Prevalence and Management of Incidental Small Testicular Masses Discovered on Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Male Infertility.

PURPOSE: We report the safety of surveillance of small testicular masses incidentally discovered during evaluation of male infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database to identify patients with male infertility found to have incidental small testicular masses (hypoechoic lesions less than 10 mm) on scrotal ultrasound. The men were offered close surveillance with interval imaging and office followup. Patient and imaging characteristics were collected to compare the surveillance and surgical groups with additional comparisons between benign and malignant pathologies to elucidate predictors of underlying malignancy. RESULTS: Of 4,088 men in whom scrotal ultrasound was completed for male infertility evaluation 120 (2.9%) were found to have a subcentimeter testicular mass. Average followup was 1.30 years (range 0.1 to 16.9). A total of 18 men (15%) proceeded to extirpative surgery while 102 remained on surveillance at last followup. In those with at least 1 month of followup the mean lesion growth rate was -0.01 mm per year. Reasons for surgery included testicular exploration for infertility, mass growth, positive tumor markers, history of testis cancer, concerning imaging characteristics and patient choice. Six of the 18 men who underwent surgery were found to have malignancy, which was seminoma in all. All malignant lesions were greater than 5 mm on initial imaging and demonstrated vascularity, although size and vascularity were not significantly different from those of benign lesions on final pathology findings. No patients demonstrated advanced or recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Small testicular masses are not uncommon, especially in the infertile male population. Most of these masses do not show significant growth during long-term evaluation and can be safely surveilled with close followup.

Evaluation of upper urinary tract tumors with portal venous phase MDCT: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess the detection and negative prediction rate of upper urinary tract tumors in nonopacified urinary tracts on portal venous phase MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 20 patients with upper urinary tract tumors and 40 age- and sex-matched control subjects. All studies were assessed independently by two reviewers. Reviewers determined whether each of four segments of the upper urinary tract could be fully visualized and whether tumor was present or absent. For each tumor, reviewers characterized its morphologic features (i.e., infiltrative or polypoid mass, urothelial thickening, and associated hydroureter or hydronephrosis). RESULTS: The detection rate of the proximal two upper urinary tract segments was significantly higher than that for the distal segments (p < 0.001). For each upper urinary tract, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of portal venous phase MDCT for detecting tumors were 95%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value for an estimated population prevalence of 0.0005-0.004 was 0.6-4.8%. The morphologic features significant for the presence of tumor were urothelial thickening and the presence of a discrete polypoid mass. Interobserver agreement for all features was good or very good, except for moderate agreement on urothelial thickening involving the ureter (κ = 0.60). CONCLUSION: The detection rate of upper urinary tract tumors on nonopacified portal venous phase is high. Furthermore, in the absence of morphologic features suggestive of urothelial malignancy, a normal-appearing ureter may be reassuring.

Correction to: Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard.

Unfortunately the article was published with a spell error in the co-author name "Hassan Maan". The correct co-author name should be "Hassaan Maan".

Operator is an independent predictor of detecting prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether interoperator differences exist in the setting of prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Our secondary aim was to investigate whether a learning curve exists for prostate cancer detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database from 2000 to 2008 including 9,072 transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies at our institution was limited to 4,724 done at initial presentation. Biopsies were performed by 4 uroradiologists. The OR for detecting cancer on transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy was calculated for likely independent prognostic variables, including operator. We also examined the rate of biopsy positivity in increments, comparing the first and last cohorts. The senior radiologist (AT) with the most biopsies (75%) was considered the referent for prostate cancer detection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to determine significant covariates with p <0.05 deemed relevant. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 2,331 men (49.3%). Operators performed a median of 514 transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies (range 187 to 3,509) with a prostate cancer detection rate of 43.8% to 52.4% (p = 0.001). Other significant covariates were prostate specific antigen, suspicious lesions on ultrasound, nodule on digital rectal examination, smaller prostate volume and increasing patient age. Operator was a significant multivariate predictor of cancer detection (OR 0.67 to 0.89, p = 0.003). No learning curve was detected and biopsy rates were consistent throughout the series. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in prostate cancer detection exist among operators who perform transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy even in the same setting. The volume of previously performed transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies does not appear to influence the positive prostate cancer detection rate, nor could a learning curve be identified. Differences in prostate cancer detection among operators are likely related to unknown differences in expertise or technique. Further research is needed.

Diagnostic performance of 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines and inter-observer variability in assigning risk category.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the interobserver variability of the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) thyroid guidelines and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the guidelines in detecting thyroid cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sonographic patterns of 189 thyroid lesions were retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists according to the 2015 guidelines. The risk of malignancy was calculated for each pattern and compared with the published expected risk of malignancy. RESULTS: The observed risk of malignancy for very low suspicion, low suspicion, intermediate suspicion and high suspicion patterns were 2%, 12.7%, 26.3% and 29.8% respectively. Interobserver agreement for final category assignment was moderate (κ 0.518). CONCLUSION: The estimated risk of malignancy in the high suspicion pattern of the 2015 ATA thyroid biopsy guidelines appears to be less than stated. However, this needs further validation in a larger cohort study.

Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the findings on 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using PIRADS version 2 with prostate biopsy results as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 134 consecutive treatment naive patients (mean age 64 years, range 41-82 years) underwent MRI-directed prostate biopsy. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy was used for 77 (77/134 = 57.5%) patients, cognitive fusion for 51 (51/134 = 38.0%) patients, and 6 patients (6/134 = 4.5%) without a target nodule had systematic biopsy only. Out of the 1676 biopsy sites, 237 (237/1676 = 14.1%) were positive on MRI for a PIRADS 3, 4, or 5 nodule. Fifty-eight (58/134, 43.3%) patients had clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The findings on MRI using PIRADS version 2 were correlated with the biopsy results. RESULTS: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PIRADS ≥ 3 for csPCa were 89%, 76.5%, 89.7%, 31.7%, and 98.4%, respectively. The detection rates of csPCa for PIRADS 3, 4, and 5 nodules were 6.1% (4/66), 33.3% (42/126), and 64.4% (29/45), respectively. MRI did not identify a nodule in 23/1676 (1.4%) biopsy sites that contained csPCa. The MRI reader, biopsy operator, method of fusion biopsy, and zonal location of prostate nodule did not significantly affect the odds of having a biopsy result positive for csPCa. CONCLUSION: PIRADS ≥ 3 had high specificity and high negative predictive value for csPCa using biopsy results as the standard of reference. The presence of csPCa from a biopsy site was highly unlikely in the absence of a corresponding PIRADS ≥ 3 nodule.

Hepatic fat and glucose tolerance in women with recent gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have an elevated risk of ultimately developing pre-diabetes and diabetes later in life. They also have an increased prevalence of fatty liver, but recent studies have reported conflicting findings on whether hepatic fat affects their risk of pre-diabetes/diabetes. Thus, we sought to evaluate the associations of liver fat with glucose homeostasis and determinants thereof in women with and without recent gestational dysglycemia. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-seven women underwent an antepartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which diagnosed 97 with GDM, 40 with gestational impaired glucose tolerance (GIGT), and 120 with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). At a mean of 4.8 years post partum, they underwent an OGTT (which revealed that 52 had progressed to pre-diabetes/diabetes) and hepatic ultrasound, on which liver fat was graded as none (n=164), mild (n=66), or moderate (n=27). RESULTS: Liver fat was more prevalent in women with previous GDM than in those with GIGT or NGT (p=0.009) and in women with current pre-diabetes/diabetes than in those without (p=0.0003). As the severity of liver fat increased, there was a progressive worsening of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function, coupled with rising fasting and 2-hour glucose (all p<0.0001). On multiple linear regression analyses, moderate liver fat was independently associated with lower insulin sensitivity (p=0.0002) and higher 2-hour glucose (p=0.009). Moreover, moderate liver fat emerged as an independent predictor of pre-diabetes/diabetes (OR=3.66, 95% CI 1.1 to 12.5). CONCLUSION: The higher prevalence of liver fat in women with previous GDM is associated with their increased risk of pre-diabetes/diabetes.

Use and misuse of waterfall plots.

BACKGROUND: "Waterfall plots" are used to describe changes in tumor size observed in clinical studies. Here we assess criteria for generation of waterfall plots and the impact of measurement error in generating them. METHODS: We reviewed published waterfall plots to investigate variability in criteria used to define them. We then compared waterfall plots generated by different observers for 24 patients enrolled in a completed phase I study of solid tumors with available computed tomography (CT) scans. Tumor measurements were made independently from CT scans according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 by four board-certified radiologists and four medical oncologists. Interobserver variability was quantified and compared with reference measurements reported for the phase 1 study. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: There was substantial variability in criteria used to generate published waterfall plots. In the internal study, the results were statistically significantly different between all eight readers (P = .01, variance = 197.1, SD = 14.0) and between the oncologists (P = .01, variance = 319.0, SD = 17.9), but not between the radiologists (P = .68, variance = 70.8, SD = 8.4). Different observers classified one to five patients as having a partial response and 12-19 patients as having stable disease. Similar variability in categorization of response was observed when these error rates were applied to published waterfall plots. CONCLUSION: Waterfall plots are subject to substantial variability in criteria used to define them and are influenced by measurement errors; they should be generated by trained radiologists. Caution should be exercised when interpreting results of waterfall plots in the context of clinical trials.

The utility of screening for asymptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis during inflammatory bowel disease flares: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurs in up to 11% of medical inpatients. The incidence of asymptomatic DVT among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unknown but may be even higher. D-dimer is effective for DVT screening, but its utility has not been studied in the IBD population. METHODS: Hospitalized and ambulatory patients with IBD during flares were recruited between 2009 and 2011. Those with clinical symptoms of venous thromboembolism or previous venous thromboembolism were excluded. We determined the prevalence of DVT among asymptomatic subjects using lower extremity Doppler ultrasound and assessed the performance characteristics of the D-dimer in this high-risk study population. RESULTS: We enrolled 101 hospitalized and 49 ambulatory patients with IBD during active flares. There were no cases of proximal DVT detected by lower extremity Doppler ultrasound. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the rate of proximal DVT was 0% to 2%. D-dimer was elevated in 60% of subjects without DVT, occurring more frequently among hospitalized than ambulatory subjects [89% versus 65%, P = 0.01; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.16, 95% CI, 1.58-10.9]. Other predictors of elevated D-dimer were incremental decade in age (aOR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.24-3.14); ulcerative colitis versus Crohn's disease diagnosis (aOR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.29-8.84); and every 10-unit increase in C-reactive protein (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.09-1.62). CONCLUSION: From this pilot study, there appears to be low prevalence of asymptomatic DVTs among patients with IBD during flares. The high prevalence of elevated D-dimer in DVT-negative patients limits its utility in IBD.