New atrial arrhythmia occurrence in single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: A real-world investigation.

INTRODUCTION: A current limitation of single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is the lack of an atrial lead to reliably detect atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes. A novel ventricular based atrial fibrillation (VBAF) detection algorithm was created for single chamber ICDs to assess R-R variability for detection of AF. METHODS: Patients implanted with Visia AF™ ICDs were prospectively enrolled in the Medtronic Product Surveillance Registry from December 15, 2015 to January 23, 2019 and followed with at least 30 days of monitoring with the algorithm. Time to device-detected daily burden of AF ≥ 6 min, ≥6 h, and ≥23 h were reported. Clinical actions after device-detected AF were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 22.5 ± 7.9 months. Of these, 212 (73%) had no prior history of AF at device implant. However, 38% of these individuals had AF detected with the VBAF algorithm with daily burden of ≥6 min within two years of implant. In these 80 patients with newly detected AF by their ICD, 23 (29%) had a confirmed clinical diagnosis of AF by their provider. Of patients with a clinical diagnosis of AF, nine (39%) were newly placed on anticoagulation, including five of five (100%) patients having a burden >23 h. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous AF monitoring with the new VBAF algorithm permits early identification and actionable treatment for patients with undiagnosed AF that may improve patient outcomes.

Antibacterial Envelope to Prevent Cardiac Implantable Device Infection.

BACKGROUND: Infections after placement of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. There is limited evidence on prophylactic strategies, other than the use of preoperative antibiotics, to prevent such infections. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of an absorbable, antibiotic-eluting envelope in reducing the incidence of infection associated with CIED implantations. Patients who were undergoing a CIED pocket revision, generator replacement, or system upgrade or an initial implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive the envelope or not. Standard-of-care strategies to prevent infection were used in all patients. The primary end point was infection resulting in system extraction or revision, long-term antibiotic therapy with infection recurrence, or death, within 12 months after the CIED implantation procedure. The secondary end point for safety was procedure-related or system-related complications within 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 6983 patients underwent randomization: 3495 to the envelope group and 3488 to the control group. The primary end point occurred in 25 patients in the envelope group and 42 patients in the control group (12-month Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate, 0.7% and 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.98; P = 0.04). The safety end point occurred in 201 patients in the envelope group and 236 patients in the control group (12-month Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate, 6.0% and 6.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.06; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The mean (±SD) duration of follow-up was 20.7±8.5 months. Major CIED-related infections through the entire follow-up period occurred in 32 patients in the envelope group and 51 patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of an antibacterial envelope resulted in a significantly lower incidence of major CIED infections than standard-of-care infection-prevention strategies alone, without a higher incidence of complications. (Funded by Medtronic; WRAP-IT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02277990.).

The mortality analysis of primary prevention patients receiving a cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) according to guideline indications in the improve SCA study.

BACKGROUND: In primary prevention (PP) patients the utilization of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-D) remains low in many geographies, despite the proven mortality benefit. PURPOSE: The objective of this analysis was to examine the mortality benefit in PP patients by guideline-indicated device type: ICD and CRT-D. METHODS: Improve sudden cardiac arrest was a prospective, nonrandomized, nonblinded multicenter trial that enrolled patients from regions where ICD utilization is low. PP patient's CRT-D or ICD eligibility was based upon the 2008 ACC/AHA/HRS and 2006 ESC guidelines. Mortality was assessed according to guideline-indicated device type comparing implanted and nonimplanted patients. Cox proportional hazards methods were used, adjusting for known factors affecting mortality risk. RESULTS: Among 2618 PP patients followed for a mean of 20.8 ± 10.8 months, 1073 were indicated for a CRT-D, and 1545 were indicated for an ICD. PP CRT-D-indicated patients who received CRT-D therapy had a 58% risk reduction in mortality compared with those without implant (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.61, p < .0001). PP patients with an ICD indication had a 43% risk reduction in mortality with an ICD implant compared with no implant (adjusted HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41-0.81, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the mortality benefit of adherence to guideline-indicated implantable defibrillation therapy for PP patients in geographies where ICD therapy was underutilized. These results affirm that medical practice should follow clinical guidelines when choosing therapy for PP patients who meet the respective defibrillator device implant indication.

Use of healthcare claims to validate the Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial cardiac implantable electronic device infection risk score.

AIM: The Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT) infection risk score, developed based on a large prospectively collected data set, identified five independent predictors of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. We performed an independent validation of the risk score in a data set extracted from U.S. healthcare claims. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective identification of index CIED procedures among patients aged ≥18 years with at least one record of a CIED procedure between January 2011 and September 2014 in a U.S health claims database. PADIT risk factors and major CIED infections (with system removal, invasive procedure without system removal, or infection-attributable death) were identified through diagnosis and procedure codes. The data set was randomized by PADIT score into Data Set A (60%) and Data Set B (40%). A frailty model allowing multiple procedures per patient was fit using Data Set A, with PADIT score as the only predictor, excluding patients with prior CIED infection. A data set of 54 042 index procedures among 51 623 patients with 574 infections was extracted. Among patients with no history of prior CIED infection, a 1 unit increase in the PADIT score was associated with a relative 28% increase in infection risk. Prior CIED infection was associated with significant incremental predictive value (HR 5.66, P < 0.0001) after adjusting for PADIT score. A Harrell's C-statistic for the PADIT score and history of prior CIED infection was 0.76. CONCLUSION: The PADIT risk score predicts increased CIED infection risk, identifying higher risk patients that could potentially benefit from targeted interventions to reduce the risk of CIED infection. Prior CIED infection confers incremental predictive value to the PADIT score.

Characteristics of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and their susceptibility to antitachycardia pacing termination in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A patient-level meta-analysis of three large clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce all-cause mortality among cardiomyopathy patients. Whether or not antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is equally effective in ischemic (ICM) and nonischemic (NICM) cardiomyopathy patients remains poorly understood. We describe the distribution of monomorphic (MVT) and non-monomorphic (polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [PVT/VF]) ventricular tachyarrhythmias among ICM and NICM primary prevention patients. METHODS: This patient-level meta-analysis included primary prevention patients from the Shock-Less (n = 3519), PainFree SST (n = 1917), and PREPARE (n = 690) studies. Distribution of MVT and PVT/VF events were compared with χ2 tests. ATP success was estimated using a generalized estimating equation model to correct for multiple episodes for a patient between cohorts for slow (≥320 ms) and fast (240-310 ms) MVTs. RESULTS: Among 6126 patients, 714 (29% NICM, age 66 ± 13 years, female 18%, EF = 29 ± 12%) had a total of 4444 treated ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes. The rate of individuals treated for MVT or PVT/VF was comparable between ICM (11.9%) and NICM (11.2%) over 21 ± 10 months. In addition, the distribution of MVT (76% ICM vs. 71% NICM) and PVT/VF (15% ICM vs. 20% NICM) was not significantly different (p = .28). Among MVT episodes, the average tachycardia cycle lengths (332 ± 58 ms ICM vs. 313 ± 40 ms NICM; p = .27) were similar, as was the likelihood of ATP-associated termination (74.6% ICM vs. 76.4% NICM; p = .58). Overall, ATP success was higher for slow (≥320 ms) MVT versus faster (240-310 ms) episodes (84.1% vs. 69%; p < .001). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of primary prevention ICD patients, ICM and NICM patients have similar rates and proportions of MVT and PVT/VF episodes. ATP-associated termination of MVT was comparable between the two groups.

SVT discrimination algorithms significantly reduce the rate of inappropriate therapy in the setting of modern-day delayed high-rate detection programming.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) programming involving delayed high-rate detection and use of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) discriminators has significantly reduced the rate of inappropriate shocks. The extent to which SVT algorithms alone reduce inappropriate therapies is poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: PainFree SST enrolled 2770 patients with a single- or dual-chamber ICD or cardiac resynchronization defibrillator. Patients were followed for 22 ± 9 months with SVT discriminators on in 96% of patients. Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SVT episodes were adjudicated by an independent physician committee. For this analysis, all episodes were subjected to postprocessing computer simulation with SVT discriminators off with and without delayed high-rate detection criteria (ventricular fibrillation zone only, 30/40 at 320 ms). There were 3282 adjudicated SVT episodes of which 115 resulted in an ICD shock and 113 received only ATP (2-year inappropriate shock and therapy rates of 3.1% and 4.1%). Therapy was appropriately withheld for the remaining 3054 SVT episodes. With both SVT discriminators and delayed high-rate detection simulated off, the 2-year inappropriate therapy rate would have been 22.9% (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.20-7.49). With SVT discriminators simulated off and delayed high-rate detection simulated on in all patients, the 2-year rate would have been 6.4% (HR = 1.63; CI: 1.44-1.85). CONCLUSIONS: The use of SVT discriminators has a significant role in reducing the rate of inappropriate ICD therapy even in the setting of delayed high-rate detection settings. Deactivating SVT discriminators would have resulted in an overall increase in the inappropriate ICD therapy rate by 63% and 524% with and without delayed high-rate detection programming, respectively.

Estimating the incidence of atrial fibrillation in single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.

BACKGROUND: Atrial arrhythmias are associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. Recent reports among implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients have demonstrated a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), predominantly in dual-chamber recipients. AF incidence among patients with single-chamber systems (approximately 50% of all ICDs) is currently unknown. The objective was to estimate the prevalence of new-onset AF among single-chamber ICD patients by observing the rates of new atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF among a propensity scoring matched cohort of dual-chamber ICD patients from the PainFree SmartShock technology study, to better inform screening initiatives. METHODS: Among 2770 patients enrolled, 1862 single-chamber, dual-chamber, and cardiac resynchronization therapy subjects with no prior history of atrial tachyarrhythmias were included. Daily AT/AF burden was estimated using a propensity score weighted model against data from dual-chamber ICDs. RESULTS: Over 22 ± 9 months of follow-up, the estimated incidence of AT/AF-lasting at least 6 min, 6 h, and 24 h per day -in the single-chamber cohort was 22.0, 9.8, and 6.3%, whereas among dual-chamber patients, the prevalence was 26.6, 13.1, and 7.1%, respectively. Initiation of oral anticoagulation was estimated to occur in 9.8% of the propensity matched single-chamber cohort, which was higher than the actual observed rate of 6.0%. Stroke and transient ischemic attack occurred at low rates in all device subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial arrhythmias occur frequently, and significant underutilization of anticoagulation is suggested in single-chamber ICD recipients. Routine screening for AF should be considered among single-chamber ICD recipients.

Worldwide Randomized Antibiotic EnveloPe Infection PrevenTion Trial (WRAP-IT).

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is a major complication that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to determine whether Medtronic TYRX absorbable envelope reduces the risk of CIED infection through 12 months of follow-up post procedure. METHODS: WRAP-IT is a randomized, prospective, multi center, international, single-blinded study. Up to 7,764 subjects who are undergoing CIED generator replacement, upgrade, or revision, or a de novo CRT-D implant, will be enrolled and randomized (1:1) to receive the TYRX envelope or not. The primary endpoint is major CIED infection throughout 12 months of follow up after the procedure. Data will be analyzed with an intention to treat approach. WRAP-IT will also assess the performance of Medtronic's lead monitoring algorithms in subjects whose CIED includes a transvenous right ventricular defibrillation system. CONCLUSIONS: WRAP-IT is a large randomized clinical trial that will assess the efficacy of TYRX absorbable envelope in reducing CIED infection, define its cost effectiveness, and will also provide a unique opportunity to better understand the pathophysiology and risk factors for CIED infection.

Metabolic networks in a porcine model of trauma and hemorrhagic shock demonstrate different control mechanism with carbohydrate pre-feed.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with oral carbohydrate prior to trauma and hemorrhage confers a survival benefit in small animal models. The impact of fed states on survival in traumatically injured humans is unknown. This work uses regulatory networks to examine the effect of carbohydrate pre-feeding on metabolic response to polytrauma and hemorrhagic shock in a clinically-relevant large animal model. METHODS: Male Yorkshire pigs were fasted overnight (n = 64). Pre-fed animals (n = 32) received an oral bolus of Karo\textregistered\syrup before sedation. All animals underwent a standardized trauma, hemorrhage, and resuscitation protocol. Serum samples were obtained at set timepoints. Proton NMR was used to identify and quantify serum metabolites. Metabolic regulatory networks were constructed from metabolite concentrations and rates of change in those concentrations to identify controlled nodes and controlling nodes of the network. RESULTS: Oral carbohydrate pre-treatment was not associated with survival benefit. Six metabolites were identified as controlled nodes in both groups: adenosine, cytidine, glycerol, hypoxanthine, lactate, and uridine. Distinct groups of controlling nodes were associated with controlled nodes; however, the composition of these groups depended on feeding status. CONCLUSIONS: A common metabolic output, typically associated with injury and hypoxia, results from trauma and hemorrhagic shock. However, this output is directed by different metabolic inputs depending upon the feeding status of the subject. Nodes of the network that are related to mortality can potentially be manipulated for therapeutic effect; however, these nodes differ depending upon feeding status.

Effects of envelopes on cardiac implantable electronic device pocket healing: A head-to-head preclinical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The healing response to cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation results in inflammation that can lead to fibrous pocket formation, which may disrupt pocket healing or complicate future interventions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess CIED pocket healing with use of the second-generation TYRX absorbable antibacterial envelope (T2), the next-generation (NG) TYRX absorbable antibacterial envelope under development, and the CanGaroo® extracellular matrix envelope (ECM) compared to no envelope. METHODS: A total of 110 CIEDs were implanted in an ovine model, either with (T2, NG, or ECM) or without envelopes. Histopathologic and morphometric analyses were completed at several timepoints after implant (3 days, 7 days, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks). An independent pathologist completed a blinded histopathology assessment of the pockets. RESULTS: TYRX (T2/NG) pockets showed similar inflammatory and healing profiles to controls with more rapid provisional matrix formation compared to controls and ECM. ECM pockets exhibited increased acute (3 and 7 days) and chronic (24 weeks) inflammation. T2/NG had almost complete (T2) or complete (NG) absorption by week 12. ECM remained present at week 24 and was associated with significantly thicker capsules (ECM 0.80 ± 0.14 mm; NG 0.37 ± 0.10 mm; control 0.56 ± 0.17 mm). CONCLUSION: Compared to ECM, pockets with TYRX showed less inflammation, more rapid provisional matrix formation, faster absorption, and thinner capsules. TYRX pockets had low inflammation comparable to controls with accelerated provisional matrix deposition and tissue adhesion. The healing response to CIEDs used with TYRX fosters the formation of a well-healed pocket, which may bring patient benefit beyond its proven infection reduction.

Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis.

Background: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electric devices improves patient outcomes and experiences. Alert-based systems notify physicians of clinical or device issues in near real-time, but their effectiveness is contingent upon device connectivity. Objective: To assess patient connectivity by analyzing alert transmission times from patient transceivers to the CareLink network. Methods: Alert transmissions were retrospectively gathered from a query of the United States de-identified Medtronic CareLink database. Alert transmission time was defined as the duration from alert occurrence to arrival at the CareLink network and was analyzed by device type, alert event, and alert type. Using data from previous studies, we computed the benefit of daily connectivity checks. Results: The mean alert transmission time was 14.8 hours (median = 6 hours), with 90.9% of alert transmissions received within 24 hours. Implantable pulse generators (17.0 ± 40.2 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers (17.2 ± 42.5 hours) had longer alert transmission times than implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (13.7 ± 29.5 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (13.5 ± 30.2 hours), but the median time was 6 hours for all 4 device types. There were differences in alert times between specific alert events. Based on our data and previous studies, daily connectivity checks could improve daily alert transmission success by 8.5% but would require up to nearly 800 additional hours of staff time on any given day. Conclusion: Alert transmission performance from Medtronic devices was satisfactory, with some delays likely underscored by patient connectivity issues. Daily connectivity checks could provide some improvement in transmission success at the expense of increased clinic burden.

Cardioverter-defibrillator reduces mortality risk in eligible ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients: Sub-analysis of the multi-center Improve SCA study.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Despite the burden of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) worldwide, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are underutilized, particularly in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The Improve SCA trial demonstrated that primary prevention (PP) patients in these regions benefit from an ICD or a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). We aimed to compare the rate of device therapy and mortality among ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM and NICM) PP patients who met guideline indications for ICD therapy and had an ICD/CRT-D implanted. METHODS: Improve SCA was a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded multicenter trial that enrolled patients from the above-mentioned regions. All-cause mortality and device therapy were examined by cardiomyopathy (ICM vs NICM) and implantation status. Cox proportional hazards methods were used, adjusting for factors affecting mortality risk. RESULTS: Of 1848 PP NICM patients, 1007 (54.5%) received ICD/CRT-D, while 303 of 581 (52.1%) PP ICM patients received an ICD/CRT-D. The all-cause mortality rate at 3 years for NICM patients with and without an ICD/CRT-D was 13.1% and 18.3%, respectively (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.68, p < 0.001). Similarly, all-cause mortality at 3 years in ICM patients was 13.8% in those with a device and 19.9% in those without an ICD/CRT-D (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-.0.88, p = 0.011). The time to first device therapy, time to first shock, and time to first antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy were not significantly different between groups (p ≥ 0.263). CONCLUSIONS: In this large data set of patients with a guideline-based PP ICD indication, defibrillator device implantation conferred a significant mortality benefit in both NICM and ICM patients. The rate of appropriate device therapy was also similar in both groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02099721.

Trends in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming practices and its impact on therapies: Insights from a North American Remote Monitoring Registry 2007-2018.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has revealed the utility of prolonged arrhythmia detection duration and increased rate cutoff to reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Data on real-world trends in ICD programming and its impact on outcomes are limited. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in ICD programming and its impact on ICD therapy using a large remote monitoring database. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with ICD implanted from 2007 to 2018 was conducted using the de-identified Medtronic CareLink database. Data on ICD programming (number of intervals to detection [NID] and therapy rate cutoff) and delivered ICD therapies were collected. RESULTS: Among 210,810 patients, the proportion programmed to a rate cutoff of ≥188 beats/min increased from 41% to 49% and an NID of ≥30/40 increased from 17% to 67% before May 2013 vs after February 2016. Programming to a rate cutoff of ≥188 beats/min, a ventricular fibrillation (VF) NID of ≥30/40, or a combined rate cutoff of ≥188 beats/min and VF NID of ≥30/40 were associated with reductions in ICD therapy. The largest reductions in ICD therapy occurred when the combination of rate cutoff ≥ 188 beats/min and VF NID ≥ 30/40 was programmed (antitachycardia pacing: hazard ratio [HR] 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.36; P < .001; shocks: HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.65-0.69; P < .001; and antitachycardia pacing/shocks: HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.42-0.44; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Despite evidence supporting the use of prolonged detection duration and high rate cutoff, implementation of shock reduction programming strategies in real-world clinical practice has been modest. The use of evidence-based ICD programming is associated with reduced ICD shocks over long-term follow-up.

Performance evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with SmartShock technology in patients with inherited arrhythmogenic diseases.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inherited arrhythmogenic diseases (IADs) are often prescribed preventative implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) to manage their increased sudden cardiac arrest risk. However, it has been suggested that ICDs in IAD patients may come with additional risk. We aimed to leverage the PainFree SmartShock Technology dataset to compare inappropriate therapies, appropriate therapies, mortality, and complications in patients with and without IAD. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included extracted, physician-adjudicated, arrhythmic episodes from ICD devices. The incidence of arrhythmic events was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the 1699 ICD patients, 77 patients (4.5%) had IAD. Incidence of inappropriate shock was similar in both patients with (3.2% at 24 months) and without (3.8% at 24 months) IAD (HR: 0.80, CI: 0.19-3.30, p = 0.76). In a multivariable analysis IAD was not significantly associated with reduced mortality (HR: 0.64, CI: 0.08-4.80, p = 0.66). The rates of complications were numerically lower in patients with IAD vs without (8.8% vs 9.6% at 24 months respectively), but not statistically significant (HR: 0.83, CI: 0.20-3.38, p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: IAD patients showed a very low annual rate of inappropriate therapy. This suggests that newer algorithms, such as the SST algorithm, are equally good at identifying and treating life-threatening arrhythmias in patients regardless of whether they have IAD.

Risk factors for hematoma in patients undergoing cardiac device procedures: A WRAP-IT trial analysis.

Background: Implant site hematoma is a known complication of cardiac device procedures and can lead to major consequences. Objectives: To evaluate risk factors for hematoma and further understand the relationship between anticoagulant (AC), antiplatelet (AP) use, and hematoma development. Methods: We included 6800 patients from the WRAP-IT trial. To assess baseline and procedural characteristics associated with hematoma within the first 30 days postprocedure, a stepwise Cox regression model was implemented with minimal Akaike information criterion. Cox regressions were also used to evaluate AC/AP use and hematoma risk. Results: The overall rate of hematoma was 2.2%. The model identified 11 baseline and procedural characteristics associated with hematoma risk. AC use (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.44, P < .001), lower body mass index (HR: 1.06, P < .001), and history of valve surgery (HR: 2.11, P < .001) were associated with the highest risk. AP use, male sex, history of coronary artery disease, existing pocket, history of nonischemic cardiomyopathy, number of previous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures, procedure time, and lead revision were associated with moderate risk. Antithrombotic use was high overall (86%) and AC+AP use was highly predictive of hematoma risk. Regardless of AC status, AP use was associated with an almost doubling of risk vs no AP (HR = 1.85, P = .0006) in the general cohort. Interruption of AC was associated with the lowest hematoma risk (HR = 2.35) while heparin bridging (HR = 4.98) and AP use vs no AP use (HR = 1.85) was associated with the highest hematoma risk. Conclusion: The results of this analysis highlight risk factors associated with the development of hematoma in patients undergoing CIED procedures and can inform antithrombotic management.

Risk Factors for CIED Infection After Secondary Procedures: Insights From the WRAP-IT Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify risk factors for infection after secondary cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. BACKGROUND: Risk factors for CIED infection are not well defined and techniques to minimize infection lack supportive evidence. WRAP-IT (World-wide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention trial), a large study that assessed the safety and efficacy of an antibacterial envelope for CIED infection reduction, offers insight into procedural details and infection prevention strategies. METHODS: This analysis included 2,803 control patients from the WRAP-IT trial who received standard preoperative antibiotics but not the envelope (44 patients with major infections through all follow-up). A multivariate least absolute shrinkage and selection operator machine learning model, controlling for patient characteristics and procedural variables, was used for risk factor selection and identification. Risk factors consistently retaining predictive value in the model (appeared >10 times) across 100 iterations of imputed data were deemed significant. RESULTS: Of the 81 variables screened, 17 were identified as risk factors with 6 being patient/device-related (nonmodifiable) and 11 begin procedure-related (potentially modifiable). Patient/device-related factors included higher number of previous CIED procedures, history of atrial arrhythmia, geography (outside North America and Europe), device type, and lower body mass index. Procedural factors associated with increased risk included longer procedure time, implant location (non-left pectoral subcutaneous), perioperative glycopeptide antibiotic versus nonglycopeptide, anticoagulant, and/or antiplatelet use, and capsulectomy. Factors associated with decreased risk of infection included chlorhexidine skin preparation and antibiotic pocket wash. CONCLUSIONS: In WRAP-IT patients, we observed that several procedural risk factors correlated with infection risk. These results can help guide infection prevention strategies to minimize infections associated with secondary CIED procedures.

Clinical performance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead monitoring diagnostics.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead monitoring diagnostic alerts facilitate the diagnosis of structural lead failure. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively study the performance of Medtronic ICD lead monitoring alerts. METHODS: A prespecified ancillary substudy, World-Wide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention Trial, was conducted in patients with an ICD with all available alerts enabled. The investigators reported possible lead system events (LSEs), with or without an alert. An independent committee reviewed all data and classified events as lead failure, other LSE, or nonlead system events (NLEs). RESULTS: In 4942 patients who were followed for 19.4 ± 8.7 months, there were 124 alerts (65 LSEs, 59 NLEs) and 19 LSEs without an alert. Lead monitoring alerts had 100% sensitivity for the 48 adjudicated lead failures (95% confidence interval 92.6%-100%) and for 10 events adjudicated as either lead failure or connection issue. The positive predictive value of alerts for lead failure was 38.7% (48 of 124). For 34 pace-sense lead failures, an alert that incorporated oversensing was more sensitive than the pacing impedance threshold alert (33 patients [97.1%] vs 9 patients [26.5%]; P < .0001). However, the sensitivity was only 13.6% for lead dislodgments or perforations. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 2 patients with pace-sense lead failure (5.9%). No patient had unnecessary lead replacement for any of the NLEs. CONCLUSION: In this first real-world prospective study, lead monitoring alerts had 100% sensitivity for identifying lead failures. Although their positive predictive value was modest, no false-positive alerts resulted in an unnecessary lead replacement. For the diagnosis of pace-sense lead failure, an alert for oversensing was more sensitive than a pacing impedance threshold alert. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02277990.

Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Post-Myocardial Infarction Ejection Fraction Greater Than 35.

Background Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) risk increases after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with a reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, the risk factors for SCA among patients with a post-MI EF >35% remain poorly understood. Methods and Results Using the Optum de-identified electronic health record data set from 2008 to 2017, we identified patients with an incident MI diagnosis and troponin elevation who had a post-MI EF >35% and underwent coronary angiography. Primary outcome was SCA within 1 year post-MI. The database was divided into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts by random selection. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to generate and validate a risk prediction model. Among 31 286 patients with an MI (median age 64.1; 39% female; 87% White), 499 experienced SCA within 1 year post-MI (estimated probability 1.8%). Lack of revascularization at MI, post-MI EF <50%, Black race, renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, antiarrhythmic therapy, and absence of beta blocker therapy were independent predictors of SCA. A multivariable model consisting of these variables predicted SCA risk (C-statistic 0.73). Based on this model, the estimated annual probability of SCA was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.9-4.9) in the highest quartile of risk versus 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4-0.8) in the lowest quartile. Conclusions Patients with a post-MI EF >35% have a substantial annual risk of SCA. A risk model consisting of acute coronary revascularization, EF, race, renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, antiarrhythmic therapy, and beta blocker therapy can identify patients with higher risk of SCA, who may benefit from further risk stratification and closer monitoring.

In vitro modeling accurately predicts cardiac lead fracture at 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Development of a cardiac lead fracture model has the potential to differentiate well-performing lead designs from poor performing ones and could aid in future lead development. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a predictive model for lead fracture and validate the results generated by the model by comparing them to observed 10-year implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fracture-free survival. METHODS: The model presented here uses a combination of in vivo patient data, in vitro conductor fatigue test data, and statistical simulation to predict the fracture-free survival of cardiac leads. The model was validated by comparing the results to human clinical performance data from the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis (Minneapolis, MN) models 6931 (single coil, active fixation) and 6949 (dual coil, active fixation), as well as the Quattro model 6947 (dual coil, active fixation). RESULTS: Median patient age in the single coil Fidelis 6931 population (64 years) was less than in the dual coil Fidelis 6949 and Quattro populations (68 years). Modeled and observed fracture-free survival for Quattro (>97%) was superior to that for Fidelis (<94%). The modeled survival agreed with the observed fracture-free survival data. The average model error was 0.3% (SD 1.2%). CONCLUSION: This model for cardiac lead fracture-free survival using in vivo lead bending measurements and in vitro bench testing can be used to predict lead performance as observed by alignment with field survival data.

Clinical Presentation, Timing, and Microbiology of CIED Infections: An Analysis of the WRAP-IT Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study characterized the microbiology of major cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections that occurred during the WRAP-IT (Worldwide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention Trial) study. BACKGROUND: The WRAP-IT study offers a unique opportunity for further understanding of the pathogens involved in major CIED infections in a prospective dataset, with implications for clinical practice and infection management. METHODS: A total of 6,800 patients randomized 1:1 to receive an antibacterial envelope or not (control subjects) were included in this analysis. Patient characteristics, infection manifestation (pocket vs. systemic), and infection microbiology were evaluated through all follow-up (36 months). Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 3,371 patients received an envelope, and 3,429 patients were control subjects. Major CIED infection occurred in 32 patients who received an envelope and 51 control subjects (36-month Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate, 1.3% and 1.9%, respectively; p = 0.046). A 61% reduction in major pocket infection was observed within 12 months of the procedure in the envelope group (hazard ratio: 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.21 to 0.73; p = 0.003). Among 76 patients with major infections who had a sample taken, causative pathogens were identified in 47 patients. Staphylococcus species were the predominate pathogen (n = 31) and envelope use resulted in a 76% reduction in Staphylococcus-related pocket infections (n = 4 vs. 17; p = 0.010). Envelope use was not associated with delayed onset of pocket infections and did not affect the presentation of infections. CONCLUSIONS: Antibacterial envelope use resulted in a significant reduction of major CIED pocket infections and was particularly effective against Staphylococcus species, the predominant cause of pocket infections. (Worldwide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention Trial [WRAP-IT]; NCT02277990).