Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País/Região como assunto
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 150, 2024 Jun 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38877477

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence for the rapidity and effectiveness of fentanyl buccal soluble film (FBSF) in reducing pain intensity of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) remains inadequate. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FBSF proportional to the around-the-clock (ATC) opioid regimens in rapidly relieving the intensity of BTcP episodes by determining the percentage of patients requiring further dose titration. METHODS: The study procedure included a dose-finding period followed by a 14-day observation period. Pain intensity was recorded with a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at onset and 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after FBSF self-administration. Meaningful pain relief was defined as the final NRS score ≤ 3. Satisfaction survey was conducted for each patient after treatment using the Global Satisfaction Scale. RESULTS: A total of 63 BTcP episodes occurred in 30 cancer patients. Only one patient required rescue medication at first BTcP episode and then achieved meaningful pain relief after titrating FBSF by 200 µg. Most BTcP episodes relieved within 10 min. Of 63 BTcP episodes, 30 (47.6%), 46 (73.0%), and 53 (84.1%) relieved within 5, 10, and 15 min after FBSF administration. Only grade 1/2 adverse events were reported, including somnolence, malaise, and dizziness. Of the 63 BTcP episodes, 82.6% were rated as excellent/good satisfaction with FBSF. CONCLUSION: FBSF can be administrated "on demand" by cancer patients at the onset of BTcP, providing rapid analgesia by achieving meaningful pain relief within 10 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered 24 December, 2021 at Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT05209906): https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05209906 .


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Dor Irruptiva , Fentanila , Humanos , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Masculino , Dor Irruptiva/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Irruptiva/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Administração Bucal , Adulto , Medição da Dor/métodos , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/normas , Manejo da Dor/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
2.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 53(1): 46-56, 2023 Jan 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36354095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most common and persistent issues experienced by cancer patients. Cancer-related fatigue is a distinct form of fatigue that is subjective, long-lasting and unalleviated by rest or sleep. Studies have shown that almost all cancer patients experience severe fatigue that disrupts the quality of life and physical function, but cancer-related fatigue remains under-addressed in clinical care, and only about half of all patients receive treatment. METHODS: To increase the awareness of cancer-related fatigue and improve current management, the Taiwan Society of Cancer Palliative Medicine and the Taiwan Oncology Nursing Society convened a consensus committee to develop recommendations for the screening, assessment and treatment of cancer-related fatigue. RESULTS: Thirteen consensus recommendations were subsequently developed based on the best available evidence and the clinical experience of committee members. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are expected to facilitate the standardization of cancer-related fatigue management across Taiwan and may also serve as a reference for other clinicians.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Taiwan , Consenso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/terapia , Fadiga/diagnóstico , Fadiga/etiologia , Fadiga/terapia
3.
J Nurs Res ; 30(2): e195, 2022 Mar 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35234209

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary healthcare providers, especially clinical nurses, lack a valid tool to assess the comprehensive barriers affecting oncofertility care in breast cancer treatment. PURPOSE: The aims of the research were to develop a self-assessment scale on oncofertility barriers and test its validity and reliability. METHODS: This was a methodological study. The initial 36 items of the developed Oncofertility Barrier Scale (OBS) were generated through qualitative study and a review of the literature. This scale was further refined using expert validity (n = 10), face validity (n = 10), and item analysis (n = 184). Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring and direct oblimin rotation was used to determine the construct validity. The reliability of the OBS was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest analyses. RESULTS: The mean item-level and scale-level content validity indices of the initial OBS were higher than .96. The data were shown to be feasible for the factor analysis, and a six-factor solution was chosen that accounted for approximately 57.6% of the total variance. These factors included (a) lack of information and education, (b) rigid thinking toward oncofertility care, (c) cancer patient stereotypes, (d) fertility risk, (e) insufficient support, and (f) interrupted oncofertility care. The Cronbach's alpha of the 27-item OBS was .91, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .55. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The final version of the developed OBS has acceptable reliability, content validity, and construct validity. This scale is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to identify the barriers to fertility cancer care that should be resolved by the breast cancer care team.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Preservação da Fertilidade , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Nurs Open ; 8(2): 799-807, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33570287

RESUMO

AIM: The purpose of our study was to construct the context of the nursing action/role in oncofertility care. DESIGN: Qualitative research. METHODS: We applied grounded theory to guide the qualitative study. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 12 nurses in Taipei. The data were collected from August 2018 to February 2019. RESULTS: The core theme that described the role of nurses' decision-making in oncofertility care focused on understanding oncofertility from the self to the other. Care roles or actions in oncofertility that involved the process of psychological cognition were divided into four dimensions: perceiving the patient's changes and needs, triggering the self's emotions, empathizing with patient's situations and introspective care roles. Nurses who had experienced the phase of empathizing with the patient's situations developed more diverse roles and had positive actions toward oncofertility care. Based on the psychological changes for oncofertility decision-making process, implementing contextual training in oncofertility could help nurses create more positive actions in oncofertility care.


Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Pesquisa Qualitativa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA