Single low-dose targeted bevacizumab infusion in adult patients with steroid-refractory radiation necrosis of the brain: a phase II open-label prospective clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: There is an unmet need for safe and rapidly effective therapies for refractory brain radiation necrosis (RN). The aim of this prospective single-arm phase II trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single low-dose targeted bevacizumab infusion after blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) in adult patients with steroid-refractory brain RN. METHODS: Ten adults with steroid-refractory, imaging-confirmed brain RN were enrolled between November 2016 and January 2018 and followed for 12 months after treatment. Bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg was administered as a one-time targeted intra-arterial infusion immediately after BBBD. Primary outcomes included safety and > 25% decrease in lesion volume. Images were analyzed by a board-certified neuroradiologist blinded to pretrial diagnosis and treatment status. Secondary outcomes included changes in headache, steroid use, and functional status and absence of neurocognitive sequelae. Comparisons were analyzed using the Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U-test, linear mixed models, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and repeated-measures 1-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Ten adults (mean ± SD [range] age 35 ± 15 [22-62] years) participated in this study. No patients died or exhibited serious adverse effects of systemic bevacizumab. At 3 months, 80% (95% CI 44%-98%) and 90% (95% CI 56%-100%) of patients demonstrated > 25% decrease in RN and vasogenic edema volume, respectively. At 12 months, RN volume decreased by 74% (median [range] 76% [53%-96%], p = 0.012), edema volume decreased by 50% (median [range] 70% [-11% to 83%], p = 0.086), and headache decreased by 84% (median [range] 92% [58%-100%], p = 0.022) among the 8 patients without RN recurrence. Only 1 (10%) patient was steroid dependent at the end of the trial. Scores on 12 of 16 (75%) neurocognitive indices increased, thereby supporting a pattern of cerebral white matter recovery. Two (20%) patients exhibited RN recurrence that required further treatment at 10 and 11 months, respectively, after bevacizumab infusion. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, to the authors' knowledge, the authors demonstrated that a single low-dose targeted bevacizumab infusion resulted in durable clinical and imaging improvements in 80% of patients at 12 months after treatment without adverse events attributed to bevacizumab alone. These findings highlight that targeted bevacizumab may be an efficient one-time treatment for adults with brain RN. Further confirmation with a randomized controlled trial is needed to compare the intra-arterial approach with the conventional multicycle intravenous regimen. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02819479 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Prevention and Management of Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Tumor Treating Fields in Patients With Glioblastoma.

Importance: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are an anti-mitotic treatment approved for treating newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma, and mesothelioma. TTFields in glioblastoma comprise alternating electric fields (200 kHz) delivered continuously, ideally for ≥18 h/day, to the tumor bed via transducer arrays placed on the shaved scalp. When applied locoregionally to the tumor bed and combined with systemic temozolomide chemotherapy, TTFields improved overall survival vs. temozolomide alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Improved efficacy outcomes with TTFields were demonstrated, while maintaining a well-tolerated and manageable safety profile. The most commonly-reported TTFields-associated adverse events (AEs) are beneath-array dermatologic events. Since survival benefit from TTFields increases with duration-of-use, prevention and management of skin AEs are critical to maximize adherence. This paper describes TTFields-associated dermatological AEs and recommends prevention and management strategies based on clinical trial evidence and real-world clinical experience. Observations: TTFields-associated skin reactions include contact dermatitis (irritant/allergic), hyperhidrosis, xerosis or pruritus, and more rarely, skin erosions/ulcers and infections. Skin AEs may be prevented through skin-care and shifting (~2 cm) of array position during changes. TTFields-related skin AE management should be based on clinical phenotype and severity. Depending on diagnosis, recommended treatments include antibiotics, skin barrier films, moisturizers, topical corticosteroids, and antiperspirants. Water-based lotions, soaps, foams, and solutions with minimal impact on electrical impedance are preferred with TTFields use over petroleum-based ointments, which increase impedance. Conclusions: Early identification, prophylactic measures, and symptomatic skin AE management help patients maximize TTFields usage, while maintaining quality-of-life and optimizing therapeutic benefit. Implications for practice: TTFields confer a survival benefit in patients with glioblastoma that correlates positively with duration of daily use. Skin events (rash) are the primary treatment-related AE that can limit duration of use. The recommendations described here will help healthcare professionals to recognize, prevent, and manage dermatologic AEs associated with TTFields treatment. These recommendations may improve cutaneous health and support adherence to therapy, both of which would maximize treatment outcomes.

Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation.

PURPOSE: To explore the efficacy and safety of three regimens of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin as initial therapy and the feasibility of subsequent maintenance therapy versus observation in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred one patients were randomly assigned to one of the following arms: arm 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 6) on day 1; arm 2, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC = 2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks; or arm 3, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 cycle 1 and 100 mg/m2 cycle 2 and carboplatin (AUC = 2) weekly for 6 of 8 weeks. Patients who responded (n = 130) at week 16 were randomly assigned to either weekly paclitaxel therapy (70 mg/m2, 3 of 4 weeks; n = 65) or observation (n = 65). RESULTS: For the 390 assessable patients, the objective response rates observed with initial therapy were 32% for arm 1, 24% for arm 2, and 18% for arm 3. The median time to progression and median survival times were 30 and 49 weeks for arm 1, 21 and 31 weeks for arm 2, and 27 and 40 weeks for arm 3, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were 47% for arm 1, 31% for arm 2, and 41% for arm 3. CONCLUSION: Arm 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin (AUC = 6) administered on day 1, demonstrates the most favorable therapeutic index in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Localized BCNU chemotherapy and the multimodal management of malignant glioma.

BACKGROUND: Gliomas account for 42% of all primary CNS neoplasms and 77% of all malignant primary CNS neoplasms. Unfortunately the high-grade variant of gliomas, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is difficult to treat and generally considered incurable. Survival rates are generally poor, and neurological morbidity in the setting of disease progression is high. Fortunately, significant progress has been achieved in the past decade in our understanding of the molecular biology of this aggressive tumour histology and, as a consequence, there is renewed clinical trial activity in this area focused on improving quality of life, treatment-related morbidity and outcomes. METHODS: A review of literature from June 2005 to June 2008 was conducted on multimodal treatment of malignant glioma (MG) patients, using specific search criteria in Medline, EMBASE, and BIOSIS. Abstracts from relevant US and European medical (cancer) meetings were also evaluated. RESULTS: The established therapies for MG include surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and local or systemic chemotherapy. However, over the last 10 years only two chemotherapeutic agents have received regulatory approval for treatment of MG: polifeprosan 20 with carmustine (BCNU implant) and temozolomide (TMZ), an imidazotetrazine derivative of dacarbazine. More recent advances in the treatment of brain tumours have been in the development of multimodal approaches. Specific interest in the combination of BCNU implant and TMZ has arisen due to the demonstrable depletion by TMZ of the DNA repair enzyme responsible for resistance to a nitrosourea such as BCNU. Further interest in this combination stems from the observation that there is a difference in the time to peak effect for each agent. Additional emerging data suggest that multimodal therapy with maximal resection and BCNU implants, followed by adjuvant therapy with radiation and TMZ, is effective and well-tolerated in patients with initial high-grade, resectable MG. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing body of efficacy data suggests that this combination of BCNU implants and TMZ within a multimodal treatment strategy including surgery and RT may provide an enhanced benefit compared with the use of either of these agents alone in select patients with high-grade glioma.

Comparison of outcomes for elderly patients treated with weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus the standard 3-weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes between elderly (aged > or = 70 years) patients treated with paclitaxel on a weekly basis and with carboplatin (every 4 weeks) versus the standard 3-weekly regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel for first-line therapy of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. METHODS: Of the 444 patients enrolled, 136 (31%) were aged > or = 70 years. Seventy-two patients were randomized to the weekly schedule (paclitaxel, 100 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks; carboplatin, area under the curve [AUC] = 6 mg/mL.min on Day 1 every 4 weeks), and 64 patients were randomized to the standard schedule (paclitaxel, 225 mg/m(2); carboplatin, AUC = 6 mg/mL.min on Day 1 every 21 days). Patients with stable disease or objective response after 4 cycles of therapy were eligible for maintenance therapy with weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2), 3 of 4 weeks). RESULTS: The response rate for elderly patients was 26% on the weekly regimen and 19% on the standard schedule. The median survival duration for the weekly and the standard schedules was 37 weeks and 31 weeks, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were similar at 31% and 33%. Grade 3 to 4 anemia was more common on the weekly schedule (16% vs 6%), whereas grade 3 neuropathy was less common (5.5% vs 9.5%). Nausea and emesis were also less frequent on the weekly schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy was similar between the weekly regimen and the standard regimen of carboplatin and paclitaxel for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and may be advantageous based on its favorable tolerability profile.

A phase II study of higher dose docetaxel in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of single agent docetaxel at a higher dose than previously evaluated in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic and progressive AIPC were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with overt and rapid symptomatic deterioration from AIPC were entered into this study. Nine men achieved a reduction in PSA of >50% and 4 >80% for an overall PSA response of 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-73%). Sixty percent of men experienced pain relief. Of 16 subjects with measurable disease, 25% achieved partial response (95% CI, 0-48 months), 44% stable disease, and 31% progressed. Median time to progression was 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.9-6.1 month) and median survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.7-12.9 months). Toxicity was significant and included grade 3 or greater neutropenia (76%), dehydration (16%), thrombosis (8%), confusion (4%), and death (4%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is an active agent against AIPC and should be used judiciously. The side effect profile of the 100 mg/m dose was significant and cannot be recommended for everyday clinical practice.

Treatment of elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients with three different schedules of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin: subanalysis of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Administration of paclitaxel on a weekly schedule in combination with carboplatin is associated with a lower incidence of neuropathy and myelosuppression. The authors conducted subgroup analysis of their randomized phase II study of three different schedules of weekly paclitaxel with carboplatin to determine the efficacy of each regimen in elderly patients (aged > or = 70 years) with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to one of three different weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin regimens. After four cycles of chemotherapy, those with objective response or stable disease were randomized to weekly paclitaxel or observation as maintenance therapy. Four hundred three patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 111 (28%) were aged 70 years or older. RESULTS: The treatment regimen of weekly paclitaxel (100 mg/m for 3 of 4 weeks) and carboplatin (area under the curve = 6 mg/ml/min once every 4 weeks) (arm 1) was associated with the best therapeutic index overall. The median survival and 1-year survival rates were 11.3 months and 50% for patients in the > or =70 years cohort versus 11.2 months and 46% for the <70 years cohort in arm 1. Efficacy results were comparable between the two groups in the other arms as well. Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 13.6% and 2.3% in the > or =70 years cohort compared with 4.5% and 1.1% in the <70 years cohort in arm 1. CONCLUSION: The weekly regimen of paclitaxel administered in combination with carboplatin is tolerated well by elderly NSCLC patients and has comparable efficacy with younger patients.