Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 38(3): 733-745, 2023 02 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35521751

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification (VC) is a common comorbidity among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), indicating major cardiovascular events. This study aimed to evaluate the effects and safety of intravenous sodium thiosulphate (STS) for VC in CKD patients. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for clinical trials that provided data comparing outcomes among patients treated with and without STS. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Efficacy was assessed using calcification scores and arterial stiffness. Safety was examined by analyzing adverse symptoms, electrolytes and bone mineral density (BMD). Random-effects models were performed. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were done. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tools. RESULTS: Among the 5601 publications, 6 studies involving 305 participants (mean age: 56 years, male: 56.6%) with all participants on maintenance hemodialysis met eligibility criteria. For efficacy, the progression in Agatston scores in the coronary arteries [107 patients, mean difference (MD): -241.27, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -421.50 to -61.03] and iliac arteries (55 patients, MD: -382.00, 95% CI: -751.07 to -12.93) was lower in the STS treated group compared with controls. The increase in pulse wave velocity was lower in the STS group (104 patients, MD: -1.29 m/s, 95% CI: -2.24 to -0.34 m/s). No association was found between the change in calcification scores and STS regimen. For safety, gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. nausea) and increased anion gap acidosis were noted. No reduction in BMD by STS was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous STS may attenuate the progression of VC and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients. Large and well-designed randomized controlled trials are warranted.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Calcificação Vascular , Rigidez Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Calcificação Vascular/tratamento farmacológico , Diálise Renal
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(4): e2310068, 2023 04 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37099293

RESUMO

Importance: Calciphylaxis is a rare disease with high mortality mainly involving patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Sodium thiosulphate (STS) has been used as an off-label therapeutic in calciphylaxis, but there is a lack of clinical trials and studies that demonstrate its effect compared with those without STS treatment. Objective: To perform a meta-analysis of the cohort studies that provided data comparing outcomes among patients with calciphylaxis treated with and without intravenous STS. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using relevant terms and synonyms including sodium thiosulphate and calci* without language restriction. Study Selection: The initial search was for cohort studies published before August 31, 2021, that included adult patients diagnosed with CKD experiencing calciphylaxis and could provide a comparison between patients treated with and without intravenous STS. Studies were excluded if they reported outcomes only from nonintravenous administration of STS or if the outcomes for CKD patients were not provided. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Random-effects models were performed. The Egger test was used to measure publication bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Main Outcomes and Measures: Skin lesion improvement and survival, synthesized as ratio data by a random-effects empirical Bayes model. Results: Among the 5601 publications retrieved from the targeted databases, 19 retrospective cohort studies including 422 patients (mean age, 57 years; 37.3% male) met the eligibility criteria. No difference was observed in skin lesion improvement (12 studies with 110 patients; risk ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.85-1.78) between the STS and the comparator groups. No difference was noted for the risk of death (15 studies with 158 patients; risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70-1.10) and overall survival using time-to-event data (3 studies with 269 participants; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.57-1.18). In meta-regression, lesion improvement associated with STS negatively correlated with publication year, implying that recent studies are more likely to report a null association compared with past studies (coefficient = -0.14; P = .008). Conclusions and Relevance: Intravenous STS was not associated with skin lesion improvement or survival benefit in patients with CKD experiencing calciphylaxis. Future investigations are warranted to examine the efficacy and safety of therapies for patients with calciphylaxis.


Assuntos
Calciofilaxia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Calciofilaxia/etiologia , Calciofilaxia/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Teorema de Bayes , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações
3.
Crit Care Med ; 40(5): 1470-7, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22430234

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins") have anti-inflammatory properties and are associated with improved outcomes in critically ill patients. We investigated whether previous statin therapy affects outcomes in patients at risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: Patients were followed-up for the primary outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome and secondary outcomes of intensive care unit and 60-day mortality, organ dysfunction, and ventilator-free days in a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Receipt of statin therapy was recorded. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding by indication. SETTING: Intensive care units at a tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients (2,743) with acute respiratory distress syndrome risk factors. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome developed in 738 (26%) patients; 413 patients (15%) received a statin within 24 hrs of intensive care unit admission. Those who had received a statin within 24 hrs had a lower rate of development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (odds ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.73; p<.0001). After multivariate adjustment for potential confounders, this association remained significant (odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.92; p=.01). However, after propensity score matching, the association was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.57-1.10; p=.16). Statin use was not associated with reduced acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality, organ dysfunction, or ventilator-free days. Results of the study were presented in accordance with STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy at the time of intensive care unit admission was not associated with a lower rate of development of acute respiratory distress syndrome after matching for patient propensity to receive statins. Statin therapy was not associated with improvements in acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality, organ failure, or days free from mechanical ventilation.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/prevenção & controle , APACHE , Idoso , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco
4.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 33(2): 191-194, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32313459

RESUMO

Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) have revolutionized the management of anemia. However, these agents are not always utilized with proper monitoring parameters, which can present significant safety concerns, unwarranted drug expenditures, and decreased ESA efficacy. This retrospective study assessed the utilization of all ESAs in non-intensive care unit hospitalized patients at a large academic medical center from August 18, 2018, to August 31, 2018, using established guideline-based assessment criteria. Among the 167 doses of ESA evaluated, 86% (n = 144) were utilized in accordance with guideline-based assessment criteria regarding laboratory monitoring of iron studies. However, 24% (n = 40) of ESA doses were administered to patients with active, untreated iron deficiency at the time of administration. Although most ESA doses were utilized in accordance with the guideline-based criteria, interventions can be implemented to further improve anemia treatment. Implementing a protocol-driven anemia management service is one strategy that can improve patient care, advance patient safety, and be cost-beneficial.

5.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 18(1): 29-35, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30574812

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Calciphylaxis is a rare but devastating disease with a mortality rate up to 50% in 1 year. It is characterized by profoundly painful ischemic skin lesions and vascular calcification that affects predominantly patients with end stage renal disease. The use of certain medications is an important modifiable risk factor in calciphylaxis and discontinuation of these is a mainstay of treatment. AREAS COVERED: This review will provide an overview of calciphylaxis and will focus on how certain therapeutic agents can affect the risk of calcification and associated thrombosis, key processes involved in the development of calciphylaxis. EXPERT OPINION: Calciphylaxis treatment requires a multi-modal approach including prevention, risk factor management, wound care, reperfusion, and use of fibrinolytics and antioxidants. Patients with end stage renal disease represent the most affected population. This population often has multiple medications prescribed, some worth reconsidering before starting or continuing them. When possible, we recommend stopping all potentially contributing medications in patients with calciphylaxis, including warfarin, active vitamin D, calcium supplements, and iron.


Assuntos
Calciofilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Animais , Calciofilaxia/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Trombose/induzido quimicamente , Trombose/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA