[Preoperative chemotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Impact on renal function]. / Chimiothérapie préopératoire des tumeurs des voies excrétrices supérieures : impact sur la fonction rénale.

PURPOSE: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. The standard treatment for localized disease is based on total nephroureterectomy (NUT) followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for eligible patients at risk of recurrence. However, many patients have renal failure after surgery preventing chemotherapy. Thus, the place of preoperative chemotherapy (POC) is questioned with little information available about renal toxicity and efficacity. METHODS: A single center retrospective study was performed on patients with UTUC who received POC. RESULTS: In all, 24 patients with localized UTUC were treated with POC between 2013 and 2022. Twenty-one (91%) had secondarily NUT. In this cohort, POC did not result in degradation of median renal function (pre-POC median GFR: 70mL/min, post-POC median GFR: 77mL/min, P=0.79), unlike NUT (post-NUT median GFR: 51.5mL/min, P<0.001). In addition, the rate of complete pathological response to pathological examination was 29%. After a median follow-up of 27.4 months, the overall survival rate was 74% and the recurrence-free survival rate was 46%. CONCLUSION: POC for UTUC shows a very reassuring renal toxicity profile and encouraging histological results. These data encourage prospective studies assessing its place for UTUC management.

[Profile and immune environment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. / Profil et environnement immunitaires des tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) are tumors that share similarities with bladder tumors. Immunotherapy is already used for bladder locations and appears to have interest for UTUC. In order to rationalize the immunotherapy development pipeline it seemed necessary to describe the immune infiltrate of a cohort of UTUC treated with nephroureterectomy and to determine the expression of a panel of immune checkpoints and co-stimulatory molecules on tumor cells as well as on infiltrating and circulating lymphocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a monocentric, prospective and exploratory work. Patients treated with total nephroureterectomy or segmental ureterectomy for presumably infiltrative (≥ T1) UTUC managed at the Saint-Louis Hospital were included from January 2019 to July 2020. A set of markers and immune checkpoints were studied by flow fluorocytometry on circulating lymphocytes (PBMCs) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Some markers were also studied by immunohistochemistry on tumor sample. RESULTS: In total, 14 patients were included and 13 patients could be analyzed. 1 patient had no residual tumor. 5 tumors out of the 12 (41.7%) showed a lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate. PD1 was the most represented checkpoint with a median expression rate of 41.4% on CD4+ TILs and 3.89% on circulating CD4+ T cells. This rate was 62.4% and 7.45% respectively on CD8+ T cells. TIGIT was the second most represented marker with a median expression rate on tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T cells of 25% and 2.9% on circulating CD4+ T cells. The median expression level of TIGIT on tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells was 23.3% and 3.2% on circulating CD8+ T cells. ICOS was highly expressed on CD4+ TILS with a median of 33.9% in contrast to CD8+ TILS (median: 6.67%). Variable expression of other checkpoints (ILT2, TIM3, LAG3 and OX40) was found without clear trend. CONCLUSION: This exploratory work highlighted that PD1 was the most represented checkpoint. TIGIT was the second most represented checkpoint while ICOS, TIM3 and LAG3 were 3 other checkpoints whose expression was found to be less important. ILT2 and OX40 appeared to be weakly expressed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

OBJECTIVE: To update the ccAFU recommendations for the management of bladder tumours that do not infiltrate the bladder muscle (NBMIC). METHODS: A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2020 to 2022 was performed, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and surveillance of NMIBC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS: The diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is made after complete full-thickness tumour resection. The use of bladder fluorescence and the indication of a second look (4-6 weeks) help to improve the initial diagnosis. The EORTC score is used to assess the risk of recurrence and/or tumour progression. Through the stratification of patients in low, intermediate and high-risk categories, adjuvant treatment can be proposed: intravesical chemotherapy (immediate postoperative, initiation regimen) or BCG (initiation and maintenance regimen) instillations, or even the indication of cystectomy for BCG-resistant patients. CONCLUSION: Updating the ccAFU recommendations should contribute to improving patient management, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC).

OBJECTIVE: To update the CCAFU recommendations for the management of muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). METHODS: A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2020 to 2022 was performed taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and surveillance of NMIBC and MIBC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS: MIBC is diagnosed after the most complete tumour resection possible. MIBC grading is based on CTU along with chest CT. Multiparametric pelvic MRI could be an alternative. Cystectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy is the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic MIBC. It should be preceded by platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in good general health with satisfactory renal function. Enterocystoplasty is proposed in men and women in the absence of contraindications and when the urethral resection is negative on extemporaneous examination. Otherwise, transileal cutaneous ureterostomy is the recommended method of urinary diversion. Inclusion of all patients in an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol is recommended. For metastatic MIBC, first line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy (GC or MVAC) is recommended, if general health (PS>1) and renal function (clearance>60mL/min) so allow (only 50% of the cases). Pembrolizumab immunotherapy has demonstrated an overall survival benefit in second-line treatment. CONCLUSION: Updating the ccAFU recommendations should contribute to improving patient management, as well as the diagnosis and decision-making concerning MIBC treatment.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC).

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC). METHODS: A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS: The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0). CONCLUSION: These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.

[Guidelines from the cancer (CC-AFU) and infection disease (CI-AFU) committees of the French Association of Urology for the management of adverse events and complications of BCG]. / Recommandations des Comités de cancérologie (CC-AFU) et d'infectiologie (CI-AFU) de l'Association française d'urologie pour la prise en charge effets indésirables et complications du BCG.

INTRODUCTION: Intravesical instillations of BCG are recommended for the treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, their prolonged use remains limited by the associated potentially serious adverse effects or complications. The purpose of this article was to provide updated recommendations for the diagnosis and management of adverse events (AEs) or complications of intravesical BCG instillations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of the literature in Medline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using the following MeSH keywords or a combination of these keywords: "bladder," "BCG," "complication," "toxicity," "adverse events," "prevention," and "treatment". RESULTS: AEs or complications of BCG included genitourinary and systemic symptoms. The most common complications (cystitis, moderate fever) should be treated symptomatically and may require adjustment to allow patients to have the most complete BCG treatment possible. Serious complications are rare but must be identified promptly because of the life-threatening nature of the disease. Their management is based on the combination of anti-tuberculosis treatments, anti-inflammatory drugs and the definitive discontinuation of BCG. CONCLUSION: The management of BCG AEs requires early identification, rational and effective treatment if necessary, and discussion of the continuation of treatment for each situation.

Perioperative results of radical cystectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to the implementation of ERAS pathway.

BACKGROUND: The effect of ERAS protocols in a population of radical cystectomy (RC) patients fit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been specifically explored. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes of open RC according to the application of an ERAS protocol in a population of patients treated by cisplatin-based NAC. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated by NAC and RC between 2016 and 2019 were included. The ERAS pathway was implemented in June 2018 and followed the EAU recommendations. All data were prospectively collected. Patients' characteristics, operative outcomes, length of stay (LOS), complication rate according to Clavien-Dindo and pathological results were compared between pre- and post-ERAS. Statistical analysis was performed using R. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients were included, 29 in the ERAS group and 50 in the non-ERAS group. A median number of 19 out of 22 ERAS criteria were followed. Mean number of NAC cycles was 4.45 vs. 4.79 in the pre- and post-ERAS groups respectively (P=0.24). Median time between NAC and RC was 3.8months. Thirty-eight percent vs. 48% of patients received an ileal neobladder in the pre- and post-ERAS group respectively (P=0.51). No differences were observed regarding operative time, blood loss or operative transfusion rates. LOS was drastically reduced in the ERAS period (18.94 vs. 12.10days, P<0.001) as well as major (>Clavien 2) complications rate (65% vs. 28%, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: ERAS drastically reduced the LOS and the rate of high-grade complications and can be effectively applied to patients receiving NAC without delaying RC.

[Intravesical adjuvant regimen of epitubicin for intermediate risk NMIBC: Feasability study from CC-AFU vessie]. / Instauration du traitement adjuvant endovésical par épirubicine des tumeurs de vessie n'infiltrant pas le muscle : premier retour national d'expérience du CC-AFU vessie.

INTRODUCTION: Mitomycin C is the gold standard intravesical adjuvant therapy for intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Tensions in the supply of mitomycin have emerged in France since late 2019. The ANSM in agreement with the AFU proposed to use epirubicin, already available in other European countries in this indication. The objective of our study was to report the initial French experience with the use of epirubicin in adjuvant treatment of NMIBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a French multicenter retrospective descriptive study to collect, from the centers of the members of the CC-AFU bladder, the clinico-pathological data of the patients, the indications, the modalities of use (dose, indication, circuit in the pharmacy) and the tolerance data of epirubicin. The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on treatment interruptions was also identified. Of the 20 centers contacted, 5 (25%) had implemented the epirubicin administration protocol developed by the CC-AFU bladder subcommittee. A total of 61 patients were treated with endovesical instillations of epirubicin between November 2019 and November 2020 for NMIBC at a single dose of 50mg. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients (mean age 67 years, 64-77 years) were treated with epirubicin, of which 45 (73.8%) were male. The patients had intermediate-risk NMIBC in 88.5%, the rest had high-risk disease. Induction therapy without or with maintenance was planned for 48 (78.7%) and 13 patients (21.3%), respectively. The preparation and administration of epirubicin was similar to that of mitomycin: central pharmacy preparation for same-day dispensing with immediate outpatient instillation. Unlike mitomycin, urinary alkalinization was not required. Of the 498 total instillations scheduled, 345 were performed (69.3%). The COVID-19 epidemic significantly impacted epirubicin delivery: one patient could not start treatment (1.6%), 8 patients (13.1%) had to discontinue it permanently; the rest of the patients underwent delayed instillations (18%). Other causes of discontinuation included infectious complications (9.8%). No major toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an adjuvant epirubicin treatment protocol presented a good feasibility with low toxicity, without modifying the organization of the patients' care pathway. In the context of unpredictable mitomycin shortage, epirubicin represents a good therapeutic alternative in the endovesical adjuvant treatment of intermediate-risk NMIBC. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

[Guidelines from the cancer committee of the French Association of Urology (CC-AFU) for adequate intravesical instillations of Mitomycin C, Epirubicin, and BCG for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer]. / Recommandations du Comité de cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie (CC-AFU) pour la bonne pratique des instillations intravésicales de mitomycine C, d'épirubicine et de BCG pour le traitement des tumeurs de la vessie n'infiltrant pas le muscle (TVNIM).

INTRODUCTION: Intravesical instillations of mitomycin C, epirubicin and BCG are considered as the standard treatment for most patients diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. These guidelines aim to optimize the adjuvant intravesical treatment in order to increase the efficacy and lower the morbidity associated with its administration. METHODS: We conducted a daily practice survey, an online search of available national regulation recommendations and of published guidelines. A bibliography search in French and English using Medline® and Embase® with the keywords "BCG"; "mitomycin C"; "epirubicin"; "bladder"; "complication"; "toxicity"; "adverse reaction"; "prevention" and "treatment" was performed November 2021. RESULTS: Patient information should be given by the attending physician before the first intravesical instillation. A medical exam to look for specific contraindications is also mandatory to select adequate candidates. Intravesical instillations should be delivered in health-care centers where urologic endoscopic procedures are routinely performed. Attending urologist or specialized nurse should check for negative pretreatment urine test. Intravesical instillation can only be delivered after bladder catheter has been inserted in the bladder without any injury of the lower urinary tract. The pharmaceutical agent should be kept in the bladder for two hours. Finally, voiding within the 6hours following intravesical instillations should be done in the sitting position and the patient should drink at least 2 liters of water per day for 2 days. CONCLUSION: The delivery of intravesical instillations of mitomycin C, epirubicin and BCG should follow a standardized procedure for better efficacy and lower morbidity.

Achieving disease free distal ureteral margin at the time of radical cystectomy: Why and for whom? (an overview of literature).

OBJECTIVE: Achieving negative status of distal ureteral margin at the time of radical cystectomy (RC), and its therapeutic benefit, remains controversial. The aim of this review was to evaluate frequency, reliability and impact of positive distal ureteral margin after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer on upper tract recurrence, cancer specific and overall survival, and to identify best candidates for intraoperative frozen section analyses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systemic review was performed following the PRISMA guideline. PubMed/Medline (with following terms; bladder cancer or cystectomy and frozen section or ureteral margin), and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2020, to identify all papers evaluating distal ureteral margin and discussing clinical interest. Previous reviews and single case reports were excluded. RESULTS: In total, thirty-two relevant studies were identified. Mean rate of positive ureteral frozen section after RC was close to 10% [1.1-25.4%]. Frozen section (FS) achieved a very good specificity [83-100%] and reserved sensibility [45-100%]. In many cases, an initial positive margin on FS can be converted to negative. Positive FS and/or PS (permanent section) were associated with upper urinary tract recurrence (UUTR). Conversion from positive FS to negative PS was associated with low UUTR frequency and better cancer survival in large retrospective studies. The relevant prognostic factor associated with positive FS and/or PS was CIS within the bladder. CONCLUSION: FS should be recommended for patients with CIS within the bladder. Achieving negative FS/PS might be associated with lower rates of UUTR and better survival, for patients with higher life expectancy. Prospective randomized controlled studies need to be performed to provide definitive recommendations in this area.

Morbidity and long-term results of subcutaneous pyelovesical bypass in chronic ureteral obstruction.

BACKGROUND: We present the long-term results and complications of the DETOUR® prosthesis, a permanent subcutaneous pyelovesical bypass for the treatment of ureteral obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 et 2018, 34 prosthesis were implanted in 28 patients (mean age 65,8 years) with ureteral obstruction of malignant or benign etiologies. The prosthesis, composed to an inner tube of silicone and an outer tube of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, is placed subcutaneously between the kidney and the bladder. We are performed infrared spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy on two removed prostheses to explore the prosthetic encrustation. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 25,8 months (Maximum: 64 months). Stent revision was required for early bladder fistula in three patients. The major long-term complications were infection (46%), obstruction (3 patients) and bladder fistula (7 patients). The most frequently infection are non-severe, but two patients died from septic shock after fungic colonization of the prosthesis. The infrared spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the obstruction was favored by urinary infection and an alkaline medium. The functional prosthesis rate at 1,2 and 3 years was 94%, 71% and 62%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DETOUR® subcutaneous extra-anatomical urinary bypass is an effective and minimally invasive alternative to permanent percutaneous nephrostomy, for both malignant and benign ureteral obstructions in selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Active surveillance of prostate cancer: treatement-free survival according to restricted or expanded eligibility criteria]. / Surveillance active du cancer de prostate : survie sans traitement curatif selon critères d'éligibilité stricts ou élargis.

AIM: Overtreatment is an actual problem in low risk localized prostate cancer (PC) management. Active surveillance (AS) is a solution to limit this problem, but eligibility criteria remained discussed. The aim was to assess possibilities of widening selection criteria for patient in AS, studying curative treatment free survival (CTFS) according to restricted or expanded eligibility criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients beginning AS between 2008 and 2014, for Gleason 6 localized PC, PSA<15ng/ml,

[Is sarcopenia a morbi-mortality factor in the treatment of localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer?] / La sarcopénie est-elle un facteur de morbi-mortalité dans le traitement des tumeurs localisées de la vessie infiltrant le muscle ?

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia evaluated from the measurement of skeletal muscle index (SMI) has been evaluated as a predictive factor of morbidity and mortality after surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether it was predictive of morbidity and mortality in patients managed by cystectomy or tri-modality therapy (TMT), combining radiotherapy and chemotherapy after endoscopic resection of the tumour, for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 146 consecutive patients from 2 university hospital centres treated by cystectomy between January 2012 and April 2017 or TMT between October 2008 and October 2014 were included. The SMI was measured on axial computed-tomography at the level of the transverse process of L3, before treatment. Sarcopenia was assessed in two ways: either by SMI without muscle mass adjustment or according to the definition by Martin and al. based on gender and patient BMI, then called "adjusted sarcopenia". The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) for sarcopenia. The secondary endpoints were OS, progression-free survival (PFS) and survival without re-admission (SRH) for the total population and for each treatment group. Survival analyses were performed using the Cox model. The association between sarcopenia and complications has been investigated by the Chi2 test. RESULTS: The characteristics of sarcopenic (n=67) and non-sarcopenic (n=79) patients were comparable except for 2 criteria: older patients in the sarcopenic group and a higher proportion of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in non-sarcopenic patients. Sarcopenia was not significantly associated with any type of survival. Sarcopenia was not associated with the proportion or severity of complications. CONCLUSION: Unlike unadjusted SMI, sarcopenia was not associated with survival or complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: bladder cancer]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l'AFU ­ actualisation 2020­2022 : tumeurs de la vessie.

OBJECTIVE: - To update French guidelines for the management of bladder cancer specifically non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBC). METHODS: - A Medline search was achieved between 2018 and 2020, notably regarding diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of bladder cancer, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS: - Diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is based on a complete deep resection of the tumor. The use of fluorescence and a second-look indication are essential to improve initial diagnosis. Risks of both recurrence and progression can be estimated using the EORTC score. A stratification of patients into low, intermediate and high risk groups is pivotal for recommending adjuvant treatment: instillation of chemotherapy (immediate post-operative, standard schedule) or intravesical BCG (standard schedule and maintenance). Cystectomy is recommended in BCG-refractory patients. Extension evaluation of MIBC is based on contrast-enhanced pelvic-abdominal and thoracic CT-scan. Multiparametric MRI can be an alternative. Cystectomy associated with extended lymph nodes dissection is considered the gold standard for non-metastatic MIBC. It should be preceded by cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients. An orthotopic bladder substitution should be proposed to both male and female patients with no contraindication and in cases of negative frozen urethral samples; otherwise transileal ureterostomy is recommended as urinary diversion. All patients should be included in an Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. For metastatic MIBC, first-line chemotherapy using platin is recommended (GC or MVAC), when performans status (PS <1) and renal function (creatinine clearance >60 mL/min) allow it (only in 50% of cases). In second line treatment, immunotherapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival. CONCLUSION: - These updated French guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed with NMIBC and MIBC.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l'AFU - actualisation 2020­2022 : tumeurs de la voie excrétrice urinaire supérieure.

INTRODUCTION: -The purpose was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS: - A systematic Medline search was performed between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS: - The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low risk lesion: unifocal tumor, possible complete resection and low grade and absence of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce risk of bladder recurrence. A systemic chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION: - These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment for UTUC.

French ccAFU guidelines ­ Update 2018­2020: Bladder cancer / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : tumeurs de la vessie

Objective: To propose updated French guidelines for non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) bladder cancers. Methods: A Medline search was achieved between 2015 and 2018, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of bladder cancer, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. Results: Diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is based on a complete deep resection of the tumor. The use of fluorescence and a second-look indication are essential to improve initial diagnosis. Risks of both recurrence and progression can be estimated using the EORTC score. A stratification of patients into low, intermediate and high risk groups is pivotal for recommending adjuvant treatment: instillation of chemotherapy (immediate post-operative, standard schedule) or intravesical BCG (standard schedule and maintenance). Cystectomy is recommended in BCG-refractory patients. Extension evaluation of MIBC is based on contrast-enhanced pelvic-abdominal and thoracic CT-scan. Multiparametric MRI can be an alternative. Cystectomy associated with extended lymph nodes dissection is considered the gold standard for non-metastatic MIBC. It should be preceded by cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients. An orthotopic bladder substitution should be proposed to both male and female patients with no contraindication and in cases of negative frozen urethral samples; otherwise transileal ureterostomy is recommended as urinary diversion. All patients should be included in an Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. For metastatic MIBC, first-line chemotherapy using platin is recommended (GC or MVAC), when performans status (PS < 1) and renal function (creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min) allow it (only in 50 % of cases). In second line treatment, immunotherapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival. Conclusion: These updated French guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for NMIBC and MIBC.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : tumeurs de la vessie French ccAFU guidelines ­ Update 2018­2020: Bladder cancer / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : tumeurs de la vessie.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.006. C'est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l'article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.006. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure.

INTRODUCTION: To propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS: A systematic Medline search was performed between 2016 and 2018, with regards to the diagnosis, the options of treatment and the follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate the different studies with levels of evidence. RESULTS: The diagnosis of this rare disease is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low-risk diseases: unifocal tumour, possible complete resection low-grade and lack of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended in order to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence. An adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION: These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment of UTUC.

[ypT0N0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Incidence and prognosis. A review from the Bladder group of the French Committee of Oncology]. / Pièce opératoire ypT0N0 après séquence chimiothérapie néo-adjuvante ­ cystectomie pour TVIM : épidémiologie et impact pronostique. Une mise au point du CCAFU Vessie.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is recommended for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer when patients are fit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A pathological complete response can be observed, corresponding to ypT0N0 stage on the radical cystectomy specimen. This review discusses the incidence, prognosis and potential therapeutic impact of complete response on pathological specimen in NAC treated patients. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using Medline database, with no time frame. The articles were selected using the following keywords association: "Bladder cancer" (Mesh) AND "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy" (Mesh) AND "pT0" (Mesh). RESULTS: After NAC, ypT0N0 rates vary from 9 to 46% among the series, reported rates that are higher compared to those of pT0 without NAC administration. The incidence depends on the chemotherapy regimen (maximal local effect with cisplatin-based chemotherapy) and the pathological type of the disease (presence of variant histologies). Molecular analyses of bladder cancer could probably help in the near future to identify and predict NAC responders. Pathological complete response is associated with a favorable prognosis in terms of recurrence-free and overall survival. Nevertheless, disease recurrences are still observed in 10-15% of cases, which underlies the importance of local treatment and close follow-up even in these patients. CONCLUSION: ypT0N0 rate is approximately 25% after NAC, that is 4.3 higher than after bladder resection alone. The prognosis is better than that with residual tumor on specimen and is comparable to that of pT0 without NAC administration.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure French ccAFU guidelines ­ Update 2018­2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma / Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l'AFU ­ Actualisation 2018­2020 : tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005. C'est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l'article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.