Prognostic factors for early relapse in non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer - real world data.

BACKGROUND: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has the worst prognosis amongst all subtypes. Studies have shown that the achievement of pathologic complete response in the breast and axilla correlates with improved survival. The aim of this study was to identify clinical or pathological features of real-life TNBC patients with a higher risk of early relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-centre retrospective analysis of 127 women with TNBC, stage II-III, submitted to neoadjuvant treatment and surgery between January 2016 and 2020. Multivariate Cox regression analysis for disease free survival (DFS) at 2 years was performed and statistically significant variables were computed into a prognostic model for early relapse. RESULTS: After 29 months of median follow-up, 105 patients (82.7%) were alive and, in total, 38 patients (29.9%) experienced recurrence. The 2-year DFS was 73% (95% CI: 21.3-22.7). In multivariate analysis, being submitted to neoadjuvant radiotherapy [HR 2.8 (95% CI: 1.2-6.4), p = 0.017] and not achieving pathologic complete response [HR 0.3 (95% CI: 0.1-1.7), p = 0.011] were associated with higher risk of recurrence. In our prognostic model, the presence of at least one of these variables defined a subgroup of patients with a worse 2-year DFS than those without these features (59% vs. 90%, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life non-metastatic TNBC cohort, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (performed due to insufficient clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or significant toxicity) impacted as an independent prognostic factor for relapse along with the absence of pathologic complete response identifying a subgroup of higher risk patients for early relapse that might merit a closer follow-up.

Adjuvant Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy in Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a frequently diagnosed neoplasm, which is typically managed with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) eventually followed by intravesical therapies. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is used as first-line adjuvant treatment in high- (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) NMIBC, although, in the latter, mitomycin C (MMC) may also be used. Multiple limitations to the use of BCG encouraged the search for therapeutic alternatives. In this context, hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with MMC (HIVEC-MMC) emerged as a promising therapy in the adjuvant setting for NMIBC. The aim of our study was to evaluate the tolerability, compliance, and survival outcomes of HIVEC-MMC in patients with IR- and HR-NMIBC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of IR- and HR- NMIBC patients who received HIVEC-MMC after TURBT between August 2018 and August 2022. Levels of risk stratification were defined using the European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. The protocol consisted of four weekly HIVEC-MMC instillations (induction) followed by six monthly instillations (maintenance). The primary outcomes were to evaluate the tolerability and compliance with the HIVEC-MMC protocol and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For the purpose of statistical analysis, methods of descriptive statistics, survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimation), and multivariate analysis (Cox regression, and binary logistic regression) were used. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled with a median age of 67.9 (34.4-83.5) years old. In this cohort, 40 patients (70.2%) had primary tumors. At the time of referral for HIVEC-MMC, the majority of the patients had IR-NMIBC (n= 33, 57.9%). A total of 41 patients (71.9%) completed the HIVEC-MMC protocol. Disease recurrence and adverse events (AEs) were the most common reasons to stop the protocol. After a median follow-up of 31 months (95% CI, 5.0-54.0), 32 patients (61.4%) were disease-free, 22 (38.6%) experienced recurrent disease and six patients (10.5%) died, although only one death was directly attributable to bladder cancer. The median DFS was 42 months (95% CI, 28.0-56.0). Completion of the HIVEC-MMC maintenance phase protocol stood as a predictive factor for DFS (44 months, 95% CI 29.1-58.9 vs. 14 months, 95% CI 0.0-29.6, p < 0.001; HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.65-12.15). The median OS was not reached; the 24- and 48-month OS were 92.6% and 82.7%, respectively. EAU risk group, ECOG-PS, and completion of HIVEC protocol were found to be significant predictive factors of OS but lost their significance on multivariate analysis. However, if we exclude those who experienced recurrence during the maintenance phase protocol, treatment completion had a significant positive impact on OS (HR: 42.8, 95% CI 1.75-1045.072, p= 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that HIVEC is a secure and well-tolerated treatment with promising efficacy data, making this therapeutic approach a feasible option in IR- and HR-NMIBC patients, mainly in those who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to BCG therapy, but also as an alternative during BCG shortages.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Management in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Survey-Based Study of Medical Oncologists.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer care providers have faced many challenges in delivering safe care for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-sectional survey-based study investigated the impact of the pandemic on clinical practices of Portuguese medical oncologists caring for patients with breast cancer. METHODS: An anonymous online survey comprising 42 questions gathered information regarding COVID-19 testing, treatment in (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings, and other aspects of breast cancer management. Practices before and during the pandemic were compared, and potential differences in outcomes according to respondents' regions, case volumes, and practice type were explored. RESULTS: Of 129 respondents, 108 worked in the public health system, giving a representative national picture of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer management. Seventy-one percent of respondents reported a reduction in visits for new cases of breast cancer, and there was a shift towards increased use of telemedicine. Clinical decision-making was largely unaffected in the most aggressive indications (i.e., triple-negative, HER2-positive, visceral crisis). The use of neoadjuvant therapy increased when access to surgery was difficult, whereas dose-dense regimens decreased, and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor treatment decreased for less aggressive disease and increased for more aggressive disease. The use of oral formulations and metronomic chemotherapy regimens increased, and clinical trial participation decreased. Some differences by respondents' region and case volume were noted. CONCLUSION: Medical oncologists in Portugal implemented many changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, most of which were logical and reasonable responses to the current healthcare emergency; however, the true impact on patient outcomes remains unknown.

This study was an online survey of Portuguese medical oncologists to determine how they managed patients with breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Forty-two questions covered topics such as how COVID testing was done, the types of cancer treatments used, and how this compared to before the pandemic. It also examined whether the geographic region, the number of patients each doctor was responsible for (caseload), and the type of medical institution influenced how patients with breast cancer were managed. One hundred and twenty-nine oncologists completed the survey, of whom 108 worked in the public health system, making this survey representative of breast cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic across Portugal. Most (71%) said there were fewer visits for new cases of breast cancer during lockdown. The use of telemedicine increased, as did the use of pre-surgery hormone therapy or chemotherapy when access to surgery was difficult, and the use of anticancer medications taken orally or metronomically (low doses given frequently over a long time period). Chemotherapy given very frequently (dose-dense) was used less often, and fewer patients participated in clinical trials. Treatment decisions for patients with aggressive breast cancer types (e.g., triple-negative breast cancer) were largely unchanged, except for greater use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors­drugs targeting the cell cycle and cell division control. Geographic region and caseload influenced treatment decisions. All of these changes in breast cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic were logical and reasonable for the circumstances, but their long-term impact is not yet known.

Survival predictors and outcomes of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab as first-line therapy: A real-world retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) the estimated prognosis is usually poor. Patient-specific factors that affect prognosis should be considered when choosing therapy. We conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis in patients treated with first line platinum and antiEGFR antibody-containing regimen. The objective was to generate real-world data considering treatment outcomes and to identify predictors of survival. PATIENTS/METHODS: Clinical charts of patients treated with cetuximab and platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) for R/M HNSCC in first-line setting, between January-2009 and December-2018 were assessed. In these 103 patients, the prognostic value of site of the primary tumor, age at diagnosis, gender, Cetuximab induced skin toxicity and prior treatments were studied multivariately. To evaluate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used. The Coxregression model was used to investigate the effect of these variables on OS. RESULTS: Longer OS was associated with oral cavity tumor location (p = 0,003), European Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status 0 (ECOG-PS) (p = 0,01), complete/partial response (p<0,0001), cetuximab monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (p = 0,037) and Grade 2-4 cetuximab induced skin toxicity (p = 0,037). The median follow-up period was 11,7 months. The mortality rate was 90,3% during this retrospective cohort assessment. The PFS was 7,1 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5,6-8.6). The OS was 11,7 months (95%CI, 10,5-12,8). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the combination of cetuximab with platinum-based CT was effective in R/M HNSCC. Among patients with R/M HSCC treated with platinum plus cetuximab as first-line therapy, primary site, ECOG-PS, grade 2-4 cetuximab induced toxicity, and weekly cetuximab monotherapy have a marked impact on OS.