Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 177(3): 751-757, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28218972

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is common and can significantly impair quality of life, yet little is known about patients' understanding of acne and its treatments. Oral antibiotics are widely used for acne despite concerns about antibiotic resistance. People are increasingly turning to online discussion forums for advice, and information on these sites may influence health beliefs and treatment adherence. OBJECTIVES: To explore understandings about the use of oral antibiotics for acne and advice shared among messages posted on online forums. METHODS: We systematically searched for online forums and identified four where acne was frequently discussed. Discussion threads relating to oral antibiotics were analysed thematically. RESULTS: We extracted 136 pages of data comprising 65 discussions among 294 participants. We found a wide range of perceptions around effectiveness of antibiotics for acne and concerns about adverse effects. The delayed onset of action of antibiotics was a source of frustration and compounded dissatisfaction with healthcare providers, who were perceived by people as 'fobbing them off' with prolonged courses of ineffective treatment. Advice ranged from when to ask for or insist on referral to use of costly cleansers. Forum posts related to a wide range of severities, from 'spots' to severe acne, which may make it confusing for users to assess appropriateness of information. CONCLUSIONS: Online forums offer opinions that could confuse patients, or lead to early abandonment of treatments, challenging consultations and patient dissatisfaction. Users expressed frustration about the delayed onset of action of antibiotics for acne, perceptions of only temporary effectiveness and adverse effects.


Assuntos
Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Internet , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Acne Vulgar/psicologia , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Percepção , Mídias Sociais , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 25(6): 673-680, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30616011

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sore throat resulting from pharyngotonsillitis is one of the commonest reasons for primary care consultation and inappropriate antibiotic prescription and finding effective alternative treatments is important. OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence for using the probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 (SsK12) for the prevention or treatment of pharyngotonsillitis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Adults or children. INTERVENTIONS: SsK12 as active treatment or prophylaxis, against pharyngotonsillitis. METHODS: Literature search. RESULTS: Four articles were identified (1846 participants). All were deemed to be of poor quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment. Two trials studied SsK12 prophylaxis for streptococcal pharyngitis (children without history of recurrence). One compared daily administration of SsK12 to no treatment over 6 months (n = 222, age 33-45 months), reporting significantly lower incidence in the SsK12 group (16.2% vs. 48.6%, p < 0.01), whereas another placebo-controlled RCT over four school terms (n = 1314, 5-14 years) found no significant difference (7.8% vs. 8.8%, p 0.34) with SsK12 (administered on school days). Another trial found daily SsK12 to significantly protect children (n = 250, 6-7 years) against chronic adenoiditis exacerbation over 3 months compared to no treatment (71.7% vs. 100%, p < 0.0001). The one placebo-controlled RCT in adults that studied the use of SsK12 for acute pharyngotonsillitis (concurrently with penicillin) showed no significant benefit. In all trials, SsK12 was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: SsK12 appears safe and well tolerated. However, further RCTs are required to establish its role as a prophylactic therapy, particularly among patients experiencing frequent exacerbations of pharyngitis. In the acute setting, SsK12 is unlikely to be effective if given concurrently with antibiotics; however, further RCTs should establish its role as an alternative to antibiotics in nonsevere cases or when prescribed after antibiotic therapy for the prevention of disease recurrence and/or secondary infection.


Assuntos
Faringite/prevenção & controle , Faringite/terapia , Probióticos/administração & dosagem , Streptococcus salivarius/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Placebos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA