Assessment of HER2 gene amplification in adenocarcinomas of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction in the INT-0116/SWOG9008 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab has been approved for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic gastric carcinoma; however, relatively little is known about the role of HER2 in the natural history of this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in the INT-0116/SWOG9008 phase III gastric cancer clinical trial with available tissue specimens were retrospectively evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by FISH and overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The original trial was designed to evaluate the benefit of postoperative chemoradiation compared with surgery alone. RESULTS: HER2 gene amplification rate by FISH was 10.9% among 258 patients evaluated. HER2 overexpression rate by IHC was 12.2% among 148 patients evaluated, with 90% agreement between FISH and IHC. There was a significant interaction between HER2 amplification and treatment with respect to both disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.020) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.034). Among patients with HER2-non-amplified cancers, treated patients had a median OS of 44 months compared with 24 months in the surgery-only arm (P = 0.003). Among patients with HER2-amplified cancers, there was no significant difference in survival based on treatment arm. HER2 status was not a prognostic marker among patients who received no postoperative chemoradiation. CONCLUSION: Patients lacking HER2 amplification benefited from treatment as indicated by both DFS and OS. CLINICAL TRIAL: INT-0116/SWOG9008 phase III.

An assessment of the carcinogenic potential of ezetimibe using nonclinical data in a weight-of-evidence approach.

Ezetimibe blocks intestinal absorption of sterols via interaction with the Neimann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) transporter and is approved for use in the treatment of primary hyperlipidemia (heterozygous familial and non-familial), homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, and homozygous sitosterolemia. A recently completed randomized clinical trial [simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis (SEAS)] testing the effectiveness of Vytorin (a combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe) in patients with aortic stenosis reported an unexpected safety finding: an increase in overall cancer incidence and cancer-associated mortality (all types) in the treated groups relative to the placebo control. A subsequent meta-analysis utilizing a much larger database from two ongoing clinical trials indicated that the observed findings in the SEAS trial were likely due to chance and not a true drug-induced effect. Nonetheless, it has been suggested by various commentators on the SEAS trial that ezetimibe may be carcinogenic. The extensive nonclinical database for ezetimibe was used to test the hypothesis that ezetimibe may be a direct or indirect carcinogen. Using two different in silico approaches, ezetimibe showed no structural alerts for genetic toxicity or carcinogenicity. Ezetimibe was not genotoxic in two reverse mutation assays, one in vitro clastogenicity assay, and two mouse micronucleus assays. No evidence of proliferative lesions was observed in three species in studies of 1-12 months in duration. Ezetimibe was not carcinogenic in standard 2-year bioassays in mice and rats. Additionally, in these 2-year bioassays, no drug-related non-neoplastic lesions were noted. The absence of drug-induced non-neoplastic or proliferative lesions in these studies indicates that ezetimibe treatment was not associated with findings characteristic of carcinogens (i.e., DNA reactivity or cell proliferation) Administration of pharmacologic doses of ezetimibe to mice did not alter hepatic expression patterns of genes associated with apoptosis, cell proliferation, or epithelial-mesenchymal transition. No evidence of drug-induced tumors was observed in mice in which the molecular target of ezetimibe (NPC 1L1) was knocked out over the life span of the animal. In conclusion, the nonclinical data do not support the proposed hypothesis based on the single observation from the SEAS trial and, rather, support the conclusion that ezetimibe does not represent a carcinogenic hazard to humans using this drug in a therapeutic setting.

Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers.

Introduction of tumor markers into routine clinical practice has been poorly controlled, with few criteria or guidelines as to how such markers should be used. We propose a Tumor Marker Utility Grading System (TMUGS) to evaluate the clinical utility of tumor markers and to establish an investigational agenda for evaluation of new tumor markers. A Tumor Marker Utility Grading Worksheet has been designed. The initial portion of this worksheet is used to clarify the precise characteristics of the marker in question. These characteristics include the marker designation, the molecule and/or substance and the relevant alteration from normalcy, the assay format and reagents, the specimen type, and the neoplastic disease for which the marker is being evaluated. To determine the clinical utility of each marker, one of several potential uses must be designated, including risk assessment, screening, differential diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring clinical course. For each of these uses, associations between marker assay results and expected biologic process and end points must be determined. However, knowledge of tumor marker data should contribute to a decision in practice that results in a more favorable clinical outcome for the patient, including increased overall survival, increased disease-free survival, improvement in quality of life, or reduction in cost of care. Semiquantitative utility scales have been developed for each end point. The only markers recommended for use in routine clinical practice are those that are assigned utility scores of "++" or " " on a 6-point scale (ranging from 0 to ) in the categories relative to more favorable clinical outcomes. Each utility score assignment should be supported by documentation of the level of evidence used to evaluate the marker. TMUGS will establish a standardized analytic technique to evaluate clinical utility of known and future tumor markers. It should result in improved patient outcomes and more cost-efficient investigation and application of tumor markers.

Ki-ras mutation and p53 overexpression predict the clinical behavior of colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

We assessed Ki-ras mutations by single-strand conformation polymorphism followed by DNA sequencing, p53 expression by immunohistochemistry, ploidy status, and S-phase fraction in 66 stage II and 163 stage III colon cancer patients enrolled on a randomized trial of surgery followed by observation or adjuvant levamisole or 5-fluorouracil (5FU) plus levamisole (Intergroup Trial 0035) to see whether these factors were independently associated with survival or with differential effects of adjuvant therapy. A Cox proportional hazards survival model was used to describe marker effects and therapy by marker interactions, with adjustment for the clinical covariates affecting survival. A Bonferroni adjustment was used to account for multiple testing. Mutation of the Ki-ras gene was found in 41% of the cancers and was associated with a poor prognosis in stage II but not stage III. In stage II, 7-year survival was 86% versus 58% in those with wild type versus Ki-ras mutations. After adjustment for treatment and clinical variables, the hazard ratio (HR) for death was 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7-12.1 (P = 0.012). p53 overexpression was found in 63% of cancers and was associated with a favorable survival in stage III but not stage II. Seven-year survival in stage III was 56% with p53 overexpression versus 43% with no p53 expression (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.6; P = 0.012). Aneuploidy was more common in stage III than in stage II (66 versus 47%; P = 0.009) but was not independently related to survival in either group. The proliferative rate was greater in aneuploid than in diploid cancers but was not related to survival. There was no benefit of adjuvant therapy in stage II nor in any of the stage II subgroups defined by mutational status. In stage III, adjuvant therapy with 5FU plus levamisole improved 7-year survival in patients with wild-type Ki-ras (76 versus 44%; HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8) and in those without p53 overexpression (64 versus 26%; HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7). Adjuvant therapy did not benefit those with Ki-ras mutations or p53 overexpression. The effects of adjuvant therapy did not differ according to ploidy status or proliferative rate. Ki-ras mutation is a significant risk factor for death in stage II, and the absence of p53 expression is a significant risk factor for death in stage III colon cancer after adjustment for treatment and clinical covariates. Exploratory analyses suggest that patients with stage III colon cancer with wild-type Ki-ras or no p53 expression benefit from adjuvant 5FU plus levamisole, whereas those with Ki-ras mutations or p53 overexpression do not. An independent study will be required to determine whether response to adjuvant therapy in colon cancer depends on mutational status.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer is difficult to treat, with most patients surgically unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy can offer palliation, but more effective therapy is needed. This trial evaluated the effects of an aggressive schedule of paclitaxel given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were required to have a histologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Patients had to have performance status of 0 to 2, pretreatment absolute granulocyte count > or = 1,500/microL, and platelet count greater than or equal to the institutional lower limit of normal. Following pretreatment with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine, patients received paclitaxel at a dose of 250 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 1, repeated every 21 days. G-CSF was given at a dose of 5 microg/kg/d on days 3 to 18 or until two consecutive absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) > or = 10,000/microL were obtained. Doses of paclitaxel were modified depending on nadir counts. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered onto this study, with six ineligible. For the 39 eligible patients, there was one complete response (CR) and two partial responses (PRs), five stable/no responses, 23 increasing disease, two early deaths, and six patients whose assessment was inadequate to determine response. The response rate was therefore three of 39 or 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2% to 21%). The median survival time for the 39 eligible patients was 5 months. The most common toxicities were anemia, leukopenia/granulocytopenia, malaise/fatigue, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, thrombocytopenia, paresthesias, and liver function abnormalities. There was one death due to sepsis. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel in this dose and schedule has minimal activity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor accelerates neutrophil engraftment following peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation: a prospective, randomized trial.

PURPOSE: It is well-established that the infusion of hematopoietic growth factors (HGF) accelerates neutrophil recovery in patients undergoing high-dose therapy followed by autologous bone marrow infusion. In addition, there is evidence that the infusion of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSC) accelerates engraftment in comparison to patients who receive bone marrow alone. However, few data are available regarding the ability of HGF to accelerate engraftment further in patients who receive PBSC following high-dose therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing high-dose therapy followed by infusion of autologous PBSC with or without bone marrow were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg/d beginning on day + 1 following transplant or standard posttransplant supportive care without HGF. RESULTS: The median time to a neutrophil count > or = 500/microL was 10.5 days in the G-CSF group versus 16 days in the control group (P = .0001). G-CSF was associated with statistically significant reductions in the time to neutrophil engraftment among patients who received PBSC alone (11 v 17 days, P = .0003) and in patients who received PBSC in conjunction with bone marrow (10 v 14 days, P = .02). The median duration of posttransplant hospitalization (18 v 24 days, P = .002) and the median number of days on nonprophylactic antibiotics (11 v 15, P = .03) were also significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Administration of G-CSF in the posttransplant period accelerates the rate of neutrophil engraftment, shortens the duration of hospitalization, and reduces the number of days on nonprophylactic antibiotics in patients who receive autologous PBSC with or without autologous bone marrow following high-dose therapy.

Hepatic toxicity associated with fluorouracil plus levamisole adjuvant therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and nature of hepatic toxicity associated with fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had resection of stage II or stage III colon cancer and were randomized to receive observation only, levamisole alone, or 5-FU plus levamisole. Serial liver function studies were documented in 1,025 patients who did not develop recurrence during the year of therapy. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine (39.6%) of 376 patients treated with 5-FU plus levamisole showed laboratory abnormalities consistent with hepatic toxicity, compared with 16.3% of 251 patients treated with levamisole alone and 16.1% of 398 untreated controls. Most common was elevation of alkaline phosphatase, frequently accompanied by elevations of transaminase or serum bilirubin. Characteristically, these changes were mild, not associated with symptoms, and resolved when therapy was stopped. In some instances, they were associated with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tests or with fatty liver seen on computed tomographic (CT) scan or liver biopsy. CONCLUSION: Mild and reversible hepatotoxicity is a common consequence of 5-FU plus levamisole adjuvant therapy, but this is only rarely symptomatic. However, the oncologist should be alert to this phenomenon, since the associated laboratory and imaging findings may simulate those associated with hepatic metastasis.

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) and cimetidine: a pilot study.

Forty-five patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with coumarin (1,2-benzopyrone) and cimetidine. Patients received coumarin, 100 mg orally daily; cimetidine administration, 300 mg orally four times daily, was initiated on day 15 of therapy, and treatment with both drugs was continued until progression of disease. Three patients are too early to evaluate (on study less than or equal to 2 months with no change in tumor status). Objective responses (greater than or equal to 50% reduction in measurable disease) occurred in 14 of 42 evaluable patients (33.3%) (the 95% confidence interval based on this rate is +/- 14.3%), with three complete responses and 11 partial responses (PR). Complete responses lasted 9.5, 4+, and 9.5+ months. The median duration of response for the PR group was 5 months (range, 4 to 21+ months). Twelve patients experienced stabilization of disease ranging from 4 to 16.5+ months. No response was seen in 16 patients. There was no symptomatic, hematologic, or chemical (organ dysfunction) toxicity among the 45 patients treated. Coumarin and cimetidine appear to be safe and active agents in the treatment of metastatic renal carcinoma. Further studies are required to determine the optimal dose and scheduling of these agents.

Phase II trial of chlorozotocin and fluorouracil in islet cell carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial that used fluorouracil (5-FU) and chlorozotocin (CTZ) was performed in patients with metastatic islet cell carcinoma to determine the response rate and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received four cycles of induction chemotherapy. Good-risk patients received 5-FU 800 mg/m2/d days 1 to 4 as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion (CIV) and CTZ 175 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Poor-risk patients (previous radiation to > or = 25% bone marrow-bearing areas; serum bilirubin > or = 5 mg/dL; creatinine > 1.0 mg/dL) received 5-FU 600 mg/m2/d and CTZ 75 mg/m2 in a similar manner. In responding or stable patients, reduced doses of 5-FU and CTZ were continued as maintenance therapy (maximum, 18 months). RESULTS: Forty-seven of 51 patients were eligible, and 44 received chemotherapy. Fourteen of 44 patients had partial responses, with 13 of 36 (36%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.0% to 54.0%) good-risk patients and one of eight (12%; 95% CI, 0.3 to 52.6%) poor-risk patients responding. Median survival of all patients was 25 months, and the median response duration was 11 months. Side effects were moderate to severe and included myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Thirteen patients developed renal toxicity, which was severe or life-threatening in five. This seemed to be related to the administration of cumulative doses of CTZ > or = 1,500 mg. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the combination of 5-FU and CTZ has activity in islet cell carcinoma, but the occurrence of renal toxicity secondary to CTZ may limit the use of this agent.

Controlled trial of fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of intensive-course fluorouracil (5FU) plus low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months following potentially curative resection of colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventeen patients with high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned 3 to 4 weeks following surgery to receive either (1) chemotherapy with six cycles of 5FU (425 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (20 mg/m2) by rapid intravenous injection daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 to 5 weeks, or (2) observation. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration is 72 months for patients still alive. Patients who received postoperative 5FU plus leucovorin experienced significant improvement in time to relapse (P < .01) and survival (P = .02) compared with control patients treated with surgery alone. Stomatitis, diarrhea, and leukopenia were the predominant chemotherapy toxicities. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin is effective in preventing tumor relapse and improving survival in patients with high-risk colon cancer. These benefits were seen with only six cycles of treatment, using low-dose leucovorin in combination with 5FU on a schedule convenient for outpatient administration.

Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We postulated that the pathologic evaluation of the lymph nodes of surgical specimens from patients with rectal cancer can have a substantial impact on time to relapse and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 1,664 patients with T3, T4, or node-positive rectal cancer treated in a national intergroup trial of adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Associations between the number of lymph nodes found by the pathologist in the surgical specimen and the time to relapse and survival outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Patients were divided into groups by nodal status and the corresponding quartiles of numbers of nodes examined. The number of nodes examined was significantly associated with time to relapse and survival among patients who were node-negative. For the first through fourth quartiles, the 5-year relapse rates were 0.37, 0.34, 0.26, and 0.19 (P: = .003), and the 5-year survival rates were 0.68, 0.73, 0.72, and 0.82 (P: = .02). No significant differences were found by quartiles among patients determined to be node-positive. We propose that observed differences are primarily related to the incorrect determination of nodal status in node-negative patients. Approximately 14 nodes need to be studied to define nodal status accurately. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the pathologic assessment of lymph nodes in surgical specimens is often inaccurate and that examining greater number of nodes increases the likelihood of proper staging. Some patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy are misclassified as node-negative due to incomplete sampling of lymph nodes.

Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship, in patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon, between survival and the number of lymph nodes analyzed from surgical specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intergroup Trial INT-0089 is a mature trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer. We performed a secondary analysis of this group with overall survival (OS) as the main end point. Cause-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival were secondary end points. Rates for these outcome measures were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Log-rank test was used to compare overall curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to multivariately assess predictors of outcome. RESULTS: The median number of lymph nodes removed at colectomy was 11 (range, one to 87). Of the 3411 assessable patients, 648 had no evidence of lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analyses were performed on the node-positive and node-negative groups separately to ascertain the effect of lymph node removal. Survival decreased with increasing number of lymph node involvement (P =.0001 for all three survival end points). After controlling for the number of nodes involved, survival increased as more nodes were analyzed (P =.0001 for all three end points). Even when no nodes were involved, OS and CSS improved as more lymph nodes were analyzed (P =.0005 and P =.007, respectively). CONCLUSION: The number of lymph nodes analyzed for staging colon cancers is, itself, a prognostic variable on outcome. The impact of this variable is such that it may be an important variable to include in evaluating future trials.

5-Fluorouracil and folinic acid in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized comparison. A Southwest Oncology Group Study.

In order to determine the clinical applicability of the in vitro observation of enhanced cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the presence of excess reduced folates, the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performed a randomized trial evaluating two dose schedules of 5-FU and folinic acid (FA) in 128 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Of 125 eligible patients, 62 were randomized to receive bolus FA (200 mg/m2 days 1 through 4) in addition to 5-FU (1,000 mg/m2 days 1 through 4) by continuous four-day infusion (infusion arm), while 63 were randomized to receive bolus FA (200 mg/m2 days 1 through 5) in addition to 5-FU (325 mg/m2 days 1 through 5) by bolus injection (bolus arm). The toxicities of the two schedules differed, with stomatitis being more severe in the infusion arm and leukopenia being more severe in the bolus arm. The response rates and survival data for the two arms are nearly identical. The median survival of patients on the infusion arm is 11.0 months and of patients on the bolus arm, 10.3 months. The infusion arm produced one complete response (CR) and 12 partial responses (PRs), for a major response rate of 21% of eligible patients. The bolus arm produced three CRs and 11 PRs, for a major response rate of 22% of eligible patients. The response rate produced is minimally superior to recent cooperative group studies of colorectal cancer, but the response rate and survival experience are within the range of experience for treatment with 5-FU alone.

Intergroup study of fluorouracil plus levamisole as adjuvant therapy for stage II/Dukes' B2 colon cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of fluorouracil plus levamisole administered postoperatively to patients with resected stage II (Dukes' B2) colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial (INT-0035) was performed by National Cancer Institute-sponsored cancer clinical trials cooperative groups. Patients were assigned to observation only or to fluorouracil (450 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] daily for 5 days and, beginning at 28 days, weekly for 48 weeks) plus levamisole (50 mg orally three times daily for 3 days repeated every 2 weeks for 1 year). Cancer recurrence, survival, and treatment side effects were assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen eligible patients were analyzed with a median follow-up time of 7 years. Fluorouracil plus levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by 31%, although this trend was not statistically significant (P = .10). A total of 87 patients died: 43 on observation and 44 on fluorouracil plus levamisole. Disparity between effects on recurrence rate and overall survival is partially explained by a higher rate of non-colon cancer-related deaths on fluorouracil plus levamisole (15 v seven) and by the effects of salvage surgery with curative intent. Of seven patients with recurrence who were rendered disease-free by salvage surgery, six were on the observation arm. As was observed in patients treated with fluorouracil plus levamisole for stage III disease, toxicity was acceptable and compliance was excellent. CONCLUSION: Fluorouracil plus levamisole is tolerable and accepted as standard surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer, but the data from this study in stage II patients suggest a decreased relapse rate without a significant improvement in survival.

Adjuvant postoperative fluorouracil-modulated chemotherapy combined with pelvic radiation therapy for rectal cancer: initial results of intergroup 0114.

PURPOSE: The combination of radiation therapy with fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is generally accepted as appropriate postoperative therapy for patients with adenocarcinomas of the rectum that extend through the bowel wall or with lymph nodes positive for tumor. We attempted to determine whether the efficacy of this postoperative therapy could be improved by the addition of leucovorin and/or levamisole. METHODS: A total of 1,696 patients were randomized and eligible for treatment with one of four treatment schemes. All patients received two cycles of bolus 5-FU-based systemic chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy with chemotherapy and two more cycles of the same systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was either 5-FU alone, 5-FU with leucovorin, 5-FU with levamisole, or 5-FU with leucovorin and levamisole. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 48 months, there is no statistically significant advantage to any of the treatment regimens compared with bolus 5-FU alone. There is evidence of increased gastrointestinal toxicity with the three-drug combination compared with bolus 5-FU alone. Statistical analysis suggests it is very unlikely that either levamisole-containing combination will be shown to be of value with further follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence at present for a beneficial effect of levamisole in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. Definitive evaluation of the effect of the addition of leucovorin to 5-FU and pelvic radiation will require further follow-up evaluation.

Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control--final report of intergroup 0114.

PURPOSE: The gastrointestinal Intergroup studied postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with T3/4 and N+ rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery to try to improve chemotherapy and to determine the risk of systemic and local failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had a potentially curative surgical resection and were treated with two cycles of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation therapy and two additional cycles of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens were bolus fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-FU and leucovorin, 5-FU and levamisole, and 5-FU, leucovorin, and levamisole. Pelvic irradiation was given to a dose of 45 Gy to the whole pelvis and a boost to 50.4 to 54 Gy. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred ninety-five patients were entered and fully assessable, with a median follow-up of 7.4 years. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) by drug regimen. DFS and OS decreased between years 5 and 7 (from 54% to 50% and 64% to 56%, respectively), although recurrence-free rates had only a small decrease. The local recurrence rate was 14% (9% in low-risk [T1 to N2+] and 18% in high-risk patients [T3N+, T4N]). Overall, 7-year survival rates were 70% and 45% for the low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Males had a poorer overall survival rate than females. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage to leucovorin- or levamisole-containing regimens over bolus 5-FU alone in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer when combined with irradiation. Local and distant recurrence rates are still high, especially in T3N+ and T4 patients, even with full adjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Hypocalcemia associated with a calcitonin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma.

We report a case of symptomatic hypocalcemia with a calcitonin-producing tumor. This case is unusual for two reasons. First, the primary tumor was a hepatocellular carcinoma that was producing large amounts of calcitonin. To our knowledge, well-defined cases of calcitonin-secreting hepatoma have not been previously reported. Second, the patient's hypercalcemia was shown to be secondary to hypomagnesemic inhibition of parathyroid function and not related to hypercalcitonemia.

A phase II trial of recombinant tumor necrosis factor in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Twenty-two evaluable patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, but without prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy, received recombinant tumor necrosis factor (rTNF). rTNF was given as an intravenous infusion over 30 min daily x 5, every 14 days, at a starting dose of 150 micrograms/m2/day. Toxicities included fevers/rigors, nausea/vomiting/anorexia, flu-like symptoms, hypotension, hyperglycemia, anemia, coagulopathy, hepatotoxicity, and hypertriglyceridemia. Laboratory evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy occurred in 11 patients, with only 3 of these patients having clinical manifestations. Two patients suffered from pulmonary emboli. The high incidence of coagulopathy was felt to be, at least in part, disease related. No objective responses were observed with a 95% confidence interval of 0-15%.

Phase II trial of recombinant DNA gamma-interferon in advanced colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Fifty evaluable patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but without prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy, were randomized to one of two schedules of recombinant gamma-interferon (rGIFN). Twenty-four evaluable patients received rGIFN as a 2-h intravenous infusion daily x 5 every other week at a starting dose of 4.0 x 10(6) IU/m2/day (arm I). Twenty-six evaluable patients received rGIFN as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion daily x 5 every month at a starting dose of 2.6 x 10(6) IU/m2/day (arm II). Toxicities on both schedules included flu-like symptoms, fevers/rigors, nausea/vomiting, hypotension, leukopenia, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, diarrhea, anemia, confusion, and ileus. Toxicity appeared to be more severe on arm I. No antitumor responses were observed, with 95% confidence intervals of 0 to 14% for arm I and 0 to 13% for arm II.

Hexamethylmelamine: activity in lymphoma and other tumors.

Hexamethylmelamine, an orally administered substituted melamine, has single agent activity in lymphoma (39% PR + CR), cervical cancer (28% PR), transitional carcinoma of the bladder (27% PR + CR), and Bilharzial bladder cancer (38% PR). Toxicity is mild and reversible and is manifested by myelosuppression, neurotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity. The potential role of hexamethylmelamine in combination chemotherapy in the diseases in which it has single agent activity is largely unexplored and should be investigated in clinical trials.