Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Haematol ; 98(3): 289-295, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27893171

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: There is no strong evidence to guide therapeutic approach to multiple myeloma (MM) patients who experience first relapse. The treatment choice can be difficult since currently all patients are exposed to novel agents as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the best therapeutic sequence, the role of retreatment, and the most beneficial cutoff of first remission in order to choose retreatment, analyzing 476 patients relapsed after first-line therapy. RESULTS: Bortezomib-based regimens upfront followed by lenalidomide-based regimens at first relapse resulted in significantly better second progression-free survival (2ndPFS), PFS2, and overall survival (OS) compared to the opposite sequence. Changing therapy resulted in significantly better 2ndPFS in the whole population, whereas PFS2 was significantly longer only in patients who underwent maintenance therapy. Moreover, until PFS1 was shorter than 27 months, changing therapy at first relapse significantly extended 2ndPFS and PFS2 compared to retreatment, whereas similar outcomes were observed between the two strategies, when PFS1 was longer than 27 months. CONCLUSION: Lacking randomized trials, our study could help to choose the most appropriate therapy algorithm in patients with MM.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação , Análise de Sobrevida , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/análogos & derivados
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 61(6): 106806, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37030470

RESUMO

Bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) have been associated with high mortality rates, particularly with infections caused by antibiotic-resistant strains. A multicenter cohort study including all consecutive episodes of GNB BSI in HM patients was conducted to update the epidemiology and antibiotic resistance patterns (compared to our previous survey conducted between 2009 and 2012) and investigate risk factors for GNB BSI due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. A total of 834 GNB were recovered in 811 BSI episodes from January 2016 to December 2018. Compared to the previous survey, there was a significant reduction in use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and a significant recovery in susceptibility rates to ciprofloxacin among Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae isolates. In addition, there was a shift to a significantly increased susceptibility of P. aeruginosa isolates to ceftazidime, meropenem, and gentamicin. A total of 256/834 (30.7%) isolates were MDR. In multivariable analysis, MDR bacteria culture-positive surveillance rectal swabs, previous therapy with aminoglycosides and carbapenems, fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, and time at risk were independently associated with MDR GNB BSI. In conclusion, despite the persistence of a high prevalence of MDR GNB, there was a shift to a reduced use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and increased rates of susceptibility to fluoroquinolones in almost all isolates and to almost all antibiotics tested among P. aeruginosa isolates, compared to our previous survey. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis and previous rectal colonization by MDR bacteria were independent risk factors for MDR GNB BSI in the present study.


Assuntos
Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Sepse , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacologia , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Itália
3.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 13(4): 351-362, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162982

RESUMO

Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a very heterogeneous clonal plasma cell hematological malignancy for which new therapies and transplantation effectively improve Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Maintenance seems to have made a significant contribution in achieving these advances, whereas the real role of consolidation is still controversial. Despite lenalidomide having been approved as maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the optimal maintenance agent, drug combinations, schedules, and duration are still under investigation.Areas covered: This review summarizes data regarding maintenance and consolidation therapies for transplant-eligible patients, updating on the ongoing developments in this area. Papers published on PubMed and abstracts presented at the ASCO, ASH, and EHA meetings up to December 2019 were used.Expert opinion: The available studies demonstrate that maintenance therapy is very effective although results from ongoing clinical trials suggest that disease features and minimal residual disease (MRD) status may optimize the selection of agents, schedule, and duration of maintenance therapy. Consolidation with last-generation drugs seems to be more effective and it could replace transplantation in some subgroups of patients.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia de Consolidação , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Lenalidomida/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Transplante Autólogo
4.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0224465, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31661507

RESUMO

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain life-threatening complications in the clinical course of patients with haematological malignancies (HM) and Escherichia coli represent one of the most frequent cause of such infections. In this study, we aimed to describe risk factors for resistance to third generation cephalosporins and prognostic factors, including the impact of third generation cephalosporins resistance, in patients with HM and BSIs caused by E. coli. Three hundred forty-two cases of E. coli BSIs were collected during the study period (from January 2016 to December 2017). The percentage of resistance to third generation cephalosporins was 25.7%. In multivariate analysis, the variables recent endoscopic procedures, culture-positive surveillance rectal swabs for multidrug-resistant bacteria, antibiotic prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones, and prolonged neutropenia were independently associated with bloodstream infections caused by a third generation cephalosporins resistant E. coli. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 7.1%. Cox regression revealed that significant predictors of mortality were acute hepatic failure, septic shock, male sex, refractory/relapsed HM, and third generation cephalosporins resistance by E. coli isolate. In conclusion, resistance to third generation cephalosporins adversely affected the outcomes of bloodstream infections caused by E. coli in our cohort of HM patients. We also found a significant correlation between prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones and resistance to third generation cephalosporins by E. coli isolates.


Assuntos
Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Escherichia coli/patogenicidade , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Escherichia coli/sangue , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
5.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets ; 17(9): 769-781, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27659429

RESUMO

High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care for patients younger than 65 years of age with multiple myeloma (MM). However, this therapeutic approach has undergone substantial advances in this last decade, mainly due to the introduction of new drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib. These new drugs, in different combinations, have shown to significantly increase response rates after induction therapy and ASCT. Moreover, the positive results obtained with these agents in consolidation and maintenance strategies after ASCT strongly support the concept of continuous therapy, whose ultimate goal is the long-term control of the disease and the improvement of outcome. Preliminary data from studies investigating next generation proteasome inhibitors, such as carfilzomib and ixazomib, used upfront as well as at subsequent therapeutic lines, demonstrate the possibility of achieving molecular remission in most of the patients. The deeper responses obtained with new drugcombinations questioned the role of ASCT, and large, ongoing, phase 3 trials will shed light on the role and the timing of ASCT.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Autoenxertos , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Quimioterapia de Consolidação/métodos , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Transplante Autólogo/métodos
6.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 16(1): 21-32, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26588946

RESUMO

Continuous therapy has proven to be an effective therapeutic strategy to improve the outcome of both young and elderly multiple myeloma patients. Remarkably, lenalidomide and bortezomib showed to play a crucial role in this setting due to their safety profile allowing long-term exposure. Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor to be evaluated in multiple myeloma, exerts substantial anti-myeloma activity as a single agent and particularly in combination with immunomodulatory drugs and it may be an attractive option for maintenance therapy. Here we address the issue of maintenance therapy as part of a therapeutic approach of multiple myeloma patients focusing on the potential role of ixazomib.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Boro/administração & dosagem , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Compostos de Boro/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Boro/farmacologia , Glicina/administração & dosagem , Glicina/efeitos adversos , Glicina/farmacologia , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Inibidores de Proteassoma/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteassoma/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteassoma/farmacologia
7.
Onco Targets Ther ; 7: 1793-800, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25302026

RESUMO

Proteasome inhibition represents one of the more important therapeutic targets in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), since by suppressing nuclear factor-κB activity, which promotes myelomagenesis, it makes plasma cells susceptible to proapoptotic signals. Bortezomib, the first proteasome inhibitor approved for MM therapy, has been shown to increase response rate and improve outcome in patients with relapsed/refractory disease and in the frontline setting, particularly when combined with immunomodulatory drugs and alkylating agents. Among second-generation proteasome inhibitors, ixazomib (MLN9708) is the first oral compound to be evaluated for the treatment of MM. Ixazomib has shown improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters compared with bortezomib, in addition to similar efficacy in the control of myeloma growth and prevention of bone loss. Ixazomib was found to overcome bortezomib resistance and to trigger synergistic antimyeloma activity with dexamethasone, lenalidomide, and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Phase I/II studies using ixazomib weekly or twice weekly in relapsed/refractory MM patients suggested antitumor activity of the single agent, but more promising results have been obtained with the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed MM. Ixazomib has also been used in systemic amyloidosis as a single agent, showing important activity in this difficult-to-treat plasma-cell dyscrasia. More frequent side effects observed during administration of ixazomib were thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, and rash, whereas severe peripheral neuropathy was rare. Here, we review the chemical characteristics of ixazomib, as well as its mechanism of action and results from preclinical and clinical trials.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA