Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Surgeon ; 19(6): 321-328, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439832

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Creation of an optimal bowel anastomosis with low postoperative leakage rate is an immanent part of colorectal surgery contributing to recovery, length of hospital stay and overall hospital costs. We aimed to investigate costs of small and large bowel resection, length of hospital stay, anastomotic leakage rate and its risk factors depending on the anastomotic technique. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 198 patients (67 stapled and 131 hand-sewn anastomoses) undergoing elective bowel resection with a single anastomosis without protective ileostomy either stapled or in double-rowed running suture technique between 1st October 2012 and 30th September 2018 at Charité University Hospital Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. We analyzed costs of treatment, total length of hospital stay, rate of anastomotic leakage and possible risk factors for anastomotic leak. RESULTS: No significant difference between both anastomotic techniques could be detected for hospital stay (p = 0.754), 30-day-readmission rate (p = 0.827), or anastomotic leakage (p = 606). Neither comorbidities (p = 0.449), underlying disease (p = 0.132), experience of the surgical team (p = 0.828) nor scheduling of the operation (p = 0.531) were associated with anastomotic leakage. Stapled anastomoses took 22 min less operation time than sutured anastomoses (130 vs. 152 min. Median) (p = 0.001). Operations with stapled anastomoses saved 183 € in operation costs and 496 € in overall hospital costs. CONCLUSION: Stapled and hand-sewn bowel anastomoses can be performed equally safe without differences in postoperative outcome. No patient, procedure or surgeon related risk factors for anastomotic leakage could be detected. Bowel resections with stapled anastomoses take less time and save operation and overall hospital costs.


Assuntos
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Grampeamento Cirúrgico , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 35(3): 387-394, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31865435

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In the era of biological therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC), surgical treatment frequently consists of colectomy, end ileostomy, and rectal stump closure before patients go on towards restorative proctocolectomy. We aimed to evaluate possible risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative complications and investigate those after initial colectomy in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 180 patients (76 female, 104 male) undergoing colectomy for UC with formation of a rectal stump and terminal ileostomy between March 2008 and March 2018 at Charité University Hospital Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. A panel of possible postoperative complications was established, patient history was screened, and postoperative complications were analyzed using the Clavien Dindo Classification. RESULTS: Postoperative complication rate was 27.7%. Mortality was 0.5%. Postoperative ileus occurred in 15.3% and rectal stump leakage in 14.8%. Complications were categorized as Clavien Dindo 3 in 80%. Risk factors for surgical complications after multivariate analysis were ASA classification (p = 0.004), preoperative anemia (Hemoglobin < 8 mg/dl) (p = 0.025), use of immunosuppressants (p = 0.003), more than two cardiovascular diseases (p = 0.016), and peritonitis (p = 0.000). Reoperation rate of patients with surgical complications was 27.7%. CONCLUSION: Colectomy in high-risk UC patients is associated with significant morbidity. However, most of the surgical complications can be treated conservatively. Overall mortality is low. Patient-related risk factors are associated with postoperative complications. Optimizing these risk factors or earlier indication for surgery in the course of UC may help to reduce morbidity of this procedure.


Assuntos
Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
3.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 401(4): 409-18, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27138020

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Data regarding length of hospital stay of patients undergoing ileostomy reversal are very heterogeneous. There are many factors that may have an influence on the length of postoperative hospital stay, such as postoperative wound infections. One potential strategy to reduce their incidence and to decrease hospital stay is to insert subcutaneous suction drains. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the insertion of subcutaneous suction drains on hospital stay and postoperative wound infections in ileostomy reversal. Risk factors for postoperative wound infection were determined. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled two-center non-inferiority trial with two parallel groups. The total length of hospital stay as primary endpoint and the occurrence of a surgical site infection, the colonization of the abdominal wall with bacteria, and the occurrence of hematomas/seromas as secondary endpoints were monitored. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients with elective ileostomy reversal were included. Fifty-nine patients were randomly assigned to insertion of a subcutaneous suction drain, and 59 patients were randomly assigned to receive no drain. After 3 months of follow-up, 50 patients in the group with drain and 53 patients in the group without drain could be analyzed. Median total length of hospital stay was 8 days in the SD group and 9 days in the group without SD (p = 0.17). Fourteen percent of patients with SD and 17 % without SD developed SSI, p = 0.68. Multivariate analysis revealed anemia (p < 0.01), intraoperative bowel perforation (p = 0.02) and resident (p = 0.04) or fellow (p = 0.048) performing the operation as risk factors for SSI. CONCLUSIONS: This trial shows that the omission of subcutaneous suction drains is not inferior to the use of subcutaneous suction drains after ileostomy reversal in terms of length of hospital stay, surgical site infections, and hematomas/seromas.


Assuntos
Ileostomia , Enteropatias/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Drenagem/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco , Sucção/instrumentação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia
4.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 397(7): 1079-85, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22526415

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are frequent complications in colorectal surgery and may lead to burst abdomen, incisional hernia, and increased perioperative costs. Plastic wound ring drapes (RD) were introduced some decades ago to protect the abdominal wound from bacteria and reduce SSIs. There have been no controlled trials examining the benefit of RD in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The Reduction of wound infections in laparoscopic assisted colorectal resections by plastic wound ring drapes (REDWIL) trial was thus designed to assess their effectiveness in preventing SSIs after elective laparoscopic colorectal resections. MATERIALS/METHODS: REDWIL is a randomized controlled monocenter trial with two parallel groups (experimental group with RD and control group without RD). Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were included. The primary endpoint was SSIs. Secondary outcomes were colonization of the abdominal wall with bacteria, reoperations/readmissions, early/late postoperative complications, and cost of hospital stay. The duration of follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and October 2010, 109 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental or control group (with or without RD). Forty-six patients in the RD group and 47 patients in the control group completed follow-up. SSIs developed in ten patients with RD (21.7 %) and six patients without RD (12.8 %) (p = 0.28). An intraoperative swab taken from the abdominal wall was positive in 66.7 % of patients with RD and 57.5 % without RD (p = 0.46). The number of species cultured within one swab was significantly higher in those without RD (p = 0.03). The median total inpatient costs including emergency readmissions were 3,402 ± 4,038 in the RD group and 3,563 ± 1,735 in the control group (p = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: RD do not reduce the rate of SSIs in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The inpatient costs are similar with and without RD.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Laparoscopia , Equipamentos Cirúrgicos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adesividade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Plásticos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Equipamentos Cirúrgicos/economia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Zentralbl Chir ; 137(2): 130-7, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22495487

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Training and simulation are gaining importance in surgical education. Today, virtual reality surgery simulators provide sophisticated laparoscopic training scenarios and offer detailed assessment methods. This also makes simulators interesting for the application in surgical skills courses. The aim of the current study was to assess the suitability of a virtual surgery simulator for training and assessment in an established surgical training course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted during the annual "Practical Course for Visceral Surgery" (Warnemuende, Germany). 36 of 108 course participants were assigned at random for the study. Training was conducted in 15 sessions over 5 days with 4 identical virtual surgery simulators (LapSim) and 2 standardised training tasks. The simulator measured 16 individual parameters and calculated 2 scores. Questionnaires were used to assess the test persons' laparoscopic experience, their training situation and the acceptance of the simulator training. Data were analysed with non-parametric tests. A subgroup analysis for laparoscopic experience was conducted in order to assess the simulator's construct validity and assessment capabilities. RESULTS: Median age was 32 (27 - 41) years; median professional experience was 3 (1 - 11) years. Typical laparoscopic learning curves with initial significant improvements and a subsequent plateau phase were measured over 5 days. The individual training sessions exhibited a rhythmic variability in the training results. A shorter night's sleep led to a marked drop in performance. The participants' different experience levels could clearly be discriminated ( ≤ 20 vs. > 20 laparoscopic operations; p ≤ 0.001). The questionnaire showed that the majority of the participants had limited training opportunities in their hospitals. The simulator training was very well accepted. However, the participants severely misjudged the real costs of the simulators that were used. CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve on the simulator was successfully mastered during the course. Construct validity could be demonstrated within the course setting. The simulator's assessment system can be of value for the assessment of laparoscopic training performance within surgical skills courses. Acceptance of the simulator training is high. However, simulators are currently too expensive to be used within a large training course.


Assuntos
Simulação por Computador , Instrução por Computador , Educação Médica Continuada , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Laparoscopia/educação , Interface Usuário-Computador , Adulto , Atitude Frente aos Computadores , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Feminino , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vísceras/cirurgia
7.
Int J Surg ; 36(Pt A): 233-239, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27815185

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ileostomy reversal is frequently performed in abdominal surgery. Postoperative complications after ileostomy reversal are encountered in around 20% of patients. Data regarding risk factors for reoperation after ileostomy closure are scarce. The purpose of this prospective trial was to determine risk factors for operative revision after ileostomy closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an additional post hoc analysis of a two center prospective trial. After enrollment, patient characteristics and intraoperative details were analyzed. Patients were followed up at one postoperative visit before discharge and at a three months postoperative visit by standardized questionnaire. All reoperations occurring in the three months period after surgery were analyzed, and immediate reoperations which were directly related to the ileostomy reversal were analyzed separately. RESULTS: 118 patients with elective ileostomy reversal were included in the trial. 12 out of 106 patients (11.3%) underwent any reoperation within three months after surgery (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb). On multivariate analysis, anemia was associated with any reoperation p = 0.004; OR 6.93 (95% CI 1.37-30.07). Six out of 114 patients (5.3%) required an immediate reoperation (small bowel perforation, anastomotic leakage, postoperative ileus, deep wound infection) due to surgical complications directly related to the ileostomy reversal. Higher body mass index and anemia were associated with immediate reoperations (BMI: p = 0.038; OR 0.73 (95% CI 0.55-0.98); anemia: p = 0.001; OR 25.50 (95% CI 3.87-168.21). CONCLUSION: Surgical complications after ileostomy reversal occurred to a substantial extent. Rate of reoperations was associated with anemia and high body mass index. Optimizing patients in terms of preoperative hemoglobin and BMI may reduce surgical complications after ileostomy closure.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Ileostomia/métodos , Íleus/cirurgia , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Sucção/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Anemia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Íleus/epidemiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/epidemiologia , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia
8.
Chirurg ; 87(1): 47-55, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25971607

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernias are one of the the most frequent complications in visceral surgery and incisional hernia repair has a relevant complication rate. Therefore, there have to be solid indications before carrying out incisional hernia repair. To date, there is a lack of evidence concerning the correct indications for surgical repair of incisional hernias. The AWARE trial compares watchful waiting to surgical repair of incisional hernias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The AWARE trial is a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Patients with asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic incisional hernia are randomized into the watchful waiting or the surgical repair group with a follow-up of 2 years. The primary endpoint is pain during normal activities due to the hernia or the hernia repair after 2 years measured on the hernia-specific surgical pain scale (SPS). RESULTS: In this study 36 centers are participating throughout Germany, more than 1600 patients had been screened up to 31 December 2014 and 234 (14.6%) of the screened patients could be recruited. CONCLUSION: The AWARE study will provide evidence concerning the two therapeutic options of watchful waiting and surgical repair of incisional hernia.


Assuntos
Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Conduta Expectante , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/diagnóstico , Hérnia Incisional/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida
9.
Chirurg ; 85(1): 46-50, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780410

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Even though laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the most frequent procedures in abdominal surgery, the technique of appendiceal stump closure is still not standardized. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the effect of the use of endoloops or linear staplers for appendiceal stump closure concerning surgical site infections (SSI) and intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All laparoscopic appendectomies between January 1st 2007 and May 31st 2010 were split into an endoloop group (ELG) and a linear stapler group (LSG). The groups were compared with respect to the outcome parameters SSI and IAA. RESULTS: A total of 430 appendectomies were performed in the study period of which 105 operations were conducted laparoscopically. In this study 47.6 % (n = 50) were alloted to the LSG and 52.4 % (n = 55) to ELG. In LSG 3.1 % (n = 1) developed an SSI versus 10.0 % (n = 4, p = 0.254) in ELG. No IAAs occurred in LSG compared to 2 (5.1 %, p = 0.499) in ELG. CONCLUSION: The use of EL for appendiceal stump closure is safe and cost effective for low-grade appendicitis but high-grade appendicitis should be treated with LS.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Grampeadores Cirúrgicos , Abscesso Abdominal/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Hernia ; 17(2): 203-9, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22782368

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernias are among the most frequent complications in visceral surgery and are currently considered to be an indication for surgery in all cases, regardless of the patient's symptoms. However, it still remains unclear to what extent surgery actually results in improvement according to objective (e.g., less pain or dysesthesia) or subjective criteria (e.g., less discomfort or better cosmetic result). The purpose of this prospective study was to identify patients who derive objective and subjective benefit from surgical repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients who underwent open incisional hernia repair with mesh implantation from December 2006 to April 2009. Data were collected before and 18 months after surgery. Pain intensity was rated on the numerical analog scale (NAS) pre- and postoperatively. Patients were divided into oligosymptomatic (NAS 0-3) and symptomatic (NAS 4-10) groups based on their preoperative pain level, and the postoperative outcome of the two groups was compared by standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety patients were prospectively enrolled, 45 (50 %) of each gender. Prior to surgery, 43 patients (47.8 %) were oligosymptomatic, and 47 (52.2 %) reported clinically relevant pain. Eighteen months after surgery, 7.5 % of the oligosymptomatic patients complained of clinically relevant pain; its rate remained unchanged. The symptomatic group showed a significant reduction in clinically relevant pain from 100 % to 14.0 %, (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with clinically relevant dysesthesia was 12.5 % in the oligosymptomatic and 20.9 % in the symptomatic group 18 months postoperatively. The overall recurrence rate was 13.3 % after 18 months without difference in both groups. A reduction in discomfort in the surgical area was reported by 77.5 % of the oligosymptomatic and 79.1 % of the symptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic patients definitely profit from surgical repair in the long-term course. However, the notable postoperative rate of clinically relevant pain and dysesthesia in oligosymptomatic patients and their high recurrence rate cast doubt on whether they really benefit from surgical repair. The remarkable degree of subjective satisfaction in oligosymptomatic patients should not be underestimated.


Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Assintomáticas , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Feminino , Hérnia Ventral/complicações , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Terapêutica
11.
Chirurg ; 82(3): 255-62, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20697683

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernia (IH) surgery has changed fundamentally during the last 25 years due to tension-free repair, minimally-invasive approaches and growing influence of economy in medical decision making. Aim of the study was the documentation and analysis of changes in IH surgery during the last 15 years in our patient cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing elective or emergency inguinal/femoral hernia repair from January 1995 to December 2009 were included in the study. Analysis of patient data was carried out by prospective online recording. RESULTS: A total of 1,908 patients with 2,124 IHs were treated in the study period and the number of IH repairs decreased continuously. The number of recurrent hernias peaked in 2005-2009 with 16.4%. The average preoperative hospital stay decreased from 2.4 to 0.4 days and the postoperative hospital stay from 7.0 to 3.3 days. The percentage of suture repairs declined from 54.9% in 1995 to 4.1% in 2009 and the percentage of open tension-free repairs rose to 52.9% in 1998. In the following years the majority of repairs were performed by minimally invasive procedures but in 2009 the percentage of conventional hernia repairs exceeded the rate of minimally invasive repairs. CONCLUSION: The main reason for these changes is the implementation of diagnosis-related groups which hampers inpatient repair of "simple" inguinal hernias, favors short hospital stay and does not adequately reimburse minimally invasive repairs.


Assuntos
Hérnia Femoral/cirurgia , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/tendências , Técnicas de Sutura/tendências , Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Estudos Transversais , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/tendências , Previsões , Alemanha , Hérnia Femoral/epidemiologia , Hérnia Inguinal/epidemiologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/tendências , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendências , Reoperação/tendências , Telas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Telas Cirúrgicas/tendências , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
12.
Chirurg ; 80(10): 956-65, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19387562

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive repair with alloplastic material for inguinal hernia has become a method with few complications and a low recurrence rate. Persistent pain and dysesthesia years after the procedure are however of growing clinical interest. It is still unknown to what degree initial pain or dysesthesia change in the long term. Therefore this study was done to evaluate patient complaints following total extraperitoneal repair (TER) over a long observation period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in the study were patients from January 2000 to December 2006 who were treated electively for uni- or bilateral inguinal hernia using TER. Exclusion criteria were emergency procedures, incarcerated hernia, and scrotal hernia. The patient data were collected using a prospective online data system and evaluation of long-term results via standardized questionnaires determining persisting pain, dysesthesia, physical limitations from the surgery, satisfaction with the operation, and recurrences. The patients were grouped according to length of follow-up after surgery: 12-36 months (group 1), 37-60 months (group 2), and 61-96 months (group 3). RESULTS: Since January 2000, 484 patients 18 to 97 years old with 620 inguinal hernias were operated. Of those, 349 were evaluated for this study (proportion of returned questionnaires: 72.1%). No significant differences were noted in patient characteristics or early postoperative complications. The percentage of patients suffering from relevant pain (moderate to severe) dropped significantly: 10.3% (group 1) vs 1.0% (group 2) (P<0.05) and 3.4% (group 3) (P<0.05). No significant differences were found concerning dysesthesia (19.6% in group 1 vs 19.2% in group 3). There were no significant differences in satisfaction with the operation, as 73.8% in group 1, 67.7% in group 2, and 73.3% in group 3 were very satisfied with the results. The number of recurrences increased during the observation period: 1.9% in group 1, 3.1% in group 2, and 5.5% in group 3 (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Total extraperitoneal repair is a reliable method with low recurrence rate and high patient satisfaction. A relevant proportion of patients complain however of pain and dysesthesia persisting over years. The data from this study show that in the long term, pain incidence drops significantly while the rate of dysesthesia remains constant. Long follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term course of persistent pain. For more precise understanding of the long-term results of herniotomy, prospective randomized studies are needed with accordingly long follow-up.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Dor/etiologia , Parestesia/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
13.
Chirurg ; 80(9): 864-71, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19669714

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Skill courses for surgery offer a good but cost and personnel-intensive possibility to obtain practical and theoretical knowledge by the employment of a close teacher-pupil contact of a large group of surgeons. The goal of the study presented here was to evaluate the satisfaction and benefits of the practical course for visceral surgery in Warnemünde after 10 years of course experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All participants in the annual course for visceral surgery were included since 1999. During this 1-week course conventional and laparoscopic exercises are performed under direct guidance of an experienced tutor. The participants are divided into 3 groups based on their surgical experience (e.g. <3 years, 3-5 years, >5 years). All participants received a standardised questionnaire before and after successful course completion for the collection of relevant data (e.g. demography, training, surgical experience and course evaluation). RESULTS: A total of 1,062 participants (435 female, 627 male, mean age 37 years) participated in the course. The average surgical experience of the participants was 5 years. Of the participants 489 came from a hospital of basic medical care, 499 from a hospital of maximum medical care and 74 from a university hospital. Of the participants 96% had no or only little experience with skill courses (1,020 out of 1,065) and 827 participants had no or only few possibilities for training outside of the operation room (78%). The conventional part of the course was evaluated by 77% of the participants as very good and by 50% as very good for the laparoscopic part. Only 8.3% of the participants were willing to finance the costs of the course by themselves. CONCLUSIONS: The practical course for visceral surgery leads to a subjective success in learning. Participation in the course leads to a high satisfaction and offers a cost-intensive possibility for a standardised surgical training. But there are too few experiences with skill courses and possibilities for surgical training outside the operation room so far.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/educação , Educação Médica Continuada , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Currículo , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA