Raising awareness to prevent, recognise and manage acute pain during caesarean delivery: The French Practice Bulletin.

The incidence of acute pain during caesarean section varies between studies, with a reported rate ranging between 0.5%-17% for spinal anaesthesia and 1.7%-20% for epidural anaesthesia. Leaders from the French Club anesthésie-réanimation en obstétrique (CARO) convened to provide a clinical framework and practice bulletin to prevent, recognise and treat acute pain during caesarean section. First, a steering group agreed on 5 themes guiding quality of anaesthesia care for caesarean section: (1) appropriate neuraxial anaesthesia and testing of the surgical block prior to incision (PREVENTION); (2) appropriate organisation around decision to delivery time (COMMUNICATION); 3) appropriate management of pain before and/or after skin incision (RECOGNITION & RESPONSE); (4) appropriate prevention, identification and management of post-traumatic stress disorder (SCREENING, PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF COMPLICATIONS); (5) management of medico-legal issues (MITIGATION). Then, an interdisciplinary multi-professional taskforce composed of obstetric anaesthesiologists, obstetricians, neonatologists, psychiatrists, midwifes, nurse anaesthetists, lawyers and patients, developed 23 statements that contribute to optimise care for caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia, of which 10 were deemed key recommendations. A decision-tree was built to optimise prevention, communication, recognition, response and management. The aim of this practice bulletin, which was endorsed by 6 societies, is to raise awareness on the risks associated with severe acute pain during caesarean section and to provide best clinical practices; pain during caesarean is not acceptable and should be prevented and managed by all stakeholders.

Insurance statements related to regional anaesthesia: A French database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adverse events in the perioperative period remain frequent, occurring in about 30% of the hospital admission and may be avoidable in nearly 50% of cases. Improving safety needs a continuous assessment of the risk level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the MACSF-Sou medical insurance company, including all the statements declared by anaesthesiologists and intensivists, were analyzed retrospectively by three experts, senior anaesthesiologists, of the SFAR, the French society of anesthesia and intensive care (Société française d'anesthésie réanimation) to describe the risk associated with regional anaesthesia. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four events were analyzed, involving young patients (mean age of 48.3±15years; sex ratio: 0.57). The most involved surgical specialties were: orthopaedic surgery (61%) and obstetric surgery (13.4%). Reported events were predominantly peripheral nerve injury (64.6%). Mechanical complications of puncture (pneumothorax, haemothorax, complications of axial punctures) accounted for approximately 15% of events, infection for 11%. The revelation was predominant in the postoperative course (137 cases, 83.6%), particularly after the release of the operating room in over 47% of cases, including 39 cases (22%) after discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSION: Collaboration with insurance companies allows a relevant approach of the perioperative risk. In most cases, liability related to regional anaesthesia involved young patients in the perioperative course of scheduled surgery. One of the future challenges in managing, the anaesthetic and perioperative risks should be to invest more accurately the postoperative care both in the hospital or ambulatory settings.

Insurance statements from French anaesthesiologists and intensivists: A database analysis.

BACKGROUND: From its origins, anaesthesia is a leading medical specialty for improving patient safety. However, perioperative adverse events remain frequent and may be preventable in 50% of cases. We conducted a collaborative retrospective study analysis of the insurance-database of the MACSF-Sou Medical insurance company to assess the perioperative risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study, including all the statements declared by anaesthesiologists to the MACSF-Sou Medical insurance company. A description of risk in perioperative medicine was performed by the assessment of these statements by three experts member of the SFAR. All the statements concerning regional anaesthesia and dental injuries were excluded. RESULTS: Eight hundred and seventy statements were analyzed. The patients involved were predominantly women (sex-ratio: 0.86), with a mean age of 56 years (±18). Three hundred and fifteen cardiac arrests, 157 severe systemic complications, 340 moderate complications and 106 conflicts were analyzed. Most of the events were revealed postoperatively (79.3%) and almost half of them after the discharge of the postanesthetic care unit. The medical consequences were considered as serious. Death followed 35.9% of the events declared. Relative or true hypovolaemia and stroke were responsible for a large part of postoperative mortality and morbidity. CONCLUSION: Collaborating with insurance companies allows a relevant approach of the perioperative risk. The study highlighted the importance of the delayed complications and is a plea for a more intense implication of anaesthesia in the postoperative care with the aim of improving patient safety.