RESUMO
Plant exposures leading to systemic or topical toxicity are common presentations seen in the emergency department. While often nonfatal, certain highly toxic plants result in cardiovascular or respiratory failure requiring invasive management. We describe a 65-y-old patient who presented with a refractory ventricular dysrhythmia secondary to an unintentional ingestion of an aconitine-containing plant after incorrect identification. Despite aggressive treatment with vasopressors, intravenous fluids, antiarrhythmics, as well as electrolyte correction and multiple attempted synchronized cardioversions, the patient remained in a refractory dysrhythmia with cardiogenic shock. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygen (ECMO) therapy was initiated successfully and resulted in rapid resolution of the unstable dysrhythmia. The patient was weaned from ECMO in under 48 h and was discharged without neurological or cardiovascular sequelae. This case highlights management options available to clinicians who encounter toxicity associated with aconitine ingestion. Fatal consequences were averted, and caution is required with the use of plant-identifying applications and resources.
Assuntos
Aconitina , Choque Cardiogênico , Humanos , Choque Cardiogênico/induzido quimicamente , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Oxigênio , Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Ingestão de AlimentosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Relying on a treatment threshold for methanol poisoning of 20 mg/dL (6.2 mmol/L) as a stand-alone criterion may lead to unnecessary and invasive treatment because it is likely too conservative, especially for patients with repeated, intentional methanol exposures. OBJECTIVE: We investigated how often patients with recurrent intentional methanol exposures above this threshold developed biochemical or overt clinical toxicity despite not being treated with either an alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor (ADHi) or hemodialysis. METHODS: We identified patients with ≥3 methanol-related emergency visits from 2002 to 2015 and selected every visit in which neither ADHi nor hemodialysis were administered despite serum methanol >20 mg/dL but neither metabolic acidosis nor end organ toxicity at presentation. The primary outcome was the incidence of visual deterioration or death. RESULTS: Four patients accounted for the 17 visits that met inclusion criteria. All exposures were intentional substance misuse, and 7 of 17 were via inhalation (i.e., huffing). Initial methanol concentrations ranged from 22 mg/dL to 35 mg/dL (7-11 mmol/L). Four of these 17 visits had undetectable initial ethanol concentrations at presentation, including 1 with an initial methanol concentration of 35 mg/dL. No patients developed visual deterioration, and all were known to have survived the exposure. CONCLUSION: Following recurrent, intentional methanol exposure, isolated serum methanol concentrations as high as 35 mg/dL (11 mmol/L) appear to be well-tolerated without treatment in the absence of metabolic acidosis or end-organ toxicity. To better define the methanol treatment threshold, prospective studies are warranted in which patients are followed closely while fomepizole is withheld.
Assuntos
Álcool Desidrogenase , Metanol , Antídotos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Pirazóis , Diálise RenalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The minimum recommended treatment duration for i.v. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) after an acute, single acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is 21 h. Some have questioned whether shorter courses may be sufficient in carefully selected cases. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the incidence of hepatotoxicity in a cohort of acute APAP overdose patients who received <21 h of i.v. NAC for any reason. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a large multicenter retrospective cohort of patients hospitalized for APAP poisoning. We selected patients with a potentially toxic serum APAP concentration measured between 4 and 24 h post ingestion, in whom i.v. NAC was initiated but discontinued before completing the full 21-h course. We further characterized outcomes in these patients as a function of two novel risk-prediction tools, the psi (ψ) parameter and APAP × aminotransferase (AT) product. The ψ parameter is an estimate of the cellular burden of injury based on the area under the concentration-time curve before treatment, and calculated with respect to the APAP concentration and time to initiation of NAC. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Intravenous NAC was initiated a median of 11.3 h post ingestion and administered for a median of 11.0 h. Hepatotoxicity (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] or alanine aminotransferase [ALT] > 1,000 IU/L) occurred in one patient (1.7%; 95% confidence interval 0.04-9.1), and eight additional patients developed hepatic injury (AST or ALT > 100 IU/L). No fatalities occurred. A multiplication product of APAP and AT (APAP × AT) that falls below 10,000 µmol/L/IU-L, or pretreatment ψ < 5 mmol/L-h suggested a low risk of hepatic injury. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of patients treated with < 21 h of i.v. NAC for acute APAP overdose, the incidence of hepatotoxicity and coagulopathy was low, despite delays to NAC treatment.
Assuntos
Acetaminofen/intoxicação , Acetilcisteína/uso terapêutico , Acetilcisteína/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Importance: The US and Canada currently have no formal published nationwide guidelines for specialists in poison information or emergency departments for the management of acetaminophen poisoning, resulting in significant variability in management. Objective: To develop consensus guidelines for the management of acetaminophen poisoning in the US and Canada. Evidence Review: Four clinical toxicology societies (America's Poison Centers, American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, American College of Medical Toxicology, and Canadian Association of Poison Control Centers) selected participants (n = 21). Led by a nonvoting chairperson using a modified Delphi method, the panel created a decision framework and determined the appropriate clinical management of a patient with acetaminophen poisoning. Unique to this effort was the collection of guidelines from most poison centers in addition to systematic collection and review of the medical literature. Comments from review by external organizations were incorporated before the guideline was finalized. The project began in March 2021 and ended in March 2023. Findings: The search retrieved 84 guidelines and 278 publications. The panel developed guidelines for emergency department management of single or repeated ingestion of acetaminophen. In addition, the panel addressed extended-release formulation, high-risk ingestion, coingestion of anticholinergics or opioids, age younger than 6 years, pregnancy, weight greater than 100 kg, and intravenous acetaminophen use. Differences from current US practice include defining acute ingestion as an ingestion presentation from 4 to 24 hours after overdose was initiated. A revised form of the Rumack-Matthew nomogram was developed. The term massive ingestion was replaced with the term high-risk ingestion and denoted by a specific nomogram line. Other recommendations include specific criteria for emergency department triage, laboratory evaluation and monitoring parameters, defining the role of gastrointestinal decontamination, detailed management of acetylcysteine treatment, associated adverse effects, and stopping criteria for acetylcysteine treatment, as well as criteria for consultation with a clinical toxicologist. Finally, specific treatment considerations, including acetylcysteine dosing, fomepizole administration, and considerations for extracorporeal elimination and transplant evaluation, were addressed. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study provides a consensus statement on consistent evidence-based recommendations for medical, pharmacy, and nursing education and practice to optimize care of patients with acetaminophen poisoning.
Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Venenos , Humanos , Criança , Acetaminofen , Acetilcisteína , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Canadá/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Cocaine is one of the most commonly abused drugs and represents a major public health concern. Cocaine users frequently present to the emergency department, with chest pain being the most common presenting complaint. The incidence of acute myocardial infarction in patients with cocaine-associated chest pain is often quoted as 6%, but it is highly variable depending on the included population. Risk assessment can be challenging in these patients; serial assessment of electrocardiograms and troponins is often required. This review focuses on the assessment and management of patients presenting with cocaine-associated chest pain and cardiotoxicity. Specific treatments are discussed, including benzodiazepines, nitroglycerin, calcium channel blockers, and phentolamine, and how treatment priorities differ from patients with noncocaine presentations. The use of beta-blockers in this population remains controversial, and the literature around its use is reviewed. The most recent literature and recommendations for the use of percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolytics in cocaine-associated myocardial infarction is discussed as well. Cocaine-associated dysrhythmias are suggested to be the cause of sudden cardiac death in some users. The pathophysiology and evidence-based treatments for dysrhythmias are reviewed. This review provides evidence-based recommendations for the assessment and management of patients presenting with cocaine-associated cardiovascular toxicity.