PD-L1 protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry is neither prognostic nor predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: The expression of programmed death (PD) ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been correlated with response and survival benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy of several agents appears correlated with PD-L1 expression. It remains controversial whether PD-L1 is prognostic in NSCLC. We assessed the prognostic value of PD-L1 IHC and its predictive role for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage NSCLC. Patients and methods: Tumor sections from three pivotal adjuvant chemotherapy trials (IALT, JBR.10, CALGB 9633) using the E1L3N antibody were studied in this pooled analysis. PD-L1 staining intensity and percentage in both tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) were scored by two pathologists. The average or consensus PD-L1 expression levels across intensities and/or percent cells stained were correlated with clinicopathological and molecular features, patient survivals and potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Results from 982 patients were available for analysis. Considering staining at any intensities for overall PD-L1 expression, 314 (32.0%), 204 (20.8%) and 141 (14.3%) tumor samples were positive for PD-L1 staining on TCs using cut-offs at ≥1%, ≥10% and ≥25%, respectively. For PD-L1 expressing ICs, 380 (38.7%), 308 (31.4%) and 148 (15.1%) were positive at ≥ 1%, ≥10% and 25% cut-offs, respectively. Positive PD-L1 was correlated with squamous histology, intense lymphocytic infiltrate, and KRAS but not with TP53 mutation. EGFR mutated tumors showed statistically non-significant lower PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was neither prognostic with these cut-offs nor other exploratory cut-offs, nor were predictive for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: PD-L1 IHC is not a prognostic factor in early stage NSCLC patients. It is also not predictive for adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in these patients.

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: new insights into the effect on failure type via a multistate approach.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy has become the standard therapy against resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of variable results on its late effect, we reanalyze the long-term data of the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial (IALT) to describe in details the role of adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the IALT, 1867 patients were randomized between adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and control, who were followed up for a median of 7.5 years. Of these, 1687 patients were enrolled from 132 centers accepting to report the times to cancer events. We used event history methodology to estimate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on the risks of local relapse, distant metastasis, and death. RESULTS: Adjuvant chemotherapy was highly effective against local relapses [HR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.90; P = 0.003] and nonbrain metastases (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94; P = 0.008) but not against brain metastases (HR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.82-1.4; P = 0.61). The effect on noncancer mortality was nonsignificant during the first 5 years (HR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.81-1.5; P = 0.29), whereas the risk of noncancer mortality was subsequently higher with treatment (HR = 3.6; 95% CI 2.2-5.9; P < 0.001). This harmful effect, however, potentially concerned only about 2% of the patients at 8 years. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the risk of local relapse and of nonbrain metastasis, thereby improving survival. This treatment exerted no residual effect on mortality during the first 5 years, but a higher risk of noncancer mortality was found thereafter. Detailed long-term follow-up is strongly recommended for all patients in randomized trials evaluating adjuvant treatments in NSCLC.

Developments in the treatment of early NSCLC: when to use chemotherapy.

approximately 30% of lung carcinomas are resected and these cases are candidates for adjuvant treatments. The PORT meta-analysis reported in 1999 that postoperative radiotherapy had a detrimental effect for pathological N0 and N1 patients, and a debatable effect for N2 patients. Following the results of the 1995 meta-analysis on the role of chemotherapy (CT) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many randomized, controlled trials were launched to evaluate the effect of adjuvant cisplatin-based CT after the complete resection of NSCLC. The Lung adjuvant Ciplatin Evaluation pooled analysis included a total of 4584 patients recruited in five recent cisplatin-based adjuvant trials. It confirmed that adjuvant CT was associated with an absolute 5-year survival benefit of 5.3% (P = 0.0043). In addition, it showed that adjuvant cisplatin-based CT is detrimental in cases of stage Ia resected NSCLC; it also suggested that the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin was of more benefit than older two and three drug combinations. The individual data-based meta-analysis was also updated with a total of over 10 000 patients. It confirmed the substantial effect of postoperative CT, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, with a substantial overall benefit of 4% at 5 years. Recent results of biological programs suggest that evaluating the expression of various tumor markers, including excision repair cross-complementation group 1, may allow the identification of patients most likely to benefit from CT. If these results are confirmed, tailored therapy might be the next step forward for resected NSCLC.

Cisplatin benefit is predicted by immunohistochemical analysis of DNA repair proteins in squamous cell carcinoma but not adenocarcinoma: theranostic modeling by NSCLC constituent histological subclasses.

BACKGROUND: Most non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy though clinical response is restricted to a subset of patients. DNA repair protein levels are possible surrogates for cisplatin-induced DNA adduct (and subsequent cell death) repair efficiency and thus molecular determinants of therapeutic efficacy. The International Adjuvant Lung Trial (IALT)-Bio study previously suggested ERCC1 and MSH2 as predictive of cisplatin-based therapeutic benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA repair protein expression (XPF, BRCA1, ERCC1, MSH2, p53, PARP1, and ATM) was assessed by immunohistochemistry on a large subset of patients (N = 769) from the IALT trial. Tissue Microarray slides were digitally scanned and signal quantified by user-defined macros. Statistical analyses (univariate and multivariate) of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival used binary cut-offs (H score low/high expression). RESULTS: In patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), ATM, p53, PARP1, ERCC1, and MSH2 displayed significant (borderline) predictive values, mainly on DFS with chemotherapy efficacy limited to low marker levels. Adenocarcinoma (ADC) results were not significant. BRCA1 and XPF were not significant for predictive modeling in either SCC or ADCs. CONCLUSION: Here predictive utility of DNA repair enzymes co-segregates with SCC histology, focusing their predictive value to this histological subclass of NSCLC. Distinct mechanisms of chemotherapeutic response or resistance might exist among histological subclasses of solid tumors.

Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Many randomised controlled trials have investigated the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in operable non-small-cell lung cancer. We undertook two comprehensive systematic reviews and meta-analyses to establish the effects of adding adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery, or to surgery plus radiotherapy. METHODS: We included randomised trials, not confounded by additional therapeutic differences between the two groups and that started randomisation on or after Jan 1, 1965, which compared surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone, or surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy. Updated individual patient data were collected, checked, and included in meta-analyses stratified by trial. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation until death by any cause. All analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The first meta-analysis of surgery plus chemotherapy versus surgery alone was based on 34 trial comparisons and 8447 patients (3323 deaths). We recorded a benefit of adding chemotherapy after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92, p<0.0001), with an absolute increase in survival of 4% (95% CI 3-6) at 5 years (from 60% to 64%). The second meta-analysis of surgery plus radiotherapy and chemotherapy versus surgery plus radiotherapy was based on 13 trial comparisons and 2660 patients (1909 deaths). We recorded a benefit of adding chemotherapy to surgery plus radiotherapy (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, p=0.009), representing an absolute improvement in survival of 4% (95% CI 1-8) at 5 years (from 29% to 33%). In both meta-analyses we noted little variation in effect according to the type of chemotherapy, other trial characteristics, or patient subgroup. INTERPRETATION: The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer improves survival, irrespective of whether chemotherapy was adjuvant to surgery alone or adjuvant to surgery plus radiotherapy. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (AOM 05 209), Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Sanofi-Aventis.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: where is it going?

Following the 1995 meta-analysis on the role of postoperative chemotherapy in NSCLC, many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the effect of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adding substantially to the existing evidence. The LACE pooled analysis included a total of 4584 patients accrued in five recent cisplatin-based adjuvant trials. It confirmed the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.0043). In addition, it showed that adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is detrimental in stage IA resected NSCLC; it also indicated that the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin offered a higher benefit compared with older doublets or triplets. The individual-databased meta-analysis was also updated with a total of >10,000 patients. It confirmed the significant effect of postoperative chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, with an overall significant benefit of 4% at 5 years. The recent results of biological programmes indicate that the expression of some tumour markers including ERCC1 be evaluated in order to determine which patients are more likely to benefit from chemotherapy. If these results are confirmed, tailored therapy might be the next progress for resected NSCLC.

Should progression-free survival be the primary measure of efficacy for advanced NSCLC therapy?

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of malignancy-related mortality in the Western world. Despite advances in early detection and standard treatment, NSCLC is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage and therefore patients have a poor prognosis. However, its heterogeneity provides ample opportunity for multiple treatment approaches and target pathways. Considerable progress has been made in identifying novel targets, leading to a growing number of treatment options. Overall survival (OS) may not always be the most appropriate primary end point for assessment of efficacy, as it is likely that patients with NSCLC will receive multiple lines of therapy during their treatment. Additionally, crossover appears as an ethical necessity to many investigators if molecular targeted agents display outstanding early efficacy. While improving OS remains the goal for clinicians, progression-free survival (PFS) is increasingly being utilised as an alternative end point. In this article, we will evaluate the value of PFS as a primary measure of efficacy for advanced NSCLC, compare the clinical situation with that in other solid malignancies and review the growing number of treatment options for NSCLC.

Phase I trial of recombinant adenovirus gene transfer in lung cancer. Longitudinal study of the immune responses to transgene and viral products.

Animal studies indicate that the use of replication-deficient adenovirus for human gene therapy is limited by host antivector immune responses that result in transient recombinant protein expression and blocking of gene transfer when rechallenged. Therefore, we have examined immune responses to an adenoviral vector and to the beta-galactosidase protein in four patients with lung cancer given a single intratumor injection of 10(9) plaque-forming units of recombinant adenovirus. The beta-galactosidase protein was expressed in day-8 tumor biopsies from all patients at variable levels. Recombinant virus DNA was detected by PCR in day-30 and day-60 tumor biopsies from all patients except patient 1. A high level of neutralizing antiadenovirus antibodies was detected in patient 1 before Ad-beta-gal injection whereas it was low (patient 3) or undetectable in the other two patients. All patients developed potent CD4 type 1 helper T cell (Th1) responses to adenoviral particles which increased gradually over time after injection. Antiadenovirus cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses were consistently boosted in the two patients examined (patients 3 and 4). Sustained production of anti-beta-galactosidase IgG was observed in all patients except patient 1. Consistent with anti-beta-gal antibody production, all patients except patient 1 developed intense, dose-dependent Th1 responses to soluble beta-galactosidase which increased over time. Strong beta-galactosidase-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses were detected in patients 2, 3, and 4. Our results clearly show that despite the intensity of antiadenovirus responses, transgene protein expression was sufficient to induce strong and prolonged immunity in three patients. Recombinant adenovirus injected directly into the tumor is a highly efficient vector for immunizing patients against the transgene protein.

Review of the pemetrexed and gemcitabine combination in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Pemetrexed is a new multitargeted antifolate that can be easily administered as a 10-min infusion every 3 weeks. The use of folic acid, vitamin B(12), and corticoid prophylaxis has significantly reduced pemetrexed-induced toxicity. Single-agent pemetrexed has shown antitumor activity in a wide range of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Association with vinorelbine, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin have been tried, but the pemetrexed and gemcitabine combination, an easy to administer cisplatin-free doublet, has been documented in many phase 2 trials in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. In vitro cytotoxic assays and phase I studies have defined several schedules of administration for pemetrexed and gemcitabine. The recommended dose is pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 or 8, and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8, but it is unknown if pemetrexed should precede or follow gemcitabine and at what time interval. Published studies have failed to show significant differences in overall survival times despites response rates oscillating between 15% and 41%. The main toxicities are neutropenia, fatigue, skin rashes and elevated transaminases and seem to occur with similar rates in the many phase 2 trials. Hopes for the future are in tailored chemotherapy, since molecular markers of sensitivity are available for gemcitabine and pemetrexed, allowing to determinate in the future which patients will be most likely to benefit from the gemcitabine-pemetrexed doublet.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small-cell lung cancer decreases the overall rate of brain metastases without an effect on overall survival. It has been suggested that this treatment may increase neuropsychological syndromes and brain abnormalities indicated by computed tomography scans. However, other retrospective data suggested a beneficial effect on overall survival for patients in complete remission. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate the effects of prophylactic cranial irradiation on brain metastasis, overall survival, and late-occurring toxic effects in patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients who had small-cell lung cancer that was in complete remission. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either prophylactic cranial irradiation delivering 24 Gy in eight fractions during 12 days (treatment group) or no prophylactic cranial irradiation (control group). A neuropsychological examination and a computed tomography scan of the brain were performed at the time of random assignment and repeatedly assessed at 6, 18, 30, and 48 months. Patterns of failure were analyzed according to total event rates and also according to an isolated first site of relapse, using a competing-risk approach. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients who did not have brain metastases at the time of random assignment were analyzed. The 2-year cumulative rate of brain metastasis as an isolated first site of relapse was 45% in the control group and 19% in the treatment group (P < 10(-6)). The total 2-year rate of brain metastasis was 67% and 40%, respectively (relative risk = 0.35; P < 10(-13)). The 2-year overall survival rate was 21.5% in the control group and 29% in the treatment group (relative risk = 0.83; P = .14). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of neuropsychological function or abnormalities indicated by computed tomography brain scans. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic cranial irradiation given to patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission decreases the risk of brain metastasis threefold without a significant increase in complications. A possible beneficial effect on overall survival should be tested with a higher statistical power. IMPLICATIONS: The results of the trial favor, at present, the indication of prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients who are in complete remission. A longer follow-up and confirmatory trials are needed to fully assess late-occurring toxic effects. The possible effect on overall survival needs to be evaluated with a larger number of patients in complete remission, and a meta-analysis of similar trials is recommended.

Response of small-cell lung cancer xenografts to chemotherapy: multidrug resistance and direct clinical correlates.

BACKGROUND: Patients with small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) initially respond to combination chemotherapy. Only a few benefit in terms of long-term survival because most relapse. Such outcome may be attributable to development of multidrug resistance. PURPOSE: The response of SCLC to chemotherapy was examined in terms of (a) patient survival, (b) drug sensitivity of tumors in patients and of tumor xenografts in nude mice, and (c) expression of multidrug resistance gene MDR1 and GST-pi gene. METHODS: Tumor samples obtained from seven untreated patients and from one patient both before and after chemotherapy were transplanted into nude mice. The patients were treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide (C'), cisplatin (C), doxorubicin (A), and etoposide (V) (C'CAV) or C'AV and radiotherapy. Drug sensitivity of SCLCs was tested in nude mice that had received tumor xenografts from these seven patients. The expression of MDR1 and GST-pi genes was assessed in the mRNA extracted from xenografts by Northern blot analysis. P-glycoprotein was quantified by enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: The patients' responses to C'CAV closely correlated with those of the corresponding xenografts. The tumors of the two patients who showed long-term survival after C'CAV completely regressed when they were transplanted into nude mice and subsequently treated with C'CAV. Despite initial complete response, the remaining five patients died during year 1. A high percentage of mice receiving the tumor grafts from these five patients showed only partial tumor regression after C'CAV treatment. The MDR1 transcript was detected in all five of these xenografts. Four of five xenografts were from untreated patients, and the fifth was from a treated patient. MDR1 mRNA expression was absent in the tumor of this fifth patient before chemotherapy, but both the mice receiving the corresponding xenograft and the patient showed expression of MDR1 after C'CAV treatment. MDR1 mRNA expression was absent in the tumor xenografts obtained from two patients with long-term survival. Expression of P-glycoprotein correlated with MDR1 mRNA expression. All xenografts except one expressed the GST-pi gene. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of MDR1 gene expression during chemotherapy for SCLC indicates a favorable prognosis, gene expression is often coincident with ineffective chemotherapy, and tumor xenografts can be appropriately used to predict response to chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS: Failure of chemotherapy to control SCLC seems to be related to an acquired multidrug resistance involving the MDR1-mediated mechanism. Therapeutic benefit could therefore be expected from chemotherapy combined with inhibitors of MDR1.

Radiotherapy alone versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: first analysis of a randomized trial in 353 patients.

We report the results observed in a large, randomized study that compared the effects of radiotherapy alone (the standard therapy) with those of a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in nonresectable squamous cell and large-cell lung carcinoma. The radiation dose was 65 Gy in each group, and chemotherapy included vindesine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and lomustine. In this study, 177 patients received radiotherapy alone (group A), and 176 patients received the combined treatment (group B). The 2-year survival rate was 14% in group A and 21% in group B (P = .08). The distant metastasis rate was significantly lower in group B (P less than .001). Local control was poor in both groups (17% and 15%, respectively) and remained the major problem.

Phase I study of a recombinant adenovirus-mediated gene transfer in lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite vigorous efforts at curbing tobacco consumption and aggressive combined-modality treatment programs, both the incidence of and the mortality from lung cancer have remained virtually unchanged in the last 10 years. More effective innovative therapies are clearly needed. The direct transfer into tumor cells of tumor suppressor genes or toxic gene products that specifically promote tumor cell death and spare nonmalignant cells is a potentially novel anticancer treatment approach that should be investigated. PURPOSE: On the basis of compelling preclinical data, we initiated a phase I study involving six patients with inoperable lung cancer and an endobronchial lesion accessible by bronchoscopy. Our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility, tolerance, and clinical, biologic, and immunologic effects of the intratumoral administration of a recombinant, replication-deficient adenovirus (rAd.RSV beta-gal), using the Rous sarcoma virus promoter to drive transcription of the Escherichia coli lacZ marker gene that encodes for the bacterial enzyme beta-galactosidase (beta-gal). METHODS: From June 1994 through April 1995, six patients (five males and one female) were enrolled in the trial. A single dose of recombinant virus suspension containing 10(7) or 10(8) plaque-forming units (PFU) was injected intratumorally into two successive cohorts of three patients. Eligible patients received concomitant chemotherapy. Patients were kept under isolation conditions from 3 days before the injection was given until virus excretion was undetectable. Biopsy specimens of the tumor and surrounding mucosa were collected on the 8th day and at 1, 2, and 3 months after injection. They were analyzed by cell culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and beta-gal expression for the presence of recombinant adenovirus. So that the risk of virus recombination or complementation could be minimized, wildtype adenovirus carriers among the hospital staff (identified by PCR) were excluded from contact with patients who were potentially excreting recombinant virus. RESULTS: beta-gal was expressed in tumor biopsy specimens of three patients (one who received the 10(7) PFU dose level and two who received 10(8)). Bronchoalveolar lavage specimens collected immediately after injection were positive for recombinant adenovirus when analyzed in culture and by PCR. All biologic fluids were negative for recombinant virus as judged by PCR after day 12, with the exception of bronchoalveolar lavage specimens (positive PCR up to 90 days in two of three patients treated with 10(8) PFU). The blood samples obtained from the three patients treated with 10(8) PFU showed positive PCR results immediately after virus injection. Patients were kept in isolation for a median of 17 days. The most common toxic effects were moderate bleeding (occurring in two patients) during bronchoscopy and fever (seen in four patients). Endoscopic and clinically objective antitumor responses were seen in four patients, including one patient who showed a complete response by pathologic evaluation. The median survival for the patients was 12.5 months (range, 3-16+ months). Throughout the study, hospital staff remained negative for recombinant adenovirus infection. CONCLUSIONS: This ongoing phase I study has demonstrated that a recombinant adenovirus-mediated marker gene, such as rAd.RSV beta-gal, can be safely introduced into humans and that the gene product is expressed by lung tumor cells of the host.

Etoposide plus cisplatin with or without the combination of 4'-epidoxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in treatment of extensive small-cell lung cancer: a French Federation of Cancer Institutes multicenter phase III randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) is considered to be standard therapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). To determine whether drug intensification improves survival of patients with extensive SCLC, we compared this treatment with a four-drug regimen containing EP plus cyclophosphamide and 4'-epidoxorubicin (PCDE). METHODS: In a phase III clinical trial organized by the French Federation of Cancer Institutes, patients were randomly assigned to receive either EP (n = 109; etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 plus cisplatin at 100 mg/m(2) on day 2) or PCDE (n = 117; etoposide and cisplatin given as in EP plus cyclophosphamide at 400 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and 4'-epidoxorubicin at 40 mg/m(2) on day 1) every 4 weeks. Both groups received a total of six cycles. Survival differences were analyzed by Wilcoxon and log-rank tests. Associations of treatment group and putative prognostic variables with survival were tested in the Cox proportional hazards model. Quality of life was assessed from the responses to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire (C30, health status and lung cancer module 13). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Patients in the PCDE arm had a statistically significant higher frequency of combined complete plus partial responses compared with those in the EP arm (21% plus 55% versus 13% plus 48%, respectively; P =.02 for difference in combined objective responses). Patients in the PCDE arm survived longer than those in the EP arm (1-year survival rate: 40% and 29%, respectively; median survival: 10.5 and 9.3 months, respectively; log-rank P =.0067). In the Cox model, the relative risk of death for patients in the PCDE arm compared with those in the EP arm was 0.70 (95% confidence interval = 0.51 to 0.95); the disease also progressed more slowly in patients in the PCDE arm. Hematologic toxicity was higher in the PCDE arm (22% with documented infections compared with 8% in the EP arm; P =.0038), and the toxicity-related death rate was 9% in the PCDE arm versus 5.5% in the EP arm (P =.22). The global health status showed similar improvement in both arms during treatment. CONCLUSION: Compared with the EP regimen, the PCDE regimen yielded higher response rates and better survival rates in patients with extensive SCLC without affecting the quality of life of the patients during chemotherapy.

Identification and measurement of calcitonin precursors in serum of patients with malignant diseases.

Previous studies have suggested that molecular species larger than the mature calcitonin (CT) are produced by tumors of different origin. In order to study these species, we developed a monoclonal immunoradiometric assay for calcitonin precursors (CT-pr). This assay was based on both monoclonal antibody KC01 directed to the 1-11 region of katacalcin and monoclonal antibody CT08 directed to the 11-17 portion of CT. The sensitivity of this monoclonal immunoradiometric assay for CT-pr was less than 100 pg/ml. Only one of 131 healthy subjects had CT-pr serum levels greater than 100 pg/ml; this value was therefore selected as the standard serum value in healthy individuals. CT-pr was present in the serum of seven of ten patients with advanced renal failure and in that of 21 of 52 patients (40%) with benign liver disease but was undetectable in sera of patients with other benign diseases. The serum CT-pr level was correlated with that of mature CT in patients with medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. In contrast, the serum CT-pr level was frequently elevated in the absence of a detectable CT level in patients with various malignant tumors and, particularly, in those with either tumors of the neuroendocrine system (60%) or hepatocellular carcinomas (62%). CT-pr was detected in tumor extract from a patient with a hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover, hybridization experiments with total RNA extracted from this tumor demonstrated the presence of RNAs hybridizing with complementary DNA encoding for common region, calcitonin, and katacalcin sequences. These results show that CT precursors are excreted by numerous cancers and might well be useful biological markers for the follow-up of productive tumors.

Competing events determining relapse-free survival in limited small-cell lung carcinoma. The French Cancer Centers' Lung Group.

PURPOSE: We report results in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS), obtained in patients with limited small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) treated by four consecutive alternating protocols, using a competing risk approach with local recurrences, distant metastases, and death unrelated to cancer as competing events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred two patients with limited SCLC were included in four consecutive protocols alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy (CT). The alternating schedule consisted of six cycles of CT (doxorubicin, etoposide [VP16213], and cyclophosphamide [CAVP16], plus methotrexate in the first protocol; cisplatin replaced methotrexate in the other three protocols) and three courses of thoracic radiotherapy at a total dose of 45, 55, 65, and 61 Gy in the four consecutive protocols, respectively (accelerated hyperfractionation was used in the first course of the fourth protocol). A 1-week rest followed each CT cycle and each course of radiotherapy. Seventy-six percent of patients were in complete remission at the end of the induction treatment. RFS variables were determined according to a model assuming competing risks to define the first cause of failure (local disease, distant metastasis, or intercurrent death). RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the four treatment groups. Overall results showed a 2-year cumulative incidence rate of failure of 75%. When analyzed, the first cause of failure was local recurrence only, 33%; distant only, 25%; distant and local simultaneously, 9%; and intercurrent death, 8%. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology of competing risks allowed an unequivocal description of first events in limited SCLC. The extent of the local problem has been relatively overshadowed by the use of conventional descriptive methods.

Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, and vindesine plus cisplatin for non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To estimate the comparative cost-effectiveness of three regimens for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Results from a randomized clinical trial of 612 European patients with NSCLC, and cost data from an academic cancer center, the Medical College of Virginia, were analyzed. In this post-hoc economic analysis, we compared vinorelbine alone, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, and a common regimen of vindesine plus cisplatin. RESULTS: Vinorelbine plus cisplatin resulted in the longest mean survival time of the three regimens, 49.6 weeks, followed by vindesine plus cisplatin, 44.3 weeks, and vinorelbine, 41.6 weeks. Compared with vinorelbine alone, vinorelbine plus cisplatin added 56 days at a cost of $2,700, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $17,700 per year of life gained. Similarly, vindesine plus cisplatin added 19 days at a cost of $1,150, or $22,100 per year of life gained. Compared with vindesine plus cisplatin, vinorelbine plus cisplatin added 37 days at a cost of $1,570, or $15,500 per year of life gained. CONCLUSION: The most effective regimen of vinorelbine plus cisplatin added substantial benefit compared with vinorelbine alone or another common treatment, vindesine plus cisplatin, at a cost-effectiveness within accepted limits for medical interventions. Vindesine plus cisplatin also added benefit at an acceptable cost per year of life gained. If vinorelbine is preferred because of its toxicity profile, the additional effectiveness of cisplatin added substantial benefit at an acceptable cost. Compared with other common medical interventions, chemotherapy for NSCLC has acceptable efficacy and cost-effectiveness and should not be arbitrarily denied based on clinical or economic grounds.

Primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: results of modern therapy including cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) are uncommon neoplasms and clinically and biologically distinct from other germ cell tumors (GCT). We describe the clinical and biologic features of these patients and evaluate the results of treatment during the cisplatin era. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1976 and 1993, 38 patients with mediastinal NSGCT received cisplatin-based chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment. Twenty-nine of them were initially treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR), VillejuiF, France, and nine were referred for salvage treatment. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients initially treated at IGR, 11 (39%) had metastasis. A complete response (CR) to therapy was obtained in 19 of 29 patients (66%) after chemotherapy and surgery. Ten patients (34.5%) have remained free of disease with a median follow-up of 89 months. All patients who did not achieve a CR died of disease. The 2-year overall survival rate for the IGR patients is 45% and the 2-year disease-free survival is 37%. Only the presence of extrapulmonary metastasis was of prognostic significance in the univariate analysis (P = .0095). None of the 20 patients who required salvage therapy is currently disease-free. Five patients developed and subsequently died of a hematologic malignancy at an interval range of 1 to 47 months from treatment of mediastinal NSGCT. Cytogenetic analysis of leukemic cells found an isochromosome of the short arm of chromosome 12 (12p) in two cases. The incidence of leukemia was 21% in patients who attained a CR. CONCLUSION: Primary mediastinal NSGCT is a clinical and biologic entity that should be distinguished from other GCT. About 40% of these patients can envisage long-term survival with modern therapy that includes cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgical resection of residual masses. New strategies are required for patients who do not attain a CR. Predictive factors and improvement in therapy are required for mediastinal NSGCT-associated leukemia.

Survival of patients with resected N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: evidence for a subclassification and implications.

PURPOSE: Patients who suffer from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (N2) belong to a heterogeneous subgroup of patients. We analyzed the prognosis of patients with resected N2 NSCLC to propose homogeneous patient subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study comprised 702 consecutive patients from six French centers who underwent surgical resection of N2 NSCLC. Initially, two groups of patients were defined: patients with clinical N2 (cN2) and those with minimal N2 (mN2) disease were patients in whom N2 disease was and was not detected preoperatively at computed tomographic scan, respectively. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 52 months (range, 18 to 120 months). A multivariate analysis using Cox regression identified four negative prognostic factors, namely, cN2 status (P <. 0001), involvement of multiple lymph node levels (L2+; P <.0001), pT3 to T4 stage (P <.0001), and no preoperative chemotherapy (P <. 01). For patients treated with primary surgery, 5-year survival rates were as follows: mN2, one level involved (mN2L1, n = 244): 34%; mN2, multiple level involvement (mN2L2+, n = 78): 11%; cN2L1 (n = 118): 8%; and cN2L2+ (n = 122): 3%. When only patients with mN2L1 disease were considered, the site of lymph node involvement according to the American Thoracic Society numbering system had no prognostic significance (P =.14). Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with a better prognosis for those with cN2 (P <.0001). Five-year survival rates were 18% and 5% for cN2 patients treated with and without preoperative chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study has identified homogeneous N2 NSCLC prognostic subgroups and suggests different therapeutic approaches according to the subgroup profile.

Combined systemic chemoimmunotherapy in advanced diffuse malignant mesothelioma. Report of a phase I-II study of weekly cisplatin/interferon alfa-2a.

PURPOSE: To assess the tolerance, toxicity, and antitumoral activity of the weekly combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and interferon alfa-2a (IFNalpha2a) in advanced diffuse malignant mesothelioma (DMM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with DMM (23 pleural and three peritoneal), previously untreated, were enrolled onto this study between August 1991 and December 1992. All patients had measurable disease defined by computed tomographic (CT) scan and diagnostic confirmation by histopathology review panel. IFNalpha2a (3 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously on days 1 to 4) and CDDP (60 mg/m2/wk on day 2) were given weekly. Initially planned as a 5-weeks-on/3-weeks-off treatment cycle, poor patient tolerance observed in the first 12 patients treated (group A) led to schedule adaptation with a shorter treatment sequence and prolongation of the rest period (4 weeks on/4 weeks off) in the following 14 patients (group B). At least two cycles were administered to each patient in the absence of tumor progression. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were assessable for toxicity and 25 for efficacy (World Health Organization [WHO] criteria). Sixty-eight cycles of IFN/CDDP were given, with a median of three cycles per patient (range, one to five). Toxicity was mainly clinical, with progressive anorexia, asthenia, and prolonged nausea/emesis; these side effects have limited treatment acceptance in many patients. Thrombocytopenia and leukopenia were rarely noted as treatment-limiting toxicities. Objective responses (all partial) were obtained in 10 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 20% to 60%). The median response duration was 11 months (range, 6 to 18). The median time to progression (TTP) for the whole cohort was 6 months and the median survival time was 12 months (range, 5 to 32). Objective responders had a significantly longer median TTP (21 months) and survival time (25 months) than nonresponders (3 and 8 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot phase I-II study show encouraging antitumor activity in this traditionally resistant tumor, even if the specific contribution of IFN remains speculative and needs further clinical research. Our ongoing program is exploring the dose-intensity impact of IFN dose within the same combination.