Incidental Laryngeal Findings in Routine Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) refers to the backflow of acidic stomach content into the larynx, pharynx, and upper aerodigestive tract. The diagnosis of LPR is based on the patient's history and findings of the laryngoscopy associated with LPR. Other possible manifestations consistent with LPR symptoms include laryngeal cancer, vocal fold granulomas, Reinke's space edema, and vocal polyps. In this study, we compared the characteristics of patients with LPR symptoms and incidental laryngeal findings (ILF) in the laryngoscopic evaluation to those without ILF (WILF). OBJECTIVES: Determine the characteristics of LPR-symptomatic patients with ILF versus WILF. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined 160 medical charts from patients referred to the otolaryngology clinic at Galilee Medical Center for LPR evaluation 2016-2018. The reflux symptoms index (RSI), reflux finding score (RFS), and demographics of the patient were collected. All patients with a positive RSI score for LPR (RSI > 9) were included, and the profiles of patients with versus without ILF on laryngoscopy examination were compared. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients, 20 (12.5%) had ILF during laryngoscopy. Most had vocal cord findings such as leukoplakia (20%), polyps (15%), and nodules (20%). Hoarseness, throat clearing, swallowing difficulty, breathing difficulties, and total RSI score were significantly higher in patients with ILF. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of LPR symptoms may provide otolaryngologists with a tool to identify patients with other findings on fiberoptic laryngoscopy. A laryngoscopic examination should be part of the examination of every patient with LPR to enable diagnosis of incidental findings.

Sino-nasal outcome test-22: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in Russian speaking patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a relatively common disease, which significantly affects the patient's quality of life (QoL). Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) is a QoL questionnaire, which allows quantifying patients' complaints. Our aim was to translate and validated the SNOT-22 into the Russian language. METHODS: Translation and validation of SNOT-22 questionnaire was performed through forward-backward translation technique. After proper translation, the translated questionnaire was completed by CRS patients before and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and by healthy individuals as controls. RESULTS: Thirty-four native Russian-speaking CRS patients completed the Russian version of the SNOT-22 questionnaire before and after ESS. The internal consistency for reliability assessment was very good (mean Cronbach's alpha = 0.816 for CRS patients). Mean scores for the preoperative, postoperative and control groups were 67.6, 18.1 and 9.2, respectively (P < .001), showing validity and responsiveness of the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The Russian version of the SNOT-22 questionnaire is a valid outcome measure for patients with CRS.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Hebrew Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale.

Objective: Nasal obstruction is a common complaint. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale (NOSE) is a reliable validated tool used to assess the quality of life of patients with nasal obstruction. The purpose of this study is to validate the Hebrew version of the NOSE scale (He-NOSE). Methods: A prospective instrument validation was conducted. The NOSE scale was translated primarily from English to Hebrew and then back from Hebrew to English according to the accepted guidelines of the cross-cultural adaptation process. The study group included surgery candidates suffering from nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum and/or inferior turbinate hypertrophy. The study group completed the validated He-NOSE questionnaire twice prior to the surgery and once again, a month post-surgery. A control group of individuals with no history of nasal complaints or surgeries was asked to complete the questionnaire once. Reliability, internal consistency, validity, and responsiveness to change of the He-NOSE were evaluated. Results: Fifty-three patients and 100 controls were included in this study. The scale showed excellent ability to discriminate between the study and the control group, exhibiting significantly lower scores in the control group (73.8 and 7 average scores respectively, p < .001). Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha .71 and .76) and test-retest reliability (Spearman rank correlation r = .752, p < .0001) were measured. Moreover, the scale revealed remarkable responsiveness to change (p < .00001). Conclusion: The translated and adapted He-NOSE scale can be a useful tool to be applied in both clinical and research fields when assessing nasal obstruction. Level of evidence: N/A.

Inter-Rater Variability of Reflux Finding Score Amongst Otolaryngologists.

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is an extra-oesophageal variant of gastro-oesophgeal reflux disease. Patients often do not present with the classic reflux symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation. Accurate diagnosis of LPR can be challenging. The reflux finding score (RFS) is system based on the assessment of eight parameters seen on fibre optic laryngoscopy, used to determine the presence and the severity of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Scoring the RFS is subjective and highly dependent on the examiner's eye and experience. In this study, we investigated the inter-rater reliability between three otolaryngologists scoring a large library of video-recorded laryngoscopies for RFS. AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of RFS in daily clinical practice by assessing inter-rater reliability among otolaryngologists when interpreting a bank of identical fibre optic laryngoscopy examinations. METHOD: Three board-certified otolaryngologists with different subspecialist interests examined video-recorded fibre optic laryngoscopies of 193 patients with or without LPR symptoms and rated each video for RFS. Statistical analysis was performed. Results were compared to determine the inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Fair to poor correlation was found between the three expert raters for total RFS score, as well as for RFS component items with nonbinary outcomes. For the dichotomous items, the inter-rater reliability was slight to moderate. Inter-rater correlation for determining whether an examination is pathological or nonpathological was fair. CONCLUSION: The RFS alone was not reliable for confirming the diagnosis of LPR, due to low inter-rater reliability and the subjective nature of the scoring system.

Prevalence of rhinosinusitis among atypical cystic fibrosis patients.

The objective of this paper is to study the correlation between sinonasal involvement and type of cystic fibrosis (CF) in Israeli's CF patients. The comparative study includes 70 CF patients: 40 typical and 30 atypical CF patients. History and physical examination data were recorded, including endoscopic nasal examination as well as sinus computer tomography scan. The data collected from the two groups were statistically analyzed. Twenty-seven percent of atypical CF patients compared with 2.5% of typical CF patients had CF presenting symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) or obstructive nasal polyps (p < 0.001). Although severe CRS was found slightly more often in patient with atypical CF (43 vs. 32.5%), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Nine patients with severe CRS underwent endoscopic sinus surgery. Among these patients, six (66.6%) had atypical CF and only three (33.3%) had typical CF (p = 0.09). In conclusion, severe CRS is a common diagnosis among patients with typical and atypical CF disease. In the current study, no significant difference in the frequency of CRS was found between the two groups. High awareness toward the diagnosis of atypical CF, careful medical history focusing on sinonasal involvement and physical examination, including nasal endoscopy, for all CF patients (typical and atypical CF) may contribute to an early detection and treatment of significant sinonasal involvement, and may improve the quality of life of the patients.

Is Nasal Endoscopy of Diagnostic Value in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps?

Endoscopic examination of the nasal cavity is an integral part of the assessment of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. However, the benefit gained by performing endoscopy with respect to the patient's medical condition has not been completely assessed. We conducted a prospective cohort in an academic medical center. Thirty-nine patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis, without polyps, whose ailment was managed conservatively with no surgical intervention. All patients underwent nasal endoscopy, a computed tomography (CT) scan rated for Lund-MacKay score, and completed a sino nasal outcome test (SNOT)-20 questionnaire. This same evaluation was repeated 6 weeks following medical treatment. The CT scan and SNOT-20 questionnaire were independent parameters to evaluate the endoscopy score in each nasal passage. Thirty-nine (28 females) patients completed the follow-up period. A total of 156 endoscopic evaluations were performed, in which 74 nasal cavities were found to have significant pathology and 82 were either normal or displayed mild pathology. The correlation with the Lund-MacKay score was poor with a positive predictive value of 68.9% (31.1% false positive and 28% false negative). However, while looking at the SNOT-20 score, corrected for repeated measures, a higher endoscopy score was associated with a higher SNOT-20 score (odds ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval = 1.54-8.09, P = .003). Patients with higher endoscopy scores had a greater probability for exhibiting severe symptoms. However, we could not demonstrate a strong correlation between nasal endoscopy findings and CT scan scores. Therefore, with respect to patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps, nasal endoscopy could be utilized as a beneficial objective tool.

Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) success rates and complications in endoscopic vs non-endoscopic approaches: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Epiphora due to refractory bicanalicular obstructions is typically managed by conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) with or without the assistance of nasal endoscopy. However, the evidence for its benefit is unclear. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on the treatment of epiphora by CDCR was performed (March 1, 2018). All studies reporting original data on patients suffering from epiphora treated with CDCR surgery were included. Primary outcomes were success and satisfaction rates. Secondary outcomes were CDCR complications. A comparison was made between the results obtained in patients undergoing CDCR with vs without assistance of nasal endoscopy. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies representing information on 2555 CDCR procedures were included in the systematic review. All the studies are case series, most of them retrospective. Lester Jones tube (LJT) is the most commonly used in CDCR (66.7%). The overall success rate with all studies included (n = 2555) was 88.9%; 90.8% (n = 890) in CDCR with assistance of nasal endoscope and 87.7% (n = 1575) in the non-endoscopic approach. The overall "tube displacement" rate, the most common complication, was 24.5% (n = 2522), 20.8% (n = 1575) tube displacement in CDCR with assistance of nasal endoscope vs 26.7% (n = 1575) in the non-endoscopic approach. Only 3 studies (5.5%) used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate epiphora improvement. Due to the low level of evidence and the high bias of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: Based on the data available in the literature, CDCR is considered an effective procedure for treating epiphora due to proximal obstruction. Controlled and qualitative studies are needed to clarify the significance of the endoscope's contribution to CDCR.

Diagnosis and Classification of 17 Diseases from 1404 Subjects via Pattern Analysis of Exhaled Molecules.

We report on an artificially intelligent nanoarray based on molecularly modified gold nanoparticles and a random network of single-walled carbon nanotubes for noninvasive diagnosis and classification of a number of diseases from exhaled breath. The performance of this artificially intelligent nanoarray was clinically assessed on breath samples collected from 1404 subjects having one of 17 different disease conditions included in the study or having no evidence of any disease (healthy controls). Blind experiments showed that 86% accuracy could be achieved with the artificially intelligent nanoarray, allowing both detection and discrimination between the different disease conditions examined. Analysis of the artificially intelligent nanoarray also showed that each disease has its own unique breathprint, and that the presence of one disease would not screen out others. Cluster analysis showed a reasonable classification power of diseases from the same categories. The effect of confounding clinical and environmental factors on the performance of the nanoarray did not significantly alter the obtained results. The diagnosis and classification power of the nanoarray was also validated by an independent analytical technique, i.e., gas chromatography linked with mass spectrometry. This analysis found that 13 exhaled chemical species, called volatile organic compounds, are associated with certain diseases, and the composition of this assembly of volatile organic compounds differs from one disease to another. Overall, these findings could contribute to one of the most important criteria for successful health intervention in the modern era, viz. easy-to-use, inexpensive (affordable), and miniaturized tools that could also be used for personalized screening, diagnosis, and follow-up of a number of diseases, which can clearly be extended by further development.

Idiopathic nasal bone osteitis: A preliminary report on a recently recognized entity.

Osteitis of the nasal bones is a rare disease; when it occurs, it usually has a known etiology. To the best of our knowledge, idiopathic nasal bone osteitis (NBO) has not been described before. We conducted a study to analyze the behavior of idiopathic NBO and its outcome and to determine a cutoff level for diagnosis using technetium-99m-methylene-diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) bone scanning. This retrospective, controlled analysis involved 9 women (mean age: 44 yr) who had been admitted to an otolaryngology department in Israel with idiopathic NBO over a 5-year period. Clinical evaluation, isotopic evaluation, and computed tomography were done. A lesion-to-nonlesion ratio was calculated between an area of interest on the nasal bone and a reference point (L/R ratio). The same ratio was calculated for a control group of 20 subjects. All the Tc-MDP scans in the study group were suggestive of osteitis. Intravenous antibiotic treatment was effective in all cases. A high degree of accuracy was achieved with cutoff L/R ratios of 2.05 for planar views and 2.34 for single-photon emission computed tomography views.

Prevention of Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss by Intratympanic Dexamethasone: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of intratympanic Dexamethasone (ITD) in the prevention of Cisplatin-induced hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients suffering from a neoplastic disease for which the treatment protocol included Cisplatin were recruited. Prior to each Cisplatin treatment session ITD was injected to the baseline randomly assigned ear while the other ear of the same patient served as the control. Audiometry and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) test results of the baseline and follow-up examinations were compared within and between the study and control ears. RESULTS: The cumulative dose of Cisplatin was greater than 400 mg for the 15 subjects who completed the study. The pure tone threshold at 8000 Hz and pure tone average threshold at 4000 to 8000 Hz significantly increased in both the study (P < .005, P < .03, respectively) and control ears (P < .01, P < .005, respectively). Significant increase in the pure tone threshold for 6000 Hz was observed in the control (P < .02) but not in the study group. Within the groups comparison also revealed significant decrease in the DPOAE average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the f2 frequencies 7031 (P < .04) and 8391 Hz (P < .04) and SNR average for 4000 to 8000 Hz in the control (P < .04) but not in the study ears. CONCLUSIONS: ITD significantly attenuated hearing loss at 6000 Hz and decreased the outer hair dysfunction in the DPOAE f2 range of 4000 to 8000 Hz. ITD might have potential in the reduction of Cisplatin-induced hearing loss.