Resisting the racialization of medical deservingness: How Latinx nurses produce symbolic resources for Latinx immigrants in clinical encounters.

This paper investigates how Latinx nurses resisted the racialization of medical un-deservingness against co-ethnic immigrants in everyday clinical encounters. Drawing on 26 in-depth interviews and dialoguing with the literature on minority professionals, we find that, as a form of racialized equity work, Latinx nurses produced certain symbolic resources, specifically the interactional signals to counteract Latinx patients' internalization of un-deservingness and other medical staff's open hostility towards these "undeserving illegals." Latinx nurses hybridized neoliberal norms (self-sufficiency and responsibility) and social justice values (including healthcare as a universal right and compassion for members of the community): they emphasized Latinx immigrants' efforts at "becoming" self-sufficient and clinically responsible, debunked the relevance of citizenship to a right to healthcare, and highlighted their communal bonds with co-ethnic patients. Meanwhile, accentuating these communal bonds revealed hefty loads of previously self-censored healthcare needs among Latinx patients, which compelled Latinx nurses to reassert some professional boundaries. Whereas some Latinx nurses were able to engage in "moralized boundary-drawing," others experienced setting professional boundaries as "demoralizing boundary-drawing," which resulted in burnout, disillusionment, or internalized racism. Our findings indicate that the path to de-racializing medical deservingness needs to be multi-tiered. Latinx nurses' racialized equity work of generating symbolic resources for Latinx immigrants is only sustainable if supported by non-Latinx colleagues' cross-ethnic equity work. Furthermore, everyday resistance in clinical encounters is necessarily incomplete unless state-level policy initiatives transform the currency of symbolic capital for medical deservingness.

The "Societalization" of pandemic unpreparedness: lessons from Taiwan's COVID response.

Adopting a Civil Sphere Theory framework, we argue that Taiwan's efforts at containing COVID-19 resulted from its "societalization" of pandemic unpreparedness, which was triggered by the 2003 SARS outbreak and resumed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Societalization refers to the process through which institutional failures are transformed into societal crises, with the civil sphere mobilized to discuss institutional dysfunctions, push for reforms, and attempt to democratize or otherwise transform institutional cultures. The societalization of pandemic unpreparedness in Taiwan led to reforms of the public health administration and the medical profession, thereby establishing state mechanisms for encouraging early responses and coordinating centralized command during outbreaks, and healthcare infrastructures for coordinating patient transfer and ensuring supplies of personal protective equipment. Reflections upon past uncivil acts among citizens motivated the civil sphere to foster a discourse of interdependence, redefining the boundaries between individual choices and civic virtues. Meanwhile, unaddressed challenges remained, including threats related to Taiwan's political polarization. Our paper challenges the thesis of "authoritarian advantage," highlighting how democratic societies can foster social preparedness to respond to crises. By illustrating how societalization can reach temporary closures but become reactivated subsequently, our study extends the theory of societalization by explicating its historical dimension.

Beyond cultural competency: Bourdieu, patients and clinical encounters.

In response to widely documented racial and ethnic disparities in health, clinicians and public health advocates have taken great strides to implement 'culturally competent' care. While laudable, this important policy and intellectual endeavour has suffered from a lack of conceptual clarity and rigour. This paper develops a more careful conceptual model for understanding the role of culture in the clinical encounter, paying particular attention to the relationship between culture, contexts and social structures. Linking Bourdieu's (1977) notion of 'habitus' and William Sewell's (1992) axioms of multiple and intersecting structures, we theorise patient culture in terms of 'hybrid habitus'. This conceptualisation of patient culture highlights three analytical dimensions: the multiplicity of schemas and resources available to patients, their specific patterns of integration and application in specific contexts, and the constitutive role of clinical encounters. The paper concludes with a discussion of directions for future research as well as reforms of cultural competency training courses.