Impact of haemostatic sealant versus electrocoagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of haemostatic sealant compared with bipolar coagulation on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas. DESIGN: Patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary hospital. POPULATION: Women aged 18-40 years with 3-8 cm unilateral or bilateral endometriomas. METHODS: Ninety-four patients were randomised to receive haemostasis by the application of haemostatic sealant (n = 47) or standard care (n = 47). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the effect on the antral follicular count 3 months after the operation as it captures the effect on the ovary subjected to treatment. Secondary outcomes included the change in anti-Mullerian hormone, follicular-stimulating hormone and peri-operative outcomes including haemostasis, complications, pain, and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients aged 32.36 ± 4.92 years underwent laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas. The average diameter of the endometrioma was 4.21 ± 1.38 cm. The increase in antral follicle count of the affected ovaries at 3 months in the intervention group (+2.36 ± 0.37) was significantly (P = 0.013) higher than that in the control group (+1.08 ± 0.36). Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significant effect with time (P < 0.001) and of interaction of group × time (P = 0.029) for affected ovary antral follicle count. No significant difference was noted between the two groups with regard to follicular-stimulating hormone, anti-Mullerian hormone, and other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Applying haemostatic sealant after laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarian endometriomas produced a greater increase in antral follicle count 3 months after surgery compared with the control group. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: RCT: Haemostatic sealant in laparoscopic cystectomy of endometriomas increase in the antral follicle count after surgery.

A questionnaire survey on patients' willingness to pay with reference to the waiting time of public in-vitro fertilization treatment in Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' willingness to pay (WTP) with reference to the waiting time of public in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment in order to improve the public IVF service in Hong Kong. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multi-centred questionnaire survey. Infertile women attending infertility clinics of nine public hospitals in Hong Kong between October 2017 and August 2018 were asked to complete a questionnaire in their first clinic visit. RESULTS: Out of 1092 respondents, 10.4 % had private IVF cycles prior to their first visit at public hospitals. In general, patients were willing to pay more for a shorter waiting time for public IVF service. The proportion of respondents who were willing to pay more than HK$10,000 (US$1282) for one IVF cycle increased from 54.6% to 80.7% if the waiting time for public IVF service were hypothetically shortened from four years to one year. Likewise, 22.5 % versus 45.5 % were willing to pay more than HK$ 25,000 (US$3205) with a waiting time of four versus one year respectively. Assuming the cost per IVF cycle was HK$ 25,000 (US$3205), 23.4 % of respondents could afford one IVF cycle, 40.0 % of them could afford two IVF cycles and 31.5 % could afford three IVF cycles. A multivariate regression model demonstrated that only family income and presence of existing child(ren) were significant independent determinants of the maximum amount that an individual was willing to pay for IVF (p < 0.05). Those with family monthly income below HK$100,000 ($12,820) were less than half as likely, and those without existing child(ren) were more than double as likely, to be willing to pay higher for IVF. CONCLUSION: Patients were willing to pay more for a shorter waiting time for public IVF service. Those with family income below HK$100,000 (US$ 12,820) were less than half as likely, and those without existing children were more than double as likely, to be willing to pay higher for IVF.