Efficacy and safety of intragastric expandable oral capsules in adults with overweight or obesity: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

AIM: This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of 2.24 g intragastric expandable capsules twice per day versus placebo for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled study included adults with a body mass index of at least 24 kg/m2 and no more than 40 kg/m2 . In total, 280 participants were recruited from six hospitals in China and were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 2.24 g oral intragastric expandable capsules or placebo for 24 weeks. Coprimary endpoints were the percentage change in body weight from baseline and the rate of weight reduction of ≥5%, assessed using both the full analysis set and per protocol set. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean body weight was 81.8 kg, and the mean body mass index was 29.4 kg/m2 . The mean body weight change at week 24 was -4.9% with intragastric expandable capsules versus -1.9% with placebo [estimated treatment difference (ETD) -3.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.1 to -1.9; p < .001] using the full analysis set and -6.1% versus -2.5% (ETD -3.6%, 95% CI -5.0 to -2.3; p < .001), respectively, using the per protocol set. The percentage of participants who had weight loss exceeding 5% was 45.0% in the intragastric expandable capsule group versus 19.7% in the placebo group (ETD 25.3%, 95% CI 14.7-35.9; p < .001) in the full analysis set and 55.9% versus 26.2% (ETD 29.6%, 95% CI 17.1-42.2; p < .001), respectively, in the per protocol set. Waist circumference significantly decreased at week 24 (intragastric expandable capsules vs. placebo: -5.6 ± 8.3 cm vs. -2.9 ± 4.8 cm; p = .003). The most common adverse events associated with the use of intragastric expandable capsules were gastrointestinal disorders (intragastric expandable capsule vs. placebo, 25.0% vs. 21.9%), and most were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: In this 24-week trial including participants with overweight or obesity, 2.24 g of intragastric expandable capsules twice daily led to a clinically meaningful reduction in body weight compared with placebo.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated new-onset hypophysitis: a retrospective analysis using the FAERS.

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence and demographic characteristics of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated hypophysitis (ICI-hypophysitis) using data from the FAERS, and the risk factors of prognosis were explored. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all cases of newly-diagnosed hypophysitis associated with FDA approved ICIs from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2022 were accumulated using FAERS. Demographic data including age, sex, body weight, the prognosis of cases, and other co-occurred endocrinopathies induced by ICIs were analyzed and compared between different subgroups of immunotherapy. RESULTS: The reporting frequency of ICI-hypophysitis was 1.46% (2343/160089). Patients on the combination therapy had higher risk of hypophysitis reporting, followed by anti-CTLA-4 agent compared with other monotherapies (p < 0.001). Male subjects displayed higher reporting risk of ICI-hypophysitis (p = 0.015). Patients on anti-PD-1 therapy or the combination therapy showed higher occurrence rate of type 1 diabetes (anti-PD-1 vs. anti-PD-L1 vs. anti-CTLA-4 vs. combination therapy, 4.2% vs. 0.7% vs. 0.3% vs. 8.4%, p < 0.001). The occurrence rate of new-onset thyroid diseases in patients receiving combination therapy was higher than anti-PD-1 monotherapy (12.3% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.010). Elder age, lung cancer, and renal cancer emerged to be positively associated with severe clinical outcomes [>65 years, OR 1.042, 95%CI (1.022-1.063), p < 0.001; lung cancer, OR 1.400, 95%CI (1.019-1.923), p = 0.038; renal cancer, OR 1.667, 95%CI (1.153-2.412), p = 0.007]. Anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy was discovered to be a protective factor of severe outcomes [OR 0.433, 95%CI (0.335-0.558), p < 0.001]. Female sex and co-occurrence of ICI-related diabetes exhibited lower risk of death [female, OR 0.571, 95%CI (0.361-0.903), p = 0.017; diabetes, OR 0.090, 95%CI (0.016-0.524), p = 0.007]. CONCLUSIONS: ICI-induced hypophysitis is male-predominant irAE, most commonly seen in patients on anti-CTLA-4 mono- or combination therapy. Awareness among clinicians is critical when patients with elder age, lung or renal cancer develop hypophysitis, which indicates poor clinical outcomes. Female sex, anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy and co-occurrence of ICI-related diabetes are protective risk factors for poor prognosis.