Discrete choice experiment on educating value-based healthcare.

INTRODUCTION: Identifying costs and values in healthcare interventions as well as the ability to measure and consider costs relative to value for patients are pivotal in clinical decision-making and medical education. This study explores residents' preferences in educating value-based healthcare (VBHC) during postgraduate medical education. Exploring residents' preferences in VBHC education, in order to understand what shapes their choices, might contribute to improved medical residency education and healthcare as a whole. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) examined which conditions for educating VBHC are preferred by residents. DCE gives more insight into the trade-off's residents make when choosing alternatives, and which conditions for educating VBHC have the most influence on residents' preference. RESULTS: This DCE shows that residents prefer knowledge on both medical practice as well as the process of care-to be educated by an expert on VBHC together with a clinician. They prefer limited protected time to conduct VBHC initiatives (thus while at work) and desire the inclusion of VBHC in formal educational plans. CONCLUSION: When optimising graduate and postgraduate medical education curricula, these preferences should be considered to create necessary conditions for the facilitation and participation of residents in VBHC education and the set-up of VBHC initiatives.

Training Physicians to Provide High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care: A Systematic Review.

IMPORTANCE: Increasing health care expenditures are taxing the sustainability of the health care system. Physicians should be prepared to deliver high-value, cost-conscious care. OBJECTIVE: To understand the circumstances in which the delivery of high-value, cost-conscious care is learned, with a goal of informing development of effective educational interventions. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, ERIC, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until September 5, 2015, to identify learners and cost-related topics. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included on the basis of topic relevance, implementation of intervention, evaluation of intervention, educational components in intervention, and appropriate target group. There was no restriction on study design. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction was guided by a merged and modified version of a Best Evidence in Medical Education abstraction form and a Cochrane data coding sheet. Articles were analyzed using the realist review method, a narrative review technique that focuses on understanding the underlying mechanisms in interventions. Recurrent patterns were identified in the data through thematic analyses. Resulting themes were discussed within the research team until consensus was reached. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes were factors that promote education in delivering high-value, cost-conscious care. FINDINGS: The initial search identified 2650 articles; 79 met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 were randomized clinical trials. The majority of the studies were conducted in North America (78.5%) using a pre-post interventional design (58.2%; at least 1619 participants); they focused on practicing physicians (36.7%; at least 3448 participants), resident physicians (6.3%; n = 516), and medical students (15.2%; n = 275). Among the 14 randomized clinical trials, 12 addressed knowledge transmission, 7 reflective practice, and 1 supportive environment; 10 (71%) concluded that the intervention was effective. The data analysis suggested that 3 factors aid successful learning: (1) effective transmission of knowledge, related, for example, to general health economics and prices of health services, to scientific evidence regarding guidelines and the benefits and harms of health care, and to patient preferences and personal values (67 articles); (2) facilitation of reflective practice, such as providing feedback or asking reflective questions regarding decisions related to laboratory ordering or prescribing to give trainees insight into their past and current behavior (56 articles); and (3) creation of a supportive environment in which the organization of the health care system, the presence of role models of delivering high-value, cost-conscious care, and a culture of high-value, cost-conscious care reinforce the desired training goals (27 articles). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Research on educating physicians to deliver high-value, cost-conscious care suggests that learning by practicing physicians, resident physicians, and medical students is promoted by combining specific knowledge transmission, reflective practice, and a supportive environment. These factors should be considered when educational interventions are being developed.

[Lumbar puncture practice in case of hemorrhagic or ischemic risk: a national opinion survey]. / Enquête d'opinions sur la pratique de la ponction lombaire non urgente chez des patients à risque hémorragiques/thrombotiques.

CONTEXT: Lumbar puncture (LP) is a common medical procedure for which no valid consensus exists in situations of hemorrhagic or thrombotic risk. The aim of this study was to identify the opinion-guided practices of LP at a national level. METHODS: A national opinion survey on Internet. An anonymous questionnaire of 19 questions collecting information about the LP practice for patients with hemorrhagic or thrombotic risks. RESULTS: We sent 632 e-mails with the link of the survey and obtained 211 responses in six weeks. None of the responses was unanimous for any of the 13 different clinical situations proposed. Six practices were reported as adopted by the majority of participants, six by more than one-third. Reports of practices were highly variable, particularly for the minimum platelets count accepted, for the management of patients taking two antiplatelet agents or newer anticoagulant agents. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These results underline the heterogeneity of practices and the lack of recommendations. The establishment of a clear consensus in this area seems essential to guide practices in the future. In order to increase the representativeness of our responses, the survey is still going on online and will be open for all practitioners who wish to participate (http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/hemopl).

Incorporating value-based healthcare projects in residency training: a mixed-methods study on the impact of participation on understanding and competency development.

OBJECTIVES: Stimulating the active participation of residents in projects with societally relevant healthcare themes, such as value-based healthcare (VBHC), can be a strategy to enhance competency development. Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists (CanMEDS) competencies such as leader and scholar are important skills for all doctors. In this study, we hypothesise that when residents conduct a VBHC project, CanMEDS competencies are developed. There is the added value of gaining knowledge about VBHC. DESIGN: An explorative mixed-methods study assessing residents' self-perceived learning effects of conducting VBHC projects according to three main components: (1) CanMEDS competency development, (2) recognition of VBHC dilemmas in clinical practice, and (3) potential facilitators for and barriers to implementing a VBHC project. We triangulated data resulting from qualitative analyses of: (a) text-based summaries of VBHC projects by residents and (b) semistructured interviews with residents who conducted these projects. SETTING: Academic and non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Out of 63 text-based summaries from residents, 56 were selected; and out of 19 eligible residents, 11 were selected for semistructured interviews and were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Regarding CanMEDS competency development, the competencies 'leader', 'communicator' and 'collaborator' scored the highest. Opportunities to recognise VBHC dilemmas in practice were mainly stimulated by analysing healthcare practices from different perspectives, and by learning how to define costs and relate them to outcomes. Finally, implementation of VBHC projects is facilitated by a thorough investigation of a VBHC dilemma combined with an in-depth stakeholder analysis. CONCLUSION: In medical residency training programmes, competency development through active participation in projects with societally relevant healthcare themes-such as VBHC-was found to be a promising strategy. From a resident's perspective, combining a thorough investigation of the VBHC dilemma with an in-depth stakeholder analysis is key to the successful implementation of a VBHC project.

How Do Attending Physicians Prepare Residents to Deliver High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care?

PURPOSE: An estimated 20% of health care expenditures are wasteful. Educational interventions aimed at reducing waste by delivering high-value, cost-conscious care (HV3C) often focus on the role of the physician. This study sought to understand how attending physicians, who have a central role in the workplace, prepare residents to provide HV3C. METHOD: Researchers from Maastricht University in Maastricht, the Netherlands, conducted semistructured interviews between September 2016 and August 2017 with 12 attending physicians who supervise residents in the workplace. Participants were purposefully sampled from 5 institutions throughout the Netherlands to include surgical and nonsurgical attending physicians and hospital- and nonhospital-based physicians. Data collection and analysis were iterative, using principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: The attending physician's approach to providing HV3C was an important factor in preparing residents in the workplace. Three differences became apparent: priority of HV3C training, feedback on HV3C, and obstacles to HV3C delivery. Results indicate that attending physicians use 3 teaching methods to teach HV3C delivery: Socratic questioning, role modeling, and setting limits. Training was often implicit and ad hoc. CONCLUSIONS: How attending physicians deal with HV3C themselves influences how they prepare residents in the workplace. To optimize resident training, it may be important to create a supportive environment for HV3C delivery and training. Delivery could be supported by making HV3C a shared goal for attending physicians and residents, thereby providing insight into clinical practice behavior and minimizing the influence of obstacles. Training could be optimized by supporting a variety of teaching methods suitable for daily teaching to stimulate continuous learning in residents.

Evaluating medical residents as managers of care: a critical appraisal of assessment methods.

INTRODUCTION: The increasing demands for effective and efficient health care delivery systems worldwide have resulted in an expansion of the desired competencies that physicians need to possess upon graduation. Presently, medical residents require additional professional competencies that can prepare them to practice adequately in a continuously changing health care environment. Recent studies show that despite the importance of competency-based training, the development and evaluation of management competencies in residents during residency training is inadequate. The aim of this literature review was to find out which assessment methods are currently being used to evaluate trainees' management competencies and which, if any, of these methods make use of valid and reliable instruments. METHODS: In September 2012, a thorough search of the literature was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase®, MEDLINE®, and ERIC databases. Additional searches included scanning the references of relevant articles and sifting through the "related topics" displayed by the databases. RESULTS: A total of 25 out of 178 articles were selected for final review. Four broad categories emerged after analysis that best reflected their content: 1) measurement tools used to evaluate the effect of implemented curricular interventions; 2) measurement tools based on recommendations from consensus surveys or conventions; 3) measurement tools for assessing general competencies, which included care-management; and 4) measurement tools focusing exclusively on care-management competencies. CONCLUSION: Little information was found about (validated) assessment tools being used to measure care-management competence in practice. Our findings suggest that a combination of assessment tools should be used when evaluating residents' care-management competencies.