Therapeutic drug monitoring and virological response at week 48 in a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients switching to dolutegravir/rilpivirine dual maintenance therapy (ANRS-MIE-BIRIDER study).

AIMS: Dolutegravir (DTG) and rilpivirine (RPV) dual therapy is now recommended as a switch option in virologically suppressed HIV patients. Literature suggests that virological failure with dual therapy could possibly relate to subtherapeutic drug concentrations. In this study, we aimed at describing the DTG and RPV trough plasma concentrations (Cmin) and plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) during maintenance dual therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of DTG and RPV therapeutic drug monitoring in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) with dual therapy in 9 French centres. DTG and RPV trough plasma concentrations were estimated using a Bayesian approach to predict Cmin. The relationship between the pharmacokinetics of DTG and RPV and VL > 50 copies (cp)/mL was explored using joint nonlinear mixed models. The frequency of subtherapeutic threshold (DTG Cmin below 640 ng/mL and RPV Cmin below 50 ng/mL) were compared between PLWHA presenting VL > 50 cp/mL or not during the study. RESULTS: At baseline, 209 PLWHA were enrolled in the study. At week 48, 19 people living with HIV/AIDS (9.1%) discontinued their treatment and 15 PLWHA (7.1%) exhibited VL > 50 cp/mL. Six PLWHA out of 15 (40.0%) with VL > 50 cp/mL during the follow-up had at least 1 Cmin below the respective thresholds while only 26/194 patients (13.4%) without virological replication had at least 1 concentration below the threshold (P = .015). CONCLUSION: A majority of PLWHA receiving DTG/RPV maintenance dual therapy demonstrated VL < 50 cp/mL but virological replication was more frequent in people living with HIV/AIDS with subtherapeutic Cmin.

Follow the Area Under the Curve Not the Trough Concentration: A Case Study of Tacrolimus Monitoring in a Kidney Transplant Recipient Cotreated With Phenobarbital.

ABSTRACT: The authors described tacrolimus dosing in a kidney transplant patient concurrently treated with phenobarbital, where measuring the tacrolimus area under the curve was necessary to achieve adequate drug exposure and improve kidney function.

Adaptative Strategy of Immunosuppressive Drugs Dosage Adjustments When Combined With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With COVID-19.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is a promising option for preventing severe COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, concerns have arisen regarding potential drug interactions with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). This two-phase multicentre retrospective study, involving 113 patients on tacrolimus and 13 on cyclosporine A, aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of recommendations issued by The French societies of transplantation (SFT) and pharmacology (SFPT) for CNI management in this context. The study first evaluated adherence to recommendations, CNI exposure, and clinical outcomes. Notably, 96.5% of patients on tacrolimus adhered to the recommendations, maintaining stable tacrolimus trough concentrations (C0) during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. After reintroduction, most patients experienced increased C0, with 42.9% surpassing 15 ng/mL, including three patients exceeding 40 ng/mL. Similar trends were observed in cyclosporine A patients, with no COVID-19-related hospitalizations. Moreover, data from 22 patients were used to refine the reintroduction strategy. Modelling analyses suggested reintroducing tacrolimus at 50% of the initial dose on day 8, and then at 100% from day 9 as the optimal approach. In conclusion, the current strategy effectively maintains consistent tacrolimus exposure during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment, and a stepwise reintroduction of tacrolimus may be better suited to the low CYP3A recovery.

Can we predict the influence of inflammation on voriconazole exposure? An overview.

Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal indicated for invasive fungal infections that exhibits a high degree of inter-individual and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability. Voriconazole pharmacokinetics is non-linear, making dosage adjustments more difficult. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended by measurement of minimum plasma concentrations. Several factors are responsible for the high pharmacokinetic variability of voriconazole: age, feeding (which decreases absorption), liver function, genetic polymorphism of the CYP2C19 gene, drug interactions and inflammation. Invasive fungal infections are indeed very frequently associated with inflammation, which engenders a risk of voriconazole overexposure. Many studies have reviewed this topic in both the adult and paediatric populations, but few studies have focused on the specific point of the prediction, to evaluate the influence of inflammation on voriconazole pharmacokinetics. Predicting the impact of inflammation on voriconazole pharmacokinetics could help optimize antifungal therapy and improve patient management. This review summarizes the existing data on the influence of inflammation on voriconazole pharmacokinetics in adult populations. We also evaluate the role of C-reactive protein, the impact of inflammation on patient metabolic phenotypes, and the tools that can be used to predict the effect of inflammation on voriconazole pharmacokinetics.

The concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used by patients with cancer, although they could reduce the absorption of oral anticancer targeted therapies. The US Food and Drug Administration states that the effect of PPIs on the efficacy of dabrafenib use by patients with metastatic melanoma is unknown. As a precautionary measure, the European Society for Medical Oncology recommends avoiding PPIs for patients receiving dabrafenib. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the concomitant use of PPIs and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: Patients with advanced melanoma receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors as first-line treatments between 2015 and 2017 in France were selected using the French National Health Insurance database. We compared time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) according to concomitant PPI exposure. We balanced the baseline characteristics of patients exposed and nonexposed to PPIs using an overlap weighting method based on a propensity score. RESULTS: The metastatic melanoma cohort comprised 1028 patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors, including 361 (35.1%) patients using PPIs. PPI users had more comorbidities and a more severe metastatic disease. After having equally distributed metastatic sites and comorbidities across patients exposed and nonexposed to PPIs, concomitant PPI use was not associated with shorter TTD [weighted hazard ratio (wHR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.24] or OS (wHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.39). Consistent results were observed when restricting the population to patients receiving dabrafenib, or when narrowing exposure to PPIs with stronger inhibition of cytochromes. CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based cohort of patients with advanced melanoma, the concomitant use of PPIs and BRAF/MEK inhibitors was not associated with worse outcome.

Lactic acidosis after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation potentially related to letermovir.

A 53-year-old woman with a history of acute myeloid leukaemia received a second allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant and was prescribed, among other medications, acyclovir and letermovir (480-mg daily oral dose) for prophylaxis of, respectively, herpes simplex and cytomegalovirus infection. The patient was admitted in the intensive care unit for dyspnoea and oliguria. Laboratory investigations revealed acute kidney injury but also a severe and progressive lactic acidosis. Liver function tests were within normal range. The combination of lactic acidosis, hypoglycaemia and acylcarnitine profile in plasma raised the suspicion of mitochondrial toxicity. Letermovir therapy was interrupted, and determination of plasma letermovir pharmacokinetics revealed a prolonged terminal half-life (38.7 h) that was not significantly influenced by continuous venovenous haemofiltration. Exploration for genetic polymorphisms revealed that the patient was SLCO1B1*5/*15 (c.521T>C homozygous carrier and c.388A>G heterozygous carrier) with a predicted nonfunctional organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 protein. The relationship between letermovir accumulation and development of lactic acidosis requires further observations.

Blood, Cellular, and Tissular Calcineurin Inhibitors Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship in Heart Transplant Recipients: The INTRACAR Study.

BACKGROUND: After heart transplantation, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (cyclosporin A and tacrolimus) are key immunosuppressive drugs to prevent graft rejection. Whole-blood concentration (C blood )-guided therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is systematically performed to improve graft outcomes. However, some patients will still experience graft rejection and/or adverse events despite CNI C blood within the therapeutic range. Other pharmacokinetic parameters, such as the intragraft, or intracellular concentration at the CNI site of action could refine their TDM. Nonetheless, these remain to be explored. The objective of the INTRACAR study was to describe the relationship between whole blood, intragraft, and intracellular CNI concentrations as well as their efficacy in heart transplant recipients (HTR). METHODS: In a cohort of HTR, protocol endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) were collected to assess rejection by anatomopathological analysis. Part of the EMB was used to measure the intragraft concentrations of CNI (C EMB ). C blood and the concentration inside peripheral blood mononuclear cells, (C PBMC ), a cellular fraction enriched with lymphocytes, were also monitored. Concentrations in the 3 matrices were compared between patients with and without biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). RESULTS: Thirty-four HTR were included, representing nearly 100 pharmacokinetic (PK) samples for each CNI. C blood , C EMB , and C PBMC correlated for both CNI. BPAR was observed in 74 biopsies (39.6%) from 26 patients (76.5%), all except one was of low grade. None of the PK parameters (C blood , C EMB , C PBMC , C EMB/blood , and C PBMC/blood ) was associated with BPAR. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of well-immunosuppressed patients, no association was observed for any of the PK parameters, including C blood , with the occurrence of BPAR. However, a trend was noticed for the C EMB and C EMB/blood of cyclosporin A. Further studies in higher-risk patients may help optimize the use of C EMB and C PBMC for CNI TDM in HTR.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Dosage Adjustments of Immunosuppressive Drugs When Combined With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Patients With COVID-19.

ABSTRACT: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) consists of a peptidomimetic inhibitor (nirmatrelvir) of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease and a pharmacokinetic enhancer (ritonavir). It is approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. This combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir can mediate significant and complex drug-drug interactions (DDIs), primarily due to the ritonavir component. Indeed, ritonavir inhibits the metabolism of nirmatrelvir through cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) leading to higher plasma concentrations and a longer half-life of nirmatrelvir. Coadministration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) is particularly challenging given the major involvement of CYP3A in the metabolism of most of these drugs and their narrow therapeutic ranges. Exposure of ISDs will be drastically increased through the potent ritonavir-mediated inhibition of CYP3A, resulting in an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. Although a decrease in the dosage of ISDs can prevent toxicity, an inappropriate dosage regimen may also result in insufficient exposure and a risk of rejection. Here, we provide some general recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring of ISDs and dosing recommendations when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Particularly, tacrolimus should be discontinued, or patients should be given a microdose on day 1, whereas cyclosporine dosage should be reduced to 20% of the initial dosage during the antiviral treatment. Dosages of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (m-TORis) should also be adjusted while dosages of mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids are expected to be less impacted.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Abiraterone, Apalutamide, Darolutamide or Enzalutamide and Antithrombotic Drugs: Prediction of Clinical Events and Review of Pharmacological Information.

PURPOSE: Abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide and enzalutamide are second-generation hormone therapies used for advanced prostate cancer; the majority of patients receiving these treatments are elderly, poly-medicated patients. Since their first market authorizations, their pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics are increasingly well known. A potential risk of drug-drug interaction (DDI), especially with cardiovascular drugs, needs to be considered. In the case of antithrombotics, treatment imbalance can lead to severe consequences. OBJECTIVES: To describe PK profiles of hormone therapies and antithrombotics and to predict DDIs and potentially related clinical events. METHODS: PK profiles (CYP450 and P-gp substrate, inducer or inhibitor) are described by cross-referencing data sources (summary of product characteristics, European public assessment reports, PubMed database, Micromedex®, etc.); a description of the potential interactions with anti-cancer drugs for each DDI and related clinical events is provided. We discuss management recommendations, including those set out in international guidelines. RESULTS: Antithrombotics are mainly metabolized by CYP 2C9, 2C19 or 3A4. For abiraterone (CYP 2C8, 2D6 inhibitor) and darolutamide (CYP 3A4 inducer), no interaction was identified with antithrombotics. For apalutamide (CYP 2C9, 2C19, 3A4 and P-gp inducer) and enzalutamide (CYP 2C9, 2C19, 3A4 inducer and P-gp inhibitor), several PK interactions were identified with antithrombotics, which could lead to various clinical events (haemorrhage or thromboembolism). CONCLUSION: Numerous interactions are expected between enzalutamide or apalutamide and antithrombotics, for which management should be deployed on a case-by-case basis. PK and pharmaco-epidemiological studies could shed light on whether or not there are clinically significant events related to DDIs with antithrombotics.

Area under the curve of tacrolimus using microsampling devices: towards precision medicine in solid organ transplantation?

PURPOSE: Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus using trough concentration (Cmin) is mandatory to ensure drug efficacy and safety in solid organ transplantation. However, Cmin is just a proxy for the area under the curve of drug concentrations (AUC) which is the best pharmacokinetic parameter for exposure evaluation. Some studies suggest that patients may present discrepancies between these two parameters. AUC is now easily available through mini-invasive microsampling approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between AUC and Cmin in patients benefiting from a complete pharmacokinetic profile using a microsampling approach. METHODS: Fifty-one transplant recipients benefited from a complete pharmacokinetic profile using a microsampling approach, and their 24-h AUC were calculated using the trapezoidal method. The correlation with Cmin was then explored. In parallel, we estimated AUC using the sole Cmin and regression equations according to the post-transplantation days and the galenic form. RESULTS: Weak correlations were found between 24-h AUC observed and the corresponding Cmin (R2 = 0.60) and between AUC observed and expected using the sole Cmin (R2 = 0.62). Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus using Cmin leads to over- or under-estimate drug exposure in 40.3% of patients. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus Cmin appears to be an imperfect reflection of drug exposure. Evaluating AUC using a microsampling approach offers a mini-invasive strategy to monitor tacrolimus treatment in transplant recipients.

Contribution of voriconazole N-oxide plasma concentration measurements to voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with invasive fungal infection.

BACKGROUND: Voriconazole (VRC), a widely used triazole antifungal, exhibits significant inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability. The main metabolite voriconazole N-oxide (NOX) can provide information on the patient's drug metabolism capacity. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to implement routine measurement of NOX concentrations and to describe the metabolic ratio (MR), and the contribution of the MR to VRC therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by proposing a suggested dosage-adjustment algorithm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients treated with VRC were prospectively included in the study, and VRC and NOX levels were assayed by LC-MS/MS. A mixed logistic model on repeated measures was implemented to analyse risk factors for the patient's concentration to be outside the therapeutic range. RESULTS: Based on 225 measurements, the median and interquartile range were 2.4 µg/ml (1.2; 4.2), 2.1 µg/ml (1.5; 3.0) and 1.0 (0.6; 1.9) for VRC, NOX and the MR, respectively. VRC Cmin <2 µg/ml were associated with a higher MR during the previous visit. MR values >1.15 and <0.48 were determined to be the best predictors for having a VRC Cmin lower than 2 µg/ml and above 5.5 µg/ml, respectively, at the next visit. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of NOX resulted useful for TDM of patients treated with VRC. The MR using NOX informed interpretation and clinical decision-making and is very interesting for complex patients. VRC phenotyping based on the MR is now performed routinely in our institution. A dosing algorithm has been suggested from these results.

Has the Time Come for Systematic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of First-Line and WHO Group A Antituberculosis Drugs?

ABSTRACT: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global health issue, with approximately 10 million people being infected each year, and is the leading cause of mortality from infectious disease, with 1.5 million deaths a year. Optimal TB treatment requires a combination of drugs for an adequate treatment duration owing to persistent organisms, hardly accessible infection sites, and a high risk of resistance selection. Long-term therapy increases the risk of patients' loss of adherence, adverse drug reactions, and drug-drug interactions, potentially leading to treatment failure. The high interpatient variability of TB drug exposure is another point eliciting interest in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize treatment. Studies reporting clinically relevant exposure thresholds, which might be proposed as targets toward treatment personalization, are discussed. Practical TDM strategies have also been reported to circumvent issues related to delayed drug absorption and the need for multiple samples when evaluating the area under the curve of drug concentrations. The need for treatment individualization is further emphasized because of the development of multidrug-resistant TB or extensively drug-resistant TB. Finally, the willingness to shorten the treatment duration while maintaining success is also a driver for ensuring adequate exposure to TB drugs with TDM. The aim of the present review was to underline the role of TDM in drug-susceptible TB and World Health Organization group A TB drugs.

Clinical trials during pandemics and beyond: time for a more efficient pharmacological strategy.

During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, clinical trials on antiviral or symptomatic drugs have been conducted very rapidly even for drugs with a poor pharmacological rationale for efficacy on SARS-CoV-2. Despite lacking basic pharmacological information, most of these clinical trials were also extremely redundant. Applying simple rules, (such as identifying a mechanistic rationale, confirming the ability to reach exposure targets at therapeutic dosage and ensuring tests show drug efficacy in appropriate in vitro and animal models before entering clinical trials) might have saved considerable amounts of time and money, and might have avoided useless research. Moreover, combining these simple rules with the implementation of a relevant policy at both an international and a national level, by limiting studies with a poor methodological/scientific approach and aggregating studies with similar design into single clinical trials, is potentially a far more-efficient strategy.

CSF concentration of cefotaxime in adult patients with pneumococcal meningitis: a multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pneumococcal meningitis is a devastating disease that requires adequate meningeal antibiotic penetration to limit the mortality. Despite a large usage in this indication, data about CSF concentration of cefotaxime during pneumococcal meningitis in adults are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to describe the CSF concentration obtained after high-dose cefotaxime administration in adult patients treated for Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentre, observational, retrospective study, cases of adult patients with S. pneumoniae meningitis hospitalized between January 2013 and October 2019 for whom cefotaxime concentration was measured in CSF were reviewed. RESULTS: Cefotaxime concentration was analysed in 44 CSF samples collected among 31 patients. Median (IQR) age was 61 years (52-69). Dexamethasone was administered in 27 subjects. Median (IQR) cefotaxime daily dosage was 15 g (12-19), corresponding to 200 mg/kg (150-280). CSF samples were collected approximately 5 days after cefotaxime initiation. Median (IQR, range) cefotaxime CSF concentration was 10.3 mg/L (4.8-19.3, 1.2-43.4). Median (range) MIC for Streptococcus pneumoniae was 0.25 mg/L (0.008-1) (n = 22). The median (IQR, range) CSF/MIC ratio was 38 (12-146, 4-1844). Twenty-five CSF concentrations (81%) were above 10 times the MIC. Cefotaxime was discontinued in two patients for toxicity. In-hospital mortality rate was 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with pneumococcal meningitis treated with a high dose of cefotaxime (200 mg/kg/day) had elevated CSF concentrations with satisfying pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics parameters and tolerability profile. This study brings reassuring pharmacological data regarding the use of high-dose cefotaxime monotherapy for treating pneumococcal meningitis with susceptible strains to cefotaxime.

Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

ABSTRACT: When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.

The need for area under the curve measurements in the field of ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring in children: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Ganciclovir pharmacokinetics is characterized by a high variability in drug exposure. Usually, monitoring of ganciclovir exposure is performed by measuring trough concentration. However, due to the specificity of pediatric pharmacokinetics, trough concentration measurements may not be a relevant surrogate of ganciclovir exposure. Area under the curve of concentration (AUC) may be a more appropriate biomarker. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of 3.6-year-old boy with Emberger syndrome with a cytomegalovirus reactivation occurring after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. After a few days of treatment with intravenous ganciclovir, sub-therapeutic trough ganciclovir concentrations were measured (< 0.5 µg/mL) and viral load still increased. Ganciclovir dosage was increased by two-fold to deal with this treatment failure. Trough concentrations remained sub-therapeutic. The patient had hematologic disorder therefore it was decided to estimate ganciclovir AUC to assess more accurately drug exposure before any further dosage modification. AUC0-12 h was measured at 51 µg h/mL, which was within the therapeutic range (40-60 µg h/mL). Afterward, viral load decreased and became undetectable. CONCLUSIONS: This case report highlights that monitoring ganciclovir exposure based on AUC should be performed to tailor drug dosage in order to improve treatment efficacy and safety in pediatric patients.

Determination of amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole concentrations in sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis.

In the management of cystic fibrosis, treatments against Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae such as amoxicillin or cotrimoxazole have to be prescribed and the antibiotherapy's efficacy may be linked to the concentration that reaches the infected site. As cystic fibrosis patients present disturbed pharmacokinetics parameters, drug monitoring would be relevant to assess the lung distribution of antibiotics and to optimize dosing regimens. In this context, the aim of the study was to develop and validate HPLC-based methods for the determination of both antibiotics in bronchial sputum from cystic fibrosis patients, in order to assess the distribution of the drugs into the lungs. Plasma proteins were precipitated by acetonitrile and amoxicillin concentrations in sputum were determined by HPLC coupled with tandem-mass spectrometry. Following liquid extraction with ethyl acetate, cotrimoxazole was quantified by HPLC using ultraviolet detection. Both methods were rapid, specific, accurate and reproducible. The method was applied to patient samples. In three treated patients, concentrations of amoxicillin in sputum were similar and below the lower limit of quantification (0.1 µg/g) and in six patients, sputum concentrations up to 11.1 and 6.4 µg/g were measured for sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, respectively.

COVID-19 in Patient with Sarcoidosis Receiving Long-Term Hydroxychloroquine Treatment, France, 2020.

Because of in vitro studies, hydroxychloroquine has been evaluated as a preexposure or postexposure prophylaxis for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and as a possible COVID-19 curative treatment. We report a case of COVID-19 in a patient with sarcoidosis who was receiving long-term hydroxychloroquine treatment and contracted COVID-19 despite adequate plasma concentrations.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Transplant Recipients Infected With SARS-CoV-2: Considerations Regarding Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Drug-Drug Interactions.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a novel infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory distress (SARS)-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Several therapeutic options are currently emerging but none with universal consensus or proven efficacy. Solid organ transplant recipients are perceived to be at increased risk of severe COVID-19 because of their immunosuppressed conditions due to chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs). It is therefore likely that solid organ transplant recipients will be treated with these experimental antivirals. METHODS: This article is not intended to provide a systematic literature review on investigational treatments tested against COVID-19; rather, the authors aim to provide recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring of ISDs in transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 based on a review of existing data in the literature. RESULTS: Management of drug-drug interactions between investigational anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs and immunosuppressants is a complex task for the clinician. Adequate immunosuppression is necessary to prevent graft rejection while, if critically ill, the patient may benefit from pharmacotherapeutic interventions directed at limiting SARS-CoV-2 viral replication. Maintaining ISD concentrations within the desired therapeutic range requires a highly individualized approach that is complicated by the pandemic context and lack of hindsight. CONCLUSIONS: With this article, the authors inform the clinician about the potential interactions of experimental COVID-19 treatments with ISDs used in transplantation. Recommendations regarding therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustments in the context of COVID-19 are provided.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-Guided Crushed Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir Treatment: A Case Study.

In this study, the authors report the case of a patient diagnosed with hepatitis C virus who was treated with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (400/100 mg). As the patient was unable to swallow whole tablets, therapeutic drug monitoring was performed to evaluate the effect of crushing sofosbuvir-velpatasvir tablets on drug absorption and global exposure.