RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the Cultural, Social and Emotional Wellbeing Program for reducing psychological distress and enhancing the social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal women preparing for release from prison. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods; qualitative study (adapted reflexive thematic analysis of stories of most significant change) and assessment of psychological distress. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women at the Boronia Pre-release Centre for Women, Perth, Western Australia, May and July 2021. INTERVENTION: Cultural, Social and Emotional Wellbeing Program (two days per week for six weeks). The Program involves presentations, workshops, activities, group discussions, and self-reflections designed to enhance social and emotional wellbeing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes and subthemes identified from reflexive thematic analysis of participants' stories of most significant change; change in mean psychological distress, as assessed with the 5-item Kessler Scale (K-5) before and after the Program. RESULTS: Fourteen of 16 invited women completed the Program; ten participated in its evaluation. They reported improved social and emotional wellbeing, reflected as enhanced connections to culture, family, and community. Mean psychological distress was lower after the Program (mean K-5 score, 11.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-13.6) than before the Program (9.0; 95% CI, 6.5-11.5; P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The women who participated in the Program reported personal growth, including acceptance of self and acceptance and pride in culture, reflecting enhanced social and emotional wellbeing through connections to culture and kinship. Our preliminary findings suggest that the Program could improve the resilience of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander in contact with the justice system.
Assuntos
Povos Aborígenes Australianos e Ilhéus do Estreito de Torres , Saúde Mental , Prisioneiros , Estresse Psicológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Povos Aborígenes Australianos e Ilhéus do Estreito de Torres/psicologia , Emoções , Saúde Mental/etnologia , Prisioneiros/psicologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Angústia Psicológica , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estresse Psicológico/etnologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Austrália OcidentalRESUMO
Culturally safe and responsive interventions that acknowledge Aboriginal models of selfhood are needed. Such interventions empower Aboriginal peoples and communities by increasing self-determination over individual and community social and emotional wellbeing (SEWB). In response to this need, the National Empowerment Project developed the Cultural, Social, and Emotional Wellbeing Program (CSEWB). The CSEWB aims to strengthen SEWB and cultural identity and subsequently reduce psychological distress in Aboriginal peoples. An Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach ensured community ownership and engagement. Seven research questions and a culturally modified adaption of the Most Significant Change technique informed a thematic analysis of the evaluation content. Aboriginal adults (n = 49; 53% ≥50 years, 66% female, 34% male) from three Western Australian urban communities participated in the program evaluation workshops. Participants reported the benefits of enhanced SEWB and reduced psychological distress. This research reaffirms the need for culturally safe programs that acknowledge social determinants of health and are guided by the SEWB framework. Long-term commitment from the government is needed to support such programs.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde do Indígena , Adulto , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Povos Indígenas , Masculino , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Austrália OcidentalRESUMO
AIM: To evaluate a primary care partnership between the Rockingham-Kwinana Mental Health Service and Division of General Practice including a memorandum of understanding to streamline referrals, a consultation-liaison service, and a Balint group. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to all 74 general practitioners in the Division. Standardised interviews compared GPs using the service with those who did not. We compared content of GP referrals before and after implementation with referrals of a control area (Armadale). RESULTS: Thirty-four GPs (45%) returned questionnaires and 46 (62%) participated in interviews; 26 (80%) found the duty officer useful as a point of first consultation-liaison contact; 19 (60%) used referral forms. Most (80%) were aware of the consultation-liaison service and half had either used it or the Balint group. Referral content changed significantly compared to Armadale. DISCUSSION: This study had weaknesses: it relied on self report and retrospective information on GP work practices, knowledge and interests, and nonblinded assessments of referral letters. Primary care partnerships may improve GPs' self reported skills in managing psychiatric disorder and referral behaviour.