An Investigation of Further Strategies to Optimize Early Treatment Gains in Brief Therapies for Insomnia.

OBJECTIVES: Identifying those who are most (and least) likely to benefit from a stepped-care approach to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) increases access to insomnia therapies while minimizing resource consumption. The present study investigates non-targeted factors in a single-session of CBT-I that may act as barriers to early response and remission. METHODS: Participants (N = 303) received four sessions of CBT-I and completed measures of subjective insomnia severity, fatigue, sleep-related beliefs, treatment expectations, and sleep diaries. Subjective insomnia severity and sleep diaries were completed between each treatment session. Early response was defined as a 50% reduction in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores and early remission was defined by < 10 on the ISI after the first session. RESULTS: A single-session of CBT-I significantly reduced subjective insomnia severity scores and diary total wake time. Logistic regression models indicated that lower baseline fatigue was associated with increased odds of early remission (B = -.05, p = .02), and lower subjective insomnia severity (B = -.13, p = .049). Only fatigue was a significant predictor of early treatment response (B = -.06, p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue appeared to be an important construct that dictates early changes in perceived insomnia severity. Beliefs about the relationship between sleep and daytime performance may hinder perceived improvements in insomnia symptoms. Incorporating fatigue management strategies and psychoeducation about the relationship between sleep and fatigue may target non-early responders. Future research would benefit from further profiling potential early insomnia responders/remitters.

Examining whether Changes in Sleep Habits Predict Long-Term Sustainment of Treatment Gains in Individual Remitted from Insomnia after CBT-I.

OBJECTIVES: Providers of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) are often asked whether the behavioral recommendations (e.g., stimulus control, sleep restriction) must be adhered to ad infinitum. We examined whether changes in sleep habits/behaviors are a life sentence, or whether patients who remit can relax their adherence while maintaining their treatment gains at 1-year follow-up (FU). METHODS: Participants (N = 179) completed 2 weeks of sleep diaries and measures of insomnia severity and safety behaviors at baseline and following four sessions of CBT-I. Of the 137 patients that achieved remission, 77 completed these measures at 1-year FU. RESULTS: Improvements in insomnia severity and total wake time (TWT) at post-treatment were maintained at FU (ps ≥ .52). Similarly, reductions in safety behaviors were maintained at FU (p - 1.00), whereas lingering in bed reduced during treatment (p < .001) but increased at FU (p < .001). Changes in sleep habits after treatment did not predict insomnia severity at FU. However, increases in time in bed positively predicted TWT at FU (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Those who remit after CBT-I may generally relax their adherence to behavioral recommendations without significantly impacting their perceived insomnia symptoms 1 year after treatment despite some increases in TWT. Results increase our confidence in CBT-I as a brief and durable intervention.

What are patients completing Cognitive Behavioral Insomnia Therapy telling us with their post-treatment Insomnia Severity Index scores?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Cognitive Behavioral Insomnia Therapy (CBT-I) is the gold standard insomnia treatment and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a frequently used treatment outcome measure. The ISI has strong psychometric properties and is purported to measure perceived insomnia symptom severity. However, little is known about the factors that drive insomnia severity perception and the psychometric properties of the ISI post-CBT-I. METHODS: Participants were treatment-seeking adults meeting DSM-5 Insomnia Disorder criteria (n = 203, ages 18-77, M = 45.95 years). Participants completed sleep and mood questionnaires, including the ISI, pre- and post-CBT-I. They completed daily Consensus Sleep Diaries each morning throughout two pre-treatment weeks, eight weeks of treatment and two weeks post-treatment. A hierarchical regression analysis examined what predicted post-CBT-I ISI scores and Cronbach's alpha was computed to examine post-treatment reliability of the ISI. RESULTS: The regression analysis revealed that lower post-treatment ISI scores were associated with lower pre-treatment ISI, and greater decreases in fatigue and generalized anxiety symptoms. The model did not significantly improve when pre-treatment sleep effort or changes in sleep diary indices were added. The post-treatment ISI Cronbach's alpha was .88. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ISI has been shown to have sound psychometric properties, clinicians should consider that post CBT-I ISI scores are not related to their sleep improvements. Instead, they seem to be related to whether patients perceive themselves as poor sleepers pre-treatment and whether they felt less tired and anxious after CBT-I. Researchers should consider the impact of factors other than sleep when using the ISI at post-treatment. Patients are telling us that CBT-I should focus on addressing symptoms of fatigue and general anxiety; perhaps CBT-I could be improved further to address these concerns more effectively. SUMMARY: This investigation shows that when individuals are rating their symptom severity after CBT-I, they are also integrating how they felt before treatment and whether they experienced a change in their fatigue or anxiety.