Guselkumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an interleukin-23p19 subunit antagonist, in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior inadequate response and/or intolerance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and/or advanced therapy. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, induction study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous guselkumab 200 or 400 mg or placebo at weeks 0/4/8. The primary endpoint was clinical response (compared with baseline, modified Mayo score decrease ≥30% and ≥2 points, rectal bleeding subscore ≥1-point decrease or subscore of 0/1) at week 12. Guselkumab and placebo week-12 clinical nonresponders received subcutaneous or intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, respectively, at weeks 12/16/20 (uncontrolled study period). RESULTS: The primary analysis population included patients with baseline modified Mayo scores ≥5 and ≤9 (intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, n = 101; 400 mg, n = 107; placebo, n = 105). Week-12 clinical response percentage was greater with guselkumab 200 mg (61.4%) and 400 mg (60.7%) vs placebo (27.6%; both P < .001). Greater proportions of guselkumab-treated vs placebo-treated patients achieved all major secondary endpoints (clinical remission, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and endoscopic normalization) at week 12. Among guselkumab week-12 clinical nonresponders, 54.3% and 50.0% of patients in the 200- and 400-mg groups, respectively, achieved clinical response at week 24. Safety was similar among guselkumab and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Guselkumab intravenous induction was effective vs placebo in patients with moderately to severely active UC. Guselkumab was safe, and efficacy and safety were similar between guselkumab dose groups. CLINICALTRIALS: gov number: NCT04033445.

Evidence-Based Approach to Chronic Antibiotic Refractory Pouchitis: A Review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA, characterized by at least 4 weeks of pouchitis symptoms that have not responded to standard antibiotic therapy, presents a therapeutic challenge for patients and health care providers. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the current evidence regarding the management of chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified through a search of the PubMed database from the National Library of Medicine. STUDY SELECTION: We included case series, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews with meta-analyses that addressed chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis management, with prioritization of data published within the past 3 to 5 years. INTERVENTION: Studies examining pharmacologic and select nonpharmacologic interventions were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Outcomes measures included clinical, endoscopic, and histologic end points. RESULTS: Mesalamine has demonstrated efficacy in symptom improvement but no improvement in quality of life. Budesonide has demonstrated high rates of clinical remission that have mostly been sustained in a small number of patients. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have demonstrated efficacy in reaching clinical and even endoscopic end points, although rates of treatment discontinuation were not insignificant. Limited evidence is encouraging for the use of ustekinumab in achieving clinical response. Data for vedolizumab are favorable across clinical, endoscopic, and histologic end points, including one of the only randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Nonmedication therapies, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy and fecal microbiota transplant, have undergone limited evaluation, and concerns about the ultimate accessibility of these therapies remain. LIMITATIONS: Overall, studies assessing therapeutic options for chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis are mostly limited to case series and retrospective studies with small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Biologic therapies have demonstrated efficacy in the management of chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis and offer a steroid-sparing option for refractory disease. Nonpharmacologic therapies, including hyperbaric oxygen and fecal microbiota transplant, require further exploration. See video from symposium .

Cardiovascular Safety of Ozanimod in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: True North and Open-Label Extension Analyses.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Evaluating cardiovascular safety of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators is warranted due to S1P receptor expression on cardiomyocytes and vascular endothelial cells. This analysis reports the cardiovascular safety of ozanimod, an S1P receptor modulator, in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis from the phase 3 True North (TN) and open-label extension (OLE). METHODS: All patients who received ozanimod in TN (n = 796) and all eligible TN patients who entered the OLE (n = 823) were included. Cardiovascular-related adverse events were evaluated in patients with up to 146 weeks of ozanimod exposure (2219 patient-years), which included 52 weeks during TN. RESULTS: On TN day 1, first-dose ozanimod resulted in a 0.2 beats per minute mean decrease in heart rate from pretreatment to hour 6; 2 patients experienced bradycardia, which resolved without treatment modification. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure increases of 5.1 and 2.2 mm Hg, respectively, were observed at TN week 52. No second-degree Mobitz type II atrioventricular block events were reported; 1 third-degree atrioventricular block unrelated to ozanimod occurred in the OLE. Cardiac and vascular treatment-emergent adverse events were infrequent (3.8% [31 of 823] and 8.5% [70 of 823]); no ozanimod-related cardiovascular deaths occurred. The incidences of deep-vein thrombosis (0.2%; 2 of 823), pulmonary embolism (0.2%; 2 of 823), and ischemic stroke (0.4%; 3 of 823) in the OLE were low. CONCLUSIONS: No new cardiovascular safety signals were identified, consistent with findings from previous ozanimod studies. There were few major adverse cardiovascular events or thromboembolic events, which were unrelated or unlikely related to ozanimod. Ozanimod has a well-tolerated cardiovascular safety profile when prescribed in accordance with the label. Clinical trial registry website and trial numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

Supratherapeutic Infliximab Levels Do Not Predict Risk of Short-term Complications in Adults With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain if higher infliximab trough levels (TLs) confer a greater risk of infectious/noninfectious complications (IC/NIC). We aimed to assess the risk of IC and NIC in patients with different TLs. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of Crohn's disease (CD) patients treated with infliximab who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease center, between January 1, 2010, and December 1, 2019. TDM was defined as checking of infliximab trough and antibody levels within a 48-hour period before administration. Patients with a minimum of 3-month assessment pre-TDM and post-TDM were included. In the case of multiple TDMs, the highest TL was considered, and patients were distributed across 4 predefined TL groups (A: <5 µg/mL, B: 5 to 10 µg/mL, C: 10 to 15 µg/mL, and D: ≥15 µg/mL). Rates of IC and NIC during the 3-month prior and following TDM were compared across the groups. In addition, duration of exposure, in terms of months up to TDM, was collected to analyze differences in rates of IC and NIC. RESULTS: Our study included 341 CD patients (median age: 35 y, 58% men). IC and NIC occurred in 52 (15%) and 30 (9%) patients, respectively. Rates of IC and NIC were similar across the 4 TL groups ( P =0.9 and 0.7, respectively for IC and NIC). On multivariable analysis, exposure to infliximab >40 months (as determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis) was associated with decreased odds for IC (adjusted odds ratio=0.51, P =0.04), but not NIC (adjusted odds ratio=0.72, P =0.46). CONCLUSIONS: In this large CD cohort, there was no association between infliximab TL and risk of short-term IC or NIC. Interestingly, a shorter duration of exposure predicted higher rates of IC. This supports the safety of targeting higher infliximab TLs when necessary and greater vigilance during the early stages of treatment.

Impact of Concomitant Corticosteroids on Tofacitinib Induction Efficacy and Infection Rates in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. AIM: To report efficacy and infection rates in patients receiving tofacitinib induction treatment, by baseline corticosteroid status. METHODS: We evaluated efficacy and safety data from OCTAVE Induction 1&2 in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis who received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily or placebo for 8 weeks, based on induction baseline oral corticosteroid use (Corticosteroid-Yes/No) and dose (< 20/ ≥ 20 mg/day). Infections of interest included serious infections, herpes zoster (HZ), and adjudicated opportunistic infections (OIs). RESULTS: At OCTAVE Induction 1&2 baseline, 478/1092 (43.8%) patients were receiving corticosteroids. Tofacitinib demonstrated significant induction efficacy versus placebo for both Corticosteroid-Yes and Corticosteroid-No. With adjustment for prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor and immunosuppressant failure, there were no statistically significant differences in remission and clinical response rates for Corticosteroid-Yes versus Corticosteroid-No. Among tofacitinib-treated patients, HZ and OIs occurred more frequently in Corticosteroid-Yes versus Corticosteroid-No, regardless of dose (< 20 mg vs. ≥ 20 mg). Infection incidence rates (regardless of severity/seriousness) during tofacitinib induction were generally similar regardless of baseline corticosteroid use. The proportion of tofacitinib-treated patients with HZ was 0.2% for Corticosteroid-No versus 1.1% for Corticosteroid-Yes < 20 mg and 1.0% for Corticosteroid-Yes ≥ 20 mg. Two out of three patients had HZ OIs. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib induction efficacy (clinical response and remission) was similar in baseline corticosteroid subgroups. Infections of interest were rare; HZ and OIs occurred more frequently among those receiving tofacitinib and corticosteroids versus those receiving tofacitinib without corticosteroids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT01465763[21/10/2011]; NCT01458951[21/10/2011]).

Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Over the past 2 decades, biological therapy with monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor necrosis factor-α has become a cornerstone of treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Although clinically effective, the biological therapies remain expensive, and their availability and utilization have been at times limited due to their high costs. Biosimilars are biological products similar to but not identical to the original biological agent or "reference biologic," also called "originator biologic." It is hoped that the use of biosimilars might enable these agents to become more available and, thus, decrease further expenditures related to the use of the original reference agents such as infliximab and adalimumab. In this study, we review the currently available evidence and shortcomings of these data supporting the use of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, including their efficacy and safety as related to initiating therapy with biosimilar agents or switching between reference and biosimilar biologic agents.

Evolving Considerations for Thiopurine Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases-A Clinical Practice Update: Commentary.

Thiopurines (azathioprine, mercaptopurine, thioguanine) and methotrexate are widely used in a variety of clinical management scenarios for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. With the introduction of biologic therapies over the last 2 decades, controversies have emerged as to how these immunomodulators should be used in clinical practice, either alone as monotherapies or in combination with biologic therapies. Here, we provide a summary of evidence and our interpretations regarding how physicians can or should incorporate these agents into clinical practice. We have organized the review into sections regarding their utility as monotherapy or as combination therapy with biologics and safety considerations. Clinical pharmacologic considerations are important regarding both efficacy and safety.

Exposure to Intravenous Opioids Is Associated With Future Exposure to Opioids in Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Opioid use is associated with increased mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Hospitalized patients with IBD often receive high-potency intravenous opioids (IVOPIs). It is not known whether exposure to IVOPIs affects post-discharge opioid use or complications. We investigated the association between inpatient administration of IVOPIs and a post-discharge opioid prescription (OPIRx) in patients with IBD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 862 adults with IBD hospitalized at a large urban academic health system from March 1, 2017 through April 10, 2018. We collected clinical data from the electronic health records and used multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression to assess the association between inpatient opioid exposure and OPIRx-within 12 months while adjusting for confounders. IV and non-IVOPI exposures were evaluated as binary variables. IVOPI exposure was also evaluated as a continuous variable in IV morphine mg equivalents/length of stay (IVMMEs/day). RESULTS: Multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression demonstrated a significant association between IVOPIs and OPIRx (IV vs no IVOPIs odds ratio [OR], 3.3; 95% CI, 1.7-6.4 and IVMMEs/day OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1). Subgroup analysis of patients with IBD flares (n = 621) identified a significant association between IVOPIs and OPIRx (IV vs no IVOPIs OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.6-11.0). Among patients who did not receive IVOPIs, there was a significant association between oral/transdermal opioids and OPIRx (non-IVOPIs vs no opioids OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.0-16.8). CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient IV and non-IV opioid use are associated with post-discharge opioid exposure in patients with IBD, with a dose-dependent effect. Alternative analgesics should be considered for hospitalized patients with IBD, to minimize risk of future opioid use.

Lifetime Economic Burden of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis by Age at Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Understanding the burden of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is important for measuring treatment value. We estimated lifetime health care costs incurred by patients with CD or UC by age at diagnosis. METHODS: We collected data from 78,620 patients with CD, 85,755 with UC, and propensity score-matched control subjects from the Truven Health MarketScan insurance claims databases (2008‒2015). Total medical (inpatient, outpatient) and pharmacy costs were captured. Cost variations over a lifetime were estimated in cost-state Markov models by age at diagnosis, adjusted to 2016 U.S. dollars and discounted at 3% per annum. We measured lifetime total and lifetime incremental cost (the difference between costs of CD or UC patients vs matched controls). RESULTS: For CD, the lifetime incremental cost was $707,711 among patients who received their diagnosis at 0‒11 years, and $177,614 for patients 70 years or older, averaging $416,352 for a diagnosis at any age. Lifetime total cost was $622,056, consisting of outpatient ($273,056), inpatient ($164,298), pharmacy ($163,722), and emergency room (ER) ($20,979) costs. For UC, the lifetime incremental cost was $369,955 among patients who received their diagnosis at 0‒11 years, and $132,396 for individuals 70 years or older, averaging $230,102 for a diagnosis at any age. Lifetime total cost was $405,496, consisting of outpatient ($163,670), inpatient ($123,190), pharmacy ($105,142), and ER ($13,493) costs. Therefore, the prevalent populations of patients with CD or UC in the United States in 2016 are expected to incur lifetime total costs of $498 billion and $377 billion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using a Markov model, we estimated lifetime costs for patients with CD or UC to exceed previously published estimates. Individuals who receive a diagnosis of CD or UC at an early age (younger than 11 years) incur the highest lifetime cost burden. Advancing management strategies may significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce lifetime health care spending.

Mongersen and SMAD-7 Inhibition, Not a Lucky 7 for Patients With IBD: When Trial Design Is as Important as Disease Therapy.

The phase II mongersen (GED-0301) trial produced unparalleled success rates in Crohn's disease and generated much hope for a crippling disease. Unfortunately, the subsequent phase III trial was terminated early because of a lack of efficacy. We discuss the differences in trial design that may have contributed to these disparate findings and how these findings may serve as a lesson in subsequent therapeutic trials in Crohn's disease.

A Multimodal Intervention Using Nonopioid Analgesics Is Associated With Reduced Intravenous Opioid Exposure Among Hospitalized Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with increased mortality. Previous interventions targeting reduced intravenous opioid (IVOPI) exposure for all patients admitted to a general medical unit have decreased total opioid use without compromising pain control. We therefore performed a prospective evaluation of a multimodal intervention encouraging the use of nonopioid alternatives to reduce IVOPI exposure among patients with IBD hospitalized at our institution. METHODS: This was a prospective evaluation of a multimodal intervention to reduce IVOPI use among patients with IBD aged ≥18 years admitted to a general medical unit at a large urban academic medical center from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019. Intravenous and total (all routes) opioid exposures were measured as proportions and intravenous morphine milligram equivalents/patient day and compared with preintervention (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018) data. Hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates (RRs), and pain scores (1-10 scale) were also assessed. RESULTS: Our study involved 345 patients with IBD with similar baseline characteristics in preintervention (n = 241) and intervention (n = 104) periods. Between study periods, we observed a significant reduction in the proportion of patients receiving IVOPIs (43.6% vs 30.8%, P = 0.03) and total opioid dose exposure (15.6 vs 8.5 intravenous morphine mg equivalents/d, P = 0.02). We observed similar mean pain scores (3.9 vs 3.7, P = 0.55) and significantly reduced mean LOS (7.2 vs 5.3 days, P = 0.03) and 30-day RRs (21.6% vs 11.5%, P = 0.03). DISCUSSION: A multimodal intervention was associated with reduced opioid exposure, LOS, and 30-day RRs for hospitalized patients with IBD. Additional research is needed to determine long-term benefits of reduced opioid exposure in this population.

Medical, Political, and Economic Considerations for the Use of MAC for Endoscopic Sedation: Big Price, Little Justification?

The last few decades of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy have seen phenomenal growth. In many aspects, GI endoscopy has led the field of nonsurgical interventional medicine. In many aspects, this growth is facilitated by advancements in sedation-both drugs and techniques. Unfortunately, the topic of GI endoscopy sedation is also mired in many controversies, mainly emanating from the cost of anesthesia providers. While no one debates their role in the majority of advanced endoscopic procedures, the practice of universal propofol sedation in the USA, delivered by anesthesia providers, needs a closer look. In this review, medical, political, and economic considerations of this important topic are discussed in a very frank and honest way. While such ubiquitous propofol use has increased satisfaction of both patients and gastroenterologists, there is little justification. More importantly, going by the evidence, there is even less justification for the mandated anesthesia providers use for such delivery. Unfortunately, the FDA could not be convinced otherwise. The new drug fospropofol met the same fate. Approval of SEDASYS®, the first computer-assisted personalized sedation system, was a step in the right direction, nevertheless an insufficient step that failed to takeoff. As a result, in spite of years of research and efforts of many august societies, the logjam of balancing cost and justification of propofol sedation has continued. We hope that recent approval of remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine, and potential approval of oliceridine, a novel short-acting opioid, might be able to contain the cost without compromising the quality of sedation.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults.

Crohn's disease is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology with genetic, immunologic, and environmental influences. The incidence of Crohn's disease has steadily increased over the past several decades. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with Crohn's disease has evolved since the last practice guideline was published. These guidelines represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology and were developed under the auspices of the Practice Parameters Committee for the management of adult patients with Crohn's disease. These guidelines are established for clinical practice with the intent of suggesting preferable approaches to particular medical problems as established by interpretation and collation of scientifically valid research, derived from extensive review of published literature. When exercising clinical judgment, health-care providers should incorporate this guideline along with patient's needs, desires, and their values in order to fully and appropriately care for patients with Crohn's disease. This guideline is intended to be flexible, not necessarily indicating the only acceptable approach, and should be distinguished from standards of care that are inflexible and rarely violated. To evaluate the level of evidence and strength of recommendations, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The Committee reviews guidelines in depth, with participation from experienced clinicians and others in related fields. The final recommendations are based on the data available at the time of the production of the document and may be updated with pertinent scientific developments at a later time.

Correction: ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults.

Since the publication of these Guidelines, the authors have noticed an error in the text on page 15. The incorrect statement is.

Pregnancy Outcomes Reported During the 13-Year TREAT Registry: A Descriptive Report.

OBJECTIVES: We described pregnancy outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD) patients enrolled in the TREAT Registry who received infliximab before, or during pregnancy and those not treated with infliximab or any biologic agent. METHODS: In the TREAT Registry (1999-2012), pregnancy outcomes were analyzed from maternal and paternal patients exposed to infliximab ≤365 days (gestational exposure), >365 days (pre-gestational exposure) of pregnancy outcome or without infliximab exposure (non-biologic exposed). "Healthy infants" were defined as those with no congenital abnormalities, neonatal complications (e.g., jaundice, prematurity, heart murmur, cortical vision/fine motor delay, cardiac failure, hemophilia, or torticollis), prolonged hospitalization, or those who received no special treatment. Disease activity and concomitant medications were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 92.3% (324/351) of pregnancies had known outcomes. The majority of both maternal pregnancies (92.6, 91.2, and 87.8%) and partner outcomes (92.7, 93.8, and 91.7%) resulted in live births of healthy infants across gestational, pre-gestational, and non-biologic exposure groups, respectively. Among these, rates of neonatal complications were low for both maternal (6.2, 7.0, and 8.5%), and partner outcomes (4.9, 0, and 0%) in gestational, pre-gestational, and non-biologic exposure groups, respectively. Among maternal pregnancies, numerically higher rates of spontaneous abortions were observed for the gestational exposure group than for the pre-gestational or non-biologic exposed groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical condition of infants born to women with gestational infliximab exposure was similar to those without exposure. Although a lower live birth rate was reported among infliximab-exposed women, these patients had more severe CD and were more likely to have been exposed to immunosuppressives.

Improved Hemoglobin Response with Ferric Carboxymaltose in Patients with Gastrointestinal-Related Iron-Deficiency Anemia Versus Oral Iron.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) versus oral iron and other IV iron therapies in patients with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) resulting from gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. METHODS: A pooled analysis of four prospective, randomized, active-controlled trials in patients with IDA was performed. Efficacy measures included change from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb), ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) and correlations of baseline Hb, ferritin, and TSAT to change in Hb. The incidence and type of adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were evaluated. The mean change in Hb from baseline to the maximum value was 0.8 g/dL with oral iron (P = 0.001 vs. FCM), 2.2 g/dL with FCM, 2.0 g/dL with any IV iron (P = 0.391 vs. FCM), and 1.9 g/dL with iron sucrose (P = 0.329 vs. FCM). Patients treated with FCM and iron sucrose had larger increases in Hb. This effect may have been attributed to a lower baseline Hb level. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 11.9, 12, 26.2, and 25% and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 6.9, 4, 9.8, and 12.5% of patients in the FCM, oral iron, other IV iron therapies, and iron sucrose groups, respectively. No SAEs were considered treatment related in the FCM group, compared with two treatment-related SAEs in two patients (6.3%) in the iron sucrose group. CONCLUSIONS: FCM is an effective therapy in patients with IDA who have GI disorders and has a safety profile comparable to that of other IV iron agents.

Editorial: Endoscopic Scoring Systems in Crohn's Disease for Evaluation of Responsiveness to Treatment: Are we Ready for the Prime Time of Endoscopic Assessment?

There are currently two validated endoscopic indices for evaluation of Crohn's disease (CD), the Crohn's disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) and the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD). The study by Khanna et al. evaluated the responsiveness of the SES-CD and CDEIS using data from a trial of adalimumab. The study used appropriate statistical methods to quantify responsiveness of the indices as assessed by blinded central readers. The SES-CD demonstrated numerically greater responsiveness to a treatment of known efficacy, suggestive that the SES-CD is more efficient outcome measure than the CDEIS. Removal of stenosis as an index item and adjusting for observed segments did not improve responsiveness. In the future, the implementation of the SES-CD into daily clinical practice may become a practical tool used by gastroenterologists when caring for patients with Crohn's disease. Further studies analyzing the responsiveness of the indices in combination with clinical and patients' driven outcomes are expected prior to the indices' use in "prime time".

Corrigendum: ACG Clinical Guideline: Preventive Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.537.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Preventive Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Recent data suggest that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients do not receive preventive services at the same rate as general medical patients. Patients with IBD often consider their gastroenterologist to be the primary provider of care. To improve the care delivered to IBD patients, health maintenance issues need to be co-managed by both the gastroenterologist and primary care team. Gastroenterologists need to explicitly inform the primary care provider of the unique needs of the IBD patient, especially those on immunomodulators and biologics or being considered for such therapy. In particular, documentation of up to date vaccinations are crucial as IBD patients are often treated with long-term immune-suppressive therapies and may be at increased risk for infections, many of which are preventable with vaccinations. Health maintenance issues addressed in this guideline include identification, safety and appropriate timing of vaccinations, screening for osteoporosis, cervical cancer, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer as well as identification of depression and anxiety and smoking cessation. To accomplish these health maintenance goals, coordination between the primary care provider, gastroenterology team and other specialists is necessary.

Intestinal Inflammation Does Not Predict Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Severity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common cause of hepatic steatosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Both metabolic syndrome (MetS) and intestinal inflammation are implicated in NAFLD pathogenesis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD and NAFLD seen in our health system from January 1997 to December 2011 to examine associations between IBD severity and phenotype; MetS; and NAFLD fibrosis as estimated by the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS). RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were included in our analysis (24 UC, 60 CD). 23% of patients had MetS. IBD patients with MetS were significantly older at the time of IBD diagnosis (44 vs. 33, p = 0.005) and NAFLD diagnosis (55 vs. 47, p = 0.018). IBD patients with MetS had higher ALT (54 vs. 38 U/L, p = 0.02) and AST (52 vs. 35 U/L, p = 0.004). Comparing MetS patients to non-MetS IBD patients, there was no significant difference between IBD medication use (i.e., steroids, anti-TNFs, and immunomodulators) or NAFLD medication use, other than statins. Both UC and CD patients with concomitant MetS had significantly higher NFS scores than non-MetS patients: UC (-0.4 vs. -2.5, p = 0.02) and CD (-0.8 vs. -2.3, p = 0.03). IBD disease severity, disease location, or IBD medication use was associated with NAFLD severity. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that NAFLD severity in both UC and CD IBD patients is associated with the presence of MetS but not with the severity of IBD.