RESUMO
The abundance of refractory elements in giant planets can provide key insights into their formation histories1. Owing to the low temperatures of the Solar System giants, refractory elements condense below the cloud deck, limiting sensing capabilities to only highly volatile elements2. Recently, ultra-hot giant exoplanets have allowed for some refractory elements to be measured, showing abundances broadly consistent with the solar nebula with titanium probably condensed out of the photosphere3,4. Here we report precise abundance constraints of 14 major refractory elements on the ultra-hot giant planet WASP-76b that show distinct deviations from proto-solar and a sharp onset in condensation temperature. In particular, we find nickel to be enriched, a possible sign of the accretion of the core of a differentiated object during the evolution of the planet. Elements with condensation temperatures below 1,550 K otherwise closely match those of the Sun5 before sharply transitioning to being strongly depleted above 1,550 K, which is well explained by nightside cold-trapping. We further unambiguously detect vanadium oxide on WASP-76b, a molecule long suggested to drive atmospheric thermal inversions6, and also observe a global east-west asymmetry7 in its absorption signals. Overall, our findings indicate that giant planets have a mostly stellar-like refractory elemental content and suggest that temperature sequences of hot Jupiter spectra can show abrupt transitions wherein a mineral species is either present or completely absent if a cold trap exists below its condensation temperature8.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: PD-1 inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapies and are being used to treat an expanding array of cancers. To best serve patients, clinicians should be familiar with the spectrum of skin manifestations associated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy. Here, we report a unique case of hypertrophic lichen planus (HLP) in a 64-year-old man treated with pembrolizumab; the presentation initially suggested a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) morphology, then evolved into a morphology more typical of hypertrophic lichen planus. This case underscores the need for caution in diagnosing eruptive SCCs associated with PD-1 inhibitor therapy. In such instances, maintaining a high suspicion for lichenoid reactions as sequelae of PD-1 inhibitor treatment and starting an empiric trial of therapy for lichenoid dermatitis may be warranted to ensure timely management of lesions. METHODS: We describe a case of hypertrophic lichen planus mimicking squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of PD-1 inhibitory therapy with pembrolizumab. A PubMed literature review was conducted to identify other cases and determine the incidence of lichenoid reactions imitating squamous cell carcinoma in the setting of PD-1 inhibitor use. RESULTS: Our case is one of the few available pieces of literature describing eruptive hypertrophic lichen planus imitating SCC in the setting of PD-1 inhibitor use. Initial skin nodule biopsy appeared histologically compatible with squamous cell carcinoma. Repeat biopsy of the skin lesions revealed histological features consistent with hypertrophic lichen planus. Over time, lower extremity lesions evolved into a more typical appearance of hypertrophic lichen planus. Treatment with topical 0.05% clobetasol ointment and oral acitretin 25 mg led to complete resolution of lesions within 2-3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the significance of maintaining vigilance for lichenoid reactions as potential sequelae of PD-1 inhibitor therapy. It highlights the variability in initial presentation and the potential for lesions to transform over time. Timely recognition and appropriate management, including high-potency topical corticosteroids and oral acitretin, are crucial for achieving favorable outcomes in patients experiencing such reactions. More studies are necessary to fully analyze the rate of HLP occurrence as a consequence of PD-1 inhibitor use.