Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (SCORPION-NCT01461850).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery is superior to primary debulking surgery in terms of perioperative complications and progression-free survival, in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer patients with high tumor load. METHODS: Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer (stage IIIC-IV) underwent laparoscopy. Patients with high tumor load assessed by a standardized laparoscopic predictive index were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to undergo either primary debulking surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (arm A), or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (arm B). Co-primary outcome measures were progression-free survival and post-operative complications; secondary outcomes were overall survival, and quality of life. Survival analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: 171 patients were randomly assigned to primary debulking surgery (n=84) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=87). Rates of complete resection (R0) were different between the arms (47.6% in arm A vs 77.0% in arm B; p=0.001). 53 major postoperative complications were registered, mainly distributed in arm A compared with arm B (25.9% vs 7.6%; p=0.0001). All patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. With an overall median follow-up of 59 months (95% CI 53 to 64), 142 (83.0%) disease progressions/recurrences and 103 deaths (60.2%) occurred. Median progression-free and overall survival were 15 and 41 months for patients assigned to primary debulking surgery, compared with 14 and 43 months for patients assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.44, p=0.73; HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.65, p=0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary debulking surgery have the same efficacy when used at their maximal possibilities, but the toxicity profile is different.

Prognostic role and predictors of complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary unresectable ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to analyze in a large series of unresectable advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients the prognostic role of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively evaluated 322 unresectable AOC patients treated with NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Pathological response was classified as follows: complete (cPR) in the absence of residual disease, microscopic (microPR) in the presence of microscopic tumor foci (maximum diameter ≤3 mm), and macroscopic (macroPR) when macroscopic residual disease was detected. RESULTS: cPR was observed in 21 (6.5%), microPR in 104 (32.3%), and macroPR in 197 (61.2%) patients. No differences were observed in the distribution of baseline clinicopathological characteristics between the groups. Median progression-free survival was 36 months in cPR, 16 in microPR, and 13 in macroPR (P = .001). Median overall survival was 72 months in cPR, 38 in microPR, and 29 in macroPR (P = .018). The survival differences between microPR and macroPR patients were not confirmed when the analysis included only cases resected to no gross residual disease at IDS. cPR retained the independent prognostic role in the multivariate analysis. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IV was the only negative independent predictor of cPR (χ(2) = 5.362, P = .021). CONCLUSION: cPR is an uncommon event in AOC patients receiving NACT and is associated with a longer progression-free survival and overall survival compared with women showing no cPR, even in patients receiving IDS with no gross residual disease. The proposed classification of pathological response may serve in the next future as an easily assessable and highly valuable prognostic tool in this clinical setting.

Cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients: a case-control study on survival in patients with two year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To compare survival data in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients submitted to secondary cytoreduction (SCR) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) (Cases) and a similar group of women not experiencing HIPEC (Controls). METHODS: Case-control study, matching 30 Cases with 37 Controls, with at least 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Groups were comparable for all characteristics, except for a higher proportion of patients with single-nodule relapses is the Controls (19 vs. 6; p=0.011). Median follow-up time was 46 months in the Cases and 36 months in the Controls. Twenty patients (66.6%) experienced secondary recurrence in the Cases and 37 women (100%) in the Controls (p=0.001). Moreover, 7 (23.3%) and 23 (62.2%) patients died of disease in the Cases and Controls respectively (p=0.003). The duration of secondary response was 26 months in the Cases and 15 months in the Controls (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SCR and HIPEC seems to improve survival rate in patients suffering from platinum-sensitive EOC recurrence with respect to no-HIPEC treatments. This result further supports the need of a randomized trial.

Upper abdominal surgery in advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer: role of diaphragmatic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Upper abdominal spread of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer is often considered to be a major obstacle to achieve optimal residual disease at the end of surgery. In this study, we investigate the role of diaphragmatic debulking in the natural history of advanced and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients, and the morbidity of this procedure according to clinico-surgical characteristics. METHODS: Data from 234 consecutive patients with primary and recurrent advanced ovarian cancer, operated at Catholic University of Rome and Campobasso from January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2008, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients (37.2%) underwent a diaphragmatic surgery. Median age was 55 years (range 37-76). Diaphragmatic debulking was performed in 50 out of 120 patients at primary surgery (41.7%), in 16 out of 74 at interval debulking surgery (21.6%) and in 21 out of 40 secondary cytoreductions (52.5%). In the whole study population optimal residual disease at the end of surgery was achieved. The most frequent post-operative complication was pleural effusion, observed in 37 patients (42.5%). Presence of a post-operative pleural effusion was correlated liver mobilization (52.3% vs. 16%; p<0.0027) and large diaphragmatic disease (>5 cm) removal (54.1% vs. 23.5%; p<0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic surgery represents a crucial step in the debulking of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Considering the natural history of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and the rate of patients needing diaphragmatic debulking during primary cytoreduction, interval debulking surgery and secondary cytoreduction, this procedure should be present in the surgical repertoire of a gynecologic oncologist.

Phase III randomised clinical trial comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with high tumour load (SCORPION trial): Final analysis of peri-operative outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To establishing whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) is superior primary debulking surgery (PDS) in terms of clinical outcome as well as peri-operative morbidity in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) endowed with high tumour load (HTL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single-Institution, superiority, randomised phase III trial enrolling supposed AEOC women. Patients considered pre-operatively eligible were triaged to staging laparoscopy to assess the predictive index (PI) of tumour load. All AEOC women with PI≥8 or≤12 (considered as HTL) were included. They were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to undergo either PDS followed by systemic adjuvant chemotherapy (arm A, standard), or NACT followed by IDS (NACT/IDS) (arm B, experimental). Co-primary outcome measures were postoperative complications (graded according to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center surgical secondary events grading system) and progression free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes were overall survival, and quality of life (QoL). QoL was assessed using the EORTC QoL questionnaires. A sample size of 110 patients was required for the analysis of the first co-primary end-point (major peri-operative morbidity) whereas recruitment is still on-going to achieve the statistical power on PFS. RESULTS: Between October 2011 and November 2014, we registered 280 AEOC. Of the 110 eligible women, 55 were assigned to arm A and 55 to arm B. Despite different extension of surgery, rates of complete residual disease (residual tumour=0 cm) were superimposable between the groups (45.5% versus 57.7%; p=0.206). Twenty-nine patients (52.7%) in arm A experienced early grade III-IV complications versus three patients (5.7%) in IDS (p=0.0001). The most common complication was grade III and consisted of symptomatic pleural effusion requiring thoracic drainage (17/55 women (30.9%) in arm A versus 1/52 (1.9%) in arm B, p=0.0001). Three grade IV (5.4%) (i.e., two re-operations for postoperative haemorrhage and one septic multi-organ failure), and two grade V (3.6%) (two deaths for acute cardiopulmonary failure) early complications were observed in arm A only. Mean QoL scores of several scales/items were shown to ameliorate over time in both arms. Emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea, insomnia and hair loss were statistically and clinically better in NACT/IDS compared to PDS arm. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative moderate/severe morbidity as well as QoL scores were shown to be more favourable in NACT/IDS arm than PDS in AEOC patients with very HTL. Completion of patient enrolment and analysis of survival data will clarify whether PDS with such a high rate of severe complications is an acceptable treatment in AEOC women with HTL.

Concurrent 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and radiation with or without brachytherapy in recurrent cervical cancer: a scoring system to predict clinical response and outcome.

AIMS AND PURPOSE: This is a prospective, phase II study aimed to evaluate the effect of concurrent 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C, and radiation with or without brachytherapy on the clinical outcome of a series of recurrent cervical cancer patients and to determine the prognostic impact of a subset of factors. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with locally recurrent, non-metastatic cervical cancer received external beam radiation (4-week split course: 23.4 + 23.4 Gy) plus two courses of concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, 96-h continuous infusion, days 1-4, 1 g/m2/day; mitomycin C, 10 mg/m2, bolus i.v., day 1). Twelve patients with vaginal recurrence (36.4%) underwent endocavitary low-dose rate brachytherapy boost (20-25 Gy); 11 patients with lateral pelvic recurrence (33.3%) received external beam radiation boost (14-20 Gy). RESULTS: Fourteen complete responses (42.4%), 7 partial responses (21.2%), 5 disease stabilizations (15.1%) and 7 progressions (21.2%) were obtained. After a median follow-up of 34 months (range, 6-127), overall actuarial 3-year survival, progression-free survival and local progression-free survival were 59.7%, 48.1% and 51.7%, respectively. Patients with vaginal recurrence of less than 4 cm and negative lymph nodes proved to respond best to the treatment. Two patients (6.1%) experienced hematologic grade 3 toxicity. One patient had grade 3 intestinal toxicity (3.0%). No patient had major skin or urological acute toxicity. Severe late toxicity was infrequent. Three patients had prolonged leukopenia (9.0%). Four patients showed severe vaginal stenosis (12.1%). A clinical score of 0 to 1 was assigned to each patient on the basis of the absence (score = 0) or presence (score = 1) of any of the following prognostic factors: time between surgery and recurrence shorter than 12 months, pelvic wall site of recurrence, positive lymph nodes, hemoglobin < 11 g/dL. Using this system, it was clear that patients with a low total score had a significantly better outcome (clinical remission, 51% of patients with a score < or = 2 vs 12% of patients with a score > 2, P = 0.06), local control of the disease (65% vs 20% after 3 years, P = 0.001,) and overall survival (75% vs 30% after 3 years, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that this combined modality therapy was relatively well tolerated and resulted in reasonable local control and survival. The scoring system proved to be helpful to identify patients with the greatest chance of benefiting from the treatment. Further studies are probably needed to salvage the other patients, whose prognosis remains severe.

Concurrent 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and radiation, with or without brachytherapy, in recurrent endometrial cancer: a scoring system to predict clinical response and outcome.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: This prospective, phase II study aimed to test the efficacy of concurrent 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and radiation, with or without brachytherapy, on the clinical outcome of a series of recurrent endometrial cancer patients and to determine the prognostic impact of a subset of factors. METHODS: Thirty patients with locally recurrent, nonmetastatic endometrial cancer received external beam radiation (4-week split course: 23.4 + 23.4 Gy) plus two courses of concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, 96-h continous infusion, days 1-4; 1 g/m2/day; mitomycin C, 10 mg/m2, bolus iv, day 1). Nineteen patients (63.3%) underwent endocavitary, low-dose brachytherapy boost (20-25 Gy); eight patients (26.7%) received external beam radiation boost (14-20 Gy). RESULTS: Eleven complete responses (36.7%), 11 partial responses (36.7%), 6 disease stabilizations (20.0%) and 2 progressions (6.6%) were observed. After a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 1-108), overall actuarial 3-year survival, progression-free survival and local progression-free survival were 46.8%, 35.2% and 41.2%, respectively. Two patients (6.7%) experienced hematological grade 3 toxicity. Two patients (6.7%) had grade 3 intestinal toxicity. Severe late toxicity was infrequent, only 3 patients showing severe vaginal stenosis (10.0%). A clinical score of 0 to 1 was assigned to each patient on the basis of the absence (score = 0) or presence (score = 1) of any of the following prognostic factors: time between surgery and recurrence shorter than 12 months, pelvic wall site of recurrence, positive lymph nodes, hemoglobin < 11 g/dL. With this device, it was clear that patients with a low score had a significantly better outcome (clinical remission: 77.2% of patients with a score < 2 vs 25.0% of patients with a score > or = 2, P = 0.009), better local control of the disease (50.2% vs. 0 at 3 years, P = 0.014,) and better overall survival (65.8% vs 0 at 3 years, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that this combined modality therapy was relatively well tolerated and resulted in reasonable local control and survival. The scoring system proved to be helpful in identifying patients with the best chance of benefiting from the treatment.

Flap algorithm in vulvar reconstruction after radical, extensive vulvectomy.

The objective of this study was to assess the reconstructive options after radical, extensive vulvectomy; relate them to tumor characteristics; and select a choice of flaps able to correct every remaining defect. This study is a retrospective review of a 4-year experience with 31 flaps in 20 consecutive vulvar reconstructions. Three of the 31 flaps presented nonsignificant delayed healing at their tips and 3 other flaps developed a major breakdown related to an infection or an error in flap planning. According to the authors, the size of the defect is the main issue that must be taken into consideration during the establishment of reconstructive needs. Closure of vulvar defects is preferably performed using fasciocutaneous flaps, which are very reliable flaps and can be raised with different techniques to meet different needs. A flap is then chosen with the fewest potential complications. An algorithm has been thus established: Small to medium-size defects are closed with island V-Y flaps, island gluteal fold flaps, or pedicled pudendal thigh flaps. Among them, the island V-Y flap is the workhorse flap for vulvar reconstruction because of its versatility, reliability, and technical simplicity compared with its very low complication rate. If the vulvar defect is large and/or reaches the vulva-crural fold, V-Y flaps are also preferred to close these large and posteriorly extended excisions. If the vulvar defect is very large, extending both anteriorly and posteriorly, the use of a distally based, vertically oriented rectus abdominis muscle flap is recommended. Using this algorithm, immediate vulvar reconstruction with pedicled local or regional flaps can be performed easily and reliably.