Management of KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where mutations are present in 32% of lung adenocarcinoma and 4% of squamous cell lung cancer. The most common KRAS variant is KRAS G12C, which accounts for nearly 40% of all KRAS mutations. Although it is the most common oncogenic driver in NSCLC, KRAS was considered a "nondruggable target" until recently, owing to the lack of any progress in developing targeted therapies for this oncogene. With the recent development and approval of selective KRAS G12C inhibitors such as sotorasib and adagrasib for the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC in the second-line setting and beyond, the standard of care for managing these tumors has undergone a significant change. Mechanisms of resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors are highly heterogeneous, including both on-target and off-target resistance as well as morphologic switching, thus limiting the activity of these drugs when used as monotherapy. New-generation inhibitors and different combination strategies are being developed in early-phase trials to overcome or delay the onset of resistance as well as to target non-G12C mutations. Owing to the biological heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, treatment will likely need to be individualized based on factors such as co-occurring mutations.

Emerging Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance in Cancer Cells.

The rise of drug resistance in cancer cells presents a formidable challenge in modern oncology, necessitating the exploration of innovative therapeutic strategies. This review investigates the latest advancements in overcoming drug resistance mechanisms employed by cancer cells, focusing on emerging therapeutic modalities. The intricate molecular insights into drug resistance, including genetic mutations, efflux pumps, altered signaling pathways, and microenvironmental influences, are discussed. Furthermore, the promising avenues offered by targeted therapies, combination treatments, immunotherapies, and precision medicine approaches are highlighted. Specifically, the synergistic effects of combining traditional cytotoxic agents with molecularly targeted inhibitors to circumvent resistance pathways are examined. Additionally, the evolving landscape of immunotherapeutic interventions, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapies, is explored in terms of bolstering anti-tumor immune responses and overcoming immune evasion mechanisms. Moreover, the significance of biomarker-driven strategies for predicting and monitoring treatment responses is underscored, thereby optimizing therapeutic outcomes. For insights into the future direction of cancer treatment paradigms, the current review focused on prevailing drug resistance challenges and improving patient outcomes, through an integrative analysis of these emerging therapeutic strategies.

Advances in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions.

The leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide is attributed to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), necessitating a continual focus on improving the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. In this review, the latest breakthroughs and emerging trends in managing NSCLC are highlighted. Major advancements in diagnostic methods, including better imaging technologies and the utilization of molecular biomarkers, are discussed. These advancements have greatly enhanced early detection and personalized treatment plans. Significant improvements in patient outcomes have been achieved by new targeted therapies and immunotherapies, providing new hope for individuals with advanced NSCLC. This review discusses the persistent challenges in accessing advanced treatments and their associated costs despite recent progress. Promising research into new therapies, such as CAR-T cell therapy and oncolytic viruses, which could further revolutionize NSCLC treatment, is also highlighted. This review aims to inform and inspire continued efforts to improve outcomes for NSCLC patients globally, by offering a comprehensive overview of the current state of NSCLC treatment and future possibilities.

Phase I/II trial of plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Big ten cancer research consortium (BTCRC-LUN17-127) study.

BACKGROUND: Plinabulin is a GEF-H1 releasing agent with an immune-enhancing function. We report results from a multicenter Phase I/II study (NCT03575793) assessing plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab for the treatment of recurrent SCLC. METHODS: In Phase I, patients were enrolled using a 3 + 3 design to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Patients received nivolumab (1 mg/kg), ipilimumab (3 mg/kg), and plinabulin (in escalating doses) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles followed by maintenance with plinabulin and nivolumab. In phase II, patients with recurrent PD(L)1 inhibitor resistant SCLC were enrolled. The primary objective was median progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between 9/2018 and 2/2023, 39 patients were enrolled, and 36 patients received study treatment and were evaluable for safety (16 in Phase I; 20 in Phase II). In the phase I dose-escalation, there were 2 DLTs; grade 3 altered mental status lasting <24 h and grade 3 infusion reaction. The Plinabulin RP2D was determined to be 30 mg/m2. Common TRAEs were vomiting (44 %), nausea (42 %), and infusion reaction (36 %); 6 % of patients had a ≥grade 3 TRAE. Five patients (14 %) had ≥grade 3 irAEs; there were no cases of immune-related pneumonitis. In the efficacy analysis in 27 patients, the median PFS was 1.6 months (95 % CI 1.2 to 2.7) and the trial did not meet the pre-specified target median PFS of 3.5 months. Four patients treated at 30 mg/m2 had PR (confirmed 1, unconfirmed 3); 5 patients had SD with a CBR of 33 %. Two of 8 patients treated in phase I at the lower 20 mg/m2 dose had confirmed PR, with 1 patient on the drug regimen for >90 cycles. The median OS and follow-up time were 5.5 months and 2.5 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab was tolerable at the dose of 30 mg/m2. While the clinical responses in PD-1 resistant SCLC were limited, some patients had a long duration of response. The number of ≥grade 3 irAE with the combination were lower than expected.

A Phase I Trial of Atezolizumab and Varlilumab in Combination With Radiation in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC.

Introduction: Anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy is the standard of care for metastatic NSCLC but many tumors develop resistance. We hypothesized that combining a T-cell agonist such as varlilumab (anti-CD27 antibody) with checkpoint inhibition may be synergistic and this synergy may be potentiated further by using targeted radiation (RT). Methods: We conducted an open-label, single-center, phase I trial (NCT04081688) to determine the safety and clinical benefit of the atezolizumab and varlilumab in combination with palliative RT in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with progression on prior programmed cell death ligand 1therapy. On day 1 of each 21-day cycle, patients received varlilumab followed by atezolizumab on day 2. RT to a lung lesion was administered between cycle 1 and cycle 2. Results: A total of 15 patients were enrolled (one patient did not start treatment). The median age was 64 years; 10 patients were female. Eight patients (57%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE) and 7 (50%) had at least one grade III or worse treatment-related AE. There was only one grade III immune-related AE requiring steroids (1 diarrhea and colitis); there were no treatment-related deaths. Of the 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, three patients had stable disease (2 with stable disease > 4 mo) and the clinical benefit rate was 25%. The median progression-free survival was two months and the median overall survival was 6.4 months. Conclusions: Varlilumab in combination with atezolizumab and RT was safe and well tolerated; no additional signal was identified for toxicity. Clinical activity for the combination was modest with 25% of patients with stable disease as the best response.

Increase in Full-Length Dystrophin by Exon Skipping in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Patients with Single Exon Duplications: An Open-label Study.

Single exon duplications account for disease in a minority of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. Exon skipping in these patients has the potential to be highly therapeutic through restoration of full-length dystrophin expression. We conducted a 48-week open label study of casimersen and golodirsen in 3 subjects with an exon 45 or 53 duplication. Two subjects (aged 18 and 23 years) were non-ambulatory at baseline. Upper limb, pulmonary, and cardiac function appeared stable in the 2 subjects in whom they could be evaluated. Dystrophin expression increased from 0.94 % ±0.59% (mean±SD) of normal to 5.1% ±2.9% by western blot. Percent dystrophin positive fibers also rose from 14% ±17% at baseline to 50% ±42% . Our results provide initial evidence that the use of exon-skipping drugs may increase dystrophin levels in patients with single-exon duplications.

Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors: A multisite cohort study at US academic cancer centers.

BACKGROUND: Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are rare oncogenic drivers prevalent in 0.3% of solid tumors. They are most common in salivary gland cancer (2.6%), thyroid cancer (1.6%), and soft-tissue sarcoma (1.5%). Currently, there are 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapies for NTRK gene fusions: larotrectinib, approved in 2018, and entrectinib, approved in 2019. To date, the real-world uptake of tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitor (TRKi) use for NTRK-positive solid tumors in academic cancer centers remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics, clinical and genomic characteristics, and testing and treatment patterns of patients with NTRK-positive solid tumors treated at US academic cancer centers. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review study conducted in academic cancer centers in the United States. All patients diagnosed with an NTRK fusion-positive (NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3) solid tumor (any stage) and who received cancer treatment at participating sites between January 1, 2012, and July 1, 2023, were included in this study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, genomic characteristics, NTRK testing data, and treatment patterns were collected from electronic medical records and analyzed using descriptive statistics as appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 6 centers contributed data for 55 patients with NTRK-positive tumors. The mean age was 49.3 (SD = 20.5) years, 51% patients were female, and the majority were White (78%). The median duration of time from cancer diagnosis to NTRK testing was 85 days (IQR = 44-978). At the time of NTRK testing, 64% of patients had stage IV disease, compared with 33% at cancer diagnosis. Prevalent cancer types in the overall cohort included head and neck (15%), thyroid (15%), brain (13%), lung (13%), and colorectal (11%). NTRK1 fusions were most common (45%), followed by NTRK3 (40%) and NTRK2 (15%). Across all lines of therapy, 51% of patients (n = 28) received a TRKi. Among TRKi-treated patients, 71% had stage IV disease at TRKi initiation. The median time from positive NTRK test to initiation of TRKi was 48 days (IQR = 9-207). TRKis were commonly given as first-line (30%) or second-line (48%) therapies. Median duration of therapy was 610 (IQR = 182-764) days for TRKi use and 207.5 (IQR = 42-539) days for all other first-line therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports on contemporary real-world NTRK testing patterns and use of TRKis in solid tumors, including time between NTRK testing and initiation of TRKi therapy and duration of TRKi therapy.

Leveraging Cancer Phenotypic Plasticity for Novel Treatment Strategies.

Cancer cells, like all other organisms, are adept at switching their phenotype to adjust to the changes in their environment. Thus, phenotypic plasticity is a quantitative trait that confers a fitness advantage to the cancer cell by altering its phenotype to suit environmental circumstances. Until recently, new traits, especially in cancer, were thought to arise due to genetic factors; however, it is now amply evident that such traits could also emerge non-genetically due to phenotypic plasticity. Furthermore, phenotypic plasticity of cancer cells contributes to phenotypic heterogeneity in the population, which is a major impediment in treating the disease. Finally, plasticity also impacts the group behavior of cancer cells, since competition and cooperation among multiple clonal groups within the population and the interactions they have with the tumor microenvironment also contribute to the evolution of drug resistance. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that cancer cells exploit to tailor their phenotypes at a systems level can aid the development of novel cancer therapeutics and treatment strategies. Here, we present our perspective on a team medicine-based approach to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon to develop new therapeutic strategies.

Teriflunomide/leflunomide synergize with chemotherapeutics by decreasing mitochondrial fragmentation via DRP1 in SCLC.

Although up to 80% small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients' response is good for first-line chemotherapy regimen, most patients develop recurrence of the disease within weeks to months. Here, we report cytostatic effect of leflunomide (Leflu) and teriflunomide (Teri) on SCLC cell proliferation through inhibition of DRP1 phosphorylation at Ser616 and decreased mitochondrial fragmentation. When administered together, Teri and carboplatin (Carbo) act synergistically to significantly inhibit cell proliferation and DRP1 phosphorylation, reduce abundance of intermediates in pyrimidine de novo pathway, and increase apoptosis and DNA damage. Combination of Leflu&Carbo has anti-tumorigenic effect in vivo. Additionally, lurbinectedin (Lur) and Teri potently and synergistically inhibited spheroid growth and depleted uridine and DRP1 phosphorylation in mouse tumors. Our results suggest combinations of Carbo and Lur with Teri or Leflu are efficacious and underscore how the relationship between DRP1/DHODH and mitochondrial plasticity serves as a potential therapeutic target to validate these treatment strategies in SCLC clinical trials.