High Vertical and Horizontal Stability at Short-Term Follow-Up After an All-Endoscopic Double Cerclage Endobutton Technique for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Separations.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations using an all-endoscopic double cerclage endobutton technique compared with an arthroscopic-assisted single-bundle endobutton technique and to analyze the complication, failure, and revision rates of both procedures. METHODS: All patients with acute Rockwood type IIIB and V AC joint separations who were operated on using an all-endoscopic double cerclage technique (2019-2022) or an arthroscopic-assisted single-bundle technique (2017-2019) were included. The follow-up period was at least 12 months. Clinical and radiographic assessment was performed at follow-up. Complications, failures, and revisions were also investigated. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (14 double cerclage group, 14 single-bundle group, all male) with an average age of 37 years (interquartile range [IQR], 15) were available for follow-up after 45 months (IQR, 38). The median time between trauma and surgery was 7 days (IQR, 8). Very good clinical results without significant differences were observed in both groups (Constant score, 94 [IQR, 12] vs 95 [IQR, 15], P = .427, AC joint instability score, 95 [IQR, 11] vs 87 [IQR, 22], P = .210). All patients returned to sport, with an average sports level of 95% compared with preoperative status. The single-bundle group showed significantly increased anteroposterior instability (6 vs 0, P = .006). A total of 5 complications occurred (2 vs 3), leading to 1 revision surgery in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent clinical results and high vertical and horizontal stability can be achieved with the all-endoscopic double cerclage technique. Horizontal instability occurred significantly more frequently with the single-bundle technique. The prolonged operation time in the double cerclage group had no negative impact on postoperative outcomes, including complication and failure rates, and a learning curve to reduce this prolonged operative time should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative clinical series.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer Does Not Reduce the Retear Rate for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a subacromial spacer decreases the recurrent rotator cuff tear rate in arthroscopically managed massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) with 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: We selected all patients who met the following criteria: (1) an MRCT excluding Collin type A, (2) Goutallier stage equal or less than 2, and (3) complete arthroscopic repair of the MRCT. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: A (without subacromial spacer) or B (with subacromial spacer) for a prospective evaluation 1 year after surgery. The primary outcome was the retear rate, determined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to the classification of Sugaya. Secondary outcome measures were the functional outcomes using visual analog score, Shoulder Subjective Value, and Constant-Murley Score. Preoperative rotator cuff characteristics such as number of tendons involved and the tear retraction also were evaluated. Patient-related data such as sex, age, laterality, history of smoking, and diabetes mellitus were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 31 patients were included in group A and 33 in group B. Preoperatively, only 2 differences were found between both groups: a significant (but not clinical) greater Constant score in group A (P = .034) and a slightly greater retraction of the supraspinatus in group B (P = .0025). The overall retear rate between the 2 groups was similar regarding the number of patients (P = .746) and the total number of tendons involved in the recurrent tear (P = .112). At 1-year follow-up, no differences were found in VAS (P = .397), SSV (P = .309), and Constant score (P = .105). CONCLUSIONS: In reparable massive rotator cuff tears (excluding Collin type A), the augmentation of repair with a subacromial spacer did not significantly reduce the number of patients with recurrent rotator cuff tears identified by MRI. It was also ineffective in reducing the number of re-ruptured tendons in these patients. No patient-reported or clinically significant findings were noted in Constant, SSV, and VAS scores at 1-year postoperative follow-up. Patients with MRI findings of a healed rotator cuff (Sugaya 1-3) had better clinical outcomes compared with those without. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Methodology and development of a machine learning probability calculator: Data heterogeneity limits ability to predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and train a machine learning (ML) algorithm to create a clinical decision support tool (i.e., ML-driven probability calculator) to be used in clinical practice to estimate recurrence rates following an arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). METHODS: Data from 14 previously published studies were collected. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients treated with ABR without remplissage for traumatic anterior shoulder instability and (2) a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Risk factors associated with recurrence were identified using bivariate logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, four ML algorithms were developed and internally validated. The predictive performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration and the Brier score. RESULTS: In total, 5591 patients underwent ABR with a recurrence rate of 15.4% (n = 862). Age <35 years, participation in contact and collision sports, bony Bankart lesions and full-thickness rotator cuff tears increased the risk of recurrence (all p < 0.05). A single shoulder dislocation (compared to multiple dislocations) lowered the risk of recurrence (p < 0.05). Due to the unavailability of certain variables in some patients, a portion of the patient data had to be excluded before pooling the data set to create the algorithm. A total of 797 patients were included providing information on risk factors associated with recurrence. The discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve) ranged between 0.54 and 0.57 for prediction of recurrence. CONCLUSION: ML was not able to predict the recurrence following ABR with the current available predictors. Despite a global coordinated effort, the heterogeneity of clinical data limited the predictive capabilities of the algorithm, emphasizing the need for standardized data collection methods in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Comparing postoperative proprioception of the glenohumeral joint between the open and the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder proprioception, in which the anterior glenohumeral capsule plays a major role, is critical to the functioning of the shoulder. Consequently, most surgeons either do not resect or reinsert the anterior capsule in shoulder stabilization surgery. In the original open Latarjet procedure (OLP), the anterior capsule is preserved. However, in the all-arthroscopic Latarjet procedure (ALP), complete anterior capsule resection is recommended for better view and access to the coracoid. This raises the question if there is a postoperative difference in proprioception between these 2 procedures. Therefore, the aims of this study are (1) to assess the difference in postoperative proprioception between the operated and healthy sides after the OLP and ALP and (2) to compare the difference in postoperative proprioception on the operated side between the OLP and ALP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis including all patients who underwent a proprioception test after an OLP or ALP at our center. Collected baseline characteristics included sex, age at surgery, operated side, hand dominance, presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion, and time between surgery and the proprioception test. For the test, patients were positioned 1 meter from a wall. They were blindfolded and had to point at a target with a laser pointer taped to their index finger. The laser point was marked and the errors were measured horizontally and vertically and categorized as <4 cm, 4-8 cm, 8-16 cm, and >16 cm. RESULTS: Between April 2022 and April 2024, a total of 91 cases were identified, of which 24 underwent an OLP and 67 underwent an ALP. No significant difference was found in error distribution between the healthy and operated side after both the OLP (P = .30 horizontally, P = .67 vertically) and ALP (P = .20 horizontally, P = .34 vertically). Moreover, there was no significant difference in error distribution between the operated sides after the OLP vs. ALP (P = .52 horizontally; P = .61 vertically). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that postoperative proprioception is not significantly different between the operated and healthy sides after both the OLP and ALP, nor between the operated sides after the OLP vs. after the ALP. This might imply that completely resecting the anterior glenohumeral capsule does not have a detrimental effect on shoulder proprioception. However, these results are multifactorial and prospective studies are needed to better understand the regeneration potential of glenohumeral capsule mechanoreceptors and the importance of the anterior capsule for shoulder proprioception.

Lateralising reverse shoulder arthroplasty using bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) or increasing glenoid component diameter: comparison of clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes in a matched cohort.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the range of motion (ROM) of reverse shoulder arthroplasty lateralised by bony increased offset (BIO-RSA) using a standard 38-mm (mm) component to regular reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) lateralised by using a 42-mm glenoid component. The secondary aims are to compare patient-reported and radiographic outcomes between the two groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with a BIO-RSA and size 38 glenosphere were retrospectively identified and matched to patients with a regular RSA and size 42 glenosphere. Matched patients were invited for a follow-up visit. ROM was assessed as well as radiographic outcomes (lateralisation, distalisation, inferior overhang, scapular notching, heterotopic bone formation, radiolucency, stress shielding, bone graft healing and viability and complications) and patient-reported outcomes (subjective shoulder value, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, activities of daily living which require internal rotation, activities of daily living which require external rotation and a visual analogue scale for pain). Outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, 38 BIO-RSAs with a size 38 glenosphere were matched to 38 regular RSAs with a size 42 glenosphere. Of the 76 matched patients, 74 could be contacted and 70 (95%) were included. At the final follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups in ROM, patient-reported outcomes or radiographic outcomes (p > 0.485). CONCLUSIONS: Using a larger glenosphere is a feasible alternative to BIO-RSA for lateralising RSA, providing comparable ROM, patient-reported and radiographic results, while potentially decreasing costs, operative time and complication rates.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 155° neck-shaft angle inlay implant design without reattachment of the subscapularis tendon results in satisfactory functional internal rotation and no instability: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to use the Activities of Daily Living which require Internal Rotation (ADLIR) questionnaire to assess the functional internal rotation in patients who had undergone reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) without reattachment of the subscapularis (SSc) tendon at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The secondary aim was to report the objective range of motion (ROM) and the rate of postoperative instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive primary RSA procedures without reattachment of the SSc tendon that were performed using a Delta Xtend prosthesis (an inlay system with a 155° neck-shaft angle) between January 2015 and December 2020 were identified to ensure a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were contacted and requested to fill in several questionnaires, including the ADLIR and Auto-Constant scores. RESULTS: In total, 210 patients met the inclusion criteria; among those patients, 187 could be contacted and 151 completed questionnaires (response rate: 81%). The SSc tendon was fully detached without repair in all cases, and a superolateral approach was used in 130 (86%) cases. The median follow-up was 4.5 years (range: 2.0-7.6). At final follow-up, the mean ADLIR score was 88/100 (interquartile range (IQR): 81-96). The median level reached in internal rotation was the 3rd lumbar vertebra (IQR: lumbosacral region-12th thoracic vertebra). Of the 210 eligible patients, one required a revision for a dislocation within the first month after primary surgery. With regards to regression analysis with ADLIR score as the outcome, none of the factors were associated with the ADLIR score, although age and smoking approached significance (0.0677 and 0.0594, respectively). None of the explanatory variables were associated with ROM in internal rotation (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that satisfactory ADLIR scores and internal rotation ROM were obtained at mid-term follow-up after RSA leaving the SSc detached. Leaving the SSc detached also did not lead to high instability rates; only one out of 210 prostheses was revised for dislocation within the first month after primary surgery.

Functional and radiographic outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, few studies have been published reporting the long-term outcomes of RSA. This study aims to report the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of the Delta Xtend reverse shoulder prosthesis, performed by a single surgeon and with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. METHODS: All RSA procedures performed between 2005 and 2012 were identified. Patients were contacted and invited for a follow-up visit including clinical assessment, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures. Patients with a follow-up of less than 10 years were excluded. The revision-free implant survival was calculated at 10 years. Between 2005 and 2012, 119 procedures in 116 patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Of these patients, 35 were deceased before reaching the 10-year follow-up and 23 could not be reached. In total, 63 RSAs could be included in 61 patients (response rate: 75%). The median follow-up was 11.7 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.5-13.2). RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 7 patients underwent a revision after a median of 3 years (IQR: 0.2-9.8) during the total follow-up period. The 10-year implant survival was 94% (95% confidence interval: 84-98). At final follow-up, the median anterior elevation was 135° (IQR: 130°-160°), the median abduction was 120° (IQR: 100°-135°), and the median level reached with internal rotation was L5 (IQR: sacrum-L5). The median Auto-Constant score was 68 (IQR: 53-78), the median Subjective Shoulder Value was 80 (IQR: 70-93), and the median pain score was 0.2/10 (IQR: 0-2). In total, radiographs could be obtained in 25 patients (40%). Scapular notching occurred in 10 patients (40%), which was classified as Sirveaux-Nerot grade IV in 3 patients (12%). Ossification occurred in 10 patients (40%), and stress shielding in 2 patients (8%). Radiolucencies were observed around the humeral component in 24 patients (96%) and around the glenoid component in 13 patients (52%). CONCLUSION: The long-term results of RSA with a Delta Xtend prosthesis are favorable, with long-term improvement in range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures, and a satisfactory implant survival rate. Interestingly, the radiographical analysis showed high prevalence of signs associated with loosening, which did not seem to translate to high complication rates or inferior results.

Correlation between preoperative clinical examination and intraoperatively found subscapularis tendon tear.

PURPOSE: Analyze the diagnostic value for subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears, their correlation between pain and strength on clinical tests, and compare them with intraoperative arthroscopic findings to prove their diagnostic value. METHODS: 110 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were reviewed and allocated to isolated SSC (n = 39) and combined anterosuperior tendon tear (n = 71) groups and analyzed. Preoperative clinical testing included belly press (BPT), bear hug (BHT), lift-off (LOT), palm-up (PUT), and Jobe test (JT). All tests were performed in two categories: pain (in 4 categories: 0, 5, 10, and 15) and strength (from 0 to 5). The tendon tears were intraoperatively reviewed and classified. RESULTS: Mean age was 59 years (SD 10). The sensitivity of the BHT was 88.2% and 74.5% for BPT, while specificity was only 41.9% for BHT and 45% for BPT. Sensitivity of JT was 90.5% and 87.5% for PUT, while specificity was only 41% for JT and 28.2% for PUT. A low positive correlation for an intraoperative SSC lesion and the strength of BPT (Spearman rank correlation - 0.425; p value < 0.0001) and the strength of BHT ( - 0.362; p value = 0.001) could be found. With linear regression analysis estimated by ordinary least squares, a correlation between BPT strength and surgical grade of SSC lesion (- 0.528; 95% CI, - 0.923 to - 0.133; pvalue < 0.01) was found. CONCLUSION: The BHT showed a higher sensitivity for a SSC lesion, while the BPT had a higher correlation between preoperative testing, most notably internal rotation strength, and intraoperative surgical grade of the SSC tendon lesion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prospective cohort study for Diagnostic tests.

Acceptable Long-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bone Grafting for Recurrent Posterior Shoulder Instability: Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.

PURPOSE: To examine the long-term clinical outcome associated with arthroscopically placed autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for recurrent posterior shoulder instability. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2013, patients treated with posterior ICBG and a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. Clinical outcome of patients operated with a posterior ICBG was analyzed with multiple patient-reported outcome measures included Constant (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scores, shoulder subjective value, and pain visual analog score. Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking the patients their overall level of satisfaction at last follow-up on a 1 to 10 scale. RESULTS: In total, 18 patients (19 shoulders) were included. At a mean follow-up of 7.3 years (range, 5-10 years), patients had significant improvements in their mean CS from 63 (standard deviation [SD] 18) to 80 (SD 18; P = .005), ASES from 57 (SD 18) to 81 (SD 18; P = .003), Walch-Duplay from 34 (SD 31) to 79 (SD 22; P < .001), and Rowe score from 37 (SD 23) to 79 (SD 24; P < .001). Pain level decreased from 5.6 (SD 2.5) preoperative to 2.3 (SD 2.3; P < .001) and shoulder subjective value improved 58 (SD 20) to 76 (SD 24; P = .002). Global satisfaction with the procedure was 8.4 (SD 2.1). Clinical significance was met or exceeded by 84% for CS and 89% of the patients for ASES and 95% met or exceeded satisfaction threshold for CS. There were 7 shoulders (37%) reoperated for symptomatic screw irritation. CONCLUSIONS: This series reporting on the long-term follow-up after arthroscopic posterior ICBG for recurrent posterior shoulder instability demonstrates, despite a high number of reoperations for symptomatic screw irritation, its effectiveness with acceptable clinical outcomes and satisfied patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, therapeutic case series.

The V-shaped subscapularis tenotomy for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Management of the subscapularis tendon during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains controversial. In our unit, subscapularis tenotomy is the preferred technique; however, the potential for tendon gapping and failure is recognised. The purpose of this study is to describe and provide early clinical results of a novel, laterally based V-shaped tenotomy (VT) technique hypothesised to provide greater initial repair strength and resistance to gapping than a transverse tenotomy (TT), with both clinically and radiologically satisfactory post-operative tendon healing and function. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent primary TSA with VT over a three year period was performed using shoulder and subscapularis-specific outcome scores, radiographs, and ultrasound. A separate cohort of patients who underwent TSA using a subscapularis sparing approach was also reviewed to provide comparative clinical outcomes of a group with TSA and an un-violated subscapularis. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were reviewed at mean 30.4 months (± 11.7). Constant (78.2 ± 12.3), UCLA (8.4 ± 1.5), pain VAS (2.3 ± 2.8), and strength in internal rotation were no different from the comparison group. Likewise, neither were the clinical outcomes of range-of-motion, belly-press, lift-off, and shirt-tuck tests. One patient (5.5%) was found to have a failed subscapularis repair on ultrasound. CONCLUSION: VT during TSA appears to provide healing rates at least equal to those reported for TT, and not dissimilar from those of lesser tuberosity osteotomy. Clinical outcomes are comparable to reported results in the literature for alternative techniques, and not different from those observed here in a comparison cohort with TSA performed without violating the subscapularis tendon. VT therefore potentially offers a more effective and secure tendon repair than a traditional TT, with at least comparable clinical outcomes.

Learning Curves in the Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure: A Multicenter Analysis of the First 25 Cases of 5 International Surgeons.

PURPOSE: To analyze the learning curves of 5 experienced, fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons and their respective 25 first arthroscopic Latarjet cases in regard to surgical time, graft placement, complication rates, and recurrent instability. METHODS: The first 25 arthroscopic Latarjet procedures of 5 surgeons were retrospectively analyzed in an international multicenter setting, and thus 125 patients were included in this study. The surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative events out of the ordinary, and graft positioning were examined. RESULTS: The 125 patients consisted of 16 women (12.8%) and 109 men (87.2%). In 81.6% (n = 102), surgery was undertaken as a first-line procedure, whereas 18.4% (n = 23) were revisions. Surgical time decreased significantly from an average of 123.8 minutes (range 70 to 210) to 92.6 minutes (range 50 to 160) from the first 5 cases to the last 5 cases of each surgeon within a period of <2 years. Overall, 22 events in 21 patients requiring additional treatment were reported (17.6%). Five (4%) were unlikely to affect final outcome and did not require revision surgery. Twelve (9.6%) required revision surgery that was not trauma related yet was prone to affect outcomes. Five events were trauma-related (4%), 4 requiring revision surgery and 1 treated conservatively. Overall, 6 patients (4.8%) had recurrent shoulder instability, 3 as a result of a traumatic event. Conventional radiology showed the bone-block in ideal positioning in 93 cases (74.4%), flush with the glenoid in a true anteroposterior view. In 3 cases (2.4%), it was considered too high, 15 too low (12%), 5 too lateral (4%), and 15 too medial (12%). Some patients had combinations of the above. CONCLUSION: This analysis shows that surgical time in arthroscopic Latarjet can be significantly reduced after only 20 cases. However, complication rates did not decrease over this time. The authors believe that the arthroscopic Latarjet is a challenging yet viable technique to treat anterior shoulder instability, achieving results equal to the open technique with advantages of the arthroscopic setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

The new LassoLoop360° technique for biomechanically superior tissue grip.

PURPOSE: Suprapectoral tenodesis is a frequently used technique for treating pathologies of the long head of the biceps brachii (LHBB) tendon. However, so far, no Gold Standard treatment exist. Hence, the arthroscopic LassoLoop360 (LL360) technique is introduced aiming to provide secure fixation and improved biomechanical properties. It was hypothesized, that the LL360 technique would show superior biomechanical response to cyclic loading and ultimate load-to-failure testing compared to the commonly used simple Lasso Loop (SLL). METHODS: Twenty-two porcine superficial flexor digitorum tendons were prepared using a No. 2 suture according to either the SLL or the LL360 technique. Displacement after cyclic loading (1.000 cycles) between 5 and 30 N, ultimate load-to-failure (ULTF), mode of failure as well as the construct stiffness were tested. RESULTS: Significantly less displacement was found in the LL360 group (SLL 2.25 ± 0.51 mm; LL360 1.67 ± 0.37 mm; p = 0.01). Ultimate Load to Failure was significantly higher in the LL360 (168.6 ± 29.6 N) as compared to the SLL (124.1 ± 25.8 N, p = 0.02). The LL360 also revealed a significant higher stiffness compared to the SLL (SLL 13.1 ± 0.9 N/mm vs. LL360 19.1 ± 1.0 N/mm, p < 0.001). The most common mode of failure was the suture cutting through the tendon, with a significantly less suture cutting through for the LL360 compared with the SLL (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The LassoLoop360-technique offers superior biomechanical characteristics regarding the tendon-suture-interface compared to the SLL. In the initial healing phase, the suture-tendon-interface is the most vulnerable part of the tendon-suture-anchor construct, the aim of this new technique is to reduce this weakest part of the chain (Ponce et al., Am J Sports Med 39:188-194, 2011). This technique may therefore be beneficial for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis at the entrance of the bicipital groove.

Functional improvements in active elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with isolated latissimus dorsi transfer: surgical technique and midterm follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS: This study investigated the hypothesis that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in combination with an isolated latissimus dorsi tendon (LDT) transfer in patients with pseudoparalysis of abduction and external rotation (combined loss of active elevation and external rotation [CLEER] syndrome) would demonstrate improved postoperative functional results. METHODS: This study was a retrospective single-surgeon case series of 13 consecutive patients with CLEER who underwent RSA without subscapularis repair and combined with an isolated LDT transfer. We reviewed 10 patients (77%), at a minimum of 2 years, with 3 cases lost to follow-up. Shoulder function was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Constant score and postoperatively using the Oxford Shoulder Score, University of California-Los Angeles score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, ADLEIR (activities of daily living [ADLs] requiring active external and internal rotation) score, and ADLIR (ADLs requiring active internal rotation) score. Force in internal rotation (IR) at 0° of abduction, external rotation (ER) at 0° of abduction, and ER at 90° of abduction, as well as IR in the belly-press position, was measured. RESULTS: The mean postoperative follow-up period was 57 months (range, 31-85 months). We observed improvement in the Constant score (from 29.8 ± 6.64 preoperatively to 71.9 ± 10.45 postoperatively, P < .05), as well as abduction force, ER, and forward elevation (P < .05). Postoperatively, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 95.1 ± 3.38 and the mean Oxford Shoulder Score was 46.6 ± 1.57. Mean force in IR at 0° of abduction was 5.45 ± 2.42 kg, and mean force in ER at 90° of abduction was 4 ± 1.20 kg. Mean force in ER at 0° of abduction (3.65 ± 1.24 kg) and IR in the belly-press position (4.5 ± 2.84 kg) demonstrated a positive correlation with ADLs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that RSA without subscapularis repair, combined with an isolated LDT transfer, provides improved postoperative functional outcomes for patients with CLEER while maintaining sufficiently balanced force in IR and ER to effectively perform ADLs.

Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques: Graft and Fixation Positioning Assessed With 2-Dimensional Computed Tomography Is Not Equivalent With Standard Open Technique.

PURPOSE: To analyze graft and fixation (screw and EndoButton) positioning after the arthroscopic Latarjet technique with 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and to compare it with the open technique. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study (March 2013 to June 2014). The inclusion criteria included patients with recurrent anterior instability treated with the Latarjet procedure. The exclusion criterion was the absence of a postoperative CT scan. The positions of the hardware, the positions of the grafts in the axial and sagittal planes, and the dispersion of values (variability) were compared. RESULTS: The study included 208 patients (79 treated with open technique, 87 treated with arthroscopic Latarjet technique with screw fixation [arthro-screw], and 42 treated with arthroscopic Latarjet technique with EndoButton fixation [arthro-EndoButton]). The angulation of the screws was different in the open group versus the arthro-screw group (superior, 10.3° ± 0.7° vs 16.9° ± 1.0° [P < .001]; inferior, 10.3° ± 0.8° vs 15.7° ± 0.9° [P < .0001]). The angulation of the EndoButtons was 5.7° ± 0.5°; this was different from that of open inferior screws (P = .003). In the axial plane (level of equator), the arthroscopic techniques resulted in lateral positions (arthro-screw, 1.5 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .001]; arthro-EndoButton, 0 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .0001]) versus the open technique (0.9 ± 0.2 mm medial). At the level of 25% of the glenoid height, the arthroscopic techniques resulted in lateral positions (arthro-screw, 0.3 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .001]); (arthro-EndoButton, 0.7 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .0001]) versus the open technique (1.0 ± 0.2 mm medial). Higher variability was observed in the arthro-screw group. In the sagittal plane, the arthro-screw technique resulted in higher positions (55% ± 3% of graft below equator) and the arthro-EndoButton technique resulted in lower positions (82% ± 3%, P < .0001) versus the open technique (71% ± 2%). Variability was not different. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the position of the fixation devices and position of the bone graft with the arthroscopic techniques are statistically significantly different from those with the open technique with 2-dimensional CT assessment. In the sagittal plane, the arthro-screw technique provides the highest positions, and the arthro-EndoButton technique, the lowest. Overall, the mean position of the bone block with the open Latarjet technique in the axial plane is slightly medial to the joint line, as recommended. Conversely, with the arthroscopic techniques, the bone grafts are more lateral with a slight overhang. The main differences are observed in the dispersion of the values (more extreme positions) with the arthro-screw technique, given the acknowledged limitations. Despite the statistical significance, the clinical significance of these differences is yet unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Arthroscopic Double-Layer Lasso Loop Technique to Repair Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the arthroscopic double-layer lasso loop repair technique for delaminated posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Forty-one patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of a delaminated posterosuperior rotator cuff tear by the double-layer lasso loop technique. Their preoperative and postoperative clinical and functional scores were compared to evaluate surgical outcomes. The prerequisite for inclusion was a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. We excluded patients with a history of shoulder surgery before the double-layer lasso loop repair. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements (P < .001) were found in the Constant score (54 vs 83) and University of California, Los Angeles functional score (6.4 vs 9.5). Pain and strength improved according to the Jobe test, bear-hug test, belly-press test, Gerber lift-off test, and external rotation test (P < .001). No significant difference in strength was noted between the operated and nonoperated sides. There was only 1 complete rerupture (3.1%), whereas 5 patients (15.6%) had partial ruptures. CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic double-layer lasso loop repair technique for delaminated posterosuperior rotator cuff tears is an effective procedure. Our series showed a low rerupture rate. At a mean follow-up of 44 months, postoperative recovery with resultant functional, pain, and patient satisfaction scores was good to excellent and was comparable with the nonoperated side. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Arthroscopic double bone block augmentation is a salvage procedure for anterior and posterior shoulder instability secondary to glenoid bone loss.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe a one-step arthroscopic anterior and posterior bone block augmentation technique for bidirectional shoulder instability and to present preliminary results. METHODS: Seven consecutive patients who underwent a concomitant anterior and posterior bone block procedure between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical scores, return to sport rate, and complications were assessed. Radiological outcome, with CT scan at 6 months and plain radiographs at final follow-up were reviewed. Patient reported functional outcomes were also assessed via phone or email interview. RESULTS: Seven consecutive patients were included in the study with a median age at surgery of 27 years. Median clinical and radiological follow-up was 7 months (4-72 months). Walch-Duplay score and Rowe scores were improved. Four patients were able to return to sport. One patient experienced recurrent dislocation, and one subjective instability/subluxation without confirmed recurrence. CT scan showed union in all cases, with one case of anterior bone block osteolysis and one case of partial posterior bone block osteolysis. Radiographs showed no detectable progression of osteoarthritis using the Samilson and Prieto classification. At final follow-up the median WOSI score was 187 (100-1140). CONCLUSIONS: An all-arthroscopic technique for the treatment of combined anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss as a cause of shoulder instability can provide fair to good clinical outcomes, with a low incidence of intra-operative complications. The rate of failure in our series remains higher than that seen in primary stabilization procedures. As such we consider this largely as a salvage procedure for cases in which alternative treatments have failed or are unlikely to succeed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

All-Endoscopic Brachial Plexus Complete Neurolysis for Idiopathic Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Prospective Case Series.

PURPOSE: To describe an all-endoscopic technique for infra- and supraclavicular brachial plexus (BP) neurolysis and to assess its functional outcomes for patients suffering from nonspecific neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2013, 36 patients presenting an idiopathic nonspecific NTOS benefited from an endoscopic decompression in our institution. The inclusion criteria were a typical clinical NTOS and failure of a 6-month well-conducted nonsurgical treatment. Preoperative findings about other shoulder conditions and complementary procedures were exclusion criteria. Interscalene, costoclavicular, and retropectoralis minor spaces were released endoscopically. The primary endpoint was the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score improvement 6 months after the surgery. Postoperative criteria such as pain relief, paresthesia, upper limb weakness, and provocative tests were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 36 patients, 10 were excluded and 5 were lost during follow-up. The data of the 21 remaining patients were analyzed after 6 months. Pre- and postoperative mean DASH scores were, respectively, 70 (range 36-98) and 34 (range 2-91). The average improvement was 36 (range -20 to 80), with P = .0002. Pain and paresthesia were relieved in 80% to 90% of the cases. No complication was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although requiring arthroscopic skills and expert knowledge of the anatomy, our technique seems to be safe and reproducible, and it provides significant functional improvements in the selected patients with nonspecific NTOS, with an average postoperative DASH score improvement of 36%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

All-Arthroscopic Revision Eden-Hybinette Procedure for Failed Instability Surgery: Technique and Preliminary Results.

PURPOSE: To describe the technique of an all-arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure in the revision setting for treatment of a failed instability procedure, particularly after failed Latarjet, as well as to present preliminary results of this technique. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, 18 shoulders with persistent instability after failed instability surgery were treated with an arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette technique using an autologous bicortical iliac crest bone graft. Of 18 patients, 12 (9 men, 3 women) were available for follow-up. The average follow-up was 28.8 months (range, 15 to 60 months). A Latarjet procedure was performed as an index surgery in 10 patients (83%). Two patients (17%) had a prior arthroscopic Bankart repair. RESULTS: Eight patients (67%) obtained a good or excellent result, whereas 4 patients (33%) reported a fair or poor result. Seven patients (58%) returned to sport activities. A positive apprehension test persisted in 5 patients (42%), including 2 patients (17%) with recurrent subluxations. The Rowe score increased from 30.00 to 78.33 points (P < .0001). The Walch-Duplay score increased from 11.67 to 76.67 points (P < .0001). The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score showed a good result of 28.71% (603 points). The average anterior flexion was 176° (range, 150° to 180°), and the average external rotation was 66° (range, 0° to 90°). Two patients (16.67%) showed a progression of glenohumeral osteoarthritic changes, with each patient increasing by one stage in the Samilson-Prieto classification. All 4 patients (33%) with a fair or poor result had a nonunion identified on postoperative computed tomography scan. CONCLUSIONS: An all-arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure in the revision setting for failed instability surgery, although technically demanding, is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique. Although the learning curve is considerable, this procedure offers all the advantages of arthroscopic surgery and allows reconstruction of glenoid defects and restoration of shoulder stability in this challenging patient population. In our hands, this procedure yields good or excellent results in 67% of patients. Successful outcome is correlated with bony healing of the iliac crest graft to the glenoid. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Identification of a Remodeled Neo-tendon After Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure.

PURPOSE: To macroscopically, histologically, and radiologically describe a time-dependent remodeling process of a neo-tendon or -ligament in the shoulder after the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. METHODS: During follow-up surgery after the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure, 17 shoulders in 16 patients were evaluated for a remodeled tendon-like structure. The mean overall follow-up period was 27.4 months. The mean time between the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and revision was 11.6 months. All shoulders were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging, and seven histologic specimens were obtained during revision surgery. RESULTS: A distinct, oriented strand of tissue was found in 16 of 17 shoulders on revision surgery. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging analyses showed a signal-free, longitudinal tendon-like structure originating at the tip of the acromion, traversing the space of the former subcoracoid bursa to attach in the course of the transposed conjoint tendon or the proximal short head of the biceps. Histologic analysis of seven specimens showed a characteristic timeline of remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: A tendon- or ligament-like structure is remodeled between the anterior bottom tip of the acromion and the transposed coracoid process in a time-dependent manner after the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Patients in Whom Arthroscopic Bankart Repair is Not Enough: Evaluation and Management of Complex Anterior Glenohumeral Instability.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair has become the most common treatment option for patients who have anterior shoulder instability. Although arthroscopic Bankart repair is generally an effective treatment method, it may be insufficient for the treatment of many patients who have anterior shoulder instability. Risk factors for failure of arthroscopic Bankart repair include younger age, level and type of sport, and shoulder specific risks, such as ligamentous laxity and the presence of bone loss. Recently, researchers have defined the limits of arthroscopic Bankart repair and more clearly defined treatment options for patients who have a high risk for failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Surgeons must recognize patients with anterior shoulder instability in whom a more aggressive surgical approach should be considered as well as patients who have a high risk for failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair to optimize outcomes in this patient population.