Bispectral index dynamics during propofol hypnosis is similar in red-haired and dark-haired subjects.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that red hair is associated with increased desflurane requirement for immobility, compared with dark hair. The effect of red hair on IV anesthetic requirement remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that the propofol concentration in the effect site associated with half maximal electroencephalogram response, Ce50, is at least 50% higher in subjects with red hair. METHODS: We modeled the propofol concentration versus electroencephalogram response relationship using a 2-step approach in 29 healthy dark- and red-haired volunteers receiving a propofol infusion to produce loss of consciousness. Bispectral Index (BIS) was the measure of drug effect. The parameters of a 3-compartment pharmacokinetic model were fit to measured arterial propofol concentrations. The relationship between effect-site propofol concentration (Ce) and BIS was characterized using a sigmoid Emax model. Model performance and accuracy of the estimated parameters were evaluated using accepted metrics and bootstrap resampling. The effect of hair color on the Ce50 for BIS response in the final model was assessed using a threshold of 6.63 (P<0.01) in reduction of -2 log likelihood. The influence of body weight on the model was also assessed. RESULTS: The inclusion of hair color as a model covariate did not improve either the pharmacokinetic or the pharmacodynamic model. A separate analysis for the dark- and red-haired subjects estimated a median (95% confidence interval) Ce50 BIS of 2.71 µg/mL (2.28-3.36 µg/mL) and 2.57 µg/mL (1.68-3.60 µg/mL), respectively. Body weight was a significant covariate for the CL1 and V1. CONCLUSIONS: Red hair phenotype does not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of propofol.

The effects of nefopam on the gain and maximum intensity of shivering in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Mild hypothermia has been shown to improve neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. Nefopam, a centrally acting, nonsedative analgesic, decreases the threshold of shivering, but not vasoconstriction, and thus might be a suitable drug for induction of therapeutic hypothermia. However, not only the threshold but also the gain and maximum intensity of shivering define the thermoregulatory properties of a drug and thus are clinically important. Therefore, we evaluated the gain and maximum intensity of shivering at 2 different doses of nefopam and placebo. METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to 3 study days: (1) control (saline), (2) small-dose nefopam (50 ng/mL), and (3) large-dose nefopam (100 ng/mL). On all study days volunteers were cooled using central venous infusion of cold IV fluid while mean skin temperature was maintained at 31 degrees C. Core temperature was recorded at the tympanic membrane. Threshold, gain, and maximum intensity of shivering were evaluated using oxygen consumption. RESULTS: Both 50 and 100 ng/mL nefopam significantly reduced the shivering threshold as well as the gain of shivering: shivering threshold: 35.6 degrees C + or - 0.2 degrees C (control); 35.2 degrees C + or - 0.3 degrees C (small dose); 34.9 degrees C + or - 0.5 degrees C (large dose), P = 0.004; gain of shivering: 597 + or - 235 mL x min(-1) x degrees C(-1) (control); 438 + or - 178 mL x min(-1) x degrees C(-1) (small dose); 301 + or - 134 mL x min(-1) x degrees C(-1) (large dose), P = 0.028. Maximum intensity of shivering did not differ among the 3 treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Nefopam significantly reduced the gain of shivering. This reduction, in combination with a reduced shivering threshold, will allow clinicians to cool patients even further when therapeutic hypothermia is indicated.

Managing chronic whiplash associated pain with a combination of low-dose opioid (remifentanil) and NMDA-antagonist (ketamine).

The aim was to investigate the efficacy of a combination of low-dose remifentanil (REMI) and ketamine (KET) compared to the single drugs and placebo (P) on whiplash associated pain (WAD) in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Twenty patients with chronic (>1 year) WAD were included. Four different drug combinations were tested in four sessions: placebo/placebo (P/P), placebo/remifentanil (P/REMI), ketamine/placebo (KET/P) and ketamine/remifentanil (KET/REMI). Target concentrations were 1 and 2ng/ml (stepwise) for remifentanil and 100ng/ml for ketamine. Habitual pain intensity was assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Experimental pain was assessed with electrical stimulation (single and repeated) of tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, pressure pain algometry applied over infraspinatus (IS) and TA muscles and VAS scores after intramuscular hypertonic saline infusion in TA. KET/REMI significantly reduced habitual pain. KET/REMI infused at low REMI target concentration (1ng/ml) significantly elevated electrical intramuscular pain thresholds (single and repeated). Pain thresholds to electrical stimulation were similarly increased by both P/REMI and KET/REMI at 2ng/ml target concentration. Pressure pain thresholds were increased by both KET/REMI and P/REMI. VAS-scores after intramuscular saline were also similarly decreased by both REMI combinations. Seven out of 20 subjects were non-responders (<50% pain relief). No correlation was found between effects on spontaneous pain and experimental pain. KET/REMI showed an analgesic effect on habitual pain. Experimental pain was attenuated by both combinations containing the opioid, however, KET seemed to enhance the effect of REMI on electrical pain thresholds when a low REMI target concentration was used.

Meperidine and skin surface warming additively reduce the shivering threshold: a volunteer study.

INTRODUCTION: Mild therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to improve outcome for patients after cardiac arrest and may be beneficial for ischaemic stroke and myocardial ischaemia patients. However, in the awake patient, even a small decrease of core temperature provokes vigorous autonomic reactions-vasoconstriction and shivering-which both inhibit efficient core cooling. Meperidine and skin warming each linearly lower vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. We tested whether a combination of skin warming and a medium dose of meperidine additively would reduce the shivering threshold to below 34 degrees C without producing significant sedation or respiratory depression. METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers participated on four study days: (1) control, (2) skin warming (with forced air and warming mattress), (3) meperidine (target plasma level: 0.9 mug/ml), and (4) skin warming plus meperidine (target plasma level: 0.9 mug/ml). Volunteers were cooled with 4 degrees C cold Ringer lactate infused over a central venous catheter (rate asymptotically equal to 2.4 degrees C/hour core temperature drop). Shivering threshold was identified by an increase of oxygen consumption (+20% of baseline). Sedation was assessed with the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. RESULTS: Control shivering threshold was 35.5 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C. Skin warming reduced the shivering threshold to 34.9 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C (p = 0.01). Meperidine reduced the shivering threshold to 34.2 degrees C +/- 0.3 degrees C (p < 0.01). The combination of meperidine and skin warming reduced the shivering threshold to 33.8 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C (p < 0.01). There were no synergistic or antagonistic effects of meperidine and skin warming (p = 0.59). Only very mild sedation occurred on meperidine days. CONCLUSION: A combination of meperidine and skin surface warming reduced the shivering threshold to 33.8 degrees C +/- 0.2 degrees C via an additive interaction and produced only very mild sedation and no respiratory toxicity.

Monitoring xenon in the breathing circuit with a thermal conductivity sensor. Comparison with a mass spectrometer and implications on monitoring other gases.

OBJECTIVE: To test the accuracy of a thermal conductivity xenon sensor in vitro and in vivo and to test the effect of xenon on other anesthetic gas analyzers as determined by a mass spectrometry gold standard. METHODS: The xenon concentration was measured with a prototype of a thermal conductivity sensor and a mass spectrometer in vitro and in 6 patients. Further in vitro experiments determined the impact of xenon on the measurements of oxygen, carbon dioxide and desflurane with three commercially available anesthesia gas monitors. RESULTS: In vitro the thermal conductivity sensor and an associated computer, when calibrated against a mass spectrometer using a third order polynomial calibration curve measured the xenon concentration to a 95% confidence limit of -1.2 to +1.8 vol% compared to mass spectrometry. In vivo and under clinical conditions with a mixture of xenon, O2 and CO2 the 95% confidence limit was -2.5 to +1.6 vol% with a mean bias of -0.5 vol% over a concentration range of 20 to 70 vol%. Xenon induced a clinically relevant bias on the measurements of oxygen (up to 5 vol%), carbon dioxide and desflurane (both twofold overestimation) in a Hewlett-Packard M1025B monitor. In contrast there was only a small bias on the measurements of a Drager PM8060 and a Datex AS3 compact monitor, which was statistically significant (oxygen and desflurane) but clinically irrelevant. CONCLUSION: Thermal conductivity is a clinically useful technique to measure xenon in the breathing circuit despite its statistically significant but clinically irrelevant error compared to mass spectrometry. Other gases of interest have to be measured with selected monitors explicitly approved or tested for use with xenon.