high-frailty groups using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). Healthcare costs, admissions, and total length of hospitalization were analyzed using Wilcoxon-rank test 12 months pre- and post-TAVI. Composite endpoint of death, stroke, and major bleeding, with individual outcomes, were compared using Chi-squared tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 80.2 years, and 47.3% were male. 747 (34.3%) were low-frailty, 1,159 (53.3%) were moderate-frailty, and 269 (12.4%) were high-frailty. After TAVI, medical costs decreased in the intermediate (pre-TAVI: 2,269,000 KRW [1,668 USD], post-TAVI: 1,607,000 KRW [1,181 USD], p<0.001) and high frailty groups (pre-TAVI: 3,949,000 KRW [2,904 USD], post-TAVI: 2,188,000 KRW [1,609 USD], p<0.001). All frailty groups had shorter length of hospital stay post-TAVI (26 to 21 days in the low, 44 to 31 days in the intermediate, and 65 to 41 days in the high frailty group; all p<0.001). The composite outcome was higher in the frailer groups (27.8% in the low vs. 31.5% in the intermediate vs. and 37.9% in the high frailty group; p=0.008). All groups showed comparable rates of cardiovascular death, stroke or bleeding. CONCLUSION: TAVI is clinically viable and cost-saving treatment option for frail patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Estimating the Incidence-Based Cost of Illness Due to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using One-Year Insurance Claim Data in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term follow-up data are required for incidence-based cost-of-illness (COI) studies, and it is difficult to carry out such assessments. To overcome this limitation, we estimated the acute and maintenance-state costs of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using 1-year claim data. METHODS: Using Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) data from 2016, 2017, and 2018, we identified patients receiving HSCT based on the procedure code "X5*" (i.e., HSCT). The post-HSCT group was defined as patients without the "X5*" code, but with the code "Z948 (other transplanted conditions)" and indications of HSCT (referring to those who had received HSCT). Mean annual medical use and costs were computed using the monthly values available for each patient. RESULTS: The mean number of hospitalizations/year, outpatient visits per year, hospitalization days/year, and length of stay (LOS)/hospitalization were 8.14, 35.80, 97.16, and 14.72, respectively, for allogeneic HSCT patients (n = 56); 8.08, 33.58, 73.04, and 10.63, respectively, for autologous HSCT patients (n = 89); 2.93, 29.40, 50.95, and 20.84, respectively, for post-allogeneic HSCT patients (n = 40); and 1.72, 16.38, 30.11, and 19.29, respectively, for post-autologous HSCT patients (n = 252). The estimated annual NHI-covered medical costs (US dollars) were $38,833-$40,876 for the allogeneic HSCT group, $1749-$6744 for the post-allogeneic HSCT group, $21,231-$22,863 for the autologous HSCT group, and $3954-$5352 for the post-autologous HSCT group. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes an alternative method for conducting incidence-based COI studies using cross-sectional claims data.

Motivating factors of compliance to government's COVID-19 preventive guidelines: An investigation using discrete choice model.

BACKGROUND: The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in a worldwide pandemic. We aimed to identify the factors that motivate public compliance with the government's COVID-19 preventive recommendations. METHODS: Focus group interviews were conducted to identify influencing factors. The relative importance of each factor was investigated through a survey, based on a discrete choice model, from February to June, 2021 in South Korea. RESULTS: "Severity of COVID-19 symptoms" (relative importance [magnitude of attribute coefficients]: 28.40%) and "risk of infection" (27.50%) were the most influential health-related factors, followed by social consequences of infection, including "cessation of social activities due to self-quarantine" (19.77%), "risk of personal information being disclosed when infected and social criticism on the infected person" (15.78%), and "risk of spreading infection" (8.55%). Respondents behaved differently based on their socioeconomic characteristics and COVID-19 experience. DISCUSSION: The perceived severity of symptoms was a strong motivator among fragile individuals, such as women and older adults. "Cessation of social activities" was the most influential factor for those infected with COVID-19, while "risk of infection" was for those whose acquaintances were infected. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of information regarding COVID-19 to the public must be tailored based on an understanding of behavioral differences.

Role of Statins after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

The role of statins after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has not been well established in an Asian context. In this study, the use of statins and their association with long-term health outcomes were evaluated in patients undergoing EVAR using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Among the 8893 patients who underwent EVAR from 2008 to 2018, 3386 (38.1%) were on statins prior to the procedure. Patients using statins had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, such as hypertension (88.4% vs. 71.5%), diabetes mellitus (24.5% vs. 14.1%), and heart failure (21.6% vs. 13.1%), compared with non-users (all p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, statin use prior to EVAR was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.86, p = 0.002). Statin use following EVAR was associated with a lower risk of adverse events, but not significantly so. Patients on statins both preceding and following EVAR had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.91, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87, p = 0.007), compared with statin non-users. Among Korean patients undergoing EVAR, the persistent use of statins prior to and after the procedure was associated with a lower risk of mortality, compared with non-statin users.