Pharmacovigilance study of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a safety analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: With the increased use of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in cancer patients, adverse events (AEs) have garnered considerable interest. We conducted this pharmacovigilance study to evaluate the AEs of BCR-ABL1 TKIs in cancer patients using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: To query AE reports from the FAERS database, we used OpenVigil 2.1. Descriptive analysis was then employed to describe the characteristics of TKIs-associated AE reports. We also utilized the disproportionality analysis to detect safety signals by calculating the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and reporting odds ratios (ROR). RESULTS: From the FAERS database, a total of 85,989 AE reports were retrieved, with 3,080 significant AE signals identified. Specifically, imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib had significant AE signals of 1,058, 813, 232, 186, and 791, respectively. These significant signals were further categorized into 26 system organ classes (SOCs). The AE signals of imatinib and ponatinib were primarily associated with general disorders and administration site conditions. On the other hand, nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib were mainly linked to investigations, respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders, respectively. Notably, new signals of 245, 278, 47, 55, and 253 were observed in imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that AE signals differ among the five BCR-ABL1 TKIs. Furthermore, each BCR-ABL1 TKI displayed several new signals. These findings provide valuable information for clinicians aiming to reduce the risk of AEs during BCR-ABL1 TKI treatment.

Association of dietary vitamin C intake with depression in adults: A cross-sectional study of NHANES from 2005 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dietary vitamin C intake and depression in adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) during 2005 to 2020. Logistic regressions and restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression were used to assess the association between dietary vitamin C intake and depression. Additionally, we performed stratified and sensitivity analyses to evaluate the stability of the results. RESULTS: This study included 38,157 participants, with 3448 (9.04 %) of them experiencing depression. The vitamin C intake was negatively associated with depression after adjusting for all covariates (OR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.88-0.94, P < 0.001). Similar inverse associations were observed when vitamin C intake was transformed into categorical variables. Individuals in higher quartiles of dietary vitamin C intake (Q2, Q3, and Q4) had lower odds ratios (ORs) compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1), as indicated by adjusted ORs of 0.78 (95 % CI: 0.71-0.87, P < 0.001), 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.67-0.82, P < 0.001), and 0.73 (95 % CI: 0.65-0.81, P < 0.001), respectively. The RCS analysis found an L-shaped nonlinear relationship between dietary vitamin C intake and depression, after adjusting for all covariates (P for non-linearity<0.001). Consumption of vitamin C was inversely associated with depression (OR = 0.994, 95%CI: 0.993-0.996, P < 0.001) for intakes below 93.61 mg, but there was no association between dietary vitamin C intake and depression (P = 0.980) for intakes of 93.61 mg or higher. The inverse associations between vitamin C intake and depression remained robust in stratified and sensitivity analyses. LIMITATIONS: This study was a cross-sectional study, and therefore unable to establish a causal relationship between dietary vitamin C intake and depression. We are unable to fully eliminate the confounding effects resulted from other unmeasured or unknown factors. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a negative association between dietary vitamin C intake and depression, as well as an L-shaped nonlinear relationship between vitamin C intake and depression.

Adverse events with pemigatinib in the real world: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: To data, there is insufficient large-scale data on the adverse events (AEs) of pemigatinib. Consequently, we conducted a pharmacovigilance study utilizing the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to investigate these AEs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The OpenVigil 2.1 was used to extract AE data from the FAERS database. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratios (ROR), and bayesian analysis confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) were used to assess the association between pemigatinib and AEs. The clinical importance of AE signals were prioritized using a rating scale. RESULTS: A total of 848 AE reports were retrieved from the FAERS database, and 421 AE reports were identified after the data cleaning process. After accounting for indication bias and removal of medication errors, 59 positive signals were finally included. The 59 positive signals emerged in 11 system organ classes (SOCs). Besides, 19 positive AEs were classified as moderate clinical priority, while 40 were deemed weak in terms of priority. 9 positive AEs were not included in the drug label. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided valuable evidence for clinicians to mitigate the risk of pemigatinib-related toxicities in the real world.