Safety and Efficacy of Dotinurad on Uric Acid in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Below 25 mL/Min/1.73 m².

Introduction Dotinurad is being developed as a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor. However, its effect on lowering serum uric acid (UA) levels in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with severe renal dysfunction is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of dotinurad on renal function in CKD patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 25 mL/min/1.73 m2. Methods Seven patients with CKD who received dotinurad 0.5 mg to 4 mg per day were studied retrospectively. Changes in UA, eGFR, and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) were analyzed. The observation period was 10.9±2.1 months. Results Serum UA levels were decreased and maintained with dotinurad administration. Nevertheless, there were no improvements noted in renal function. Additionally, no serious adverse effects were identified in any of the patients throughout the observation period. Conclusion Although the sample size in this study was small, our findings demonstrate the efficacy of dotinurad in individuals with advanced CKD who have an eGFR lower than 25 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin for Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Vildagliptin is one of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors that have been shown to improve hyperglycemia in clinical trials among patients with type 2 diabetes. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of vildagliptin in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients with DKD received oral vildagliptin 50-100 mg/day. The duration of diabetes was 6.7±5.9 years and observation period was 23.6±9.8 months. Changes in fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) were studied before and after the administration of vildagliptin. RESULTS: Vildagliptin treatment significantly decreased fasting blood glucose and HbA1c, compared to baseline (132±56 mg/dl, p=0.036, 6.0±0.3, p=0.041, respectively). UPCR tended to be decreased, albeit without statistical significance. However, eGFR was decreased after the administration of vildagliptin. No significant adverse effects were observed in all patients during the study. CONCLUSION: Although the sample size was limited and the observation period was brief, vildagliptin was found to be an effective and reasonably well-tolerated treatment for patients with DKD.

Effect of finerenone on nephrotic syndrome in patients with diabetic kidney disease.

Introduction: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is an important complication of diabetes as it results in end-stage renal disease; hence, several drugs have been developed for its treatment. However, even with treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, the residual risk of DKD remains. While this risk is an issue, the renoprotective effects of finerenone, a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, are becoming evident. High proteinuria increases the risk of cardiovascular death as well as renal failure. Hence, it is especially important to address cases of urine protein to nephrotic levels in DKD, however, no previous studies have assessed the safety and efficacy of finerenone in patients with DKD and nephrotic syndrome. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether finerenone has a renoprotective effect in advanced DKD complicated by nephrotic syndrome. Methods: Nine patients with DKD and nephrotic syndrome who received 10-20 mg/day of finerenone were retrospectively analyzed. The average observation period was 9.7 ± 3.4 months. Patients with serum potassium levels greater than 5.0 mEq/L at the start of finelenone were excluded. Changes in urinary protein levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum potassium levels were studied before and after finerenone administration. Results: The mean changes in the urinary protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) at baseline were 6.6 ± 2.0. After finerenone treatment, the mean UPCR decreased to -0.6 ± 3.9; however, this change was not statistically significant.The eGFR decline slope also tended to decrease with finerenone treatment (before vs. after: 3.1 ± 4.9 vs. -1.7 ± 3.2 mL/min/1.73 m2. Furthermore, finerenone did not increase serum potassium levels. Conclusions: Patients treated with finerenone showed decreased UPCR; hence, it is suggested that finerenone may be effective in treating nephrotic syndrome in patients with DKD. These findings may be applicable to real-world clinical settings. Nonetheless, it is important to note that this study was a retrospective analysis of a single-center cohort and had a limited sample size, highlighting the need for additional large-scale investigations.

Effects of Oral Semaglutide on Renal Function in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Short-term Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In the SUSTAIN-6 trial, semaglutide reduced the risk of worsening nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. The objective of this retrospective study was to elucidate the effect and safety of oral semaglutide (Rybelsus®) in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients with DKD received 3 mg/day semaglutide orally. The observation period was 9.0±5.0 months. Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary protein, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c were studied from 6 months before the administration of oral semaglutide until 6 months after administration. RESULTS: The change in eGFR over the 6 months prior to semaglutide administration was -1.2±1.6 ml/min/1.73 m2, showing a trend for a decrease; although not statistically significant, the change at 6 months after oral semaglutide initiation showed improved eGFR (1-50.7±1.8 ml/min/1.73 m2). Proteinuria was not reduced after treatment with oral semaglutide. No significant adverse effects (including retinopathy) were observed in any patient during the study. CONCLUSION: Despite the small sample size and short observation period, oral semaglutide was found to be a relatively well-tolerated drug for patients with DKD.

Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Patients Having Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Long-term Observational Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Sacubitril/valsartan (SV), a novel pharmacological class of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, is effective in treating heart failure (HF) by inhibiting the degradation of natriuretic peptides and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. However, no studies have observed the long-term effects of SV on patients with HF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing hemodialysis (HD) over a long period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study of 21 months duration involved consecutive patients with HF and preserved LVEF undergoing HD, who received 50-200 mg/day. All patients were followed up regularly, and clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded at baseline and during follow-up. The efficacy and safety of SV were also analyzed. RESULTS: This longitudinal study included nine patients, with a median age of 76 years. The median HD duration was 7 years. At baseline, the mean brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was 133±73.6 pg/ml and that of LVEF was 66%±9%. After SV therapy, the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate decreased, albeit without statistical significance. BNP levels, LVEF, left atrial anteroposterior dimension, and left ventricular mass index did not change, compared to baseline values. No adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: SV tended to decrease blood pressure and heart rate in patients with HF and preserved LVEF undergoing HD but did not alter cardiac function assessments, such as BNP or echocardiography.