How to determine the optimal proximal fusion level for Scheuermann kyphosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine optimal proximal fusion levels for instrumented spinal fusion for Scheuermann kyphosis. METHODS: We reviewed 86 patients (33 women) who underwent corrective instrumented spinal fusion for Scheuermann kyphosis. All patients had long-cassette upright lateral radiographs taken preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 2 years and the last follow-up. Demographic, radiographic, and surgical parameters were compared between patients with and without PJK. RESULTS: PJK occurred in 28 patients (32%). The mean maximum Cobb angle was 85.8° ± 11.7° preoperatively, 54.8° ± 14.2° postoperatively, and 59.7° ± 16.8° at the last follow-up. Age and sex did not differ between the PJK and non-PJK groups (P > 0.05). The preoperative curve characteristics, fusion levels, and corrective ratio were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). The maximal Cobb angle at 2 years and the last follow-up significantly differed between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) at or above the proximal end vertebra (PEV) was similar in both groups (P > 0.05). The proportion of patients with UIV at or above T2 was significantly greater in the non-PJK group (P < 0.05). PJK was significantly associated with a C7 plumb line (C7PL)-sacrum distance ≥ 50 mm (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PJK is the main cause of postoperative correction loss. Proper fusion-level selection can reduce PJK occurrence. We recommend having the UIV at T2 or above, especially when the C7PL-sacrum distance ≥ 50 mm.

Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Due to recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), language model applications can generate logical text output that is difficult to distinguish from human writing. ChatGPT (OpenAI) and Bard (subsequently rebranded as "Gemini"; Google AI) were developed using distinct approaches, but little has been studied about the difference in their capability to generate the abstract. The use of AI to write scientific abstracts in the field of spine surgery is the center of much debate and controversy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the reproducibility of the structured abstracts generated by ChatGPT and Bard compared to human-written abstracts in the field of spine surgery. METHODS: In total, 60 abstracts dealing with spine sections were randomly selected from 7 reputable journals and used as ChatGPT and Bard input statements to generate abstracts based on supplied paper titles. A total of 174 abstracts, divided into human-written abstracts, ChatGPT-generated abstracts, and Bard-generated abstracts, were evaluated for compliance with the structured format of journal guidelines and consistency of content. The likelihood of plagiarism and AI output was assessed using the iThenticate and ZeroGPT programs, respectively. A total of 8 reviewers in the spinal field evaluated 30 randomly extracted abstracts to determine whether they were produced by AI or human authors. RESULTS: The proportion of abstracts that met journal formatting guidelines was greater among ChatGPT abstracts (34/60, 56.6%) compared with those generated by Bard (6/54, 11.1%; P<.001). However, a higher proportion of Bard abstracts (49/54, 90.7%) had word counts that met journal guidelines compared with ChatGPT abstracts (30/60, 50%; P<.001). The similarity index was significantly lower among ChatGPT-generated abstracts (20.7%) compared with Bard-generated abstracts (32.1%; P<.001). The AI-detection program predicted that 21.7% (13/60) of the human group, 63.3% (38/60) of the ChatGPT group, and 87% (47/54) of the Bard group were possibly generated by AI, with an area under the curve value of 0.863 (P<.001). The mean detection rate by human reviewers was 53.8% (SD 11.2%), achieving a sensitivity of 56.3% and a specificity of 48.4%. A total of 56.3% (63/112) of the actual human-written abstracts and 55.9% (62/128) of AI-generated abstracts were recognized as human-written and AI-generated by human reviewers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both ChatGPT and Bard can be used to help write abstracts, but most AI-generated abstracts are currently considered unethical due to high plagiarism and AI-detection rates. ChatGPT-generated abstracts appear to be superior to Bard-generated abstracts in meeting journal formatting guidelines. Because humans are unable to accurately distinguish abstracts written by humans from those produced by AI programs, it is crucial to exercise special caution and examine the ethical boundaries of using AI programs, including ChatGPT and Bard.

Adult spinal deformity patients revised for pseudarthrosis have comparable two-year outcomes to those not undergoing any revision surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate whether adult spinal deformity patients undergoing revision for symptomatic pseudarthrosis have comparable two-year outcomes as patients who do not experience pseudarthrosis. METHODS: Patients whose indexed procedure was revision for pseudarthrosis (pseudo) were compared with patients who underwent a primary procedure and did not have pseudarthrosis by 2Y post-op (non-pseudo). Patients were propensity-matched (PSM) based on baseline (BL) sagittal alignment, specifically C7SVA and CrSVA-Hip. Key outcomes were 2Y PROs (SRS and ODI) and reoperation. All patients had a minimum follow-up period of two years. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients with min 2-year FU were included (pseudo = 42, non-pseudo = 182). Compared to non-pseudo, pseudo-patients were more often female (P = 0.0018) and had worse BL sagittal alignment, including T1PA (P = 0.02], C2-C7 SVA [P = 0.0002], and CrSVA-Hip [P = 0.004]. After 37 PSM pairs were generated, there was no significant difference in demographics, BL and 2Y alignment, or operative/procedural variables. PSM pairs did not report any significantly different PROs at BL. Consistently, at 2Y, there were no significant differences in PROs, including SRS function [3.9(0.2) vs 3.7(0.2), P = 0.44], pain [4.0 (0.2) vs. 3.57 (0.2), P = 0.12], and ODI [25.7 (5.2) vs 27.7 (3.7), P = 0.76]. There were no differences in 1Y (10.8% vs 10.8%, P > 0.99) and 2Y (13.2% vs 15.8%, P = 0.64) reoperation, PJK rate (2.6% vs 10.5%, P = 0.62), or implant failure (2.6% vs 10.5%, P = 0.37). Notably, only 2 patients (5.4%) had recurrent pseudarthrosis following revision. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that patients undergoing intervention for pseudarthrosis had comparable overall reoperation-free survival (log-rank test, χ2 = 0.1975 and P = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing revision for pseudarthrosis have comparable PROs and clinical outcomes as patients who never experienced pseudarthrosis. Recurrence of symptomatic pseudarthrosis was infrequent.

The iliac kickstand screw: anatomic CT analysis of screw trajectory and osseous corridor for screw placement.

INTRODUCTION: The 'kickstand screw-rod' technique has been recently described for correction of coronal malalignment. This technique utilizes powerful 'construct-to-ilium' distraction between a fixed multi-screw thoracic construct and the ilium, facilitated by a novel 'iliac kickstand screw'. The 'iliac kickstand screw' traverses a previously undescribed osseous corridor in the ilium. OBJECTIVE: Using a radiographic CT study, the objective is to describe a large osseous corridor within the ilium to accommodate the novel iliac kickstand screw. METHODS: 50 consecutive patients with pelvic CTs at an academic medical center were queried. Simulated iliac kickstand screw trajectories for the left and right hemipelvis were analyzed with 3D visualization software. Maximal screw lengths and dimensions, and trajectories in the osseous corridor were measured. RESULTS: 50 patients' (31 female, 19 male) pelvic CTs were measured with a total of 100 simulated screws. The mean age was 52.4 years and BMI 28.1 ± 7.9. The average length is 119.7 ± 6.6 mm (range 98.7 - 135.3). The narrowest width (maximum potential screw diameter) is 17.8 ± 2.9 mm (coronal) and 20.8 ± 5.3 mm (sagittal). The starting point to the top of the iliac crest is 66.4 mm lateral to midline, and 15.9° caudal in the sagittal and 6.1° lateral in the coronal planes. CONCLUSIONS: The novel iliac kickstand screw traverses a consistent and large osseous corridor within the ilium. The average simulated screw length is 119.7 mm and maximum potential diameter of 17.8 mm. Starting points relative to the iliac crest are identified.

Development of a preoperative risk score predicting allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in children undergoing spinal fusion.

BACKGROUND: Children undergoing spinal fusion often receive blood products. The goal of this study was to develop a preoperative score to help physicians identify those who are at risk of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective study of children undergoing spinal fusion in the ACS-NSQIP Pediatric database (2016-2019) aimed at identifying risk factors associated with allogeneic RBC transfusion. Univariable logistic regression and multivariable logistic regression were performed using preoperative patient characteristics and aided in the creation of a simplified scoring system. RESULTS: Out of 13,929 total patients, 2990 (21.5%) were transfused. We created a risk score based on 10 independent predictors of transfusion: age, sex, race, weight < 3rd percentile, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, cardiac risk factors, hematologic disease, preoperative anemia, deformity type, and number of spinal levels to be fused. Patients in both the training and testing cohorts were assigned a score ranging from 0 (lowest risk) to 21 (highest risk). The developed transfusion risk score showed 77% accuracy in distinguishing patients who did not receive a transfusion during or soon after surgery (AUROC 0.7736 [95% CI, 0.7619-0.7852]) in the training cohort and 77% accuracy (AUROC 0.7732 [95% CI, 0.7554-0.7910]) in the testing cohort. DISCUSSION: Our score, based on routinely available preoperative data, accurately estimates the risk of allogeneic RBC transfusion in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion. Future studies will inform whether patient blood management interventions targeted to high-risk patients can help reduce the need for transfusion and improve outcomes.

A novel risk calculator predicting surgical site infection after spinal surgery in patients with cerebral palsy.

AIM: To develop and validate a risk calculator based on preoperative factors to predict the probability of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing spinal surgery. METHOD: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with CP who underwent spinal fusion. In the development stage, preoperative known factors were collected, and a risk calculator was developed by comparing multiple models and choosing the model with the highest discrimination and calibration abilities. This model was then tested with a separate population in the validation stage. RESULTS: Among the 255 patients in the development stage, risk of SSI was 11%. A final prediction model included non-ambulatory status (odds ratio [OR] 4.0), diaper dependence (OR 2.5), age younger than 12 years (OR 2.5), major coronal curve magnitude greater than 90° (OR 1.3), behavioral disorder/delay (OR 1.3), and revision surgery (OR 1.3) as risk factors. This model had a predictive ability of 73.4% for SSI, along with excellent calibration ability (p = 0.878). Among the 390 patients in the validation stage, risk of SSI was 8.2%. The discrimination of the model in the validation phase was 0.743 and calibration was p = 0.435, indicating 74.3% predictive ability and no difference between predicted and observed values. INTERPRETATION: This study provides a risk calculator to identify the risk of SSI after spine surgery for patients with CP. This will allow us to enhance decision-making and patient care while providing valid hospital comparisons, public reporting mechanisms, and reimbursement determinations.

A national analysis on complications and readmissions for adult cerebral palsy patients undergoing primary spinal fusion surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective National Database Study. OBJECTIVE: Surgical intervention with spinal fusion is often indicated in cerebral palsy (CP) patients with progressive scoliosis. The purpose of this study was to utilize the National Readmission Database to determine the national estimates of complication rates, 90-day readmission rates, and costs associated with spinal fusion in adult patients with CP. METHODS: The 2012-2015 NRD databases were queried for all adult (age ≥ 19 years) patients diagnosed with CP (ICD-9: 333.71, 343.0-4, and 343.8-9) undergoing spinal fusion (ICD-9: 81.00-08). RESULTS: 1166 adult patients with CP (42.7% female) underwent spinal fusion surgery between 2012 and 2015. 153 (13.1%) were readmitted within 90 days following the primary surgery, with a mean 33.8 ± 26.5 days. Mean hospital charge of the primary admission was $141,416 ± $157,359 and $167,081 ± $145,416 for the non-readmitted and readmitted patients, respectively (p = 0.06). The mean 90-day readmission charge was $72,479 ± $104,100. Most common complications with the primary admission included UTIs (no readmission vs. readmission: 7.6% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.18), respiratory (6.9% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.62), implant (3.8% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.21), and paralytic ileus (3.6% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.858). Multivariate analyses demonstrated the following as independent predictors for 90-day readmission: comorbid anemia (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.6-4.9; p < 0.001), coagulopathy (2.9, 1.1-8.0, 0.037), perioperative blood transfusion (2.0, 1.1-3.8, 0.026), wound complication (6.4, 1.3-31.6, 0.023), and transfer to short-term hospital versus routine disposition (4.9, 1.0-23.3, 0.045). CONCLUSION: Quality improvement efforts should be aimed at reducing rates of infection related complications as this was the most common reason for short-term complications and unplanned readmission following surgery.

Pelvic thickness, sex, ethnicity, and age affect pelvic incidence in healthy volunteers of Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) database.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the affecting factors on pelvic incidence (PI) and to test the hypothesis that PI changes even after skeletal maturity probably due to hypermobility of the sacroiliac joint using a large international multi-center database. METHODS: A prospective and cross-sectional healthy adult volunteers, ages 18-80 years, across 5 countries were used. Radiographic measurements included standard whole body alignment parameters. Bivariate regression analyses between PI versus demographics and spino-pelvic anatomical parameters were performed. An effect of sex on pelvic anatomical parameters was also investigated. Multivariate logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure was performed to identify the contributing factors to PI, and an appropriate model was obtained. RESULTS: PI showed a significant positive correlation with age in pooled data. Divided by sex, however, there was no correlation in men, but women showed a significant higher correlation coefficient. Pelvic thickness (PTh) had a significant negative correlation with age in pooled data. Divided by sex, no correlation was found in men, but there was a significant correlation in women with higher correlation coefficient. The stepwise multivariate analysis for the factors on PI identified four significant factors: age, sex, ethnicity, and PTh. CONCLUSIONS: PTh, sex, ethnicity, and age affected PI. There was a positive correlation between PI and age. The tendency was more significant in woman than in man. The results support the hypothesis that PI increases with aging, but the change seems to be small and needs to be verified in a longitudinal evaluation.

Correlation analysis of the PI-LL mismatch according to the pelvic incidence from a database of 468 asymptomatic volunteers.

PURPOSE: Previous studies on adults with degenerative scoliosis (ADS) have been fixed the threshold of PI-LL mismatch less than 10° for achieving good clinical outcomes. Recent studies discussed that PI-LL mismatch should consider individual pelvic incidence (PI) and should be set first in a normal population. The purpose of this study is to assess the variability of PI-LL mismatch according to PI in an asymptomatic population. METHODS: Full-body low dose stereoradiographic evaluation was done in a multi-ethnic cohort of 468 asymptomatic adult volunteers. Patients were clustered in three groups depending on individual PI values: PI < 45°, 45° < PI < 60° and PI > 60°. 3D measurements were performed using a commercially available 2D/3D modeling software to establish a correlation of PI with other spinopelvic parameters. ANOVA and Tukey's HSD for post-hoc analysis were used to determine the differences between the three groups. RESULTS: In our asymptomatic population, the mean value of PI-LL mismatch is - 5.4° ± 10.7°. Clusterization of the population reveals significant differences in the distribution of L1S1 lordosis, pelvic tilt and PI-LL with positive linear correlation according to PI values. As an interestingly result, PI-LL mismatch is equal to 0° when PI is around 64°. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that PI-LL mismatch is negative in an asymptomatic population (- 5.4° ± 10.7°) and the value should be customized to each patient to be able to restore the appropriate lordosis in ADS. The PI-LL mismatch is given by the formula PI-LL = - 28.5 + 0.44 × PI.

Geometric analysis of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for Kyphosis correction: anterior lengthening may occur at the osteotomized body as well as at the discs above and below.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the authors kyphosis correction formula for pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) cases. Additionally, to use the formula to evaluate the safety of PSO by determining if there is anterior lengthening. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with primarily kyphosis corrected by PSO and with clear landmarks on preoperative and postoperative x-rays were selected. Several anatomical lines and angle measurements were utilized as depicted previously in the Vertebral Column Resection formula (see below). Two approximations were calculated: the geometric approximation (G) = (tanG°*2 + 1)*15° and the rough approximation (R) which is about the same amount of actual shortening (x), if parallel length (y) ≥ 40; twice of x, if y < 40. For each patient, the change of segmental kyphosis angle (K°) was measured and compared with G° and R°, and the correlation between each value was analyzed. RESULTS: The absolute Mean ± SE for K - G and K - R was 2.33° ± 0.34 and 6.09° ± 0.58, respectively. K - G is < 3° (p = 0.03). K - R is < 8° (p = 0.001). In other words, K was close to G and R and thus can be predicted by these approximations. Average posterior shortening, anterior shortening, and kyphosis correction at each level were 20.8 ± 2.0 mm, - 3.64 ± 1.5 mm (which equates to anterior lengthening), and 31.05° ± 2.0, respectively. Anterior lengthening occurred in 13 cases (in 4 cases, both at the body as well as at the disc above and below.) The correlation between posterior and anterior shortening was 0.03 (p = 0.88). There were 3 cage insertion cases: 1 had anterior lengthening, while 2 had anterior shortening even with the cage. CONCLUSION: This study validated the geometric and rough approximations originally used in PVCR patients, for PSO patients. Additionally, this study found that anterior lengthening may occur in PSOs usually at the discs, but occasionally at the osteotomized body.

Kickstand rods and correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: Coronal malalignment (CM) is a challenging spinal deformity to treat. The kickstand rod (KR) technique is powerful for correcting truncal shift. This study tested the hypothesis that the KR technique provides superior coronal alignment correction in adult deformity compared with traditional rod techniques. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected multicenter database was performed. A 2:1 matched cohort of non-KR accessory rod and KR patients was planned based on preoperative coronal balance distance (CBD) and a vector of global shift. Patients were subgrouped according to CM classification with a 30-mm CBD threshold defining CM, and comparisons of surgical and clinical outcomes among groups was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with preoperative CM treated with a KR were matched to 36 controls. KR-treated patients had improved CBD compared with controls (18 vs. 35 mm, P < 0.01). The postoperative CBD did not result in clinical differences between groups in patient-reported outcomes (P ≥ 0.09). Eight (38%) of 21 KR patients and 12 (33%) of 36 control patients with preoperative CM had persistent postoperative CM (P = 0.72). CM class did not significantly affect the likelihood of treatment failure (postoperative CBD > 30 mm) in the KR cohort (P = 0.70), the control cohort (P = 0.35), or the overall population (P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Application of the KR technique to coronal spinal deformity in adults allows for successful treatment of CM. Compared to traditional rod techniques, the use of KRs did not improve clinical outcome measures 1 year after spinal deformity surgery but was associated with better postoperative coronal alignment.

Can pelvic incidence change after spinal deformity correction to the pelvis with S2-alar-iliac screws?

PURPOSE: Pelvic incidence (PI) is assumed to be fixed, yet studies have reported PI changes after long fusions to the pelvis. In a cohort of ASD patients undergoing surgery with S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws, we sought to: (1) report the magnitude of PI changes, and (2) evaluate subsequent pelvic parameter changes. METHODS: A retrospective case series of ASD patients undergoing surgical correction with S2AI screw placement and sagittal cantilever correction maneuvers was conducted. Patients were categorized based on preoperative PI: High-PI (H-PI) (PI ≥ 60°); Normal-PI (N-PI) (60° > PI > 40°); Low-PI (L-PI) (PI ≤ 40°). PI was measured preoperatively and immediately postoperatively. A significant PI change was established a priori at ≥ 6.0. PI, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL mismatch were analyzed. RESULTS: In 68 patients (82.3% female, ages 22-75 years), the average change in PI was 4.6° ± 3.1, and 25 (36.8%) had a PI change ≥ 6.0° with breakdown as follows: H-PI 12 (66.7%) patients, 9 (25.87%) patients, and 4 (33.3%) patients. Of 25 patients with PI changes, 10 (14.7%) had a PI increase and 15 (22.1%) had a PI decrease. Significant improvements were seen in PT, LL, PI-LL mismatch in all patients with a PI change ≥ 6.0°, in addition to both subgroups with an increase or decrease in PI. CONCLUSIONS: PI changes of ≥ 6.0° occurred in 36.8% of patients, and H-PI patients most commonly experienced PI changes. Despite PI alterations, pelvic parameters significantly improved postoperatively. These results may be explained by sacroiliac joint laxity, S2AI screw placement, or aggressive sagittal cantilever techniques.

Surgeons lack of agreement on determining preoperative radiographic and clinical shoulder balance in adolescent and adult idiopathic scoliosis patients.

PURPOSE: Preoperative shoulder balance is an important factor in determining the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV). In adolescent and adult idiopathic scoliosis (AIS/AdIS) patients, we studied the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of spinal surgeons' assessment of preoperative shoulder balance using X-rays (XR) and anterior/posterior photographs. METHODS: An observational review of a prospective multicenter database (AIS Lenke Type 1/5/6) and prospective single-institution database (AdIS) was conducted. Ten spine surgeons reviewed AIS cases; 12 spine surgeons reviewed AdIS cases. Surgeons rated the higher shoulder: left/right/same/unsure. Reliability was calculated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Among 145 Type 1 AIS cases, intraobserver reliability was moderate-to-substantial: XR (κ = 0.59), anterior photographs (κ = 0.68), posterior photographs (k = 0.65). Interobserver reliability was fair to moderate for XR (κ = 0.31), anterior photographs (κ = 0.20), and posterior photographs (κ = 0.30). Among 52 Type 5/6 AIS cases, intraobserver reliability was substantial: XR (κ = 0.70), anterior photographs (κ = 0.76), posterior photographs (κ = 0.71). Interobserver reliability was fair to moderate for XR (κ = 0.49), anterior photographs (κ = 0.47), and posterior photographs (κ = 0.36). Among 66 AdIS cases, intraobserver reliability was substantial: XR (κ = 0.68), anterior photographs (κ = 0.67), posterior photographs (κ = 0.69). Interobserver reliability was moderate for XR (κ = 0.45), anterior photographs (κ = 0.43), posterior photographs (κ = 0.49). Within Type 1 AIS patients, attendings had better intraobserver reliabilities compared to fellows using X-rays (κ = 0.61 vs. 0.53), yet no effect of surgeon experience was seen with clinical photographs. CONCLUSION: Though surgeons' ability to agree with themselves was moderate to substantial, surgeons' ability to agree with each other was fair to moderate. Combined measures to assess preoperative shoulder balance are needed for UIV selection.

Spinal fusion in pediatric patients with marfan syndrome: a nationwide assessment on short-term outcomes and readmission risk.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to utilize the National Readmission Database (NRD) to determine estimates for complication rates, 90-day readmission rates, and hospital costs associated with spinal fusion in pediatric patients with Marfan syndrome. METHODS: The 2012-2015 NRD databases were queried for all pediatric (< 19 years old) patients diagnosed with Marfan syndrome undergoing spinal fusion surgery. The primary outcome variables in this study were index admission complications and 90-day readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients with Marfan syndrome underwent spinal fusion surgery between 2012 and 2015 (mean age ± standard deviation at the time of surgery: 14 ± 2.0, 132 (53%) female). 25 (10.1%) were readmitted within 90 days of the index hospital discharge date. Overall, 59.7% of patients experienced at least one complication during the index admission. Unplanned 90-day readmission could be predicted by older age (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.3-4.2, p = 0.006), Medicaid insurance status (56.0, 3.8-820.0, p = 0.003), and experiencing an inpatient medical complication (42.9, 4.6-398.7, p = 0.001). Patients were readmitted for wound dehiscence (8 patients, 3.2%), nervous system related complications (3 patients, 1.2%), and postoperative infectious related complications (4 patients, 1.6%). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to demonstrate on a national level the complications and potential risk factors for 90-day hospital readmission for patients with Marfan syndrome undergoing spinal fusion. Patients with Marfan syndrome undergoing spinal fusion often present with multiple medical comorbidities that must be managed carefully perioperatively to reduce inpatient complications and early hospital readmissions.

The Scoli-RISK 1 results of lower extremity motor function 5 years after complex adult spinal deformity surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Neurologic complications after complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery are important, yet outcomes are heterogeneously reported, and long-term follow-up of actual lower extremity motor function is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate lower extremity motor function scores (LEMS) before and at 5 years after surgical correction of complex ASD. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter, international observational study. METHODS: The Scoli-RISK-1 study enrolled 272 ASD patients undergoing surgery from 15 centers around the world. Inclusion criteria were Cobb angle of > 80°, corrective osteotomy for congenital or revision deformity and/or 3-column osteotomy. Among patients with 5-year follow-up, comparisons of LEMS to baseline and within each follow-up period were made via documented neurologic exams on each patient. RESULTS: Seventy-seven (28.3%) patients had 5-year follow-up. Among these 77 patients with 5-year follow-up, rates of postoperative LEMS deterioration were: 14.3% hospital discharge, 10.7% at 6 weeks, 6.5% at 6 months, 9.5% at 2 years and 9.3% at 5 years postoperative. During the 2-5 year window, while mean LEMS did not change significantly (-0.5, p = 0.442), eight (11.1%) patients deteriorated (of which 3 were ≥ 4 motor points), and six (8.3%) patients improved (of which 2 were ≥ 4 points). Of the 14 neurologic complications, four (28.6%) were surgery-related, three of which required reoperation. While mean LEMS were not impacted in patients with a major surgery-related complication, mean LEMS were significantly lower in patients with neurologic surgery-related complications at discharge (p = 0.041) and 6 months (p = 0.008) between the two groups as well as the change from baseline to 5 years (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In 77 patients undergoing complex ASD surgery with 5-year follow-up, while mean LEMS did not change from 2 to 5 years, subtle neurologic changes occurred in approximately 1 in 5 patients (11.1% deteriorated; 8.3% improved). Major surgery-related complication did not result in decreased LEMS; however, those with neurologic surgery-related complications continued to have decreased lower extremity motor function at 5 years postoperative. These results underscore the importance of long-term follow-up to 5 years, using individual motor scores rather than group averages, and comparing outcomes to both baseline and last follow-up.

The odontoid-CSVL distance in a global population of asymptomatic volunteers: normative values and implications for spinal coronal alignment.

PURPOSE: In a population of asymptomatic volunteers across 5 countries, we sought to: (a) establish normative values of the Odontoid-Central Sacral Vertical Line (OD-CSVL) across patient factors, and (b) assess correlations of OD-CSVL with other radiographic parameters. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional study of asymptomatic adult volunteers, ages 18-80 years, were enrolled across 5 countries (France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, United States) forming the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort. Included volunteers had no known spinal disorder(s), no significant neck/back pain (VAS ≤ 2; ODI ≤ 20), and no significant scoliosis (Cobb ≤ 20°). Radiographic measurements included commonly used coronal alignment parameters (mm) and angles (°). OD-CSVL was defined as the difference between the odontoid plumb line (line from the tip of the odontoid vertically down) and the CSVL (vertical line from the center of the sacrum). Chi-square, student's t tests, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, linear regression, and Pearson's correlation were used with significance at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 467 volunteers were included with normative OD-CSVL values by age decade, gender, BMI, and country. Mean ± SD OD-CSVL was 8.3 mm ± 6.5 mm and 31 (6.6%) volunteers were almost perfectly aligned (OD-CSVL < 1 mm). A linear relationship was seen between OD-CSVL with both age (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.015). Significant variation was seen between OD-CSVL and 5 different ethnicities (p = 0.004). OD-CSVL correlated best with other coronal radiographic parameters, C7-CSVL (r = 0.743, p < 0.001), OD-knee (r = 0.230, p < 0.001), CAM-knee (r = 0.612, p < 0.001), and regional TL cobb angle (r = 0.4214, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Among asymptomatic volunteers, increased OD-CSVL was significantly associated with increased age, increased BMI, and ethnicity, but not gender. OD-CSVL correlated strongest with C7-CSVL, TL cobb angle, OD-knee, and CAM-knee. OD-CSVL. These results support further study of OD-CSVL in symptomatic adult spine deformity patients.

Are Higher Global Alignment and Proportion Scores Associated With Increased Risks of Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? An External Validation.

BACKGROUND: The Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score, based on pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters, was recently developed to predict mechanical complications after surgery for spinal deformities in adults. However, this score has not been validated in an independent external dataset. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: After adult spinal deformity surgery, is a higher GAP score associated with (1) an increased risk of mechanical complications, defined as rod fractures, implant-related complications, proximal or distal junctional kyphosis or failure; (2) a higher likelihood of undergoing revision surgery to treat a mechanical complication; and (3) is a lower (more proportioned) GAP score category associated with better validated outcomes scores using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) and the Short Form-36 questionnaires? METHODS: A total of 272 patients who had undergone corrective surgeries for complex spinal deformities were enrolled in the Scoli-RISK-1 prospective trial. Patients were included in this secondary analysis if they fulfilled the original inclusion criteria by Yilgor et al. From the original 272 patients, 14% (39) did not satisfy the radiographic inclusion criteria, the GAP score could not be calculated in 14% (37), and 24% (64) did not have radiographic assessment at postoperative 2 years, leaving 59% (159) for analysis in this review of data from the original trial. A total of 159 patients were included in this study,with a mean age of 58 ± 14 years at the time of surgery. Most patients were female (72%, 115 of 159), the mean number of levels involved in surgery was 12 ± 4, and three-column osteotomy was performed in 76% (120 of 159) of patients. The GAP score was calculated using parameters from early postoperative radiographs (between 3 and 12 weeks) including pelvic incidence, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, lower arc lordosis and global tilt, which were independently obtained from a computer software based on centralized patient radiographs. The GAP score was categorized as proportional (scores of 0 to 2), moderately disproportional (scores of 3 to 6), or severely disproportional (scores higher than 7 to 13). Receiver operating characteristic area under curve (AUC) was used to assess associations between GAP score and risk of mechanical complications and risk of revision surgery. An AUC of 0.5 to 0.7 was classified as "no or low associative power", 0.7 to 0.9 as "moderate" and greater than 0.9 as "high". We analyzed differences in validated outcome scores between the GAP categories using Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: At a minimum of 2 years' follow-up, a higher GAP score was not associated with increased risks of mechanical complications (AUC = 0.60 [95% CI 0.50 to 0.70]). A higher GAP score was not associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing a revision surgery to treat a mechanical complication (AUC = 0.66 [95% 0.53 to 0.78]). However, a moderately disproportioned GAP score category was associated with better SF-36 physical component summary score (36 ± 10 versus 40 ± 11; p = 0.047), better SF-36 mental component summary score (46 ± 13 versus 51 ± 12; p = 0.01), better SRS-22 total score (3.4 ± 0.8 versus 3.7 ± 0.7, p = 0.02) and better ODI score (35 ± 21 versus 25 ± 20; p = 0.003) than severely disproportioned GAP score category. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this external validation study, we found that alignment targets based on the GAP score alone were not associated with increased risks of mechanical complications and mechanical revisions in patients with complex adult spinal disorders. Parameters not included in the original GAP score needed to be considered to reduce the likelihood of mechanical complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Real-time navigation guidance with intraoperative CT imaging for pedicle screw placement using an augmented reality head-mounted display: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVE: Augmented reality (AR) has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of instrumentation placement in spinal fusion surgery, increasing patient safety and outcomes, optimizing ergonomics in the surgical suite, and ultimately lowering procedural costs. The authors sought to describe the use of a commercial prototype Spine AR platform (SpineAR) that provides a commercial AR head-mounted display (ARHMD) user interface for navigation-guided spine surgery incorporating real-time navigation images from intraoperative imaging with a 3D-reconstructed model in the surgeon's field of view, and to assess screw placement accuracy via this method. METHODS: Pedicle screw placement accuracy was assessed and compared with literature-reported data of the freehand (FH) technique. Accuracy with SpineAR was also compared between participants of varying spine surgical experience. Eleven operators without prior experience with AR-assisted pedicle screw placement took part in the study: 5 attending neurosurgeons and 6 trainees (1 neurosurgical fellow, 1 senior orthopedic resident, 3 neurosurgical residents, and 1 medical student). Commercially available 3D-printed lumbar spine models were utilized as surrogates of human anatomy. Among the operators, a total of 192 screws were instrumented bilaterally from L2-5 using SpineAR in 24 lumbar spine models. All but one trainee also inserted 8 screws using the FH method. In addition to accuracy scoring using the Gertzbein-Robbins grading scale, axial trajectory was assessed, and user feedback on experience with SpineAR was collected. RESULTS: Based on the Gertzbein-Robbins grading scale, the overall screw placement accuracy using SpineAR among all users was 98.4% (192 screws). Accuracy for attendings and trainees was 99.1% (112 screws) and 97.5% (80 screws), respectively. Accuracy rates were higher compared with literature-reported lumbar screw placement accuracy using FH for attendings (99.1% vs 94.32%; p = 0.0212) and all users (98.4% vs 94.32%; p = 0.0099). The percentage of total inserted screws with a minimum of 5° medial angulation was 100%. No differences were observed between attendings and trainees or between the two methods. User feedback on SpineAR was generally positive. CONCLUSIONS: Screw placement was feasible and accurate using SpineAR, an ARHMD platform with real-time navigation guidance that provided a favorable surgeon-user experience.

Global alignment and proportion (GAP) scores in an asymptomatic, nonoperative cohort: a divergence of age-adjusted and pelvic incidence-based alignment targets.

PURPOSE: To investigate GAP scores in an asymptomatic cohort of adults, including older adults with age-expected changes in spinal alignment. METHODS: One hundred and twenty asymptomatic volunteers underwent full-body radiographic scans. Demographics and sagittal radiographic parameters (pelvic incidence, sacral slope, L1-S1 lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, and global tilt) were measured and GAP scores calculated ( www.gapcalculator.com ). Mann-Whitney U test compared groups. RESULTS: Eighty-five individuals (65 female, average age 48 ± 16 years, BMI 27 ± 6 kg/cm2) were analyzed. The median GAP score was that of a proportioned spine (0, range 0-10). 20% were moderately disproportioned and 6% were severely disproportioned. The mean relative pelvic version, relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), lumbar distribution index (LDI), and relative spinopelvic alignment were all considered aligned, although the mean RLL and LDI scores were both greater than 1. When categorized by age (< 60 years, ≥ 60 years), the median GAP score of the younger group was 0 (normal), while the median GAP score of the older cohort was 1 (normal) and different from the younger group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Most patients in this asymptomatic, nonoperative cohort were normally proportioned. However, a large percentage of asymptomatic volunteers were moderately or severely disproportioned. Older patients had higher scores, indicating some disproportion. There was also a small number of severely sagittally misaligned and poorly proportioned, yet asymptomatic, volunteers. Further refinement of individualized targets is needed to determine the effect on mechanical complications and quality of life given the divergent recommendations of age-adjusted targets and GAP targets.

Establishing Consensus on the Best Practice Guidelines for Use of Halo Gravity Traction for Pediatric Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Although halo gravity traction (HGT) has been used to treat children with severe spinal deformity for decades, there is a distinct lack of high-quality evidence to speak to its merits or to dictate ideal manner of implementation. In addition, no guidelines exist to drive research or assist surgeons in their practice. The aim of this study was to establish best practice guidelines (BPG) using formal techniques of consensus building among a group of experienced pediatric spinal deformity surgeons to determine ideal indications and implementation of HGT for pediatric spinal deformity. METHODS: The Delphi process and nominal group technique were used to formally derive consensus among leaders in pediatric spine surgery. Initial work identified significant areas of variability in practice for which we sought to garner consensus. After review of the literature, 3 iterative surveys were administered from February through April 2018 to nationwide experts in pediatric spinal deformity. Surveys assessed anonymous opinions on ideal practices for indications, preoperative evaluation, protocols, and complications, with agreement of 80% or higher considered consensus. Final determination of consensus items and equipoise were established using the Nominal group technique in a facilitated meeting. RESULTS: Of the 42 surgeons invited, responses were received from 32, 40, and 31 surgeons for each survey, respectively. The final meeting included 14 experts with an average 10.5 years in practice and average 88 annual spinal deformity cases. Experts reached consensus on 67 items [indications (17), goals (1), preoperative evaluations (5), protocols (36), complications (8)]; these were consolidated to create final BPG in all categories, including statements to help dictate practice such as using at least 6 to 8 pins under 4 to 8 lbs of torque, with a small, tolerable starting weight and reaching goal weight of 50% TBW in ∼2 weeks. Nine items remained items of equipoise for the purposes of guiding future research. CONCLUSIONS: We developed consensus-based BPG for the use and implementation of HGT for pediatric spinal deformity. This can serve as a measure to help drive future research as well as give new surgeons a place to begin their practice of HGT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-expert opinion.