A Closer Look: Examination of Suicide Risk Screening Results and Outcomes for Minoritized Youth in Subspecialty Pediatrics.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a sample of minoritized youth who screened positive for suicide risk within medical subspecialty pediatrics, compared to non-minoritized youth and describe the screening outcomes of these youth. METHODS: This retrospective chart review from October 2018 to April 2021 used electronic medical record data from an academic pediatric medical subspecialty clinic that screens universally for suicide risk for all patients ages 9 and up. Chart reviews were conducted for 237 minoritized youth (operationalized as identifying as non-White or Hispanic/Latinx, identifying as a gender minority, and having a preferred language other than English) who screened positive for suicide risk. Descriptive statistics include need for escalation to an emergency room, connection to mental health care, receival of a mental health referral, and attendance at follow-up visits. RESULTS: Minoritized youth were more likely to screen positive and report a history of suicide attempt when compared to non-minoritized peers. Youth identifying as gender expansive had significant elevation in suicide risk. The majority of youth in this sample were already connected to mental health care, with youth preferring a language other than English being the least likely to be connected. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate heightened suicide risk for minoritized youth, with gender expansive youth having particularly elevated suicide risk. A need to support youth with a preferred language other than English in getting connected to mental health care was also revealed.

Holding Space for Facilitated Dialogues on Antiracism in Academic Medicine.

The year 2020 brought unprecedented challenges and renewed focus on racial disparities and inequities in the United States. For racial and ethnic minority groups, and in particular African Americans, racial disparities have been a constant presence and threat from the time of slavery through the present day. These racial disparities, sanctioned and maintained by institutional racism, manifest in all aspects of life for African Americans-segregated and unequal education and housing systems, health and mental health care disparities, disproportionally elevated incarceration rates, and, as painfully highlighted this past year, continued vulnerability to acts of violence at the hands of law enforcement. In addition, most recently, there has been a renewed focus on the increased suicide rate for Black youth and its relationship to these racial disparities.1 In a large urban environment, our academic Child Psychiatry Department recognized that progress toward addressing racial disparities would be impeded without raising awareness and taking individual and collective action to identify implicit bias, power, and privilege differentials, and systemic racism inherent within academic medicine and our own lived experiences. This letter describes the development of such examination through facilitated dialogues on race and antiracism in our department.

Integrating Suicide Risk Screening into Pediatric Ambulatory Subspecialty Care.

BACKGROUND: Suicide risk screening is recommended in pediatric care. To date, no previous studies illustrate the implementation of suicide risk screening in pediatric subspecialty care, even though chronic medical conditions are associated with a higher risk of suicide. METHODS: A large multidivision pediatric ambulatory clinic implemented annual suicide risk screening. Patients ages 9-21 years participated in suicide risk screening using the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions during the project. A multidisciplinary team employed quality improvement methods and survey-research design methods to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the screening process for patients, families, and medical providers. RESULTS: During the quality improvement project period, 1,934 patients were offered screening; 1,301 (67.3%) patients completed screening; 82 patients (6.3% of 1,301 patients) screened positive. The monthly compliance rate held steady at 86% following several Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles of improvement. The survey results demonstrate that providers rated the suicide risk screening process positively; however, a subset of providers indicated that the screening process was out of their scope of practice or impeded their workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide risk screening is feasible in pediatric specialty care and can identify at-risk patients. Continued efforts are needed to standardize suicide risk screening practices. Future directions include identifying factors associated with suicide risk in patients in pediatric subspecialty care settings.

Co-designed PICU Family Stress Screening and Response System to Improve Experience, Quality, and Safety.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence for successful and sustainable models that systematically identify and address family stress in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) remains scarce. Using an integrated improvement science and family engagement framework, we implemented a standardized family stress screening tool and response protocol to improve family experience and reduce family crises through the timely coordination of parent support interventions. METHODS: We conducted this improvement initiative in the 12-bed PICU of a children's hospital within a large, urban academic medical center. Our team, which included 2 family advisors, adapted a validated Distress Thermometer for use in pediatric intensive care. A co-designed family stress screening tool and response protocol were iteratively tested, refined, and implemented in 2015-2017. Process and outcome measures included screening and response reliability, parent satisfaction, and security calls for distressed families. RESULTS: Over the 18 months, the percentage of families screened for stress increased from 0% to 100%. Among families who rated stress levels ≥5, 100% received the recommended response protocol, including family support referrals made and completed within 24 hours of an elevated stress rating. From 2015 to 2017, PICU parent satisfaction scores regarding emotional support increased from a mean score of 81.7-87.0 (P < 0.01; 95% CI). The number of security calls for distressed families decreased by 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The successful implementation of a co-designed family stress screening tool and response protocol led to the timely coordination of parent support interventions, the improved family perception of emotional support, and reduced family crises in the PICU.