Plan quality and treatment efficiency assurance of two VMAT optimization for cervical cancer radiotherapy.

To investigate the difference of the fluence map optimization (FMO) and Stochastic platform optimization (SPO) algorithm in a newly-introduced treatment planning system (TPS). METHODS: 34 cervical cancer patients with definitive radiation were retrospectively analyzed. Each patient has four plans: FMO with fixed jaw plans (FMO-FJ) and no fixed jaw plans (FMO-NFJ); SPO with fixed jaw plans (SPO-FJ) and no fixed jaw plans (SPO-NFJ). Dosimetric parameters, Modulation Complexity Score (MCS), Gamma Pass Rate (GPR) and delivery time were analyzed among the four plans. RESULTS: For target coverage, SPO-FJ plans are the best ones (P ≤ 0.00). FMO plans are better than SPO-NFJ plans (P ≤ 0.00). For OARs sparing, SPO-FJ plans are better than FMO plans for mostly OARs (P ≤ 0.04). Additionally, SPO-FJ plans are better than SPO-NFJ plans (P ≤ 0.02), except for rectum V45Gy. Compared to SPO-NFJ plans, the FMO plans delivered less dose to bladder, rectum, colon V40Gy and pelvic bone V40Gy (P ≤ 0.04). Meanwhile, the SPO-NFJ plans showed superiority in MU, delivery time, MCS and GPR in all plans. In terms of delivery time and MCS, the SPO-FJ plans are better than FMO plans. FMO-FJ plans are better than FMO-NFJ plans in delivery efficiency. MCSs are strongly correlated with PCTV length, which are negatively with PCTV length (P ≤ 0.03). The delivery time and MUs of the four plans are strongly correlated (P ≤ 0.02). Comparing plans with fixed or no fixed jaw in two algorithms, no difference was found in FMO plans in target coverage and minor difference in Kidney_L Dmean, Mu and delivery time between PCTV width≤15.5 cm group and >15.5 cm group. For SPO plans, SPO-FJ plans showed more superiority in target coverage and OARs sparing than the SPO-NFJ plans in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SPO-FJ plans showed superiority in target coverage and OARs sparing, as well as higher delivery efficiency in the four plans.

Set-up errors of the neck are underestimated using the overall registration frame of head and neck in IMRT for NPC.

BACKGROUND: There is no standardized registration frame of cone beam CT (CBCT) in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The overall registration frame that covers the whole head and neck is the most commonly used CBCT registration frame for NPC patients in IMRT. OBJECTIVE: To compare the set-up errors using different registration frames of CBCT for NPC to assess the set-up errors for different region of the commonly used clinical overall registration frame. METHODS: 294 CBCT images of 59 NPC patients were collected. Four registration frames were used for matching. The set-up errors were obtained using an automatic matching algorithm and then compared. The expansion margin from the clinical target volume (CTV) to the planned target volume (PTV) in the four groups was also calculated. RESULTS: The average range of the isocenter translation and rotation errors of four registration frames are 0.89∼2.41 mm and 0.49∼1.53°, respectively, which results in a significant difference in the set-up errors (p < 0.05). The set-up errors obtained from the overall frame are smaller than those obtained from the head, upper neck, and lower neck frames. The margin ranges of the overall, head, upper neck, and lower neck frames in three translation directions are 1.49∼2.39 mm, 1.92∼2.45 mm, 1.86∼3.54 mm and 3.02∼4.78 mm, respectively. The expansion margins calculated from the overall frame are not enough, especially for the lower neck. CONCLUSION: Set-up errors of the neck are underestimated by the overall registration frame. Thus, it is important to improve the position immobilization of the neck, especially the lower neck. The margin of the target volume of the head and neck region should be expanded separately if circumstances permit.

[Bioinformatics analysis of sequence and structure of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor].

The length of IGF1R 3'UTR is greater than 7 kb. The structure of IGF1R 3'UTR is complex, with multiple binding sites of miRNAs. IGF1R is involved in the regulation of MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways and theformation and development of tumors. Bioinformatics analysis can reveal the structure features of IGF1R, which provides ideas for further research. The analysis shows that the binding sites between IGF1R and miRNAs have the highest mutation rate in Neuroblastoma. We analyzed the structure of 3'UTR, miRNAs binding sites, physical and chemical properties, hydrophilic-hydrophobic property, glycosylation and phosphorylation sites, secondary structure and tertiary structure modeling of IGF1R. The locations and names of amino acids interacting in IGF1R and IGF1 were obtained by molecular docking. Therefore, if IGF1R 3'UTR is mutated, the capacity of IGF1R combined with miRNAs will reduce and the IGF1R expression will be up-regulated, and the function of miRNAs will be repressed. We can change the sites of IGF1R to combine with IGF1 to repress the function of IGF1R and IGF1. Then the function of IGF1R will be repressed.