A review of 100 patients transported on extracorporeal life support.

Between May 1990 and January 1999, 100 patients (68 adult, 32 pediatric) with severe respiratory or cardiac instability were successfully transported to the University of Michigan Medical Center on extracorporeal life support. Diagnoses included adult respiratory distress syndrome (n = 78), cardiac failure (n = 7), sepsis (n = 7), asthma (n = 5), respiratory distress syndrome (of newborn) (n = 2), and airway compromise (n = 1). Of the patients, 53 were supported with venovenous bypass and 47 with venoarterial bypass. Patients were transported by ground ambulance (n = 80), helicopter (n = 15), or fixed-wing aircraft (n = 5). The median transport distance was 44 miles (range 2-790 miles), and the median transport time was 5 hours and 30 minutes (range: 1 h 33 min to 16 h 6 min). Sixty-six patients (66%) survived to discharge. One death occurred during cannulation, and two patients died before cannulation began. Complications that occurred during transport included 10 cases of electrical failure, 3 cases of circuit tubing leakage, and 1 case each of circuit rupture, membrane lung thrombosis, and membrane lung leakage. None of the complications occurring during transport had an adverse effect on outcome. We conclude that the long distance transport of patients on extracorporeal life support can be safely accomplished and is an effective option for the unstable patient with severe respiratory or cardiac failure.

Two decades' experience with interfacility transport on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Interfacility transport of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been performed in large numbers at only a few programs. Limited data are available on outcomes after ECMO transport to justify expanding or discontinuing these programs. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a 20-year, single-institution experience with interhospital ECMO transport as well as a systematic review of reports of transfers of patients on ECMO. Results of both were compared with historical data from the international registry of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2012, ECMO was used to facilitate transport of 221 patients to our institution, and 135 (62%) survived to discharge. Review of an additional 27 case series describing ECMO transport of 643 patients showed an overall survival of 61%. After stratifying by age and primary indication for ECMO, survival of transported patients was not significantly different compared with all ECMO patients in the ELSO registry, with the exception of pediatric patients treated for respiratory failure (transported patients in this category had higher survival than those in the ELSO registry). CONCLUSIONS: Interfacility transport on ECMO is feasible and can be accomplished safely in the critically ill. Survival of transported patients is comparable to age-matched and treatment-matched ECMO patients at large.